Exhibit 99.2

Schedule I

CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
(Parent Company Only)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(dollars in millions)

Schedule I

CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
(Parent Company Only)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

Schedule I

CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
(Parent Company Only)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in millions)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The condensed unconsolidated financial statements of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“ML & Co.” or the “Parent Company”) should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, “Merrill Lynch”) and the Notes thereto in the Merrill Lynch 2003 Annual Report to Stockholders (the “Annual Report”) included as an exhibit to this Form 8-K. Certain reclassification and format changes have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

Investments in affiliates are accounted for in accordance with the equity method.

For information on the following, refer to the indicated Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements within the Annual Report.

	l		Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Note 1)
	l		Commercial Paper and Short- and Long-Term Borrowings (Note 10)
	l		Stockholders’ Equity and Earnings Per Share (Note 12)
	l		Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees (Note 13)
	l		Employee Benefit Plans (Note 14)
	l		Employee Incentive Plans (Note 15)
	l		Income Taxes (Note 16)

The Parent Company hedges certain risks arising from long-term borrowing payment obligations and investments in and loans to foreign subsidiaries. See Note 10 and the “Derivatives” section of Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report, respectively, for additional information on these hedges.

NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Stock-based Compensation
Effective for the first quarter of 2004, Merrill Lynch adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based accounting under SFAS 123, using the retroactive restatement method described in SFAS 148. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. The December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 Condensed Balance Sheets have been restated for the retroactive adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123. Accordingly, the December 26, 2003 Condensed Balance Sheet reflects a $4.0 billion increase in paid-in capital, a $2.7 billion decrease in retained earnings, and a $1.3 billion increase in deferred income taxes. The December 27, 2002 Condensed Balance Sheet reflects a $3.8 billion increase in paid-in capital, a $2.5 billion decrease in retained earnings, and a $1.3 billion increase in deferred income taxes.

         For the years 2003, 2002, and 2001, $32 million, ($20 million after-tax), $93 million ($58 million after-tax), and $145 million ($90 million after-tax), respectively, of stock option compensation expense was recorded related to the adoption of SFAS 123.

         For the years 2003, 2002, and 2001, after-tax amounts of $134 million, $745 million, and $818 million, respectively, of stock option compensation expense was recorded related to the adoption of SFAS 123 in equity in earnings of affiliates.

NOTE 3. OTHER SIGNIFICANT EVENTS

Restructuring Charge

During the fourth quarter of 2001, Merrill Lynch’s management formally committed to a restructuring plan designed to position Merrill Lynch for improved profitability and growth, which included the resizing of selected businesses and other structural changes.

As a result, in 2001 ML & Co. incurred a fourth quarter pre-tax restructuring charge to earnings of $239 million. In 2002 and 2003, ML & Co. incurred additional pre-tax restructuring charges of $57 million and $13 million, respectively, related to changes in the 2001 restructuring.

Structural changes include targeted workforce reductions of 225 through a combination of involuntary and voluntary separations, across various business groups. At December 28, 2001, the majority of employee separations were completed or announced and all had been identified. Substantially all employee separations were completed in 2002. The remaining employee separations were completed in 2003.

Any unused portion of the original restructuring reserve will be reversed. Utilization of the restructuring reserve and a rollforward of the staff reductions at December 26, 2003 is as follows:

For information on the consolidated restructuring charges, refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

September 11-Related Expenses

On September 11, 2001 terrorists attacked the World Trade Center complex, which subsequently collapsed and damaged surrounding buildings, some of which were occupied by Merrill Lynch. These events caused the temporary relocation of approximately 9,000 employees from Merrill Lynch’s global headquarters in the North Tower of the World Financial Center, the South Tower of the World Financial Center and from offices at 222 Broadway to back-up facilities.

ML & Co. is insured for loss caused by physical damage to property. This coverage includes repair or replacement of property and lost profits due to business interruption, including costs related to lack of access to facilities. In 2003, expenses related to September 11 were $18 million. Expenses related to September 11 were $95 million and $176 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. In 2002, ML & Co. recorded and received September 11-related insurance recoveries of $150 million. In 2001, ML & Co. recorded September 11-related expenses of $71 million, net of insurance recoveries of $105 million. ML & Co. has now concluded its insurance recovery efforts related to the events of September 11. In aggregate, ML & Co. received a total of $255 million of insurance recoveries.

For information on the consolidated September 11-related expenses, refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements within the Annual Report.

NOTE 4. GUARANTEES

ML & Co. guarantees certain senior debt instruments issued by subsidiaries, which totaled $5.4 billion and $5.8 billion in 2003 and 2002, respectively.

In the normal course of business, ML & Co. guarantees certain of its subsidiaries’ obligations under derivative contracts. The current exposure associated with this activity at December 26, 2003 was approximately $40.5 billion, which represents the current fair value of the subsidiaries’ obligations. The maximum payout is not quantifiable because, for example, changes in the value of the underlying of the derivative contract could be unlimited. Under FIN 45, ML & Co. is not required to record a liability for its exposure to guarantees of its subsidiaries’ obligations. Merrill Lynch records all derivative transactions at fair value on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. (See the “Derivatives” section of Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of risk management of derivatives.)

In addition to the derivative contracts described above, ML & Co. guarantees certain liquidity facilities. ML & Co. also provides residual value guarantees associated with the Hopewell campus and aircraft leases of $325 million. As of December 26, 2003, the carrying value of the liability on the Consolidated Financial Statement is $34 million. (See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report for further information.)

ML & Co. also guarantees obligations of the trust that issued Trust Originated Preferred Securities^SM (“TOPrS^SM”) (see Note 5 below and Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report for further information).

NOTE 5. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Investment securities include highly liquid debt securities held for liquidity and collateral purposes. Investment securities reported on the Condensed Balance Sheets at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 are as follows:

Investment securities are classified as available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, or trading as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements within the Annual Report.

Information regarding investment securities subject to SFAS No. 115 follows:

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 26, 2003 by contractual maturity, for available-for-sale investments follow:

The proceeds and gross realized gains (losses) from the sale of available-for-sale investments are as follows:

The following table presents fair value and unrealized losses, after hedges, for available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 26, 2003.

(See Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) and Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report for further information.)

NOTE 6. ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES

Senior advances are provided to regulated and unregulated subsidiaries and have an average maturity of less than one year.

Subordinated loans are provided to regulated subsidiaries and qualify as regulatory capital. As of December 26, 2003, the average maturity of subordinated loans was approximately 2.5 years, with remaining maturities on individual loans ranging from 1 year to 10 years. (See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report for further information.)

Preference securities represent $1.3 billion in Redeemable Cumulative Preferred Stock issued to ML & Co. by an unregulated consolidated Merrill Lynch subsidiary. ML & Co. and the issuing subsidiary have the right and option to redeem any or all of the preferred stock at any time.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (“Merrill Lynch”) as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 26, 2003, and have issued our report thereon dated March 1, 2004 (May 4, 2004 as to the effects of the restatement related to stock-based compensation described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements) (February 3, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement related to the accounting for certain retail account fees described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements), which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs for the change in accounting method in 2002 for goodwill amortization to conform to Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for the change in accounting method in 2004 for stock-based compensation to conform to SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, by retroactively restating its 2003, 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements, and for the restatement to correct the accounting for certain retail account fees; such restated consolidated financial statements and report are included and incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also included the restated financial statement schedule of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., listed in Exhibit 99.2. Such restated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Merrill Lynch’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such restated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic restated consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 1, 2004 (May 4, 2004 as to the effects of the restatement related to stock-based compensation described in Note 2) (February 3, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement related to the accounting for certain retail account fees described in Note 2)