Exhibit 99.1
Selected Financial
Data(1)(2)
Year Ended Last Friday in December | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
Results of Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
$ | 27,783 | $ | 28,305 | $ | 38,785 | $ | 44,886 | $ | 35,366 | ||||||||||
Less Interest Expense |
7,818 | 9,872 | 17,108 | 18,317 | 13,249 | |||||||||||||||
Net Revenues |
19,965 | 18,433 | 21,677 | 26,569 | 22,117 | |||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Expenses |
14,745 | 16,121 | 21,918 | 21,578 | 18,541 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
5,220 | 2,312 | (241) | 4,991 | 3,576 | |||||||||||||||
Income Tax Expense |
1,384 | 604 | 99 | 1,548 | 1,164 | |||||||||||||||
Net Earnings (Loss) |
$ | 3,836 | $ | 1,708 | $ | (340) | $ | 3,443 | $ | 2,412 | ||||||||||
Net Earnings (Loss) Applicable to Common
Stockholders(3) |
$ | 3,797 | $ | 1,670 | $ | (378) | $ | 3,408 | $ | 2,374 | ||||||||||
Financial Position |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 496,359 | $ | 451,419 | $ | 437,083 | $ | 424,760 | $ | 328,092 | ||||||||||
Short-Term
Borrowings(4) |
$ | 191,676 | $ | 180,213 | $ | 178,155 | $ | 187,176 | $ | 115,707 | ||||||||||
Long-Term Borrowings |
$ | 83,299 | $ | 78,524 | $ | 76,572 | $ | 70,223 | $ | 54,043 | ||||||||||
Long-Term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships |
$ | 3,203 | $ | 3,189 | $ | 3,181 | $ | 3,193 | $ | 3,206 | ||||||||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
$ | 28,884 | $ | 24,081 | $ | 20,787 | $ | 18,619 | $ | 13,186 | ||||||||||
Common
Share Data(5) |
||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 4.22 | $ | 1.94 | $ | (0.45) | $ | 4.26 | $ | 3.15 | ||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 3.88 | $ | 1.77 | $ | (0.45) | $ | 3.74 | $ | 2.80 | ||||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
900,711 | 862,318 | 838,683 | 798,273 | 754,672 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
977,789 | 944,299 | 838,683 | 909,124 | 848,891 | |||||||||||||||
Shares
Outstanding at Year End(6) |
945,911 | 867,291 | 843,474 | 807,955 | 752,501 | |||||||||||||||
Book Value Per Share |
$ | 29.96 | $ | 27.07 | $ | 23.95 | $ | 22.34 | $ | 16.73 | ||||||||||
Dividends Paid Per Share |
$ | 0.64 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||||
Financial Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax
Profit Margin(7) |
26.1% | 12.5% | N/M | 18.8% | 16.2% | |||||||||||||||
Common Dividend Payout Ratio |
15.2% | 33.0% | N/M | 14.3% | 16.8% | |||||||||||||||
Return on Average Assets |
0.8% | 0.4% | N/M | 1.0% | 0.7% | |||||||||||||||
Return on Average Common Stockholders Equity |
14.8% | 7.5% | N/M | 21.7% | 22.9% | |||||||||||||||
Other Statistics |
||||||||||||||||||||
Full-Time Employees: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. |
38,200 | 40,000 | 43,400 | 51,700 | 49,700 | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. |
9,900 | 10,900 | 13,700 | 19,900 | 18,200 | |||||||||||||||
Total (8) |
48,100 | 50,900 | 57,100 | 71,600 | 67,900 | |||||||||||||||
Private Client Financial Advisors |
13,500 | 14,000 | 16,400 | 20,200 | 18,600 | |||||||||||||||
Client Assets (dollars in billions) |
$ | 1,484 | $ | 1,311 | $ | 1,556 | $ | 1,681 | $ | 1,696 | ||||||||||
(1) | Amounts have been restated
as per Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. |
(2) | Amounts have been restated
as per Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. |
(3) | Net earnings less preferred stock dividends. |
(4) | Consists of Payables under repurchase agreements and securities loaned
transactions, Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings, and
Deposits. |
(5) | All share and per share data have been restated for the two-for-one
common stock split paid in August 2000 (see Note 12 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). |
(6) | Does not include 2,900; 3,911; 4,195; 4,654; and 8,019 shares
exchangeable into common stock (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements) at year-end 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. |
(7) | Earnings before income taxes and dividends on Preferred securities issued
by subsidiaries to Net revenues. |
(8) | Excludes 200; 1,500; and 3,500 full-time employees on salary continuation
severance at year-end 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
1
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended Last Friday in December | ||||||||||||
2003(a) | 2002(a) | 2001(a) | ||||||||||
Net Revenues |
||||||||||||
Asset management and portfolio service fees |
$ | 4,698 | $ | 4,911 | $ | 5,344 | ||||||
Commissions |
4,396 | 4,657 | 5,266 | |||||||||
Principal transactions |
3,236 | 2,331 | 3,930 | |||||||||
Investment banking |
2,628 | 2,413 | 3,539 | |||||||||
Other |
1,143 | 783 | 560 | |||||||||
16,101 | 15,095 | 18,639 | ||||||||||
Interest and dividend revenues |
11,682 | 13,210 | 20,146 | |||||||||
Less interest expense |
7,818 | 9,872 | 17,108 | |||||||||
Net interest profit |
3,864 | 3,338 | 3,038 | |||||||||
Total Net Revenues |
19,965 | 18,433 | 21,677 | |||||||||
Non-Interest Expenses |
||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
9,810 | 10,677 | 12,685 | |||||||||
Communications and technology |
1,457 | 1,741 | 2,232 | |||||||||
Occupancy and related depreciation |
889 | 909 | 1,077 | |||||||||
Brokerage, clearing, and exchange fees |
722 | 727 | 895 | |||||||||
Advertising and market development |
429 | 540 | 703 | |||||||||
Professional fees |
581 | 552 | 545 | |||||||||
Office supplies and postage |
197 | 258 | 349 | |||||||||
Goodwill amortization |
| | 207 | |||||||||
Other |
787 | 630 | 901 | |||||||||
Net (recoveries) expenses related to September 11 |
(147) | (212) | 131 | |||||||||
Net restructuring and other charges |
20 | 8 | 2,193 | |||||||||
Research and other settlement-related expenses |
| 291 | | |||||||||
Total Non-Interest Expenses |
14,745 | 16,121 | 21,918 | |||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
5,220 | 2,312 | (241) | |||||||||
Income Tax Expense |
1,384 | 604 | 99 | |||||||||
Net Earnings (Loss) |
$ | 3,836 | $ | 1,708 | $ | (340) | ||||||
Net Earnings (Loss) Applicable to Common Stockholders |
$ | 3,797 | $ | 1,670 | $ | (378) | ||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 4.22 | $ | 1.94 | $ | (0.45) | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 3.88 | $ | 1.77 | $ | (0.45) | ||||||
(a) | Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 1 and Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||
Dec. 26, 2003(a) | Dec. 27, 2002(a) | |||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 10,150 | $ | 10,211 | ||||||||||
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes or
deposited with clearing organizations |
15,171 | 7,375 | ||||||||||||
Securities financing transactions |
||||||||||||||
Receivables under resale agreements |
71,756 | 71,338 | ||||||||||||
Receivables under securities borrowed transactions |
45,472 | 45,543 | ||||||||||||
117,228 | 116,881 | |||||||||||||
Trading assets, at fair value (includes securities pledged as
collateral of $23,146 in 2003 and $11,344 in 2002) |
||||||||||||||
Contractual agreements |
37,196 | 38,728 | ||||||||||||
Equities and convertible debentures |
23,170 | 13,530 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt and preferred stock |
22,459 | 18,569 | ||||||||||||
Mortgages, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed securities |
20,508 | 14,987 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. governments and agencies |
15,991 | 10,095 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agencies |
10,408 | 10,116 | ||||||||||||
Municipals and money markets |
4,577 | 5,535 | ||||||||||||
134,309 | 111,560 | |||||||||||||
Investment securities (includes securities pledged as collateral of
$6,608 in 2003 and $0 in 2002) |
74,809 | 82,327 | ||||||||||||
Securities received as collateral |
9,156 | 3,693 | ||||||||||||
Other receivables |
||||||||||||||
Customers (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$60 in 2003 and $79 in 2002) |
36,955 | 35,317 | ||||||||||||
Brokers and dealers |
7,346 | 8,485 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other |
11,187 | 11,715 | ||||||||||||
55,488 | 55,517 | |||||||||||||
Loans, notes, and mortgages (net of allowance for loan losses of
$318 in 2003 and $285 in 2002) |
50,993 | 38,833 | ||||||||||||
Separate accounts assets |
17,034 | 13,042 | ||||||||||||
Equipment and facilities (net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $5,054 in 2003 and $4,671 in 2002) |
2,612 | 3,080 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill |
4,814 | 4,446 | ||||||||||||
Other assets |
4,595 | 4,454 | ||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 496,359 | $ | 451,419 | ||||||||||
3
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||
Dec. 26, 2003(a) | Dec. 27, 2002(a) | |||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||
Securities financing transactions |
||||||||||
Payables under repurchase agreements |
$ | 96,138 | $ | 85,378 | ||||||
Payables under securities loaned transactions |
11,081 | 7,640 | ||||||||
107,219 | 93,018 | |||||||||
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings |
5,000 | 5,353 | ||||||||
Deposits |
79,457 | 81,842 | ||||||||
Trading liabilities, at fair value |
||||||||||
Contractual agreements |
43,353 | 45,202 | ||||||||
U.S. Government and agencies |
15,323 | 14,678 | ||||||||
Non-U.S. governments and agencies |
12,066 | 7,952 | ||||||||
Equities and convertible debentures |
10,793 | 4,864 | ||||||||
Corporate debt, municipals and preferred stock |
7,798 | 6,500 | ||||||||
89,333 | 79,196 | |||||||||
Obligation to return securities received as collateral |
9,156 | 3,693 | ||||||||
Other payables |
||||||||||
Customers |
28,859 | 28,569 | ||||||||
Brokers and dealers |
19,109 | 16,541 | ||||||||
Interest and other |
22,453 | 20,805 | ||||||||
70,421 | 65,915 | |||||||||
Liabilities of insurance subsidiaries |
3,353 | 3,566 | ||||||||
Separate accounts liabilities |
17,034 | 13,042 | ||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
83,299 | 78,524 | ||||||||
Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships |
3,203 | 3,189 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities |
467,475 | 427,338 | ||||||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||
Preferred Stockholders Equity (42,500 shares issued and outstanding and
liquidation preference $10,000 per share) |
425 | 425 | ||||||||
Common Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||
Shares exchangeable into common stock |
43 | 58 | ||||||||
Common stock (par value $1.331/3 per share; authorized: 3,000,000,000 shares; |
||||||||||
issued: 2003 1,063,205,274 shares and 2002 983,502,078 shares) |
1,417 | 1,311 | ||||||||
Paid-in capital |
10,676 | 9,102 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of tax) |
(551) | (570) | ||||||||
Retained earnings |
18,692 | 15,491 | ||||||||
30,277 | 25,392 | |||||||||
Less: Treasury stock, at cost (2003 117,294,392 shares; 2002
116,211,158 shares) |
1,195 | 961 | ||||||||
Unamortized employee stock grants |
623 | 775 | ||||||||
Total Common Stockholders Equity |
28,459 | 23,656 | ||||||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
28,884 | 24,081 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 496,359 | $ | 451,419 | ||||||
(a) | Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 1 and Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements. |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended Last Friday in December | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003(a) | 2002(a) | 2001(a) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning and end of year |
$425 | $425 | $425 | 42,500 | 42,500 | 42,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares Exchangeable into Common Stock |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
58 | 62 | 68 | 3,911,041 | 4,195,407 | 4,654,378 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchanges |
(15) | (4) | (6) | (1,011,118) | (284,366) | (458,971) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
43 | 58 | 62 | 2,899,923 | 3,911,041 | 4,195,407 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
1,311 | 1,283 | 1,283 | 983,502,078 | 962,533,498 | 962,533,498 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued to employees |
106 | 28 | | 79,703,196 | 20,968,580 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
1,417 | 1,311 | 1,283 | 1,063,205,274 | 983,502,078 | 962,533,498 | ||||||||||||||||||
Paid-in Capital |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
9,102 | 6,764 | 4,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock plan activity |
1,574 | 2,338 | 2,742 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
10,676 | 9,102 | 6,764 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Translation
Adjustment (net of tax) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
(320) | (302) | (309) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
19 | (18) | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
(301) | (320) | (302) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale Securities (net of
tax) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
(145) | (92) | (36) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale |
27 | (58) | (70) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other adjustments(b) |
7 | 5 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
(111) | (145) | (92) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Gains on Cash Flow Hedges
(net of tax) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
20 | 36 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net deferred gains on cash flow
hedges |
43 | 104 | 41 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment to
earnings |
(52) | (120) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
11 | 20 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum Pension Liability (net of tax) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
(125) | (10) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net minimum pension liability
adjustment |
(25) | (115) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
(150) | (125) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
(551) | (570) | (368) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retained Earnings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
15,491 | 14,374 | 15,293 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings |
3,836 | 1,708 | (340) | |||||||||||||||||||||
9% Cumulative Preferred stock
dividends declared |
(39) | (38) | (38) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends declared |
(596) | (553) | (541) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
18,692 | 15,491 | 14,374 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury Stock, at cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
(961) | (977) | (1,273) | (116,211,158) | (119,059,651) | (154,578,945) | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued to (reacquired from)
employees(c) |
(273) | (12) | 291 | (2,094,352) | 2,564,127 | 35,060,323 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share exchanges |
39 | 28 | 5 | 1,011,118 | 284,366 | 458,971 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
(1,195) | (961) | (977) | (117,294,392) | (116,211,158) | (119,059,651) |
5
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended Last Friday in December | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003(a) | 2002(a) | 2001(a) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized Employee Stock Grants |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
(775) | (776) | (853) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net issuance of employee stock grants |
(440) | (697) | (720) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of employee stock grants |
592 | 697 | 797 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 1 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
(623) | (775) | (776) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Common Stockholders Equity |
28,459 | 23,656 | 20,362 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
$ | 28,884 | $ | 24,081 | $ | 20,787 | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 1 and Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(b) | Other adjustments relate to policyholder liabilities, deferred policy
acquisition costs, and income taxes. |
|
(c) | Share amounts are net of reacquisitions from employees of 8,355,168;
2,664,083; and 4,756,694 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended Last Friday in December | ||||||||||||
2003(a) | 2002(a) | 2001(a) | ||||||||||
Net Earnings (Loss) |
$ | 3,836 | $ | 1,708 | $ | (340) | ||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment: |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
(392) | (263) | 127 | |||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
411 | 245 | (120) | |||||||||
Total |
19 | (18) | 7 | |||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period |
598 | 213 | (51) | |||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net earnings |
(571) | (271) | (19) | |||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
available-for-sale |
27 | (58) | (70) | |||||||||
Adjustments for: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder liabilities |
8 | (16) | (10) | |||||||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
(1) | 1 | (13) | |||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
| 20 | 37 | |||||||||
Total |
34 | (53) | (56) | |||||||||
Deferred gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
||||||||||||
Deferred gain on cash flow hedges |
37 | 94 | 65 | |||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
6 | 10 | (24) | |||||||||
Reclassification adjustment to earnings |
(52) | (120) | (5) | |||||||||
Total |
(9) | (16) | 36 | |||||||||
Minimum pension liability |
||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
(38) | (168) | (10) | |||||||||
Income tax benefit |
13 | 53 | | |||||||||
Total |
(25) | (115) | (10) | |||||||||
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
19 | (202) | (23) | |||||||||
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
$ | 3,855 | $ | 1,506 | $ | (363) | ||||||
(a) | Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 1 and Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended Last Friday in December | ||||||||||||
2003(1) | 2002(1) | 2001(1) | ||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
||||||||||||
Net Earnings (Loss) |
$ | 3,836 | $ | 1,708 | $ | (340) | ||||||
Noncash items included in earnings: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
570 | 652 | 888 | |||||||||
Stock compensation plan expense |
832 | 1,947 | 2,212 | |||||||||
Deferred taxes |
359 | (348) | (1,239) | |||||||||
Policyholder reserves |
156 | 168 | 183 | |||||||||
Goodwill amortization |
| | 207 | |||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
20 | 8 | 491 | |||||||||
Undistributed (earnings) loss from equity investments |
(179) | 31 | 13 | |||||||||
Other |
(48) | 101 | (85) | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities(a): |
||||||||||||
Trading assets |
(22,890) | (7,280) | (4,378) | |||||||||
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes or
deposited with clearing organizations |
(1,217) | (2,908) | 1,625 | |||||||||
Receivables under resale agreements |
(406) | (5,100) | 11,672 | |||||||||
Receivables under securities borrowed transactions |
71 | 9,387 | (19,589) | |||||||||
Customer receivables |
(1,619) | 4,533 | 1,741 | |||||||||
Brokers and dealers receivables |
1,139 | (1,617) | 19,553 | |||||||||
Trading liabilities |
9,553 | 3,279 | 7,060 | |||||||||
Payables under repurchase agreements |
10,760 | 10,474 | (15,006) | |||||||||
Payables under securities loaned transactions |
3,441 | (4,651) | (1,691) | |||||||||
Customer payables |
290 | (135) | 3,942 | |||||||||
Brokers and dealers payables |
2,568 | 4,609 | 2,418 | |||||||||
Other, net |
2,248 | 5,089 | (1,128) | |||||||||
Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
9,484 | 19,947 | 8,549 | |||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from (payments for): |
||||||||||||
Maturities of available-for-sale securities |
31,345 | 37,891 | 33,135 | |||||||||
Sales of available-for-sale securities |
56,448 | 36,697 | 14,138 | |||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
(81,639) | (71,183) | (76,201) | |||||||||
Maturities of held-to-maturity securities |
1,541 | 206 | 811 | |||||||||
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities |
(1,479) | (303) | (757) | |||||||||
Loans, notes, and mortgages |
(12,625) | (15,716) | (4,324) | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of business |
| | 344 | |||||||||
Other investments and other assets |
(3,623) | (1,684) | (814) | |||||||||
Equipment and facilities |
(102) | (860) | (663) | |||||||||
Cash Used for Investing Activities |
(10,134) | (14,952) | (34,331) | |||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from (payments for): |
||||||||||||
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings |
(353) | 212 | (10,042) | |||||||||
Deposits |
(2,385) | (3,977) | 18,171 | |||||||||
Issuance and resale of long-term borrowings |
29,139 | 25,493 | 38,781 | |||||||||
Settlement and repurchase of long-term borrowings |
(26,455) | (27,232) | (32,827) | |||||||||
Derivative financing transactions |
584 | | | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
612 | 289 | | |||||||||
Issuance of treasury stock |
12 | 6 | 515 | |||||||||
Other common stock transactions |
69 | (54) | (372) | |||||||||
Dividends |
(634) | (591) | (579) | |||||||||
Cash Provided by (used for) Financing Activities |
589 | (5,854) | 13,647 | |||||||||
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(61) | (859) | (12,135) | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year |
10,211 | 11,070 | 23,205 |
8
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended Last Friday in December | ||||||||||||
2003(1) | 2002(1) | 2001(1) | ||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year |
$10,150 | $10,211 | $11,070 | |||||||||
(a) Net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures. |
||||||||||||
Supplemental Disclosures |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for: |
||||||||||||
Income taxes |
$205 | $861 | $887 | |||||||||
Interest |
7,691 | 10,116 | 17,738 | |||||||||
(1) | Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 1 and Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Table of Contents
11 | ||||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
29 | ||||
31 | ||||
32 | ||||
35 | ||||
38 | ||||
43 | ||||
44 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | ||||
50 | ||||
56 | ||||
62 | ||||
66 | ||||
67 |
10
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
| Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S), a
U.S.-based broker-dealer in securities and futures commission merchant; |
| Merrill Lynch International (MLI), a U.K.-based broker-dealer in
securities and dealer in equity and credit derivatives; |
| Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc. (MLGSI), a U.S.-based dealer in
U.S. Government securities; |
| Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc., a U.S.-based dealer in interest rate,
currency, and credit derivatives; |
| Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, LP, a U.S.-based asset management company; |
| Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Limited, a U.K.-based asset management
company; |
| Merrill Lynch Bank USA (MLBUSA), a U.S.-based FDIC-insured depository; |
| Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust Co. (MLB&T), a U.S.-based FDIC-insured
depository; |
| Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited (MLIB), a U.K.-based bank; |
| Merrill Lynch Capital Markets Bank Limited (MLCMB), an Ireland-based bank; |
| Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co., Ltd., a Japan-based broker-dealer; |
| Merrill Lynch Canada, Inc., a Canada-based broker-dealer; and |
| Merrill Lynch Insurance Group, Inc., a U.S.-based provider of life insurance
and annuity products. |
Services provided to clients by Merrill Lynch include:
| securities brokerage, trading, and underwriting; |
| investment banking, strategic advisory services (including mergers and
acquisitions), and other corporate finance activities; |
| wealth management products and services; |
| asset management; |
| origination, brokerage, dealer, and related activities in swaps, options,
forwards, exchange-traded futures, other derivatives, and foreign exchange
products; |
| securities clearance, settlement financing services and prime brokerage; |
| equity, debt, foreign exchange, and economic research; |
| private equity and other principal investing activities; |
| banking, trust, and lending services, including deposit-taking, commercial
and mortgage lending and related services; |
| insurance and annuities sales and annuity underwriting services; and |
| investment advisory and related record-keeping services. |
Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which include industry practices. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Certain reclassifications and format changes have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
11
The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars. Many non-U.S. subsidiaries have a functional currency (i.e., the currency in which activities are primarily conducted) that is other than the U.S. dollar, often the currency of the country in which a subsidiary is domiciled. Subsidiaries assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates, while revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the year. Adjustments that result from translating amounts in a subsidiarys functional currency and related hedging, net of related tax effects, are reported in stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. All other translation adjustments are included in earnings. Merrill Lynch uses derivatives to manage the currency exposure arising from activities in non-U.S. subsidiaries. (See the Derivatives section for additional information on accounting for derivatives.)
Use of Estimates
Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available information. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates and could have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements, and it is possible that such changes could occur in the near term. A discussion of certain areas in which estimates are a significant component of the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements follows:
Trading Assets and Liabilities
Fair values for over-the-counter (OTC) derivative financial instruments, principally forwards, options, and swaps, represent the present value of amounts estimated to be received from or paid to a third party in settlement of these instruments. These derivatives are valued using pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows and directly observed prices from exchange-traded derivatives, other OTC trades, or external pricing services. Obtaining the fair value for OTC derivatives contracts requires the use of management judgment and estimates.
New and/or complex instruments may have immature or limited markets. As a result, the pricing models used for valuation often incorporate significant estimates and assumptions, which may impact the results of operations reported in the financial statements. For long-dated and illiquid contracts, extrapolation methods are applied to observed market data in order to estimate inputs and assumptions that are not directly observable. This enables Merrill Lynch to mark all positions consistently when only a subset of prices are directly observable. Values for OTC derivatives are verified using observed information about the costs of hedging the risk and other trades in the market. As the markets for these products develop, Merrill Lynch continually refines its pricing models based on experience to correlate more closely to the market risk of these instruments. Unrealized gains for these instruments are not recognized unless the valuation model incorporates significant observable market inputs.
12
Valuation adjustments are an integral component of the mark-to-market process and are taken for individual positions where either the sheer size of the trade or other specific features of the trade or particular market (such as counterparty credit quality or concentration or market liquidity) requires the valuation to be based on more than simple application of the pricing models.
Restricted Investments
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets
Valuation of Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is based on managements estimate of the amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level adequate to absorb probable incurred loan losses. Managements estimate of loan losses is influenced by many factors, including adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, current economic conditions, prior loan loss experience, and the estimated fair value of any underlying collateral. The fair value of collateral is generally determined by third-party appraisals in the case of residential mortgages, quoted market prices for securities, and estimates of fair value for other assets. Managements estimates of loan losses include considerable judgment about collectibility based on available facts and evidence at the balance sheet date, and the uncertainties inherent in those assumptions. While management uses the best information available on which to base its estimates, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in the economic environment or variances between actual results and the original assumptions used by management.
Insurance Reserves and Deferred Acquisition Costs Relating to Insurance Policies
Merrill Lynch records deferred insurance policy acquisition costs that are amortized in proportion to the estimated future gross profits for each group of contracts over the anticipated life of the insurance contracts, utilizing an effective yield methodology. These future gross profit estimates are subject to periodic evaluation by Merrill Lynch, with necessary revisions applied against amortization to date.
13
Legal and Other Reserves
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)
Fair Value
Financial instruments recorded at amounts that approximate fair value include receivables under resale agreements, receivables under securities borrowed transactions, other receivables, payables under repurchase agreements, payables under securities loaned transactions, commercial paper and other short-term borrowings, deposits, and other payables. The fair value of these items is not materially sensitive to shifts in market interest rates because of the limited term to maturity of many of these instruments and/or their variable interest rates.
The fair value amounts for financial instruments are disclosed in each respective footnote.
Securities Accounting
Securities held by a broker-dealer subsidiary are subject to specialized industry guidance as prescribed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide, Brokers and Dealers in Securities. Merrill Lynch accounts for substantially all securities held by broker-dealer subsidiaries at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings.
Investment Banking and Advisory Services
14
recognition. Investment banking and advisory services revenues are presented net of transaction-related expenses.
Balance Sheet Captions
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Securities Segregated for Regulatory Purposes or Deposited with Clearing Organizations
Securities Financing Transactions
Resale and repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at their contractual amounts plus accrued interest. Merrill Lynchs policy is to obtain possession of collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned under resale agreements. To ensure that the market value of the underlying collateral remains sufficient, collateral is valued daily, and Merrill Lynch may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged, when appropriate. Substantially all repurchase and resale activities are transacted under master netting agreements that give Merrill Lynch the right, in the event of default, to liquidate collateral held and to offset receivables and payables with the same counterparty. Merrill Lynch offsets certain repurchase and resale agreement balances with the same counterparty on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Interest rate swaps may be used to modify the interest rate characteristics of long-term resale and repurchase agreements. (See the Derivatives section for additional information on accounting policy for derivatives.)
Securities borrowed and loaned transactions are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received. Securities borrowed transactions require Merrill Lynch to provide the counterparty with collateral in the form of cash, letters of credit, or other securities. Merrill Lynch receives collateral in the form of cash or other securities for securities loaned transactions. For these transactions, the fees received or paid by Merrill Lynch are recorded as interest revenue or expense. On a daily basis, Merrill Lynch monitors the market value of securities borrowed or loaned against the collateral value. Although substantially all securities borrowing and lending activities are transacted under master netting agreements, such receivables and payables with the same counterparty are not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
All firm-owned securities pledged to counterparties where the counterparty has the right, by contract or custom, to sell or repledge the securities are disclosed parenthetically in trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In transactions where Merrill Lynch acts as the lender in a securities lending agreement and receives securities that can be pledged or sold as collateral, it recognizes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets an asset,
15
representing the securities received (securities received as collateral) and a liability, representing the obligation to return those securities (obligation to return securities received as collateral).
Trading Assets and Liabilities
Trading securities and other cash instruments (e.g., loans held for trading purposes) are recorded on a trade date basis at fair value. Included in trading liabilities are securities that Merrill Lynch has sold but did not own and will therefore be obligated to purchase at a future date (short sales). Changes in fair value (i.e., unrealized gains and losses) are recognized as principal transactions revenues in the current period. Realized gains and losses and any related interest amounts are included in principal transactions revenues and interest revenues and expenses, depending on the nature of the instrument.
Fair values of trading assets and liabilities are based on quoted market prices, pricing models (utilizing indicators of general market conditions or other economic measurements), or managements best estimates of amounts to be realized on settlement, assuming current market conditions and an orderly disposition over a reasonable period of time. As previously noted, estimating the fair value of certain trading assets and liabilities requires significant management judgment.
Derivatives
Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The accounting for changes in fair value of a derivative instrument depends on its intended use and the resulting designation.
Derivatives entered into in a dealing capacity
Derivatives entered into in a non-dealing capacity
16
closely match the duration of these borrowings to the duration of the assets being funded to minimize interest rate risk. Merrill Lynch also enters into currency swaps to ensure that non-U.S. dollar-denominated assets are funded with like-currency-denominated liabilities (to the extent that the currency cannot be sourced more efficiently through a direct debt issuance). Derivatives used most frequently include swap agreements that:
In addition, Merrill Lynch enters into hedges on marketable investment securities to manage the interest rate risk and net duration of its investment portfolio.
Merrill Lynch also uses foreign-exchange forward contracts, foreign-exchange options, currency swaps, and foreign-currency-denominated debt to hedge its net investments in foreign operations. These derivatives and cash instruments are used to mitigate the impact of changes in exchange rates.
Derivatives entered into by Merrill Lynch in a non-dealing capacity used to hedge its funding, marketable investment securities and net investments in foreign subsidiaries are reported at fair value in other assets or interest and other payables in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002.
Derivatives entered into in a non-dealing capacity are designated, on the date they are entered into, as either:
1) | A hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability (fair
value hedge). Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are
designated and qualify as fair value hedges, along with the gain or loss
on the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk,
are recorded in current period earnings as interest revenue or expense |
2) | A hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related
to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge). Changes in the
fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow
hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss until earnings
are affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged asset or
liability (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or
liability are recorded in earnings) |
3) | A hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Changes in the fair
value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as hedges of a net
investment in a foreign operation are recorded in the foreign currency
translation adjustment account within accumulated other comprehensive loss |
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are economically used to hedge non-trading assets and liabilities, but that do not meet the criteria in SFAS No. 133 to qualify as an accounting hedge are reported in current period earnings as either Principal transactions revenues, other revenue or expense or interest expense depending on the nature of the transaction.
Merrill Lynch formally assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, Merrill Lynch discontinues hedge accounting. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, hedge effectiveness is assumed for those derivatives whose terms match the terms of the asset or liability being hedged and that otherwise meet the conditions of SFAS No. 133.
As noted above, Merrill Lynch enters into interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure of certain investment securities. Hedge effectiveness testing is required for some of these hedging relationships and the component of each derivatives change in fair value not attributable to the change in interest rates is excluded and reported in earnings. For 2003 and 2002, the amounts excluded from hedge effectiveness not attributed to the change in interest rates was not material. In addition, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness on fair-value hedges was not material in 2003 or 2002.
17
For the years ended 2003 and 2002, respectively, $527 million and $362 million of net losses related to non-U.S. dollar hedges of investments in non-U.S. dollar subsidiaries were included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts were substantially offset by net gains on the hedged investments.
The majority of deferred net gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that were in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 26, 2003 are expected to be reclassified into earnings over the next four years. The amount of ineffectiveness related to these hedges reported in earnings was not material.
Embedded Derivatives
Merrill Lynch may also purchase financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives. These instruments may be part of either trading inventory or trading marketable investment securities. These instruments are generally accounted for at fair value in their entirety; the embedded derivative is not separately accounted for, and all changes in fair value are reported in principal transactions revenues.
Derivatives that contain a significant financing element
Valuation of Derivatives
New and/or complex instruments may have immature or limited markets. As a result, the pricing models used for valuation often incorporate significant estimates and assumptions, which may impact the level of precision in the financial statements. For long-dated and illiquid contracts, extrapolation methods are applied to observed market data in order to estimate inputs and assumptions that are not directly observable. This enables Merrill Lynch to mark all positions consistently when only a subset of prices are directly observable. Values for non-exchange-traded derivatives are verified using observed information about the costs of hedging out the risk and other trades in the market. Unrealized gains for these instruments are not recognized unless the
18
valuation model incorporates significant observable market inputs. As the markets for these products develop, Merrill Lynch continually refines its pricing models based on experience to correlate more closely to the market risk of these instruments.
Valuation adjustments are an integral component of the mark-to-market process and are taken for individual positions where either the sheer size of the trade or other specific features of the trade or particular market (such as counterparty credit quality or concentration or market liquidity) requires the valuation to be based on more than the simple application of the pricing models.
Risk Management of Derivatives
The risk management process, combined with CRMs personnel and analytic infrastructure, works to ensure that Merrill Lynchs risk tolerance is well-defined and understood by the firms risk-takers as well as by its executive management. Other groups, including Corporate Audit, Finance, Legal, and Treasury, work with CRM to establish this overall risk management control process. While no risk management system can ever be absolutely complete, the goal of CRM is to make certain that risk-related losses occur within acceptable, predefined levels.
Merrill Lynch documents its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions. The risk management objectives and strategies are monitored and managed by CRM in accordance with established risk management policies and procedures that include risk tolerance levels.
Investment Securities
Marketable Investment Securities
Debt and marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on these securities are reported in stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes and other related items. Any unrealized losses deemed other than temporary are included in current period earnings.
Debt securities that Merrill Lynch has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity. These investments are recorded at amortized cost unless a decline in value is deemed other than temporary, in which case the carrying value is reduced. The amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts and any unrealized losses deemed other than temporary are included in current period earnings.
19
Debt and marketable equity securities purchased principally for the purpose of resale in the near-term are classified as trading investments and are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on these investments are included in current period earnings.
Realized gains and losses on all investment securities are included in current period earnings. For purposes of computing realized gains and losses, the cost basis of each investment sold is generally based on the average cost method.
To the extent that Merrill Lynch enters into interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure of certain investment securities, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the investment security are recorded in current period earnings as interest revenue or expense. Refer to the Derivatives section for additional information.
Investments of Insurance Subsidiaries and Related Liabilities
Substantially all security investments of insurance subsidiaries are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value. These investments support Merrill Lynchs in-force, universal life-type contracts. Merrill Lynch records adjustments to deferred acquisition costs and policyholder account balances which, when combined, are equal to the gain or loss that would have been recorded if those available-for-sale investments had been sold at their estimated fair values and the proceeds reinvested at current yields. The corresponding credits or charges for these adjustments are recorded in stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of applicable income taxes.
Certain variable costs related to the sale or acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts have been deferred, to the extent deemed recoverable, and amortized over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to the estimated gross profit for each group of contracts.
Other Investments
| Investments held by a regulated broker-dealer that are of a longer-term
nature than trading inventory and are held for strategic purposes. These
investments are carried at fair value with gains and losses reported in
principal transactions revenues. Certain of these investments are subject
to restrictions that may limit Merrill Lynchs ability to realize
currently the estimated fair value of its investment until such
restrictions expire. Accordingly, Merrill Lynch estimates the fair value
of these securities, taking into account the restrictions by using pricing
models based on projected cash flows, earnings multiples, comparisons
based on similar transactions, and/or review of underlying financial
conditions and other market factors. In 2003, certain of the investments
that had been held by a regulated broker-dealer were sold to a
non-broker-dealer subsidiary and are now carried at the lower of cost or
net realizable value. |
| Private equity investments held by non-broker-dealer subsidiaries which
are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value, or under the
equity method depending on Merrill Lynchs ability to exercise significant
influence over the investee. Certain of Merrill Lynchs investments that
are accounted for under the equity method require management to make
certain estimates in determining the allocation of its cost basis to the
underlying assets. Gains and losses on these investments are reported in
other revenues. |
| Investments economically hedging deferred compensation liabilities which
are carried at fair value, with gains and losses reported in earnings. |
| TOPrSSM related investments. |
20
Other Receivables and Payables
Commissions charged for executing customer transactions are accrued on a trade date basis and are included in current period earnings. Financial Advisors compensation and benefits expense is accrued in the same period as revenue is recognized.
Mutual fund distribution fee revenues are accrued as earned, and redemption fee revenues are recognized upon redemption. Performance-based incentive fees are recognized prior to the end of the contract measurement period based on performance to date. Certain compensation costs related to sales of rear-load open-end mutual funds are deferred to match revenue recognition. Amortization of deferred amounts is accelerated when it is determined that deferred expenses cannot be recovered.
Brokers and Dealers Receivables and Payables
Interest and Other Receivables and Payables
Loans, Notes, and Mortgages
Loans held for investment purposes, including some commercial loans that are syndicated and some consumer and small business loans, are carried at their principal amount outstanding. The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions that are based on managements estimate of probable incurred losses. Loans are charged off against the allowance for loan losses when management determines that the loan is uncollectible.
Loans held for sale, which include commercial loans that are syndicated and certain residential mortgage loans, are reported at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The impact of the loan loss provision for syndicated loans other than those held by Merrill Lynchs U.S. banks is included in principal transactions revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The loan loss provision related to all other loans is included in interest revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The gain or loss on the sale of mortgages into the secondary market is reflected in other revenues.
Nonrefundable loan origination fees, loan commitment fees, and draw down fees received in conjunction with financing arrangements are generally deferred and recognized over the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment to the yield. If, at the outset, or any time during the term of the loan it becomes highly probable that the repayment period will be extended, the amortization is recalculated using the expected remaining life of the loan. When the loan contract does not provide for a specific maturity date, managements
21
best estimate of the repayment period is used. At repayment of the loan, any unrecognized deferred fee is immediately recognized in earnings.
Separate Accounts Assets and Liabilities
Equipment and Facilities
Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method. Equipment is depreciated over its estimated useful life, while leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the improvements estimated economic useful life or the term of the lease. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.
Included in the occupancy and related depreciation expense category was depreciation and amortization of $209 million, $204 million, and $245 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Depreciation and amortization recognized in the communications and technology expense category was $361 million, $448 million, and $643 million, for 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Qualifying costs incurred in the development of internal-use software are capitalized when costs exceed $5 million and are amortized over the useful life of the developed software, generally not exceeding three years.
Goodwill
Merrill Lynch has reviewed its goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142 and determined that the fair value of the reporting units to which goodwill relates exceeded the carrying value of such reporting units. Accordingly, no goodwill impairment loss has been recognized. The majority of the goodwill, and related accumulated amortization, is denominated in sterling, and as a result has changed from 2002 due to exchange rate changes. This goodwill is related to the 1997 purchase of the Mercury Asset Management Group and was tested for impairment at the Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (MLIM) segment level since this business has been fully integrated into MLIM. Accumulated amortization of goodwill amounted to $1,039 million and $984 million at year-end 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Other Assets
In addition, real estate purchased for investment purposes is also included in this category. Real estate held in this category may be classified as either held and used or held for sale depending on the facts and circumstances. Real estate held and used is valued at cost, less depreciation, and real estate held for sale is valued at the lower of cost or fair value, less cost to sell.
22
Commercial Paper and Short- and Long-Term Borrowings
Merrill Lynch is a significant issuer of debt whose coupons or repayment terms are linked to the performance of equity or other indices, or a basket of securities. These debt instruments must be separated into a debt host and an embedded derivative if the derivative is not considered clearly and closely related under the criteria established in SFAS No. 133. Embedded derivatives are recorded at fair value and changes in fair value are reflected in the income statement. See the Embedded Derivatives section above for additional information.
Merrill Lynch uses derivatives to manage the interest rate, currency, equity, and other risk exposures of its borrowings. See the Derivatives section for additional information on accounting policy for derivatives.
Deposits
Stock-Based Compensation
Employee stock-based awards are amortized over the vesting period. The unamortized portion of the grant value for certain of these plans is reflected as a reduction of stockholders equity in Unamortized employee stock grants on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Income Taxes
Merrill Lynch uses the asset and liability method in providing income taxes on all transactions that have been recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The asset and liability method requires that deferred taxes be adjusted to reflect the tax rates at which future taxable amounts will likely be settled or realized. The effects of tax rate changes on future deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, as well as other changes in income tax laws, are recognized in net earnings in the period during which such changes are enacted. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
New Accounting Pronouncements
23
make a one-time election to defer accounting for the effects of the Act. Merrill Lynch has elected to defer accounting for the effects of the Act, and as a result any measures of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the financial statements or accompanying notes do not reflect the effects of the Act on the plan. Furthermore, specific authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy is pending and that guidance, when issued, could require Merrill Lynch to change previously reported information. Merrill Lynch will assess the impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements when the final guidance is issued. FSP FAS 106-1 is effective for interim or annual financial statements of fiscal years ending after December 7, 2003.
On December 23, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits. The revised SFAS No. 132 retains the disclosure requirements in the original statement and requires additional disclosures about pension plan assets, benefit obligations, cash flows, benefit costs and other relevant information. The new disclosures are effective for financial statements of annual periods ending after December 15, 2003. However, the revised SFAS No. 132 provides that disclosures of information about foreign plans and estimated future benefit payments shall be effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for these disclosures.
In December of 2003, the AICPA issued Statement of Position (SOP) 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and expected cash flows in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. SOP 03-3 limits the yield that may be accreted (accretable yield) to the expected cash flows at acquisition and requires that the difference between contractual cash flows and expected cash flows (non-accretable difference) not be recognized as either an adjustment of yield, loss accrual, or valuation allowance. SOP 03-3 prohibits investors from displaying accretable yield and non-accretable difference in the balance sheet and prohibits carrying over or creation of valuation allowances in the initial accounting of all loans acquired in a transfer that are within the scope of this SOP. In addition, SOP 03-3 requires that subsequent increases in expected cash flows be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield over the remaining life with decreases in expected cash flows recognized as impairment. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans and debt securities acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. Merrill Lynch will adopt SOP 03-3 at the beginning of fiscal year 2005, and is currently assessing the potential impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November of 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue 03-01, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, as it relates to disclosures for SFAS 115 securities. In addition to the disclosures already required by SFAS 115, EITF Issue 03-01 requires both quantitative and qualitative disclosures for marketable equity and debt securities. The new disclosure requirements are required to be applied to financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for these disclosures.
On July 7, 2003, the AICPA issued SOP 03-1, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts. The SOP is effective for financial statements for Merrill Lynch beginning in 2004. The SOP requires the establishment of a liability for contracts that contain death or other insurance benefits using a specified reserve methodology that is different from the methodology that Merrill Lynch currently employs. The adoption of SOP 03-1 will result in an additional $45 million of pre-tax expense at the beginning of fiscal year 2004.
On May 15, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 changes the accounting for certain financial instruments, including mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and certain freestanding equity derivatives, which under previous guidance were accounted for as equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that most mandatorily redeemable preferred shares, written put options and physically settled forward purchase contracts on an issuers shares, and certain financial instruments that must be settled by issuing a variable number of an issuers shares, be classified as liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. SFAS No. 150 became effective for all new instruments issued or modified after May 31, 2003 and to all other pre-existing instruments beginning in the
24
third quarter of this year. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On April 30, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, which amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. In addition, it clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component that warrants special reporting in the statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, in accordance with SFAS No. 149, Merrill Lynch modified its classification within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Certain derivative instruments entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, that have been determined to contain a financing element at inception, where Merrill Lynch is deemed the borrower, are now included as a separate component within cash flows from financing activities. Prior to July 1, 2003, the activity associated with such derivative instruments is included within cash flows from operating activities. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On January 17, 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, which clarifies when an entity should consolidate another entity known as a VIE. A VIE is an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, and may include many types of SPEs. FIN 46 requires that an entity consolidate a VIE if that enterprise has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the VIEs expected losses, receive a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both. FIN 46 does not apply to qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs), the accounting for which is governed by SFAS No. 140. Merrill Lynch adopted FIN 46 on February 1, 2003 for VIEs with which it became involved after January 31, 2003. On October 8, 2003, the FASB deferred the effective date for pre-existing VIEs, and on December 24, 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46. Companies are required to adopt either FIN 46 or FIN 46R on an entity-by- entity basis for periods ending after December 15, 2003. As a result, Merrill Lynch has adopted FIN 46R as the method used for evaluating whether or not VIEs must be consolidated. In addition, in the first quarter of 2004, Merrill Lynch adopted FIN 46R for the VIEs that issue Trust Originated Preferred SecuritiesSM (TOPrSSM), which resulted in these entities being deconsolidated and the dividends related to the TOPrSSM being reclassified from dividends on preferred securities issued by subsidiaries to net revenues (primarily interest expense). The debt and partnership interests related to the entities are now included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships and Investment securities, respectively. All prior periods have been restated to reflect the deconsolidation of the TOPrSSM entities and the deconsolidation of TOPrSSM did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional FIN 46 disclosure.
On November 25, 2002, the FASB issued FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an Interpretation of FASB Statements Nos. 5, 57, and 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN 45 requires guarantors to disclose their obligations under certain guarantees. It also requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosures were effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for these disclosures.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This standard requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred, rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 replaces the guidance provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). Merrill Lynch adopted SFAS No. 146 as of the beginning of fiscal year 2003, which had no material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
25
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires companies to recognize legal obligations associated with the future retirement of tangible long-lived assets at their fair value. Asset retirement obligations are then realized through earnings over the economic life of the long-lived asset. Merrill Lynch adopted SFAS No. 143 as of January 1, 2003 and there was no material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 2. Accounting Changes
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) |
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes as reported |
$ | 5,218 | $ | 2,315 | $ | (234 | ) | |||||
Adjustment to correct error |
2 | (3 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes as restated |
$ | 5,220 | $ | 2,312 | $ | (241 | ) | |||||
Net earnings (loss) as previously reported |
$ | 3,834 | $ | 1,710 | $ | (335 | ) | |||||
Adjustment to correct error |
2 | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Net earnings (loss) as restated |
$ | 3,836 | $ | 1,708 | $ | (340 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 4.21 | $ | 1.94 | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||
Adjustment to correct error |
.01 | | | |||||||||
Basic, as restated |
$ | 4.22 | $ | 1.94 | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 3.88 | $ | 1.77 | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||
Adjustment to correct error |
| | | |||||||||
Diluted, as restated |
$ | 3.88 | $ | 1.77 | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||
Stock-based Compensation
Effective for the first quarter of 2004, Merrill Lynch adopted the fair value method of accounting
for stock-based accounting under SFAS 123, using the retroactive restatement method described in
SFAS 148. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, stock-based compensation cost
is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the
vesting period. The December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 Consolidated Balance Sheets have been
restated for the retroactive adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123.
Accordingly, the December 26, 2003 Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects a $4.0 billion increase in
paid-in capital, a $2.7 billion decrease in retained earnings, and a $1.3 billion increase in
deferred income taxes. The December 27, 2002 Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects a $3.8 billion
increase in paid-in capital, a $2.5 billion decrease in retained earnings, and a $1.3 billion
increase in deferred income taxes.
For the years 2003, 2002, and 2001, $240 million, ($154 million after-tax, or $0.17 per diluted share), $1,251 million ($803 million after-tax, or $0.86 per diluted share), and $1,416 million ($908 million after-tax or $1.02 per diluted share), respectively, of stock option compensation expense was recorded related to the adoption of SFAS 123.
Note 3. Other Significant Events
Merrill Lynch has now concluded its insurance recovery efforts related to the events of September 11th. In aggregate, Merrill Lynch was reimbursed $725 million for repair and replacement of physical damage, recovery expenses, and losses due to business interruption.
Restructuring and Other Charges
During the fourth quarter of 2001, Merrill Lynchs management formally
committed to a restructuring plan designed to position Merrill Lynch for
improved profitability and growth, which included the resizing of selected
businesses and other structural changes. As a result, Merrill Lynch incurred a
fourth quarter pre-tax charge to earnings of $2.2 billion, which included
restructuring costs of $1.8 billion and other charges of $396 million. These
other charges primarily related to asset write-offs, which were recorded in
2001. In addition, a charge of approximately $135 million of deferred tax
expense was recorded related to losses of the Global Private Client (GPC)
operations in Japan that are not expected to be utilized during the
carryforward period.
During 2003, a charge of $56 million was recorded related to lease write-offs as well as technology and other fixed asset write-offs relating to GMI, GPC and MLIM following a real estate rationalization effort. This charge, in combination with the $36 million net reduction in the 2001 restructuring reserve, was recorded as a net $20 million restructuring and other charge in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in 2003. During 2002,
26
Restructuring Charge
The 2001 restructuring charges related primarily to initial severance costs of
$1.1 billion, facilities costs of $299 million, technology and fixed asset
write-offs of $187 million, and legal, technology, and other costs of $178
million. Structural changes included workforce reductions of 6,205 through a
combination of involuntary and voluntary separations across all business
groups. The initial $1.1 billion of severance costs included non-cash charges
related to accelerated amortization for stock grants associated with employee
separations totaling $135 million. Facilities-related costs included the
closure or subletting of excess space, and the consolidation of GPC offices in
the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Japan. Office consolidations have
been completed as employees have vacated the facilities. However, additional
reserves remain at December 26, 2003, as remaining lease payments extend to
future periods. Any unused portion of the original restructuring reserve will
be reversed. Substantially all of the remaining cash payments related to real
estate and severance will be funded by cash from operations. Asset write-offs
primarily reflected the write-off of technology assets and furniture and
equipment that resulted from managements decision to close Private Client
branch offices. Utilization of the restructuring reserve and a rollforward of
staff reductions at December 26, 2003 is as follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Utilized | Change | Balance | Utilized | Change | Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 28, | in | in | Dec. 27, | in | in | Dec. 26, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 | 2002 | Estimate | 2002 | 2003 | Estimate | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Category: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance costs |
$ 919 | $(842) | $(32) | $ 45 | $ (32) | $ (8) | $ 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Facilities costs |
299 | (66) | 51 | 284 | (91) | 13 | 206 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technology and
fixed asset
write-offs |
| (9) | 9 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other costs |
178 | (82) | (37) | 59 | 2 | (41) | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$1,396 | $(999) | $ (9) | $388 | $(121) | $(36) | $231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Staff reductions |
5,456 | (5,211) | (22) | 223 | (102) | (121) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
The changes in estimate during 2003 and 2002 are attributable to differences in actual costs from initial estimates in implementing the original restructuring plan. As a result of changes in estimates during 2003, severance-related reserves of $8 million and other reserves of $41 million were reversed and recorded to the Consolidated Statements of Earnings as Restructuring credits. These amounts resulted from lower than anticipated costs, principally in the Japan GPC business. The estimates for facilities costs were increased by $13 million in 2003, reflecting increased facilities closure costs for locations in the United States and Europe. The charges and credits above are included in net restructuring and other charges in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
As a result of changes in estimates during 2002, severance-related reserves of $32 million and other reserves of $37 million, principally related to the Japan GPC business, were reversed and recorded to the Consolidated Statements of Earnings as restructuring credits. The estimates for facilities costs were adjusted in 2002 to reflect increased costs relating primarily to unutilized space in the World Financial Center of $70 million and certain other location closings in the United States of $22 million. These changes in estimates were partially offset by lower than anticipated costs in Japan of $41 million. Technology and fixed assets write-offs was also adjusted in 2002 to reflect increased fixed asset write-offs in various other U.S. corporate locations totaling $9 million. The charges and credits above are included in net restructuring and other charges in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
27
Divestitures
In the first quarter of 2002, Merrill Lynch sold its Securities Pricing
Services business and its Canadian retail asset management business. Merrill
Lynch recorded pre-tax gains of $45 million and $17 million, respectively,
related to these sales, which were included in other revenues on the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
In 2002, Merrill Lynch and HSBC integrated their joint venture company, Merrill Lynch HSBC (MLHSBC), into the HSBC Group. MLHSBC was a 50/50 joint venture formed by Merrill Lynch and HSBC in April 2000 to create a global online investment and banking services company, serving individual self-directed customers outside the United States. Merrill Lynch recognized losses related to MLHSBC of $34 million and $150 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively, which have been recorded in other revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Research and other settlements
In May 2002, Merrill Lynch executed an agreement with the New York Attorney
General regarding alleged conflicts of interest between Merrill Lynchs
Research and Investment Banking groups. As part of the agreement, the Attorney
General terminated his investigation and Merrill Lynch agreed to implement
changes to further insulate the Research Department from Investment Banking. In
addition, in order to reach a resolution and settlement of the matter, Merrill
Lynch agreed to make a civil payment of $48 million to New York State and an
additional $52 million to the other 49 states and to Puerto Rico and the
District of Columbia. Merrill Lynch admitted no wrongdoing or liability as part
of this agreement. The majority of these payments were made in the fourth
quarter of 2002. In addition, $11 million of related legal fees were incurred.
In April 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission, New York Stock Exchange, National Association of Securities Dealers, and state securities regulators announced that the settlements-in-principle that the regulators had disclosed on December 20, 2002 had been reduced to final settlements with regard to ten securities firms, including Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch disclosed the settlements-in-principle on December 24, 2002. The final settlements pertaining to Merrill Lynch, which involve both monetary and non-monetary relief set forth in the regulators announcements, concluded the regulatory actions against Merrill Lynch related to those alleged conflicts of interest affecting research analysts. The settlement became final on October 31, 2003 when the Court entered the order approving the related agreement. Merrill Lynch entered into these settlements without admitting or denying the allegations and findings by the regulators, and the settlements do not establish wrongdoing or liability for purposes of any other proceedings. Pursuant to this settlement, Merrill Lynch, among other things, contributed $100 million for the funding of independent research and investor education over five years, but did not pay any fines or make any additional civil payments. The full amount of the settlement-in-principle was accrued for in 2002.
In March 2003, Merrill Lynch entered into a final settlement agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in which it neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, regarding an investigation into two 1999 transactions between Merrill Lynch and Enron Corporation. This final settlement concluded the Securities and Exchange Commissions investigation of all Enron-related matters with respect to Merrill Lynch. As a result, a pre-tax charge of $80 million ($64 million after-tax), which includes disgorgement, penalties and interest, was included in the 2002 Consolidated Statements of Earnings in research and other settlement-related expenses.
In September 2003, the Department of Justice agreed not to prosecute Merrill Lynch for alleged crimes of its former employees related to certain transactions with Enron, subject to certain understandings, including Merrill Lynchs continued cooperation with the Department, its acceptance of responsibility for conduct of its former employees, and its agreement to adopt and implement new policies and procedures related to the integrity of client and counterparty financial statements, complex-structured finance transactions and year-end transactions.
28
Note 4. Segment and Geographic Information
The principal methodology used in preparing the segment results in the table that follows is:
| Revenues and expenses are assigned to segments where directly attributable |
||
| Principal transactions, net interest and investment banking
revenues and related costs resulting from the client activities of
GPC are allocated among GMI and GPC based on production credits,
share counts, trade counts, and other measures which estimate
relative value |
||
| MLIM receives a net advisory fee from GPC relating to certain
MLIM branded products offered through GPCs 401 (k) product offering |
||
| Revenues and expenses related to mutual fund shares bearing a
contingent deferred sales charge are reflected in segment results as
if MLIM and GPC were unrelated entities |
||
| Interest (cost of carry) is allocated based on managements
assessment of the relative liquidity of segment assets and
liabilities |
||
| Acquisition financing costs and other corporate interest,
September 11-related expenses, research and other settlement-related
expenses and goodwill amortization are not attributed to segments
because management excludes these items from segment operating
results in evaluating segment performance. The elimination of
intersegment revenues and expenses is also included in Corporate
items |
||
| Residual expenses (i.e., those related to overhead and
support units) are attributed to segments based on specific
methodologies (e.g., headcount, square footage, intersegment
agreements etc.). |
Management believes that the following information by business segment provides a reasonable representation of each segments contribution to the consolidated net revenues and pre-tax earnings:
29
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(including | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
GMI | GPC | MLIM | intersegment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
eliminations) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest revenues |
$7,223 | $7,507 | $1,377 | $(6) | (1) | $16,101 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest profit(2) |
2,853 | 1,358 | 24 | (371) | (3) | 3,864 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
10,076 | 8,865 | 1,401 | (377) | 19,965 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
6,301 | 7,346 | 1,133 | (35) | (4) | 14,745 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax earnings (loss) |
$3,775 | $1,519 | $268 | $(342) | $5,220 | |||||||||||||||||||
Year-end total assets |
$418,241 | $66,437 | $6,293 | $5,388 | $496,359 | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest revenues |
$6,167 | $7,444 | $1,526 | $(42) | (1) | $15,095 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest profit(2) |
2,261 | 1,333 | 24 | (280) | (3) | 3,338 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
8,428 | 8,777 | 1,550 | (322) | 18,433 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
6,960 | 7,714 | 1,331 | 116 | (4) | 16,121 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax earnings (loss) |
$1,468 | $1,063 | $219 | $(438) | $2,312 | |||||||||||||||||||
Year-end total assets |
$382,925 | $58,302 | $5,173 | $5,019 | $451,419 | |||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest revenues |
$8,460 | $8,372 | $1,902 | $(95) | (1) | $18,639 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest profit(2) |
1,808 | 1,518 | 21 | (309) | (3) | 3,038 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
10,268 | 9,890 | 1,923 | (404) | 21,677 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
9,229 | 10,377 | 2,057 | 255 | (4) | 21,918 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax earnings (loss) |
$1,039 | $(487) | $(134) | $(659) | $(241) | |||||||||||||||||||
Year-end total assets |
$358,991 | $67,643 | $5,808 | $4,642 | $437,084 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Primarily represents the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses. |
|
(2) | Management views interest income net of interest expense in evaluating results. |
|
(3) | Represents acquisition financing costs, the impact of TOPrSSM and other corporate interest. |
|
(4) | Represents elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses and
September 11-related net expenses. 2002 also included research and other
settlement-related expenses. 2001 also included goodwill amortization. |
Geographic Information
Merrill Lynch operates in both U.S. and non-U.S. markets. Merrill Lynchs
non-U.S. business activities are conducted through offices in five regions:
| Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
| Japan |
|
| Asia Pacific |
|
| Canada, and |
|
| Latin America |
The principal methodology used in preparing the geographic data in the table that follows is:
| Revenue and expenses are generally recorded based on the location of the
employee generating the revenue or incurring the expense |
|
| Earnings before income taxes include the allocation of certain shared expenses among regions, and |
|
| Intercompany transfers are based primarily on service agreements. |
30
The information that follows, in managements judgment, provides a reasonable representation of each regions contribution to the consolidated net revenues and pre-tax earnings:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
||||||||||||
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
$3,295 | $2,579 | $3,435 | |||||||||
Japan |
1,252 | 778 | 1,007 | |||||||||
Asia Pacific |
736 | 669 | 792 | |||||||||
Canada |
218 | 245 | 880 | |||||||||
Latin America |
553 | 491 | 538 | |||||||||
Total Non-U.S. |
6,054 | 4,762 | 6,652 | |||||||||
United States |
14,288 | 13,993 | 15,429 | |||||||||
Corporate |
(377) | (322) | (404) | |||||||||
Total |
$19,965 | $18,433 | $21,677 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
||||||||||||
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
$818 | $(219) | $(360) | |||||||||
Japan |
650 | 192 | (429) | |||||||||
Asia Pacific |
151 | 10 | (101) | |||||||||
Canada |
63 | 85 | 210 | |||||||||
Latin America |
192 | 108 | 15 | |||||||||
Total Non-U.S. |
1,874 | 176 | (665) | |||||||||
United States |
3,688 | 2,574 | 1,083 | |||||||||
Corporate |
(342) | (438) | (659) | |||||||||
Total |
$5,220 | $2,312 | $(241) | |||||||||
Note 5. Securities Financing Transactions
Under these transactions, Merrill Lynch either receives or provides collateral, including U.S. Government and agencies, asset-backed, corporate debt, equity, and non-U.S. governments and agencies securities. Merrill Lynch receives collateral in connection with resale agreements, securities borrowed transactions, customer margin loans, and other loans. Under many agreements, Merrill Lynch is permitted to sell or repledge these securities held as collateral (e.g., use the securities to secure repurchase agreements, enter into securities lending transactions, or deliver to counterparties to cover short positions). At December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, the fair value of securities received as collateral where Merrill Lynch is permitted to sell or repledge the securities was $270 billion and $276 billion, respectively, and the fair value of the portion that has been sold or repledged was $236 billion and $229 billion, respectively.
Merrill Lynch pledges firm-owned assets to collateralize repurchase agreements and other secured financings. Pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are parenthetically disclosed in trading assets and investment securities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value and classification of securities owned by Merrill Lynch that have been loaned or pledged to counterparties where those counterparties do not have the right to sell or repledge at year-end 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
31
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Asset Category |
||||||||
Trading assets |
||||||||
Mortgages, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed securities |
$10,855 | $11,530 | ||||||
U.S. Government and agencies |
9,293 | 5,112 | ||||||
Corporate debt and preferred stock |
6,766 | 7,843 | ||||||
Equities and convertible debentures |
2,215 | 256 | ||||||
Non-U.S. governments and agencies |
910 | 811 | ||||||
Municipals and money markets |
82 | 337 | ||||||
Loans, notes, and mortgages |
4,272 | 3,078 | ||||||
Total |
$34,393 | $28,967 | ||||||
Note 6. Investment Securities
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||
Available-for-sale(1) |
$66,121 | $72,197 | ||||||
Trading |
4,798 | 3,337 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity |
636 | 638 | ||||||
Non-qualifying(2) |
||||||||
Deferred compensation hedges(3) |
636 | 1,927 | ||||||
Other(4) |
9,197 | 4,228 | ||||||
Total(1) |
$81,388 | $82,327 | ||||||
(1) | At December 26, 2003, includes $6.6 billion of investment securities
reported in cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes or
deposited with clearing organizations. |
|
(2) | Non-qualifying for SFAS No. 115 purposes. |
|
(3) | Represents investments economically hedging deferred compensation liabilities. |
|
(4) | Includes insurance policy loans, merchant banking investments, preferred
stock, TOPrSSM-related investments, and other non-qualifying investments. |
The fair value of non-qualifying investment securities approximated the carrying amounts at year-end 2003 and 2002, respectively. Fair value for non-qualifying investments is estimated using a number of methods, including earnings multiples, discounted cash flow analyses, and review of underlying financial conditions and other market factors. These instruments may be subject to restrictions (e.g., sale requires consent of other investors to sell) that may limit Merrill Lynchs ability to realize currently the estimated fair value. Accordingly, Merrill Lynchs current estimate of fair value and the ultimate realization for these instruments may differ.
Investment securities are classified as available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, or trading as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
32
Information regarding investment securities subject to SFAS No. 115 follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 26, 2003 | December 27, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost/ | Gross | Gross | Estimated | Cost/ | Gross | Gross | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage- and
asset-backed
securities |
$45,950 | $636 | $(155) | $46,431 | $49,078 | $1,085 | $(140) | $50,023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and
agencies |
11,442 | 210 | (77) | 11,575 | 13,610 | 686 | (14) | 14,282 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
3,490 | 84 | (13) | 3,561 | 4,720 | 173 | (57) | 4,836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
2,801 | 13 | (14) | 2,800 | 1,698 | 1 | (18) | 1,681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt securities |
63,683 | 943 | (259) | 64,367 | 69,106 | 1,945 | (229) | 70,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
1,747 | 11 | (4) | 1,754 | 1,418 | 2 | (45) | 1,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$65,430 | $954 | $(263) | $66,121 | $70,524 | $1,947 | $(274) | $72,197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and
agencies |
$2 | $ | $ | $2 | $254 | | $ | $254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage- and
asset-backed
securities |
20 | | | 20 | 26 | | | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
614 | | | 614 | 358 | | | 358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$636 | $ | $ | $636 | $638 | $ | $ | $638 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents fair value and unrealized losses, after hedges, for available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 26, 2003.
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 Year | More than 1 Year | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Asset category |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage- and
asset-backed
securities |
$6,518 | $(33) | $16,265 | $(119) | $22,783 | $(152) | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and
agencies |
4,321 | (25) | 2,475 | (63) | 6,796 | (88) | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
446 | (6) | 96 | (7) | 542 | (13) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
730 | (20) | | | 730 | (20) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt securities |
12,015 | (84) | 18,836 | (189) | 30,851 | (273) | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 24 | (4) | 24 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily
impaired securities |
$12,015 | $(84) | $18,860 | $(193) | $30,875 | $(277) | ||||||||||||||||||
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 26, 2003 by contractual maturity, for available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investments follow:
33
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | Held-to-Maturity | |||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Cost | Value | |||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$3,083 | $3,088 | $361 | $361 | ||||||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
9,990 | 10,122 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
4,033 | 4,058 | | | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
627 | 668 | 254 | 254 | ||||||||||||
17,733 | 17,936 | 616 | 616 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
45,950 | 46,431 | 20 | 20 | ||||||||||||
Total(1) |
$63,683 | $64,367 | $636 | $636 | ||||||||||||
The proceeds and gross realized gains (losses) from the sale of available-for-sale investments are as follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Proceeds |
$56,448 | $36,697 | $14,138 | |||||||||
Gross realized gains |
709 | 331 | 85 | |||||||||
Gross realized losses |
(138) | (60) | (66) | |||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) from investment securities classified as trading included in the 2003, 2002, and 2001 Consolidated Statements of Earnings were $(93) million, $70 million, and $47 million, respectively.
The majority of the unrealized losses relate to mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Government and agency securities where Merrill Lynch has held these positions greater than one year. The majority of the investments are AAA rated debentures and mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. agencies. These investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired because Merrill Lynch has the ability and intent to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient for a forecasted market price recovery up to or beyond the cost of the investment.
Also during 2003, other revenues include a write-down of $114 million related to certain available-for-sale securities that were considered to be impaired on an other than temporary basis. Unrealized losses on these securities were previously included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. During 2003, the write-down was charged to earnings and removed from accumulated other comprehensive loss.
34
Note 7. Trading Assets and Liabilities
Interest revenue and expense are integral components of trading activities. In assessing the profitability of trading activities, Merrill Lynch views net interest and principal transactions revenues in the aggregate.
Trading activities expose Merrill Lynch to market and credit risks. These risks are managed in accordance with established risk management policies and procedures. Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on risk management.
Market Risk
Market risk is the potential change in an instruments value caused by
fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, equity and commodity
prices, credit spreads, or other risks. The level of market risk is influenced
by the volatility and the liquidity in the markets in which financial
instruments are traded.
Merrill Lynch seeks to mitigate market risk associated with trading inventories by employing hedging strategies that correlate rate, price, and spread movements of trading inventories and related financing and hedging activities. Merrill Lynch uses a combination of cash instruments and derivatives to hedge its market exposures. The following discussion describes the types of market risk faced by Merrill Lynch.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in interest rates
will affect the value of financial instruments. Interest rate swap agreements,
Eurodollar futures, and U.S. Treasury securities and futures are common
interest rate risk management tools. The decision to manage interest rate risk
using futures or swap contracts, as opposed to buying or selling short U.S.
Treasury or other securities, depends on current market conditions and funding
considerations.
Interest rate agreements used by Merrill Lynch include caps, collars, floors, basis swaps, leveraged swaps, and options. Interest rate caps and floors provide the purchaser with protection against rising and falling interest rates, respectively. Interest rate collars combine a cap and a floor, providing the purchaser with a predetermined interest rate range. Basis swaps are a type of interest rate swap agreement where variable rates are received and paid, but are based on different index rates. Leveraged swaps are another type of interest rate swap where changes in the variable rate are multiplied by a contractual leverage factor, such as four times three-month LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate). Merrill Lynchs exposure to interest rate risk resulting from these leverage factors is typically hedged with other financial instruments.
Currency Risk
Currency risk arises from the possibility that fluctuations in foreign exchange
rates will impact the value of financial instruments. Merrill Lynchs trading
assets and liabilities include both cash instruments denominated in and
derivatives linked to more than 50 currencies, including the Euro, Japanese
Yen, Swiss franc, and British pound. Currency forwards and options are commonly
used to manage currency risk associated with these instruments. Currency swaps
may also be used in situations where a long-dated forward market is not
available or where the client needs a customized instrument to hedge a foreign
currency cash flow stream. Typically, parties to a currency swap initially
exchange principal amounts in two currencies, agreeing to exchange interest
payments and to re-exchange the currencies at a future date and exchange rate.
Equity Price Risk
Equity price risk arises from the possibility that equity security prices will
fluctuate, affecting the value of equity securities and other instruments that
derive their value from a particular stock, a defined basket of stocks, or a
stock index. Instruments typically used by Merrill Lynch to manage equity price
risk include equity options,
35
warrants, and baskets of equity securities. Equity options, for example, can require the writer to purchase or sell a specified stock or to make a cash payment based on changes in the market price of that stock, basket of stocks, or stock index.
Credit Spread Risk
Credit spread risk arises from the possibility that changes in credit spreads
will affect the value of financial instruments. Credit spreads represent the
credit risk premiums required by market participants for a given credit quality
(i.e., the additional yield that a debt instrument issued by a AA-rated entity
must produce over a risk-free alternative (e.g., U.S. Treasury instrument)).
Certain instruments are used by Merrill Lynch to manage this type of risk.
Swaps and options, for example, can be designed to mitigate losses due to
changes in credit spreads, as well as the credit downgrade or default of the
issuer. Credit risk resulting from default on counterparty obligations is
discussed in the Credit Risk section.
Commodity Price and Other Risks
Merrill Lynch views its commodity contracts as financial instruments since they
are generally settled in cash and not by delivery of the underlying commodity.
Commodity price risk results from the possibility that the price of the
underlying commodity may rise or fall. Cash flows from commodity contracts are
based on the difference between an agreed-upon fixed price and a price that
varies with changes in a specified commodity price or index. Commodity
contracts held by Merrill Lynch principally relate to precious metals and base
metals.
Merrill Lynch is also a party to financial instruments that contain risks not correlated to typical financial risks. Merrill Lynch generally mitigates the risk associated with these transactions by entering into offsetting derivative transactions.
Credit Risk
Merrill Lynch is exposed to risk of loss if an issuer or a counterparty fails
to perform its obligations under contractual terms (default risk). Both cash
instruments and derivatives expose Merrill Lynch to default risk. Credit risk
arising from changes in credit spreads was previously discussed in the Market
Risk section.
Merrill Lynch has established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk on principal transactions, including reviewing and establishing limits for credit exposure, maintaining collateral, and continually assessing the creditworthiness of counterparties.
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch executes, settles, and finances various customer securities transactions. Execution of these transactions includes the purchase and sale of securities by Merrill Lynch. These activities may expose Merrill Lynch to default risk arising from the potential that customers or counterparties may fail to satisfy their obligations. In these situations, Merrill Lynch may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at unfavorable market prices to satisfy obligations to other customers or counterparties. Additional information about these obligations is provided in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, Merrill Lynch seeks to control the risks associated with its customer margin activities by requiring customers to maintain collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines.
Liabilities to other brokers and dealers related to unsettled transactions (i.e., securities failed-to-receive) are recorded at the amount for which the securities were purchased, and are paid upon receipt of the securities from other brokers or dealers. In the case of aged securities failed-to-receive, Merrill Lynch may purchase the underlying security in the market and seek reimbursement for losses from the counterparty.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Merrill Lynchs exposure to credit risk (both default and credit spread)
associated with its trading and other activities is measured on an individual
counterparty basis, as well as by groups of counterparties that share similar
attributes. Concentrations of credit risk can be affected by changes in
political, industry, or economic factors. To reduce the potential for risk
concentration, credit limits are established and monitored in light of changing
counterparty and market conditions.
36
At December 26, 2003, Merrill Lynchs most significant concentration of credit risk was with the U.S. Government and its agencies. This concentration consists of both direct and indirect exposures. Direct exposure, which primarily results from trading asset and investment security positions in instruments issued by the U.S. Government and its agencies, amounted to $22.1 billion and $24.8 billion at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. Merrill Lynchs indirect exposure results from maintaining U.S. Government and agencies securities as collateral for resale agreements and securities borrowed transactions. Merrill Lynchs direct credit exposure on these transactions is with the counterparty; thus Merrill Lynch has credit exposure to the U.S. Government and its agencies only in the event of the counterpartys default. Securities issued by the U.S. Government or its agencies held as collateral for resale agreements and securities borrowed transactions at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 totaled $98.2 billion and $113.9 billion, respectively.
At December 26, 2003, Merrill Lynch had concentrations of credit risk with other counterparties, the largest of which was a government-sponsored agency rated AAA by recognized credit-rating agencies. Total unsecured exposure to this counterparty was approximately $3.7 billion, or 0.8% of total assets. Merrill Lynchs most significant industry credit concentration is with financial institutions. Financial institutions include other brokers and dealers, commercial banks, finance companies, insurance companies, and investment companies. This concentration arises in the normal course of Merrill Lynchs brokerage, trading, hedging, financing, and underwriting activities. Merrill Lynch also monitors credit exposures worldwide by region. Outside the United States, sovereign governments and financial institutions represent the most significant concentrations.
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch purchases, sells, underwrites, and makes markets in non-investment grade instruments. In conjunction with merchant banking activities, Merrill Lynch also provides extensions of credit and makes equity investments to facilitate leveraged transactions. These activities expose Merrill Lynch to a higher degree of credit risk than is associated with trading, investing in, and underwriting investment grade instruments and extending credit to investment grade counterparties.
Derivatives
Merrill Lynchs trading derivatives consist of derivatives provided to
customers and derivatives entered into for proprietary trading strategies or
risk management purposes.
Default risk on derivatives can also occur for the full notional amount of the trade where a final exchange of principal takes place, as may be the case for currency swaps. Default risk exposure varies by type of derivative. Swap agreements and forward contracts are generally OTC-transacted and thus are exposed to default risk to the extent of their replacement cost. Since futures contracts are exchange-traded and usually require daily cash settlement, the related risk of loss is generally limited to a one-day net positive change in market value. Generally such receivables and payables are recorded in Customers receivables and payables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Option contracts can be exchange-traded or OTC-transacted. Purchased options have default risk to the extent of their replacement cost. Written options represent a potential obligation to counterparties and, accordingly, do not subject Merrill Lynch to default risk. Additional information about derivatives that meet the definition of a guarantee for accounting purposes is included in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Merrill Lynch generally enters into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. master agreements or their equivalent (master netting agreements) with each of its counterparties, as soon as possible. Master netting agreements provide protection in bankruptcy in certain circumstances and, in some cases, enable receivables and payables with the same counterparty to be offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, providing for a more meaningful balance sheet presentation of credit exposure. However, the enforceability of master netting agreements under bankruptcy laws in certain countries, or in certain industries is not free from doubt and receivables and payables with counterparties in these countries or industries are accordingly recorded on a gross basis.
To reduce default risk, Merrill Lynch requires collateral, principally cash and U.S. Government and agencies securities, on certain derivative transactions. From an economic standpoint, Merrill Lynch evaluates
37
default risk exposures net of related collateral. At December 26, 2003, such collateral amounted to $10.4 billion. In addition to obtaining collateral, Merrill Lynch attempts to mitigate default risk on derivatives by entering into transactions with provisions that enable Merrill Lynch to terminate or reset the terms of the derivative contract.
Many of Merrill Lynchs derivative contracts contain provisions that could, upon an adverse change in ML & Co.s credit rating, trigger a requirement for an early payment or additional collateral support.
Note 8. Securitization Transactions and Transactions with Special Purpose Entities (SPEs)
Merrill Lynch securitized assets of $61.9 billion and $42.4 billion for the years ended December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. For the years ended December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, Merrill Lynch received $62.7 billion and $43.4 billion, respectively, of proceeds, and other cash inflows, from new securitization transactions, and recognized net securitization gains, excluding gains on related derivative transactions, of $111.3 million and $52.2 million, respectively in Merrill Lynchs Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Merrill Lynch generally records assets prior to securitization at fair value.
In 2003 and 2002, cash inflows from securitizations related to the following asset types:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Asset category |
||||||||
Residential mortgage loans |
$43,717 | $28,676 | ||||||
Municipal bonds |
11,301 | 7,956 | ||||||
Corporate and government bonds |
1,721 | 2,708 | ||||||
Commercial loans and other |
6,002 | 4,077 | ||||||
$62,741 | $43,417 | |||||||
In certain instances, Merrill Lynch retains interests in the senior tranche, subordinated tranche, and/or residual tranche of securities issued by certain SPEs created to securitize assets. The gain or loss on sale of the assets is determined with reference to the previous carrying amount of the financial assets transferred, which is allocated between the assets sold and the retained interests, if any, based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer.
Retained interests are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements at fair value. To obtain fair values, observable market prices are used if available. Where observable market prices are unavailable, Merrill Lynch generally estimates fair value initially and on an ongoing basis based on the present value of expected future cash flows using managements best estimates of credit losses, prepayment rates, forward yield curves, and discount rates, commensurate with the risks involved. Retained interests are either held as trading assets, with changes in fair value recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, or as securities available-for-sale, with changes in fair value included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Retained interests held as available-for-sale are reviewed periodically for impairment.
38
Retained interests in securitized assets were approximately $2.7 billion and $3.3 billion at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively, which related primarily to residential mortgage loan and municipal bond securitization transactions. The majority of the retained interest balance consists of mortgage-backed securities that have observable market prices. These retained interests include mortgage-backed securities that Merrill Lynch has committed to purchase and expects to sell to investors in the normal course of its underwriting activity. Approximately 64% and 77% at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively, of residential mortgage loan retained interests consist of interests in U.S. Government agency sponsored securitizations, which are guaranteed with respect to principal and interest. In addition, $740 million and $851 million at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively, of the retained interest balance relates to municipal bond transactions where observable market prices are available for the underlying assets, which provide the inputs and parameters used to calculate the fair value of the retained interest.
The following table presents information on retained interests, excluding the offsetting benefit of financial instruments used to hedge risks, held by Merrill Lynch as of December 26, 2003 arising from Merrill Lynchs residential mortgage loan, municipal bond and other securitization transactions. As noted above, most retained interests are priced based on observable market values or derive their value directly from the observable value of the underlying securities. Key economic assumptions and parameters shown in the table below represent inputs derived from these observable market values. These assumptions and parameters are as of December 26, 2003. The sensitivities of the current fair value of the retained interests to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions and parameters are also shown.
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Residential | ||||||||||||
Mortgage | Municipal | |||||||||||
Loans | Bonds | Other | ||||||||||
Retained interest amount |
$1,822 | $740 | $122 | |||||||||
Weighted average life (in years) |
3.2 | 3.6 | N/A | |||||||||
Range |
0.0 20.0 | 0.1 6.9 | N/A | |||||||||
Weighted average credit losses (rate per annum) |
0.7% | 0% | 0.4% | |||||||||
Range |
0.0 3.5% | 0% | 0.0 3.1% | |||||||||
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
$(14) | $ | $ | |||||||||
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
$(23) | $ | $(1) | |||||||||
Weighted average discount rate |
6.4% | 2.2% | 6.6% | |||||||||
Range |
0.0 83.9% | 1.0 11.3% | 1.8 25.0% | |||||||||
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
$(12) | $(52) | $(3) | |||||||||
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
$(23) | $(100) | $(6) | |||||||||
Weighted average prepayment speed (CPR) |
17.6% | 15.1%(1) | N/A | |||||||||
Range |
0.0 65.0% | 7.0 24.0%(1) | N/A | |||||||||
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
$(12) | $(1) | N/A | |||||||||
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
$(23) | $(2) | N/A | |||||||||
The preceding table does not include the offsetting benefit of financial instruments that Merrill Lynch utilizes to hedge risks including credit, interest rate, and prepayment risk that are inherent in the retained interests. Merrill Lynch employs hedging strategies that are structured to take into consideration the hypothetical stress scenarios above such that they would be effective in principally offsetting Merrill Lynchs exposure to loss in the event these scenarios occur. In addition, the sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and should be used with caution. In particular, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated independent of changes in any other assumption; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Further, changes in fair value based on a 10% or 20% variation in an assumption or parameter generally cannot be extrapolated because the
39
relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the sensitivity analysis does not consider any hedging activity that Merrill Lynch may take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in the key assumptions.
The weighted average assumptions and parameters used initially to value retained interests relating to securitizations effected in 2003 that were still held by Merrill Lynch as of December 26, 2003 are as follows:
Residential | ||||||||||||
Mortgage | Municipal | |||||||||||
Loans | Bonds | Other | ||||||||||
Weighted average life (in years) |
5.6 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Credit losses (rate per annum) |
0.3% | 0% | 0% | |||||||||
Weighted average discount rate |
6.0% | 3.2% | 4.5% | |||||||||
Prepayment speed assumption (CPR) |
17.9% | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
For residential mortgage loan and other securitizations, the investors and the securitization trust have no recourse to Merrill Lynchs other assets for failure of mortgage holders to pay when due.
For municipal bond securitization SPEs, in the normal course of dealer market-making activities, Merrill Lynch acts as liquidity provider. Specifically, the holders of beneficial interests issued by municipal bond securitization SPEs have the right to tender their interests for purchase by Merrill Lynch on specified dates at a specified price. Beneficial interests that are tendered are then sold by Merrill Lynch to investors through a best efforts remarketing where Merrill Lynch is the remarketing agent. If the beneficial interests are not successfully remarketed, the holders of beneficial interests are paid from funds drawn under a standby liquidity letter of credit issued by Merrill Lynch.
Merrill Lynch also provides default protection or credit enhancement to investors in securities issued by certain municipal bond securitization SPEs. Interest and principal payments on beneficial interests issued by these SPEs are secured by a guarantee issued by Merrill Lynch. In the event that the issuer of the underlying municipal bond defaults on any payment of principal and/or interest when due, the payments on the bonds will be made to beneficial interest holders from an irrevocable guarantee by Merrill Lynch.
The maximum commitment under these liquidity and default guarantees totaled $17.0 billion and $13.7 billion at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. The fair value of the commitments approximate $126 million and $69 million at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively, which is reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Of these arrangements, $2.8 billion and $2.3 billion at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively, represent agreements where the guarantee is provided to the SPE by a third-party financial intermediary and Merrill Lynch enters into a reimbursement agreement with the financial intermediary. In these arrangements, if the financial intermediary incurs losses, Merrill Lynch has up to one year to fund those losses. Additional information regarding these commitments is provided in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
The following table summarizes principal amounts outstanding, delinquencies, and net credit losses of securitized financial assets as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Residential | ||||||||||||
Mortgage | Municipal | |||||||||||
Loans | Bonds | Other | ||||||||||
December 26, 2003 |
||||||||||||
Principal Amount |
||||||||||||
Outstanding |
$43,777 | $14,890 | $4,527 | |||||||||
Delinquencies |
54 | | | |||||||||
Net Credit Losses |
3 | | 8 | |||||||||
December 27, 2002 |
||||||||||||
Principal Amount |
||||||||||||
Outstanding |
$23,107 | $18,379 | $2,476 | |||||||||
Delinquencies |
90 | | 3 | |||||||||
Net Credit Losses |
5 | | 44 | |||||||||
Variable Interest Entities
The FASB issued FIN 46R on December 24, 2003, which provides most public entities with the ability to defer implementation of the revised FIN 46 to no later than the first fiscal quarter of 2004. However, should a public issuer elect to defer implementation of FIN 46R, the entity is required to adopt FIN 46 for the 2003 fiscal year-end reporting. Merrill Lynch has elected to follow the guidance in FIN 46R for purposes of determining those VIEs that must be consolidated or disclosed as giving rise to a significant variable interest at December 26, 2003. Merrill Lynch has accounted for those VIEs that are consolidated under the new guidance as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, which did not have a material effect on the 2003 year-end financial statements.
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch acts as a transferor, derivative counterparty, investor, arranger, structurer, underwriter, market-maker, guarantor, and/or liquidity provider to many VIEs. In addition, Merrill Lynch acts as transferor to certain entities that meet the requirements of qualifying special purpose entities, which are not consolidated in the Merrill Lynch Financial Statements in accordance with SFAS No. 140, but which are disclosed herein where Merrill Lynch typically holds a significant variable interest and/or the transaction type represents a significant Merrill Lynch sponsored program.
Merrill Lynch has entered into transactions with a number of VIEs in which it is the primary beneficiary and therefore must consolidate the VIE; or is a significant variable interest holder in the VIE. These VIEs are as follows:
| Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary of VIEs that own
convertible bonds purchased from Merrill Lynch, in which Merrill
Lynch maintains a call option to repurchase the convertible bonds
from the VIE. The purpose of these VIEs is to market convertible
bonds to a broad investor base by separating the bonds into callable
debt and a conversion call option. Assets held by these VIEs are
reported in equities and convertible debentures or resale
agreements, depending on the nature of the transaction, |
41
in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Holders of the beneficial interests
in these VIEs have no recourse to the general credit of Merrill Lynch;
rather their investment is paid exclusively from the convertible bonds
held by the VIE. |
|||
| Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary of maturity
shortening transactions, in which the VIE serves to shorten the
maturity of a fixed income security, and, at the maturity date of
the VIE, Merrill Lynch has the obligation to repurchase some or all
of the securities held by the VIE. Assets held by these VIEs are
reported in corporate debt and preferred stock. The beneficial
interest holders in these VIEs have recourse to Merrill Lynch to the
extent that the underlying assets that Merrill Lynch is required to
repurchase have declined in value from the initial transaction date. |
||
| Merrill Lynch is the sponsor and guarantor of VIEs that
provide a guarantee of principal to beneficial interest holders,
thereby limiting investors losses generated from the assets.
Merrill Lynch may also guarantee investors returns in excess of
principal depending on the nature of the fund. In certain of these
VIEs, Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary. Investors in these
VIEs have recourse to Merrill Lynch to the extent that the value of
the assets held by the VIEs at maturity is less than the investors
initial investment or guaranteed amount. Where Merrill Lynch is not
the primary beneficiary, guarantees related to these funds are
discussed and disclosed in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
||
| Merrill Lynch has made loans to, and/or investments in, VIEs
that hold loan receivable assets and real estate, and as a result of
these loans and investments, Merrill Lynch may be either the primary
beneficiary and consolidate, or a significant variable interest
holder. These VIEs are primarily designed to provide temporary on or
off balance sheet financing to clients and/or to invest in real
estate. Assets held by VIEs where ML has provided financing and is
the primary beneficiary are recorded in other assets and/or loans,
notes and mortgages in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Assets held
by VIEs where Merrill Lynch has invested in real estate partnerships
are classified as investment securities where Merrill Lynch holds a
significant variable interest, and in other assets where Merrill
Lynch is the primary beneficiary. The beneficial interest holders in
these VIEs have no recourse to the general credit of Merrill Lynch;
rather their investments are paid exclusively from the assets in the
VIE. |
||
| Merrill Lynch has a significant variable interest in
municipal bond securitization QSPEs to which it provides liquidity
and default facilities. Additional information on these programs is
provided in the retained interest securitization disclosures above
and in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
||
| Merrill Lynch has entered into transactions with VIEs that
are used, in part, to provide foreign tax planning strategies to
investors. Merrill Lynch is a significant variable interest holder
in these VIEs. |
||
| Merrill Lynch has a significant variable interest in
residential mortgage securitizations entered into by one of its
banking subsidiaries. In accordance with the previous accounting
guidance of SFAS No. 125, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, this entity
qualifies as a QSPE, although Merrill Lynch retains a 97% interest
in the vehicle. |
||
| Merrill Lynch has entered into transactions with VIEs where
Merrill Lynch is a derivative counterparty to a VIE that serves to
synthetically expose investors to a specific credit risk. Based on
the provisions of FIN 46R, Merrill Lynch does not have a significant
variable interest since the derivative it has purchased does not
absorb variability. However, because these structures represent a
significant Merrill Lynch sponsored program, information related to
these structures has been included in the following table. |
The following table summarizes Merrill Lynchs involvement with the VIEs listed above as of December 26, 2003. Where an entity is a significant variable interest holder, FIN 46R requires that entity to disclose its maximum exposure to loss as a result of its interest in the VIE. It should be noted that this measure does not reflect Merrill Lynchs estimate of the actual losses that could result from adverse changes, nor does it reflect the economic hedges Merrill Lynch enters into to reduce its exposure.
42
(dollars in millions) | December 26, 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Variable | ||||||||||||||||
Primary Beneficiary | Interest Holder | |||||||||||||||
Recourse | ||||||||||||||||
Asset | to Merrill | Asset | Maximum | |||||||||||||
Description | Size | Lynch(4) | Size | Exposure | ||||||||||||
Convertible Bond Stripping |
$1,864 | None | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Maturity Shortening |
379 | $1 | | | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed Funds |
863 | 863 | | | ||||||||||||
Loan and Real Estate VIEs |
775 | None | 636 | 567 | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bond Securitizations(1) |
| | 16,927 | 16,927 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Tax Planning VIEs(2) |
| | 2,811 | 114 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Securitizations |
| | 345 | 334 | ||||||||||||
Synthetic Credit Risk VIEs(3) |
| | 6,402 | 474 | ||||||||||||
(1) | The maximum exposure for Municipal Bond Securitizations reflects Merrill
Lynchs potential liability as a result of the liquidity and default
facilities entered into with the VIEs. It significantly overestimates
Merrill Lynchs exposure to these VIEs since Merrill Lynch enters into
economic hedges that are designed to be effective in principally
offsetting Merrill Lynchs exposure to loss. |
(2) | The maximum exposure for Foreign Tax Planning VIEs reflects the fair value
of derivatives entered into with the VIEs, as well as the maximum exposure
to loss associated with indemnifications made to investors in the VIEs. |
(3) | The maximum exposure for Synthetic Credit Risk VIEs is the asset carrying
value of the derivatives entered into with the VIEs as of December 26,
2003. |
(4) | This column reflects the extent, if any, to which investors have recourse to
Merrill Lynch beyond the assets held in the VIE. |
At December 26, 2003, the Consolidated Balance Sheet included $1.2 billion of incremental assets related to the consolidation of these entities in which Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary.
Note 9. Loans, Notes, and Mortgages and Related Commitments to Extend Credit
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Loans | Commitments | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003(1) | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Consumer and small-and middle-market business: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgages |
$16,688 | $16,484 | $4,842 | $5,168 | ||||||||||||
Small- and middle-market business |
6,737 | 4,982 | 3,411 | 2,673 | ||||||||||||
Other |
4,045 | 1,172 | 603 | 477 | ||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||
Secured |
21,048 | 11,972 | 12,425 | 9,321 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured investment grade |
1,806 | 3,492 | 15,028 | 10,882 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured non-investment grade |
669 | 731 | 562 | 300 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$50,993 | $38,833 | $36,871 | $28,821 | ||||||||||||
The loan amounts are net of an allowance for loan losses of $318 million and $285 million as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively.
43
Consumer and small- and middle-market business loans, which are substantially secured, consisted of approximately 269,500 individual loans at December 26, 2003, and included residential mortgages, home equity loans, small- and middle-market business loans, and other loans to individuals for household, family, or other personal expenditures. Commercial loans, which at year-end 2003 consisted of approximately 7,500 separate loans, include syndicated loans and other loans to corporations and other businesses. Secured loans and commitments include lending activities made in the normal course of Merrill Lynchs securities and financing businesses. The investment grade and non-investment grade categorization is determined using the credit rating agency equivalent of internal credit ratings. Non-investment grade counterparties are those rated lower than BBB. Merrill Lynch enters into credit default swaps to mitigate credit exposure related to funded and unfunded unsecured commercial loans. The notional value of these swaps totaled $4.9 billion and $3.8 billion at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. For information on credit risk management see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The above amounts include $7.6 billion and $6.2 billion of loans held for sale at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. Loans held for sale are loans that management expects to sell prior to maturity. At December 26, 2003, such loans consisted of $5.2 billion of consumer loans, primarily residential mortgages, and $2.4 billion of commercial loans, approximately 59% of which are to investment grade counterparties. At December 27, 2002, such loans consisted of $3.2 billion of consumer loans, primarily residential mortgages, and $3.0 billion of commercial loans, approximately 49% of which were to investment grade counterparties. For information on the accounting policy related to loans, notes and mortgages, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The fair values of loans, notes, and mortgages were approximately $51.1 billion and $38.9 billion at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. Fair value for loans made in connection with private equity investing activities, consisting primarily of senior debt, is estimated using discounted cash flows. Merrill Lynchs estimate of fair value for other loans, notes, and mortgages is determined based on loan characteristics. For certain homogeneous categories of loans, including residential mortgages and home equity loans, fair value is estimated using market price quotations or previously executed transactions for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted for credit risk and other individual loan characteristics. For Merrill Lynchs variable-rate loan receivables, carrying value approximates fair value.
Merrill Lynch generally maintains collateral on secured loans in the form of securities, liens on real estate, perfected security interests in other assets of the borrower, and guarantees.
Merrill Lynch enters into commitments to extend credit, predominantly at variable interest rates, in connection with corporate finance and loan syndication transactions. Customers may also be extended loans or lines of credit collateralized by first and second mortgages on real estate, certain liquid assets of small businesses, or securities. Merrill Lynch considers commitments to be outstanding as of the date the commitment letter is issued. These commitments usually have a fixed expiration date and are contingent on certain contractual conditions that may require payment of a fee by the counterparty. Once commitments are drawn upon, Merrill Lynch may require the counterparty to post collateral depending on its creditworthiness and general market conditions.
The contractual amounts of these commitments represent the amounts at risk should the contract be fully drawn upon, the client defaults, and the value of the existing collateral becomes worthless. The total amount of outstanding commitments may not represent future cash requirements, as commitments may expire without being drawn upon. For a maturity profile of these and other commitments see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 10. Commercial Paper and Short- and Long-Term Borrowings
44
Total borrowings at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 consisted of the following:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Senior debt issued by ML & Co. |
$80,159 | $76,822 | ||||||
Senior debt issued by subsidiaries, guaranteed by ML & Co. |
5,441 | 5,833 | ||||||
Other subsidiary financing |
2,699 | 1,222 | ||||||
Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships |
3,203 | 3,189 | ||||||
Total |
$91,502 | $87,066 | ||||||
These borrowing activities may create exposure to market risk, most notably interest rate, equity, and currency risk. Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Derivatives section for additional information on the use of derivates to hedge these risks and the accounting for derivatives embedded in these instruments.
Borrowings at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 are presented below:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings |
||||||||
Commercial paper |
$ 4,568 | $ 3,966 | ||||||
Other |
432 | 1,387 | ||||||
Total |
$ 5,000 | $ 5,353 | ||||||
Long-term borrowings |
||||||||
Fixed-rate obligations(1)(3) |
$37,210 | $34,084 | ||||||
Variable-rate obligations(2)(3) |
41,297 | 39,703 | ||||||
Zero-coupon contingent convertible debt (LYONs®) |
4,792 | 4,737 | ||||||
Total |
$83,299 | $78,524 | ||||||
Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships |
$ 3,203 | $ 3,189 | ||||||
(1) | Fixed-rate obligations are generally swapped to floating rates. |
(2) | Variable interest rates are generally based on rates such as LIBOR, the
U.S. Treasury Bill Rate, or the Federal Funds Rate. |
(3) | Included are various equity-linked or other indexed instruments. |
Long-term borrowings, including adjustments related to fair value hedges and various equity-linked or other indexed instruments, and Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships at December 26, 2003, mature as follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2004 |
$ 17,508 | 20% | ||||||
2005 |
12,174 | 14 | ||||||
2006 |
13,092 | 15 | ||||||
2007 |
10,023 | 12 | ||||||
2008 |
8,205 | 10 | ||||||
2009 and thereafter |
25,500 | 29 | ||||||
Total |
$ 86,502 | 100% | ||||||
Certain long-term borrowing agreements contain provisions whereby the borrowings are redeemable at the option of the holder at specified dates prior to maturity. Management believes, however, that a portion of such borrowings will remain outstanding beyond their earliest redemption date. A limited number of notes whose coupon or repayment terms are linked to the performance of equity, other indices, or baskets of securities,
45
may be accelerated based on the value of a referenced index or security, in which case Merrill Lynch may be required to immediately settle the obligation for cash or other securities. Merrill Lynch typically hedges these notes with positions in derivatives and/or in the underlying securities. Merrill Lynch also makes markets buying and selling its debt instruments, including such notes.
Senior debt issued by ML & Co. and senior debt issued by subsidiaries guaranteed by ML & Co. do not contain provisions that could, upon an adverse change in ML & Co.s credit rating, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows, or ML & Co. stock price, trigger a requirement for an early payment, additional collateral support, changes in terms, acceleration of maturity, or the creation of an additional financial obligation.
The fair values of long-term borrowings and related hedges approximated the carrying amounts at year-end 2003 and 2002.
The effective weighted-average interest rates for borrowings, at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 were:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings |
2.10 | % | 2.27 | % | ||||
Long-term borrowings, contractual rate |
2.99 | 3.26 | ||||||
Long-term borrowings, including the impact of hedges |
1.38 | 1.74 | ||||||
Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships |
7.15 | 7.17 | ||||||
In March 2002, Merrill Lynch issued $2.3 billion aggregate original principal amount of floating rate zero-coupon contingently convertible debt (Liquid Yield OptionTM notes or LYONs®) at an issue price of $1,000 per note, which resulted in gross proceeds of $2.3 billion. The LYONs® are unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Merrill Lynch with a maturity date of 30 years. Merrill Lynch will pay no interest prior to maturity unless, during any six-month period commencing June 1, 2007, the average market price of the LYONs® for a certain period exceeds 120% or more of the accreted value of the LYONs®. In the case that payment is required, contingent interest will be equal to the greater of the common stock dividend for that period or $0.16 multiplied by the initial amount of shares into which the LYONs® are convertible. At maturity on March 13, 2032, holders will receive, for each note, a contingent principal amount equal to $1,000 increased daily by a yield of 3-month LIBOR minus 2.0% per annum, reset quarterly. Regardless of the level of 3-month LIBOR, however, the yield will never be less than 0% and, after March 13, 2007, the yield will not exceed 5.5%. For the year ended December 26, 2003, the weighted average yield of the notes was 0%. Merrill Lynch is recognizing any contingent principal amount as it is accrued over the term of the LYONs®. Each LYONs® is convertible into 13.8213 shares of common stock if certain conditions are met. Holders may require Merrill Lynch to purchase all or a portion of their LYONs® on March 13, 2005, 2007, 2012, 2017, 2022, and 2027 at the then contingent principal amount. Holders may also require Merrill Lynch to repurchase all or a portion of the LYONs® upon a change in control occurring on or before March 13, 2007 at a price equal to the then contingent principal amount. Merrill Lynch may elect to pay the purchase price in cash, shares of common stock or any combination thereof. Merrill Lynch may redeem all or a portion of the LYONs® at any time after March 13, 2007.
In May 2001, Merrill Lynch issued $4.6 billion of LYONs® at an issue price of $511.08 per note, which resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $2.4 billion. The LYONs® are unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Merrill Lynch with a maturity date of 30 years. Merrill Lynch will pay no interest prior to maturity unless, during any six-month period commencing June 1, 2006, the average market price of the LYONs® for a certain period exceeds 120% or more of the accreted value of the LYONs.® In the case that payment is required, contingent interest will be equal to the greater of the common stock dividend for that period or $0.16 multiplied by the initial amount of shares into which the LYONs® are convertible. Each note has a yield to maturity of 2.25% with a maturity value of $1,000 on May 23, 2031. Merrill Lynch is amortizing the issue discount using the effective interest method over the term of the LYONs.® Each LYONs® is convertible into 5.6787 shares of common stock if certain conditions are met. Holders may require Merrill Lynch to purchase all
46
or a portion of their LYONs® on May 23, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2011, 2016, 2021 and 2026 at the then accreted value. Holders may also require Merrill Lynch to repurchase all or a portion of the LYONs® upon a change in control occurring on or before May 23, 2006 at a price equal to the then accreted value. Merrill Lynch may elect to pay the purchase price in cash, shares of common stock or any combination thereof. Merrill Lynch may redeem all or a portion of the LYONs® at any time after May 23, 2006.
Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships
Long-term debt issued to TOPrSSM partnerships represent long-term debt payable to the partnerships that issued Trust Originated Preferred Securities (TOPrSSM). TOPrSSM were issued to investors by trusts created by Merrill Lynch and are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Using the issuance proceeds, the trusts purchased Partnership Preferred Securities, representing limited partnership interests. Using the purchase proceeds, the limited partnerships extended loans to ML & Co. and one or more subsidiaries of ML & Co. ML & Co. has guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, the payment in full of all distributions and other payments on the TOPrSSM to the extent that the trusts have funds legally available. This guarantee and a similar partnership distribution guarantee are subordinated to all other liabilities of ML & Co. and rank equally with preferred stock of ML & Co. Merrill Lynch has accounted for its issuance of TOPrSSM in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46R and, as a result, the partnerships and trusts that issue these securities have been deconsolidated in Merrill Lynchs financial statements.
Borrowing Facilities
The credit quality, amounts, and terms of this credit facility are continually monitored and modified as warranted by business conditions. Under the existing agreement, the credit facility will mature in May 2004.
Note 11. Deposits
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
U.S. |
||||||||
Savings Deposits |
$64,197 | $67,528 | ||||||
Time Deposits |
1,212 | 1,022 | ||||||
Total U.S. Deposits |
65,409 | 68,550 | ||||||
Non-U.S. |
||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
359 | 237 | ||||||
Interest bearing |
13,689 | 13,055 | ||||||
Total Non-U.S. Deposits |
14,048 | 13,292 | ||||||
Total Deposits |
$79,457 | $81,842 | ||||||
The effective weighted-average interest rates for deposits, which include the impact of hedges, at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 were 0.78% and 1.32%, respectively. The fair values of deposits approximated carrying values at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002.
47
Note 12. Stockholders Equity and Earnings Per Share
9% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A
Dividends on the 9% Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly when declared by the authority of the Board of Directors. The 9% Preferred Stock is perpetual and redeemable on or after December 30, 2004 at the option of ML & Co., in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to $10,000 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to the date fixed for redemption.
Common Stock
Shares Exchangeable into Common Stock
During 2003 and 2002, 1,011,118 and 284,366 Exchangeable Shares, respectively, were converted to ML & Co. common stock. At year-end 2003, 2,899,923 Exchangeable Shares were outstanding, compared with 3,911,041 at year-end 2002.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
||||||||
Unrealized (losses), net of gains |
$(758) | $(366) | ||||||
Income taxes |
457 | 46 | ||||||
Total |
(301) | (320) | ||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment
securities available-for-sale |
||||||||
Unrealized (losses), net of gains |
(158) | (185) | ||||||
Adjustments for: |
||||||||
Policyholder liabilities |
(36) | (44) | ||||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
2 | 3 | ||||||
Income taxes |
81 | 81 | ||||||
Total |
(111) | (145) | ||||||
Deferred gains on cash flow hedges |
11 | 20 | ||||||
Minimum pension liability |
(150) | (125) | ||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$(551) | $(570) | ||||||
48
Stockholder Rights Plan
If, after the Rights have been distributed, either the acquiring party holds 15% or more of ML & Co.s outstanding shares or ML & Co. is a party to a business combination or other specifically defined transaction, each Right (other than those held by the acquiring party) will entitle the holder to receive, upon exercise, a Unit of preferred stock or shares of common stock of the surviving company with a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. The Rights expire in 2007, and are redeemable at the option of a majority of the directors of ML & Co. at $.01 per Right at any time until the 10th day following an announcement of the acquisition of 15% or more of ML & Co.s common stock.
Earnings Per Share
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Net earnings |
$3,836 | $1,708 | (340) | |||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
39 | 38 | 38 | |||||||||
Net earnings applicable to common stockholders |
$3,797 | $1,670 | $(378) | |||||||||
(shares in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding(1) |
900,711 | 862,318 | 838,683 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive instruments(2) |
||||||||||||
Employee stock options |
32,807 | 32,779 | | |||||||||
FACAAP shares |
22,995 | 23,990 | | |||||||||
Restricted shares and units |
21,215 | 25,141 | | |||||||||
ESPP shares |
61 | 71 | | |||||||||
Dilutive potential common shares |
77,078 | 81,981 | | |||||||||
Diluted shares(3) |
977,789 | 944,299 | 838,683 | |||||||||
Basic EPS |
$4.22 | $1.94 | $(0.45) | |||||||||
Diluted EPS |
3.88 | 1.77 | (0.45) | |||||||||
(1) | Includes shares exchangeable into common stock. |
|
(2) | See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
these instruments and issuances subsequent to December 26, 2003. |
|
(3) | At year-end 2003, 2002, and
2001, there were 90,555; 118,070; and 138,239
instruments, respectively, that were considered antidilutive and thus were
not included in the above calculations. Additionally, shares related to
Merrill Lynchs LYONs® issuance are not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the threshold trigger price for
conversion has not been reached. |
49
Note 13. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Some of the legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. In some cases, the issuers that would otherwise be the primary defendants in such cases are bankrupt or otherwise in financial distress. Merrill Lynch is also involved in investigations and/or proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies. The number of these investigations has also increased in recent years with regard to many firms, including Merrill Lynch.
Given the number of these legal actions, investigations and proceedings, some are likely to result in adverse judgments, settlements, penalties, injunctions, fines or other relief. Merrill Lynch believes it has strong defenses to, and, where appropriate, will vigorously contest these actions. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages, Merrill Lynch often cannot predict what the eventual loss or range of loss related to such matters will be. Merrill Lynch believes, based on information available to it, that the resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of Merrill Lynch as set forth in the Consolidated Financial Statements, but may be material to Merrill Lynchs operating results or cash flows for any particular period and may impact ML & Co.s credit ratings.
Commitments
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commitment expiration | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less | ||||||||||||||||||||
than | 1 3 | 3+ 5 | Over 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | years | years | years | ||||||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit(1) |
$ | 36,871 | $ | 18,197 | $ | 7,415 | $ | 7,166 | $ | 4,093 | ||||||||||
Purchasing and other commitments |
8,348 | 7,211 | 715 | 186 | 236 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
3,885 | 524 | 1,006 | 853 | 1,502 | |||||||||||||||
Resale agreements |
10,215 | 10,215 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 59,319 | $ | 36,147 | $ | 9,136 | $ | 8,205 | $ | 5,831 | ||||||||||
Lending Commitments
The contractual amounts of these commitments represent the amounts at risk should the contract be fully drawn upon, the client defaults, and the value of the existing collateral becomes worthless. The total amount of outstanding commitments may not represent future cash requirements, as commitments may expire without being drawn upon.
50
Purchasing and Other Commitments
In connection with trading activities, Merrill Lynch enters into commitments related to resale agreements.
Merrill Lynch also obtains commercial letters of credit from issuing banks to satisfy various counterparty collateral requirements in lieu of depositing cash or securities collateral. Commercial letters of credit aggregated $507 million and $434 million at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively.
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch enters into institutional and margin-lending transactions, some of which is on a committed basis, but most of which is not. Margin lending on a committed basis only includes amounts where Merrill Lynch has a binding commitment. These binding margin lending commitments totaled $459 million at December 26, 2003 and $1.2 billion at December 27, 2002.
Merrill Lynch has commitments to purchase partnership interests, primarily related to private equity investing activities, of $426 million and $698 million at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. Merrill Lynch also has entered into agreements with providers of market data, communications, and systems consulting services. At December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 minimum fee commitments over the remaining life of these agreements aggregated $503 million and $527 million, respectively. Merrill Lynch has entered into other purchasing commitments totaling $7.0 billion and $1.4 billion at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively.
Leases
In 1999 and 2000, Merrill Lynch established two SPEs to finance its Hopewell, New Jersey campus and an aircraft. Merrill Lynch leased the facilities and the aircraft from the SPEs. The total amount of funds raised by the SPEs to finance these transactions was $383 million. These SPEs were not consolidated by Merrill Lynch pursuant to the accounting guidance that was then in effect. In the second quarter of 2003, the facilities and aircraft owned by these SPEs were acquired by a newly created limited partnership, which is unaffiliated with Merrill Lynch. The limited partnership acquired the assets subject to the leases with Merrill Lynch as well as the existing indebtedness incurred by the original SPEs. The proceeds from the sale of the assets to the limited partnership, net of the debt assumed by the limited partnership, were used to repay the equity investors in the original SPEs. After the transaction was completed, the original SPEs were dissolved. The limited partnership has also entered into leases with third-parties unrelated to Merrill Lynch.
The leases with the limited partnership mature in 2005 and 2006, and each lease has a renewal term to 2008. In addition, Merrill Lynch has entered into guarantees with the limited partnership, whereby if Merrill Lynch does not renew the lease or purchase the assets under its lease at the end of either the initial or the renewal lease term, the underlying assets will be sold to a third party, and Merrill Lynch has guaranteed that the proceeds of such sale will amount to at least 84% of the acquisition cost of the assets. The maximum exposure to Merrill Lynch as a result of this residual value guarantee is approximately $325 million as of December 26, 2003. As of December 26, 2003, the carrying value of the liability on the Consolidated Financial Statements is $34 million. Merrill Lynchs residual value guarantee does not comprise more than half of the limited partnerships assets. Merrill Lynch had entered into a similar residual value guarantee with the previous SPEs; the maximum exposure under the previous guarantee was approximately $325 million as of December 27, 2002.
The limited partnership does not meet the definition of a VIE as defined in FIN 46. Merrill Lynch does not have a partnership or other interest in the limited partnership. Accordingly, Merrill Lynch is not required to
51
consolidate the limited partnership in its financial statements. The leases with the limited partnership are accounted for as operating leases.
At December 26, 2003, future noncancellable minimum rental commitments under leases with remaining terms exceeding one year, including lease payments to the limited partnerships discussed above are as follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
WFC(1) | Other | Total | ||||||||||
2004 |
$ | 179 | $ | 345 | $ | 524 | ||||||
2005 |
179 | 336 | 515 | |||||||||
2006 |
179 | 312 | 491 | |||||||||
2007 |
179 | 271 | 450 | |||||||||
2008 |
179 | 224 | 403 | |||||||||
2009 and thereafter |
848 | 654 | 1,502 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,743 | $ | 2,142 | $ | 3,885 | ||||||
The minimum rental commitments shown above have not been reduced by $812 million of minimum sublease rentals to be received in the future under noncancellable subleases. Certain leases contain renewal or purchase options or escalation clauses providing for increased rental payments based upon maintenance, utility, and tax increases.
Net rent expense for each of the last three years is presented below:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Rent expense |
$ | 531 | $ | 538 | $ | 651 | ||||||
Sublease revenue |
(93) | (92) | (106) | |||||||||
Net rent expense |
$ | 438 | $ | 446 | $ | 545 | ||||||
Guarantees
For certain derivative contracts, such as written interest rate caps and written currency options, the maximum payout could theoretically be unlimited, because, for example, the rise in interest rates or changes in foreign exchange rates could theoretically be unlimited. In addition, Merrill Lynch does not monitor its exposure to derivatives in this manner. As such, rather than including the maximum payout, the notional value of these contracts has been included to provide information about the magnitude of involvement with these types of contracts. However, it should be noted that the notional value is not a reliable indicator of Merrill Lynchs exposure to these contracts.
52
Merrill Lynch records all derivative transactions at fair value on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. As previously noted, Merrill Lynch does not monitor its exposure to derivative contracts in terms of maximum payout. Instead, a risk framework is used to define risk tolerances and establish limits to ensure that certain risk-related losses occur within acceptable, predefined limits. Merrill Lynch economically hedges its exposure to these contracts by entering into a variety of offsetting derivative contracts and security positions. See the Derivatives section of Note 1 for further discussion of risk management of derivatives.
Merrill Lynch also provides guarantees to SPEs in the form of liquidity facilities, credit default protection and residual value guarantees for equipment leasing entities.
The liquidity facilities and credit default protection relate primarily to municipal bond securitization SPEs. Merrill Lynch acts as liquidity provider to municipal bond securitization SPEs. Specifically, the holders of beneficial interests issued by these SPEs have the right to tender their interests for purchase by Merrill Lynch on specified dates at a specified price. If the beneficial interests are not successfully remarketed, the holders of beneficial interests are paid from funds drawn under a standby facility issued by Merrill Lynch (or by third-party financial institutions where Merrill Lynch has agreed to reimburse the financial institution if a draw occurs). If the standby facility is drawn, Merrill Lynch may claim the underlying assets held by the SPEs. In general, standby facilities that are not coupled with default protection are not exercisable in the event of a downgrade below investment grade or default of the assets held by the SPEs. In addition as of December 26, 2003, the value of the assets held by the SPE plus any additional collateral pledged to Merrill Lynch exceeds the amount of beneficial interests issued, which provides additional support to Merrill Lynch in the event that the standby facility is drawn. As of December 26, 2003, the value of the municipal bond assets to which Merrill Lynch has recourse in the event of a draw was in aggregate $18.3 billion, which exceeds the maximum payout if the standby facilities are drawn of $13.9 billion in aggregate. However, it should be noted that the assets to which Merrill Lynch has recourse are on a deal-by-deal basis and are not part of a cross-collateralized pool.
In certain instances, Merrill Lynch also provides default protection in addition to liquidity facilities. Specifically, in the event that an issuer of a municipal bond held by the SPE defaults on any payment of principal and/or interest when due, the payments on the bonds will be made to beneficial interest holders from an irrevocable guarantee by Merrill Lynch (or by third-party financial institutions where Merrill Lynch has agreed to reimburse the financial institution if losses occur). If the default protection is drawn, Merrill Lynch may claim the underlying assets held by the SPEs. As of December 26, 2003, the value of the assets to which Merrill Lynch has recourse in the event that an issuer of a municipal bond held by the SPE defaults on any payment of principal and/or interest when due was $4.1 billion; the maximum payout if an issuer defaults was $3.1 billion. As described in the preceding paragraph, the assets to which Merrill Lynch has recourse are not part of a cross-collateralized pool.
Further, to protect against declines in the value of the assets held by SPEs for which Merrill Lynch provides either liquidity facilities or default protection, Merrill Lynch economically hedges its exposure through derivative positions that principally offset the risk of loss arising from these guarantees.
Merrill Lynch also provides residual value guarantees to leasing SPEs where either Merrill Lynch or a third party is the lessee. For transactions where Merrill Lynch is not the lessee, the guarantee provides loss coverage for any shortfalls in the proceeds from asset sales beyond 7590% of the current book value of the asset to which the guarantee pertains. As of December 26, 2003, the maximum payout on these guarantees is $502 million. Where Merrill Lynch is the lessee, it provides a guarantee that any proceeds from the sale of the assets will amount to at least 84% of the acquisition cost of the assets.
Merrill Lynch also enters into reimbursement agreements in conjunction with sales of loans originated under its Mortgage 100 SM program. Under this program, borrowers can pledge marketable securities in lieu of making a cash down payment. Upon sale of these mortgage loans, purchasers may require a surety bond that reimburses for certain shortfalls in the borrowers securities accounts. Merrill Lynch provides this reimbursement through a financial intermediary. Merrill Lynch requires borrowers to meet daily collateral calls to ensure that the securities pledged as down payment are sufficient at all times. Merrill Lynch believes that its
53
potential for loss under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no liability is recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, Merrill Lynch makes guarantees to counterparties in the form of standby letters of credit. Merrill Lynch holds marketable securities of $277 million as collateral to secure these guarantees. In addition, standby letters of credit include $89 million of financial guarantees for which Merrill Lynch has recourse to the guaranteed party upon draw down.
Further, in conjunction with certain principal-protected mutual funds, Merrill Lynch guarantees the return of the initial principal investment at the termination date of the fund. These funds are generally managed based on a formula that requires the fund to hold a combination of general investments and highly liquid risk-free assets that, when combined, will result in the return of principal at the maturity date unless there is a significant market event. At December 26, 2003 Merrill Lynchs maximum potential exposure to loss with respect to these guarantees is $261 million assuming that the funds are invested exclusively in other general investments (i.e., the funds hold no risk-free assets), and that those other general investments suffer a total loss. As such, this measure significantly overstates Merrill Lynchs exposure or expected loss at December 26, 2003.
These guarantees and their expiration are summarized at December 26, 2003 as follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum | Less | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Payout/ | than | 1 - 3 | 3+ 5 | Over | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||
Notional | 1 year | years | years | 5 years | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivative contracts(1) |
$936,089 | $305,555 | $290,815 | $195,530 | $144,189 | $20,687 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liquidity facilities with SPEs(2) |
13,865 | 12,233 | 1,632 | | | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liquidity and default facilities
with SPEs |
3,120 | 2,024 | 797 | 1 | 298 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residual value guarantees(3)(4) |
1,768 | 57 | 78 | 344 | 1,289 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit and other
performance guarantees(5) |
770 | 397 | 62 | 43 | 268 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | As noted above, the notional value of derivative contracts is provided
rather than the maximum payout amount, although the notional value should
not be considered as a substitute for maximum payout. |
(2) | Amounts relate primarily to facilities provided to municipal bond
securitization SPEs. Includes $2.8 billion of guarantees provided to SPEs
by third-party financial institutions where Merrill Lynch has agreed to
reimburse the financial institution if losses occur, and has up to one
year to fund losses. |
(3) | Includes residual value guarantees associated with the Hopewell campus
and aircraft leases of $325 million. |
(4) | Includes $892 million of reimbursement agreements with the Mortgage 100SM program. |
(5) | Includes guarantees related to principal-protected mutual funds. |
In addition to the guarantees described above, Merrill Lynch also provides guarantees to securities clearinghouses and exchanges. Under the standard membership agreement, members are required to guarantee the performance of other members. Under the agreements, if another member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearinghouse, other members would be required to meet shortfalls. Merrill Lynchs liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and could exceed the cash and securities it has posted as collateral. However, the potential for Merrill Lynch to be required to make payments under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no liability is carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements for these arrangements.
In connection with its prime brokerage business, Merrill Lynch provides to counterparties guarantees of the performance of its prime brokerage clients. Under these arrangements, Merrill Lynch stands ready to meet the obligations of its customers with respect to securities transactions. If the customer fails to fulfill its obligation, Merrill Lynch must fulfill the customers obligation with the counterparty. Merrill Lynch is secured by the assets in the customers account as well as any proceeds received from the securities transaction entered
54
into by Merrill Lynch on behalf of the customer. No contingent liability is carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements for these transactions as the potential for Merrill Lynch to be required to make payments under these arrangements is remote.
In connection with its securities clearing business, Merrill Lynch performs securities execution, clearance and settlement services on behalf of other broker-dealer clients for whom it commits to settle, with the applicable clearinghouse, trades submitted for or by such clients; trades are submitted either individually, in groups or series or, if specific arrangements are made with a particular clearinghouse and client, all transactions with such clearing entity by such client. Merrill Lynchs liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and could exceed any cash deposit made by a client. However, the potential for Merrill Lynch to be required to make unreimbursed payments under these arrangements is remote due to the contractual capital requirements associated with clients activity and the regular review of clients capital. Accordingly, no liability is carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements for these transactions.
In connection with certain European mergers and acquisition transactions, Merrill Lynch, in its capacity as financial adviser, in some cases may be required by law to provide a guarantee that the acquiring entity has or can obtain or issue sufficient funds or securities to complete the transaction. These arrangements are short-term in nature, extending from the commencement of the offer through the termination or closing. Where guarantees are required or implied by law, Merrill Lynch engages in a credit review of the acquirer, obtains indemnification and requests other contractual protections where appropriate. Merrill Lynchs maximum liability equals the required funding for each transaction and varies throughout the year depending upon the size and number of open transactions. Based on the review procedures performed, management believes the likelihood of being required to pay under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no liability is recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements for these transactions.
In the course of its business, Merrill Lynch routinely indemnifies investors for certain taxes, including U.S. and foreign withholding taxes on interest and other payments made on securities, swaps and other derivatives. These additional payments would be required upon a change in law or interpretation thereof. Merrill Lynchs maximum exposure under these indemnifications is not quantifiable. Merrill Lynch believes that the potential for such an adverse change is remote. As such, no liability is recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In connection with certain asset sales and securitization transactions, Merrill Lynch typically makes representations and warranties about the underlying assets conforming to specified guidelines. If the underlying assets do not conform to the specifications, Merrill Lynch may have an obligation to repurchase the assets or indemnify the purchaser against any loss. To the extent these assets were originated by others and purchased by Merrill Lynch, Merrill Lynch seeks to obtain appropriate representations and warranties in connection with its acquisition of the assets. Merrill Lynch believes that the potential for loss under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no liability is carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements for these arrangements.
In connection with divestiture transactions, (for example, the integration of MLHSBC into HSBC and the sale of the GPC business in Canada), Merrill Lynch provides an indemnity to the purchaser, which will fully compensate the purchaser for any unknown liens or liabilities (e.g., tax liabilities) that relate to prior periods but are not discovered until after the transaction is closed. Merrill Lynchs maximum liability under these indemnifications cannot be quantified. However, Merrill Lynch believes that the likelihood of being required to pay is remote given the level of due diligence performed prior to the close of the transactions. Accordingly, no liability is recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements for these indemnifications.
55
Note 14. Employee Benefit Plans
Merrill Lynchs measurement date for both its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans is September quarter-end.
Defined Contribution Plans
Merrill Lynch established the RAP and the ESOP, collectively known as the Retirement Program, for the benefit of employees with a minimum of one year of service. A notional retirement account is maintained for each participant. The RAP contributions are employer-funded based on compensation and years of service. Under the RAP, employees are given the opportunity to invest their retirement savings in a number of different investment alternatives. Under the ESOP, all retirement savings are in ML & Co. common stock, until employees have five years of service after which they have the ability to diversify.
On July 17, 2001 Merrill Lynch merged the assets of the Herzog ESOP with the Merrill Lynch ESOP. Merrill Lynch allocates ESOP shares of Merrill Lynch stock to all participants of the ESOP as principal is repaid. Beginning in 2004, these allocations will be made on an annual basis. ESOP shares are considered to be either allocated (contributed to participants accounts), committed (scheduled to be contributed at a specified future date but not yet released), or unallocated (not committed or allocated). Share information at December 26, 2003 is as follows:
Unallocated shares as of December 27, 2002 |
928,674 | |||
Release of escrow shares |
1,300 | |||
Shares allocated/committed(1) |
(161,863) | |||
Unallocated shares as of December 26, 2003 |
768,111 | |||
Additional information on ESOP activity follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Compensation costs funded with ESOP shares |
$ | 9 | $ | 17 | $ | 8 | ||||||
Dividends used for debt service |
1 | 1 | | |||||||||
Employees can participate in the 401(k) by contributing, on a tax-deferred basis, a certain percentage of their eligible compensation, up to 25% in 2003, and up to 15% in years prior, but not more than the maximum annual amount allowed by law. Employees are given the opportunity to invest their 401(k) contributions in a number of different investment alternatives including ML & Co. common stock. Merrill Lynchs contributions are made in cash, and are equal to one-half of the first 6% of each participants eligible compensation contributed to the 401(k), up to a maximum of two thousand dollars annually. No corporate contributions are made for participants who are also Employee Stock Purchase Plan participants (see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). This restriction was removed effective January 1, 2004.
56
Merrill Lynch also sponsors various non-U.S. defined contribution plans. The costs of benefits under the RAP, 401(k), and non-U.S. plans are expensed during the related service period.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Employees of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries participate in various local defined benefit plans. These plans provide benefits that are generally based on years of credited service and a percentage of the employees eligible compensation during the final years of employment. Merrill Lynchs funding policy has been to contribute annually the amount necessary to satisfy local funding standards.
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the plans benefit obligations, assets, and funded status for the twelve-month periods ended September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002 and the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at year-end 2003 and 2002:
57
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Projected benefit obligations |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 2,425 | $ | 2,014 | ||||
Service cost |
43 | 45 | ||||||
Interest cost |
143 | 140 | ||||||
Net actuarial loss |
180 | 282 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(128) | (127) | ||||||
Foreign exchange and other |
87 | 71 | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
2,750 | 2,425 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
2,741 | 2,500 | ||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
134 | 273 | ||||||
Contributions |
53 | 51 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(128) | (127) | ||||||
Foreign exchange and other |
45 | 44 | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
2,845 | 2,741 | ||||||
Funded status |
95 | 316 | ||||||
Unrecognized net actuarial losses (gains) |
136 | (77) | ||||||
Fourth-quarter activity, net |
29 | 16 | ||||||
Net amount recognized |
$260 | $255 | ||||||
Assets |
$ | 313 | $ | 290 | ||||
Liabilities |
(269) | (213) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ($150 million and $125 million, net of tax in 2003 and 2002) |
216 | 178 | ||||||
Net amount recognized |
$ | 260 | $ | 255 | ||||
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $2,646 million and $2,298 million at September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002.
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $937 million, $856 million, and $540 million, respectively, as of September 26, 2003, and $838 million, $711 million, and $488 million, respectively, as of September 27, 2002. These plans primarily represent U.S. supplemental plans not subject to ERISA or non-U.S. plans where funding strategies vary due to legal requirements and local practices.
The increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss in 2003 resulted from the recognition of an additional minimum pension liability in 2003 of $38 million ($25 million, net of tax), primarily related to the U.K. pension plan. The unfunded accumulated benefit obligation of this plan increased in value due to a decline in the market value of assets, combined with a reduction in the interest rate used for discounting the benefit obligation.
The weighted average assumptions used in calculating the projected benefit obligation at September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002 are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Discount rate |
5.6% | 6.2% | ||||||
Rate of compensation increase |
4.1 | 4.3 | ||||||
58
The weighted average assumptions used in calculating the net periodic benefit cost for the years ended September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002 are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Discount rate |
6.2% | 6.7% | ||||||
Rate of compensation increase |
4.1 | 4.3 | ||||||
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
5.0 | 6.0 | ||||||
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets reflects the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits included in the projected benefit obligation. The U.S. tax-qualified plan, which represents approximately 78% of Merrill Lynchs total plan assets as of September 26, 2003, is 100% invested in a group annuity contract which is currently 100% invested in fixed income securities. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for the U.S. tax-qualified plan is based on the portfolio yield at the beginning of each fiscal year. The U.K. plan, which represents approximately 16% of Merrill Lynchs total plan assets as of September 26, 2003, is currently invested in 79% equity securities, 15% debt securities and 6% real estate. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was calculated by the plan actuary and reflects estimates of the expected returns on different asset classes held by the plan in light of prevailing economic conditions at the beginning of the fiscal year.
Pension cost for the years ended 2003, 2002, and 2001 included the following components:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Defined contribution plan cost |
$201 | $222 | $256 | |||||||||
Defined benefit plans |
||||||||||||
Service cost for benefits earned during the
year |
43 | 45 | 43 | |||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations |
143 | 140 | 129 | |||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(137) | (152) | (157) | |||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized items and other |
3 | 6 | (9) | |||||||||
Total defined benefit plan cost |
52 | 39 | 6 | |||||||||
Total pension cost |
$253 | $261 | $262 | |||||||||
The pension plan weighted-average asset allocations at September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002, by asset category are as follows:
Asset Category | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
Debt securities |
84% | 89% | ||||||
Equity securities |
15 | 10 | ||||||
Real estate and other |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Total |
100% | 100% | ||||||
Assets and liabilities of the U.S. tax-qualified plan are dollar duration matched, such that the assets are expected to mature within one half year of the time when liabilities come due. The asset portfolios investment objective calls for a concentration in fixed income securities, the majority of which have an investment grade rating.
For the U.K. plan, the target asset allocation is 80% equity securities, 15% debt securities and 5% real estate.
Merrill Lynch currently expects to contribute $57 million to its pension plans in 2004.
59
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the plans benefit obligations, assets, and funded status for the twelve-month periods ended September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002, and the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at year-end 2003 and 2002:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Accumulated benefit obligations |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$398 | $260 | ||||||
Service cost |
15 | 10 | ||||||
Interest cost |
32 | 23 | ||||||
Net actuarial loss |
96 | 116 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(18) | (17) | ||||||
Other |
2 | 6 | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
525 | 398 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
| | ||||||
Contributions |
18 | 17 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(18) | (17) | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
| | ||||||
Funded status |
(525) | (398) | ||||||
Unrecognized net actuarial losses |
195 | 110 | ||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
2 | 3 | ||||||
Fourth quarter activity, net |
5 | 4 | ||||||
Accrued benefit liabilities |
$ | (323) | $ | (281) | ||||
The weighted average assumptions used in calculating the postretirement accumulated benefit obligations at September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002 are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Discount rate |
6.0% | 6.5% | ||||||
Health care cost trend rates(1) |
||||||||
Initial |
12.9 | 10.8 | ||||||
Long-term |
5.0 | 5.0 | ||||||
60
The weighted average assumptions used in calculating the net periodic benefit cost for the years ended September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002 are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Discount rate |
6.5% | 7.0% | ||||||
Health care cost trend rates(1) |
||||||||
Initial |
12.8 | 10.8 | ||||||
Long-term |
5.0 | 5.0 | ||||||
Other postretirement benefits cost included the following components:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 15 | $ | 10 | $ | 8 | ||||||
Interest cost |
32 | 23 | 16 | |||||||||
Other |
11 | 7 | 8 | |||||||||
Total other postretirement benefits cost |
$ | 58 | $ | 40 | $ | 32 | ||||||
The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement health care plans. A one-percent change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
1% Increase | 1% Decrease | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Effect on: |
||||||||||||||||
Other postretirement benefits cost |
$ | 8 | $ | 6 | $ | (7) | $ | (5) | ||||||||
Accumulated benefit obligation |
90 | 68 | (70) | (55) | ||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch currently expects to contribute $19 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2004.
Postemployment Benefits
Merrill Lynch recognized $285 million, $358 million, and $298 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively, of postemployment benefits expense, which included severance costs for terminated employees of $253 million, $323 million, and $281 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The 2001 severance costs exclude costs related to the restructuring and other charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Although all full-time employees are eligible for severance benefits, no additional amounts were accrued as of December 26, 2003 since future severance costs are not estimable.
61
Note 15. Employee Incentive Plans
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans (LTIC Plans) Employee Stock Compensation Plan (ESCP) and Equity Capital Accumulation Plan (ECAP)
Restricted Shares and Units
In January 2003, 18,656,866 Restricted Units were converted to Restricted Shares; no change was made to the remaining vesting periods and the restricted periods were removed. Further, in 2003, 16,049,636 Restricted Units were released as a result of the early removal of the restricted period. The activity for Restricted Shares and Units under these plans during 2003 and 2002 follows:
62
LTIC Plans | ECAP | |||||||||||
Restricted | Restricted | Restricted | ||||||||||
Shares | Units | Shares | ||||||||||
Authorized for issuance at: |
||||||||||||
December 26, 2003 |
660,000,000 | N/A | 104,800,000 | |||||||||
December 27, 2002 |
660,000,000 | N/A | 104,800,000 | |||||||||
Available for issuance at:(1) |
||||||||||||
December 26, 2003 |
81,044,822 | N/A | 10,843,278 | |||||||||
December 27, 2002 |
109,612,528 | N/A | 10,827,789 | |||||||||
Outstanding, end of 2001 |
12,457,371 | 34,947,273 | 376,078 | |||||||||
Granted - 2002 |
1,805,409 | 13,518,586 | 8,065 | |||||||||
Paid, forfeited, or released from
contingencies |
(6,634,632) | (5,664,532) | (254,493) | |||||||||
Outstanding, end of 2002 |
7,628,148 | 42,801,327 | 129,650 | |||||||||
Granted - 2003 |
14,752,807 | 1,901,446 | 8,946 | |||||||||
Unit to share conversion |
18,656,866 | (18,656,866) | | |||||||||
Paid, forfeited, or released from contingencies |
(7,209,193) | (18,825,452) | (99,537) | |||||||||
Outstanding, end of 2003(2) |
33,828,628 | 7,220,455 | 39,059 | |||||||||
(1) | Includes shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of stock options. |
|
(2) | In January 2004, 10,997,449 and 1,762,532 Restricted Shares and
Restricted Units under LTIC plans, respectively, were granted to eligible
employees. |
The weighted-average fair value per share or unit for 2003, 2002, and 2001 grants follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
LTIC Plans |
||||||||||||
Restricted Shares |
$ 36.69 | $ 50.31 | $ 75.76 | |||||||||
Restricted Units |
37.18 | 52.98 | 74.52 | |||||||||
ECAP Restricted Shares |
53.65 | 48.81 | 60.51 | |||||||||
Merrill Lynch sponsors other plans similar to LTIC Plans in which restricted shares are granted to employees and non-employee directors. At year-end 2003 and 2002, 3,800,000 restricted shares were authorized for issuance under these plans. A total of 88,657 and 127,195 shares were outstanding under these plans at year-end 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Non-qualified Stock Options
Non-qualified Stock Options granted under LTIC Plans in 1994 and 1995 generally
became exercisable over four years in equal installments commencing one year
after the date of grant. Options granted in 1996 through 2000 generally are
exercisable over five years; options granted in 2001 and 2002 became
exercisable after approximately six months. New option grants made in 2003 and
2004 generally become exercisable over four years. The exercise price of these
options is equal to 100% of the fair market value (as defined in LTIC Plans) of
a share of ML & Co. common stock on the date of grant. Non-qualified Stock
Options expire ten years after their grant date.
63
The activity for Non-qualified Stock Options under LTIC Plans for 2003, 2002, and 2001 follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Options | Average | |||||||
Outstanding | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding, beginning of 2001 |
187,055,223 | $ 27.48 | ||||||
Granted 2001 |
35,136,631 | 76.49 | ||||||
Exercised |
(23,558,452) | 17.19 | ||||||
Forfeited |
(4,182,983) | 38.69 | ||||||
Outstanding, end of 2001 |
194,450,419 | 37.36 | ||||||
Granted 2002 |
45,373,396 | 53.76 | ||||||
Exercised |
(14,874,865) | 14.78 | ||||||
Forfeited |
(3,060,806) | 49.26 | ||||||
Outstanding, end of 2002 |
221,888,144 | 42.07 | ||||||
Granted 2003 |
23,188,910 | 36.15 | ||||||
Exercised |
(26,988,687) | 20.41 | ||||||
Forfeited |
(1,943,844) | 36.70 | ||||||
Outstanding, end of 2003(1) |
216,144,523 | 44.20 | ||||||
(1) | In January 2004, 9,561,879 Non-qualified Stock Options and Stock
Appreciation Rights were granted to eligible employees. |
At year-end 2003, 2002, and 2001, options exercisable under LTIC Plans were 176,168,602, 190,264,151, and 126,979,165, respectively.
The table below summarizes information related to outstanding and exercisable options at year-end 2003:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Number | Exercise | Remaining | Number | Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Price | Outstanding | Price | Life (Years)(1) | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||
$ 8.00 $31.99 |
43,436,084 | $ 20.54 | 2.78 | 43,436,084 | $ 20.54 | |||||||||||||||
$32.00 $37.99 |
60,132,628 | 36.14 | 6.57 | 34,925,910 | 36.14 | |||||||||||||||
$38.00 $50.99 |
35,485,566 | 43.70 | 6.12 | 21,236,670 | 43.75 | |||||||||||||||
$51.00 $60.99 |
43,727,866 | 53.76 | 8.09 | 43,418,582 | 53.75 | |||||||||||||||
$61.00 $77.99 |
33,362,379 | 77.51 | 7.08 | 33,151,356 | 77.55 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Based on original contractual life of ten years. |
The weighted-average fair value of options granted in 2003, 2002, and 2001 was $13.55, $22.44, and $31.80 per option, respectively. Fair value is estimated as of the grant date based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.86% | 4.61% | 5.05% | |||||||||
Expected life |
5 yrs. | 5 yrs. | 5 yrs. | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
46.41% | 45.88% | 42.84% | |||||||||
Dividend yield |
1.77% | 1.19% | 0.84% | |||||||||
64
Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPP)
The ESPP, which is shareholder approved, allows eligible employees to invest
from 1% to 10% of their eligible compensation to purchase ML & Co. common stock
at a price generally equal to 85% of its fair market value. The maximum annual
purchase is $21,250. The 15% discount has been eliminated effective January 10,
2004. These purchases are made on four quarterly investment dates through
payroll deductions. Up to 100,600,000 shares of common stock have been
authorized for issuance under ESPP. The activity in ESPP during 2003, 2002, and
2001 follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Available, beginning of year |
26,918,962 | 29,425,067 | 6,518,168 | |||||||||
Authorized during year |
| | 25,000,000 | |||||||||
Purchased through plan |
(1,987,053) | (2,506,105) | (2,093,101) | |||||||||
Available, end of year |
24,931,909 | 26,918,962 | 29,425,067 | |||||||||
The weighted-average fair value of ESPP stock purchase rights exercised by employees in 2003, 2002, and 2001 was $6.69, $6.35, and $8.78 per right, respectively.
Financial Advisor Capital Accumulation Award Plans (FACAAP)
Under FACAAP, eligible employees in GPC are granted awards generally based upon
their prior years performance. Payment for an award is contingent upon
continued employment for a period of time and is subject to forfeiture during
that period. Awards granted in 2003 are generally payable eight years from the
date of grant in a fixed number of shares of ML & Co. common stock. For
outstanding awards granted prior to 2003, payment is generally made ten years
from the date of grant in a fixed number of shares of ML & Co. common stock
unless the fair market value of such shares is less than a specified minimum
value plus interest, in which case the minimum value plus interest is paid in
cash. Eligible participants may defer awards beyond the scheduled payment date.
Only shares of common stock held as treasury stock may be issued under FACAAP.
FACAAP, which was approved by the Board of Directors, has not been shareholder
approved.
At December 26, 2003, shares subject to outstanding awards totaled 44,668,824 while 22,087,047 shares were available for issuance through future awards. The weighted-average fair value of awards granted under FACAAP during 2003, 2002, and 2001 was $38.78, $52.67, and $64.70 per award, respectively.
Other Compensation Arrangements
To give employees flexibility in meeting their future income needs, Merrill
Lynch sponsors deferred compensation plans in which employees who meet certain
minimum compensation requirements may participate. Contributions to the plans
are made on a tax-deferred basis by participants. Participants returns on
these contributions may be indexed to various Merrill Lynch mutual funds and
other funds, including certain company-sponsored investment vehicles that
qualify as employee securities companies.
Merrill Lynch also sponsors several cash-based employee award programs, under which certain employees are eligible to receive future cash compensation, generally upon fulfillment of the vesting criteria for the particular program.
When appropriate, Merrill Lynch maintains various assets as an economic hedge of its liabilities to participants under the deferred compensation plans and award programs. These assets and the payables accrued by Merrill Lynch under the various plans and grants are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such assets totaled $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion, at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. Accrued liabilities at year-end 2003 and 2002 were $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.
65
Note 16. Income Taxes
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
U.S. federal |
||||||||||||
Current |
$821 | $485 | $921 | |||||||||
Deferred |
285 | (129) | (883) | |||||||||
U.S. state and local |
||||||||||||
Current |
5 | 68 | 34 | |||||||||
Deferred |
48 | (19) | (143) | |||||||||
Non-U.S. |
||||||||||||
Current |
197 | 402 | 390 | |||||||||
Deferred |
28 | (203) | (220) | |||||||||
Total |
$1,384 | $604 | $99 | |||||||||
The corporate statutory U.S. federal tax rate was 35% for the three years presented. A reconciliation of statutory U.S. federal income taxes to Merrill Lynchs income tax provisions for earnings follows:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
U.S. federal income tax at statutory rate |
$ 1,826 | $ 810 | $ (82) | |||||||||
U.S. state and local income taxes, net |
34 | 32 | (72) | |||||||||
Non-U.S. operations |
(232) | 6 | 25 | |||||||||
Tax-exempt interest |
(148) | (127) | (90) | |||||||||
Dividends received deduction |
(17) | (13) | (29) | |||||||||
Valuation allowance |
(66) | (64) | 334 | |||||||||
MLHSBC joint venture exit(1) |
| (81) | | |||||||||
Other |
(13) | 41 | 13 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
$ 1,384 | $ 604 | $ 99 | |||||||||
The 2003 and 2002 effective tax rates reflect net benefits of $220 million and $77 million, respectively, related to changes in estimates for prior years, and settlements with various tax authorities.
Deferred income taxes are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These temporary differences result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Details of Merrill Lynchs deferred tax assets and liabilities follow:
66
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
||||||||||||
Deferred compensation |
$2,667 | $2,826 | $2,078 | |||||||||
Valuation and other reserves |
702 | 595 | 843 | |||||||||
Employee benefits |
139 | 148 | 124 | |||||||||
Restructuring related |
140 | 188 | 616 | |||||||||
Other |
1,016 | 921 | 833 | |||||||||
Gross deferred tax assets |
4,664 | 4,678 | 4,494 | |||||||||
Valuation allowances |
(315) | (330) | (394) | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
4,349 | 4,348 | 4,100 | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||||||
Lease transactions |
66 | 93 | 178 | |||||||||
Employee benefits |
(25) | 107 | 90 | |||||||||
Other |
520 | 409 | 467 | |||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
561 | 609 | 735 | |||||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ 3,788 | $ 3,739 | $ 3,365 | |||||||||
At December 26, 2003, Merrill Lynch had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,911 million and non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of $823 million. The U.S. amounts are primarily state carryforwards expiring in various years after 2007. The non-U.S. amounts are primarily Japan carryforwards expiring in various years after 2003. Merrill Lynch also had approximately $31 million of state tax credit carryforwards expiring in various years after 2005.
The valuation allowance in 2003 decreased primarily due to utilization against earnings in Japan.
Income tax benefits of $370 million, $178 million, and $750 million, were allocated to stockholders equity related to employee stock compensation transactions for 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Cumulative undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries were approximately $5.9 billion at December 26, 2003. No deferred U.S. federal income taxes have been provided for the undistributed earnings to the extent that they are permanently reinvested in Merrill Lynchs non-U.S. operations. It is not practical to determine the amount of additional tax that may be payable in the event these earnings are repatriated.
Note 17. Regulatory Requirements and Dividend Restrictions
Certain U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries are subject to various securities, banking, and insurance regulations and capital adequacy requirements promulgated by the regulatory and exchange authorities of the countries in which they operate. Merrill Lynchs principal regulated subsidiaries are discussed below.
Securities Regulation
MLPF&S, a U.S. registered broker-dealer and futures commission merchant, is
subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and capital requirements of the Commodities Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC). Under the alternative method permitted by Rule
15c3-1, the minimum required net capital, as defined, shall not be less than 2%
of aggregate debit items (ADI) arising from customer transactions. The CFTC
also requires that minimum net capital should not be less than 4% of segregated
and secured requirements. At December 26, 2003, MLPF&Ss regulatory net capital
of $2,704 million was approximately 19% of ADI, and its regulatory net capital
in excess of the minimum required was $2,419 million at 2% of ADI.
67
MLI, a U.K. regulated investment firm, is subject to capital requirements of the Financial Services Authority (FSA). Financial resources, as defined, must exceed the total financial resources requirement of the FSA. At December 26, 2003, MLIs financial resources were $5,753 million, exceeding the minimum requirement by $920 million.
MLGSI, a primary dealer in U.S. Government securities, is subject to the capital adequacy requirements of the Government Securities Act of 1986. This rule requires dealers to maintain liquid capital in excess of market and credit risk, as defined, by 20% (a 1.2-to-1 capital-to-risk standard). At December 26, 2003, MLGSIs liquid capital of $2,031 million was 248% of its total market and credit risk, and liquid capital in excess of the minimum required was $1,046 million.
Banking Regulation
Two subsidiaries of ML & Co., MLBUSA and MLB&T, are required to maintain
capital levels that at least equal minimum capital levels specified in federal
banking laws and regulations. Failure to meet the minimum levels will result in
certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by the
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the
banks. The capital levels, defined as the Tier 1 leverage ratio, the Tier 1
risk-based ratio, and the Total risk-based capital ratio, are calculated as (i)
Tier 1 Capital or Total Capital to (ii) average assets or risk-weighted assets.
MLBUSA and MLB&T each exceed the minimum bank regulatory requirement for
classification as a well-capitalized bank for the Tier 1 leverage ratio 5%,
the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio 6% and the Total risk-based capital ratio
10%. The following table presents the actual capital ratios and amounts for
MLBUSA and MLB&T at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002.
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Actual | Actual | |||||||||||||||
Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | |||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage (to average assets) |
||||||||||||||||
MLBUSA |
6.47% | $ 4,480 | 5.35% | $ 3,740 | ||||||||||||
MLB&T |
6.00 | 857 | 5.42 | 848 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||
MLBUSA |
10.73 | 4,480 | 11.48 | 3,740 | ||||||||||||
MLB&T |
19.18 | 857 | 20.53 | 848 | ||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||
MLBUSA |
11.28 | 4,706 | 12.04 | 3,924 | ||||||||||||
MLB&T |
19.20 | 858 | 20.54 | 848 | ||||||||||||
MLCMB, an Ireland-based regulated bank, is subject to the capital requirements of the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority. The Bank is required to meet minimum regulatory capital requirements under EU banking law. The minimum capital level is defined as a Risk Asset Ratio of 8%. At December 26, 2003, MLCMBs capital ratio was 11.20% and its financial resources, as defined, were $1,606 million.
MLIB, a U.K. regulated bank, is subject to the capital requirements of the FSA. MLIBs overall individual consolidated capital ratio, which is above the minimum capital requirements established by the FSA, was 12.61% as of December 26, 2003 and its consolidated capital base was $1,932 million.
Insurance Regulation
Merrill Lynchs insurance subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory
restrictions that limit the amount available for distribution as dividends. At
December 26, 2003, $730 million, representing 82% of the insurance
subsidiaries net assets, was unavailable for distribution to Merrill Lynch.
68
Other
Approximately 60 other subsidiaries are subject to regulatory and other
requirements of the jurisdictions in which they operate. These regulatory
restrictions may impose regulatory capital requirements and limit the amounts
that these subsidiaries can pay in dividends or advance to Merrill Lynch. At
December 26, 2003, restricted net assets of these subsidiaries were $1.6
billion.
With the exception of regulatory restrictions on subsidiaries abilities to pay dividends, there are no restrictions on ML & Co.s present ability to pay dividends on common stock, other than ML & Co.s obligation to make payments on its preferred stock and TOPrSSM, and the governing provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
69
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (Merrill Lynch) as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 26, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of Merrill Lynchs management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Merrill Lynch at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 26, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 Merrill Lynch changed its method of accounting for goodwill amortization to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2004 Merrill Lynch changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation to conform to SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, and retroactively restated its 2003, 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the 2003, 2002, and 2001 consolidated financial statements have been restated to correct the accounting for certain retail account fees.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
March 1, 2004 (May 4, 2004 as to the effects of the restatement related to stock-based compensation
described in Note 2) (February 3, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement related to the
accounting for certain retail account fees described in Note 2)
70
Supplemental Financial Information (unaudited)
Quarterly Information
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 26, | Sept. | June | Mar. 28, | Dec. | Sept. | June | Mar. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003(a) | 26, | 27, | 2003 | 27, | 27, | 28, | 29, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003(b) | 2003(c) | 2002(d) | 2002(e) | 2002(f) | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Revenues, as reported |
$6,882 | $6,866 | $7,301 | $6,932 | $6,507 | $6,892 | $7,343 | $7,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to correct error |
6 | 3 | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | 10 | 6 | (8 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Revenues, as restated |
6,688 | 6,869 | 7,297 | 6,929 | 6,517 | 6,898 | 7,335 | 7,555 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
Expense, as reported(g) |
1,807 | 1,851 | 2,032 | 2,128 | 2,330 | 2,554 | 2,456 | 2,532 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Revenues, as reported |
4,875 | 5,015 | 5,269 | 4,804 | 4,177 | 4,338 | 4,887 | 5,034 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to correct error |
6 | 3 | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | 10 | 6 | (8 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Revenues, as restated |
4,881 | 5,018 | 5,265 | 4,801 | 4,187 | 4,344 | 4,879 | 5,023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Interest
Expenses, as reported(g) |
3,320 | 3,609 | 3,921 | 3,895 | 3,529 | 3,540 | 4,531 | 4,521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings
Before Income Taxes, as reported |
1,555 | 1,406 | 1,348 | 909 | 648 | 798 | 356 | 513 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to correct error |
6 | 3 | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | 10 | 6 | (8 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings
Before Income Taxes, as restated |
1,561 | 1,409 | 1,344 | 906 | 658 | 804 | 348 | 502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Tax
Expense, as reported |
344 | 403 | 371 | 266 | 140 | 238 | 73 | 154 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to correct error |
2 | 1 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | 4 | 3 | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income Tax
Expense, as restated |
346 | 404 | 370 | 264 | 144 | 241 | 69 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Earnings, as reported |
1,211 | 1,003 | 977 | 643 | 508 | 560 | 283 | 359 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to correct error |
4 | 2 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | 6 | 3 | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Earnings, as restated |
$ 1,215 | $ 1,005 | $ 974 | $ 642 | $ 514 | $ 563 | $ 279 | $ 352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per
common share: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic, as
reported |
$ 1.32 | $ 1.10 | $ 1.08 | $ 0.71 | $ 0.58 | $ 0.64 | $ 0.32 | $ 0.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to correct error |
| | | | | | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic, as
restated |
$ 1.32 | $ 1.10 | $ 1.08 | $ 0.71 | $ 0.58 | $ 0.64 | $ 0.31 | $ 0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted, as
reported |
$ 1.19 | $ 1.00 | $ 1.00 | $ 0.67 | $ 0.53 | $ 0.59 | $ 0.29 | $ 0.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to correct error |
| | | | | | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted, as
restated |
$ 1.19 | $ 1.00 | $ 1.00 | $ 0.67 | $ 0.53 | $ 0.59 | $ 0.28 | $ 0.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
71
Dividends Per Common Share
(declared and paid) | ||||||||||||||||
1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | |||||||||||||
2003 |
$ .16 | $ .16 | $ .16 | $ .16 | ||||||||||||
2002 |
.16 | .16 | .16 | .16 | ||||||||||||
With the exception of regulatory restrictions on subsidiaries abilities to pay dividends, there are no restrictions on ML & Co.s present ability to pay dividends on common stock, other than ML & Co.s obligation to make payments on its preferred stock and TOPrSSM, and the governing provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Certain subsidiaries ability to declare dividends may also be limited. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Stockholder Information
(at calendar period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
$ 43.75 | $ 30.75 | $ 49.20 | $ 35.30 | $ 57.50 | $ 45.83 | $ 60.47 | $ 53.85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
59.32 | 44.15 | 55.20 | 36.50 | 40.71 | 30.99 | 44.91 | 28.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The approximate number of holders of record of ML & Co. common stock as of February 24, 2004 was 19,620. As of February 24, 2004, the closing price of ML & Co. common stock as reported on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System was $60.75.
72