Exhibit 99.7

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited)

(1) Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 2.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited)

(1) Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 2.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(1) Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 2.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(1) Amounts have been restated as discussed in Note 2.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 24, 2004

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

         For a complete discussion of Merrill Lynch’s accounting policies, refer to the restated excerpt of the Annual Report to Shareholders filed as Exhibit 13 to Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2003, which is included as exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.

Basis of Presentation

         The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“ML & Co.”) and subsidiaries (collectively, “Merrill Lynch”), whose subsidiaries are generally controlled through a majority voting interest but may be controlled by means of a significant minority ownership, by contract, lease or otherwise. In certain cases, Merrill Lynch subsidiaries (i.e., Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)) may also be consolidated based on a risks and rewards approach as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Revised Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46R. Intercompany balances have been eliminated. The interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three- and nine- month periods are unaudited; however, in the opinion of Merrill Lynch management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair statement of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been included.

         These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the 2003 Annual Report. The December 26, 2003 restated Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from the consolidated financial statements included in the 2003 Annual Report. The nature of Merrill Lynch’s business is such that the results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. In presenting the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, management makes estimates that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available information. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates and could have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and it is possible that such changes could occur in the near term. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements, where appropriate, to conform to the current period presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements

         On September 30, 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) affirmed its previous consensus regarding Issue 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share. The guidance in this Issue requires that contingently convertible instruments be included in diluted earnings per share computations (if dilutive) regardless of whether the market price trigger has been met. The effective date of this consensus is expected to be for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. Retroactive restatement of earnings per share amounts is required for contingent convertible debt issuances that are outstanding at the effective date. Merrill Lynch currently has two contingently convertible debt issuances outstanding (see Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on LYONs^®) and

estimates that the inclusion of these instruments in the earnings per share computation for the third quarter of 2004 would have resulted in an increase in diluted shares of approximately 6% and a reduction in diluted earnings per share of 3%.

         On December 15, 2003, the FASB issued an Exposure Draft, Earnings Per Share, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 128 (the “Amendment”). The proposed Amendment requires, in part, that for contracts that can be settled in either cash or shares, issuing entities should assume share settlement for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share. The FASB subsequently decided that retroactive restatement of earnings per share is not required for those contracts that are appropriately modified prior to the effective date of the Amendment. This Amendment is expected to be finalized in the fourth quarter of 2004 and effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. Currently, Merrill Lynch has two debt issuances outstanding for which Merrill Lynch has the right to elect cash or share settlement in the event that holders of LYONs^® require Merrill Lynch to repurchase the securities (see Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on LYONs^®). On November 1, 2004, Merrill Lynch entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which it surrendered the right to elect to pay such amounts in common stock and instead will be obligated to pay such amounts when and if required in cash. As a result, the proposed Amendment, if finalized based on the decisions of the Board reached to date, would have no impact on Merrill Lynch’s diluted earnings per share.

         On June 30, 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue 02-14, Whether the Equity Method of Accounting Applies When an Investor Does Not Have an Investment in Voting Stock of an Investee but Exercises Significant Influence through Other Means. The consensus reached indicates that in situations where an investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee, an investor should apply the equity method of accounting only when it has either common stock or “in-substance” common stock of a corporation. The guidance prohibits the application of the equity method in instances where an investment is neither common stock nor “in-substance” common stock. Merrill Lynch will adopt the new guidance in the fourth quarter of 2004 on a prospective basis, and as a result, will adopt the cost method of accounting for certain investments to which the equity method of accounting had previously been applied. Under the equity method of accounting, Merrill Lynch recognized cumulative $320 million in Other Revenues related to one of these investments over the period from the third quarter of 2003 to the third quarter of 2004. Under the cost method of accounting, Merrill Lynch will record income when dividends are declared by the investee.

         On May 19, 2004, the “FASB” issued a final FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, which supersedes FSP 106-1 of the same title issued in January 2004. FSP 106-2 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“the Act”) that was signed into law on December 8, 2003. The Act allows for a tax-free government subsidy to employers providing “actuarially equivalent” prescription drug benefits to its Medicare eligible retirees. Management concluded that the benefits provided under Merrill Lynch’s plan are “actuarially equivalent” to Medicare Part D and qualify for the subsidy provided by the Act. Effective for the third quarter of 2004, Merrill Lynch adopted FSP 106-2 using the prospective application method. As a result, Merrill Lynch’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation has been reduced by approximately $43 million and the net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the third quarter of 2004 has decreased by $1.3 million.

         In March 2004, the EITF reached a final consensus on Issue 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 requires that when

the fair value of an investment security is less than its carrying value, an impairment exists for which the determination must be made as to whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. The EITF 03-1 impairment model applies to all investment securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and to investment securities accounted for under the cost method to the extent an impairment indicator exists. Under the guidance, the determination of whether an impairment is other-than-temporary and therefore would result in a recognized loss depends on market conditions and management’s intent and ability to hold the securities with unrealized losses. In September 2004, the FASB approved FSP EITF 03-1, which defers the effective date for recognition and measurement guidance contained in EITF 03-1 until certain issues are resolved. Merrill Lynch expects that the issues will be resolved in the fourth quarter and will adopt the guidance at the time it is issued. Merrill Lynch previously implemented the disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 in its December 26, 2003 Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 6 to the 2003 Annual Report for additional information.

         On December 23, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits. The revised SFAS No. 132 retains the disclosure requirements in the original statement and requires additional disclosures about pension plan assets, benefit obligations, cash flows, benefit costs and other relevant information. Merrill Lynch adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 132 as of December 26, 2003. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for these disclosures.

         In December of 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 addresses revenue recognition and impairment assessments for certain loans and debt securities that were purchased at a discount that was at least in part due to credit quality. SOP 03-3 states that where expected cash flows from the loan or debt security can be reasonably estimated, the difference between the purchase price and the expected cash flows (i.e., the “accretable yield”) should be accreted into income. In addition, the SOP prohibits the recognition of a reserve for impairment on the purchase date. Further, the SOP requires that the allowance for loan losses be supported through a cash flow analysis, on either an individual or on a pooled basis, for all loans that fall within the scope of the guidance. Merrill Lynch will adopt SOP 03-3 as of the beginning of fiscal year 2005 and is currently assessing the potential impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

         On July 7, 2003, the AICPA issued SOP 03-1, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts. The SOP was effective for financial statements for Merrill Lynch beginning in 2004. The SOP required the establishment of a liability for contracts that contain death or other insurance benefits using a specified reserve methodology that is different from the methodology that Merrill Lynch previously employed. The adoption of SOP 03-1 resulted in an additional $45 million of pre-tax expense in the first quarter of 2004.

         On January 17, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), which clarifies when an entity should consolidate entities that are considered VIEs, and on December 24, 2003 the FASB issued a revised standard (“FIN 46R”). A VIE is an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, and may include many types of Special Purpose Entities (“SPEs”). FIN 46R requires that an entity consolidate a VIE if that enterprise has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns,

or both. FIN 46R does not apply to qualifying special purpose entities (“QSPEs”), the accounting for which is governed by SFAS No. 140. As permitted by the transition guidance in FIN 46R, Merrill Lynch adopted the revised standard on an entity-by-entity basis. At December 26, 2003, Merrill Lynch applied FIN 46R to all VIEs with which it is involved, with the exception of those VIEs that issue Merrill Lynch Trust Originated Preferred Securities (“TOPrS^SM”). The adoption of FIN 46R at December 26, 2003 was reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of March 26, 2004, Merrill Lynch applied FIN 46R to those VIEs that issue TOPrS^SM . As a result, these VIEs were deconsolidated. The deconsolidation of TOPrS^SM did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Merrill Lynch and was reported by retroactively restating prior period financial statements. See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional FIN 46R disclosure.

Note 2. Accounting Changes

Retail Account Fees

In the fourth quarter of 2004, subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 24, 2004, Merrill Lynch corrected its method of accounting to recognize certain retail account fees over the contract period instead of when the fees were received, and prior period results have been restated to correct the previous error. These account fees are included in Asset management and portfolio service fees on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings. This restatement resulted in a cumulative decrease to stockholders’ equity of $73 million, or 0.2% as of September 24, 2004. This restatement also resulted in decreases to retained earnings of $73 million and $66 million, as of September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively, with corresponding increases in deferred revenues of $121 million and $109 million, respectively, and increases to deferred income taxes of $48 million and $43 million, respectively. Further details of this change are as follows:

Stock-based Compensation
On December 31, 2002 the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Effective for the first quarter of 2004, Merrill Lynch adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123, using the retroactive restatement method described in SFAS No.148. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. The December 26, 2003 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three and nine months ended September 26, 2003 have been restated for the retroactive adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123.

         Accordingly, the December 26, 2003 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects a $4.0 billion increase in paid-in capital, a $2.7 billion decrease in retained earnings, and a $1.3 billion increase in deferred income tax assets. See Note 15 to the 2003 Annual Report for additional information related to stock-based compensation.

Note 3. Other Significant Events

Restructuring and Other Charges

         During the fourth quarter of 2001, Merrill Lynch’s management formally committed to a restructuring plan designed to position Merrill Lynch for improved profitability and growth, which included the resizing of selected businesses and other structural changes. As a result, Merrill Lynch incurred a 2001 fourth quarter pre-tax charge to earnings of $2.2 billion, which included restructuring costs of $1.8 billion and other charges of $396 million. Utilization of the restructuring reserve at September 24, 2004 is as follows:

Note 4. Segment Information

         In reporting to management, Merrill Lynch’s operating results are categorized into three business segments: the Global Markets and Investment Banking Group (“GMI”), Global Private Client (“GPC”) and Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (“MLIM”). Prior period amounts have been restated to reflect the retroactive restatement for accounting for stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123, and to conform to the current period presentation. For information on each segment’s business activities, see the 2003 Annual Report.
Results by business segment are as follows:

Note 5. Investment Securities

         Investment securities at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003 are presented below:

Note 6. Securitization Transactions and Transactions with Special Purpose Entities (SPEs)

         In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch securitizes commercial and residential mortgage and home equity loans; municipal, government, and corporate bonds; and other types of financial assets. SPEs are often used when entering into or facilitating securitization transactions. Merrill Lynch’s involvement with SPEs used to securitize financial assets includes: establishing SPEs; selling assets to SPEs; structuring SPEs; underwriting, distributing, and making loans to SPEs; making markets in securities issued by SPEs; engaging in derivative transactions with SPEs; owning notes or certificates issued by SPEs; and/or providing liquidity facilities and other guarantees to SPEs.

         Merrill Lynch securitized assets of $48.6 billion and $48.5 billion for the nine months ended September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively. For the nine months ended September 24, 2004, and September 26, 2003, Merrill Lynch received $49.2 billion and $49.1 billion, respectively, of proceeds, and other cash inflows, from new securitization transactions, and recognized net securitization gains of $341 million and $190 million, respectively, in Merrill Lynch’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The increase in the net gains in 2004 reflects a higher proportion of more profitable securitization transactions. Merrill Lynch generally records assets prior to securitization at fair value.

         For the first nine months of 2004 and 2003, cash inflows from securitizations related to the following asset types:

         Retained interests in securitized assets were approximately $2.0 billion and $2.7 billion at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively, which related primarily to residential mortgage loan and municipal bond securitization transactions. The majority of the retained interest balance consists of mortgage-backed securities that have observable market prices. These retained interests include mortgage-backed securities that Merrill Lynch has purchased and expects to sell to investors in the normal course of its underwriting activity.

         The following table presents information on retained interests, excluding the offsetting benefit of financial instruments used to hedge risks, held by Merrill Lynch as of September 24, 2004 arising from Merrill Lynch’s residential mortgage loan, municipal bond and other securitization transactions. The sensitivities of the current fair value of the retained interests to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions and parameters are also shown.

         The preceding table does not include the offsetting benefit of financial instruments that Merrill Lynch utilizes to hedge risks including credit, interest rate, and prepayment risk that are inherent in the retained interests. Merrill Lynch employs hedging strategies that are structured to take into consideration the hypothetical stress scenarios above such that they would be effective in principally offsetting Merrill Lynch’s exposure to loss in the event these scenarios occur. In addition, the sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and should be used with caution. In particular, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated independent of changes in any other assumption; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Further, changes in fair value based on a 10% or 20% variation in an assumption or parameter generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the sensitivity analysis does not consider any hedging activity that Merrill Lynch may take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in the key assumptions.

         The weighted average assumptions and parameters used initially to value retained interests relating to securitizations effected in 2004 that were still held by Merrill Lynch as of September 24, 2004 are as follows:

         For residential mortgage loan and other securitizations, the investors and the securitization trust have no recourse to Merrill Lynch’s other assets for failure of mortgage holders to pay when due.

         For municipal bond securitization SPEs, in the normal course of dealer market-making activities, Merrill Lynch acts as liquidity provider. Specifically, the holders of beneficial interests issued by municipal bond securitization SPEs have the right to tender their interests for purchase by Merrill Lynch on specified dates at a specified price. Beneficial interests that are tendered are then sold by Merrill Lynch to investors through a best efforts remarketing where Merrill Lynch is the remarketing agent. If the beneficial interests are not successfully remarketed, the holders of beneficial interests are paid from funds drawn under a standby liquidity letter of credit issued by Merrill Lynch.

         Merrill Lynch also provides default protection or credit enhancement to investors in securities issued by certain municipal bond securitization SPEs. Interest and principal payments on beneficial interests issued by these SPEs are secured by a guarantee issued by Merrill Lynch. In the event that the issuer of the underlying municipal bond defaults on any payment of principal and/or interest when due, the payments on the bonds will be made to beneficial interest holders from an irrevocable guarantee by Merrill Lynch.

         The maximum commitment under these liquidity and default guarantees totaled $19.8 billion and $17.0 billion at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively. The fair value of the

commitments approximated $152 million and $126 million at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively, which is reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Of these arrangements, $3.1 billion and $2.8 billion at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively, represent agreements where the guarantee is provided to the SPE by a third party financial intermediary and Merrill Lynch enters into a reimbursement agreement with the financial intermediary. In these arrangements, if the financial intermediary incurs losses, Merrill Lynch has up to one year to fund those losses. Additional information regarding these commitments is provided in Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and in Note 13 in the 2003 Annual Report.

         The following table summarizes principal amounts outstanding and delinquencies of securitized financial assets as of September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, and net credit losses for the year-to-date periods then ended.

Variable Interest Entities

         In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, which provides additional guidance on the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, for enterprises that have interests in entities that meet the definition of a VIE, and on December 24, 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46R. FIN 46R requires that an entity shall consolidate a VIE if that enterprise has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, or both.

         As permitted under the transition guidance, Merrill Lynch adopted the provisions of FIN 46R on an entity-by-entity basis. At December 26, 2003 Merrill Lynch applied FIN 46R for purposes of determining those VIEs that must be consolidated or disclosed as giving rise to a significant variable interest, with the exception of those VIEs that issue TOPrS^SM, in which case Merrill Lynch applied FIN 46R beginning in the first quarter of 2004. Merrill Lynch accounted for those VIEs that were consolidated under FIN 46R at year-end 2003 as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, which did not have a material effect on the year-end 2003 consolidated financial statements.

         During the first quarter of 2004, in accordance with FIN 46R, Merrill Lynch deconsolidated the partnerships and trusts that issue TOPrS^SM since Merrill Lynch does not bear the majority of the risks and rewards of those entities. As a result, the dividends, of approximately $48 million per quarter, related to the TOPrS^SM have been reclassified from dividends on preferred securities

issued by subsidiaries to net revenues (primarily interest expense), and the debt, of approximately $3.2 billion, and partnership interests, of $564 million, related to the entities have been included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-term debt issued to TOPrS^SM partnerships and Investment securities, respectively. Merrill Lynch has reflected the deconsolidation of TOPrS^SM by retroactively restating prior period financial statements in order to provide comparability from period to period.

         Merrill Lynch has entered into transactions with a number of VIEs in which it is the primary beneficiary and therefore must consolidate the VIE; or is a significant variable interest holder in the VIE. These VIEs are as follows:

	•		Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary of VIEs that own convertible bonds purchased from Merrill Lynch, in which Merrill Lynch maintains a call option to repurchase the convertible bonds from the VIE. The purpose of these VIEs is to market convertible bonds to a broad investor base by separating the bonds into callable debt and a conversion call option. Assets held by these VIEs are reported in Equities and convertible debentures or Receivables under resale agreements, depending on the nature of the transaction, in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Holders of the beneficial interests in these VIEs have no recourse to the general credit of Merrill Lynch; their investment is paid exclusively from the convertible bonds held by the VIE.
	•		Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary of “maturity shortening transactions,” in which the VIE serves to shorten the maturity of a fixed income security, and, at the maturity date of the VIE, Merrill Lynch has the obligation to repurchase some or all of the securities held by the VIE. Assets held by these VIEs are reported in Trading assets (Corporate debt and preferred stock). The beneficial interest holders in these VIEs have recourse to Merrill Lynch to the extent that the underlying assets that Merrill Lynch is required to repurchase have declined in value from the initial transaction date.
	•		Merrill Lynch is the sponsor and/or guarantor of certain mutual funds, closed-end funds and similar investment entities that provide a guaranteed return to the investors at the maturity of the fund. This guarantee may include a guarantee of the return of an initial investment or of the initial investment plus an agreed upon return depending on the terms of the funds. Although the investors typically hold voting equity in the entity, these entities are deemed to be VIEs because their losses are limited. Investors in these VIEs have recourse to Merrill Lynch to the extent that the value of the assets held by the VIEs at maturity is less than the guaranteed amount. In some instances Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the fund. In instances where Merrill Lynch is not the primary beneficiary, the guarantees related to these funds are considered to be a significant variable interest and further discussed in Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
	•		Merrill Lynch has made loans to, and/or investments in, VIEs that hold loan receivable assets and real estate, and as a result of these loans and investments, Merrill Lynch may be either the primary beneficiary of and consolidate the VIE, or may be a significant variable interest holder. These VIEs are primarily designed to provide temporary on or off-balance sheet financing to clients and/or to invest in real estate. Assets held by VIEs where Merrill Lynch has provided financing and is the primary beneficiary are recorded in Other assets and/or Loans, notes, and mortgages in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Assets held by VIEs where Merrill Lynch has invested in real estate partnerships are classified as Investment securities where Merrill Lynch holds a significant variable interest, and in Other assets where Merrill Lynch is the primary

         The following tables summarize Merrill Lynch’s involvement with the VIEs listed above as of September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively. Where an entity is a significant variable interest holder, FIN 46R requires that entity to disclose its maximum exposure to loss as a result of its interest in the VIE. It should be noted that this measure does not reflect Merrill Lynch’s estimate of the actual losses that could result from adverse changes because it does not reflect the economic hedges Merrill Lynch enters into to reduce its exposure.

Note 7. Loans, Notes, and Mortgages and Related Commitments to Extend Credit

         Loans, Notes, and Mortgages and related commitments to extend credit at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, are presented below:

         The loan amounts are net of an allowance for loan losses of $314 million and $318 million as of September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively.

         Consumer and small- and middle-market business loans, substantially all of which are secured by real and/or personal property, consisted of approximately 213,500 individual loans at September 24, 2004 and included residential mortgages, home equity loans, small- and middle-market business loans, and other loans to individuals for household, family, or other personal expenditures. Commercial loans, which at September 24, 2004 consisted of approximately 7,200 separate loans, included syndicated loans and other loans to corporations and other businesses. Secured loans and commitments include lending activities made in the normal course of Merrill Lynch’s securities and financing businesses. The investment grade and non-investment grade categorization is determined using the credit rating agency equivalent of internal credit ratings. Non-investment grade counterparties are those rated lower than BBB or equivalent ratings by recognized credit rating agencies. Merrill Lynch enters into credit default swaps to mitigate credit exposure primarily related to funded and unfunded unsecured commercial loans. The notional value of these swaps totaled $5.5 billion and $4.9 billion at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively.

         The above amounts include $7.5 billion and $7.6 billion of loans held-for-sale at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively. Loans held-for-sale are loans which management expects to sell prior to maturity. At September 24, 2004, such loans consisted of $4.5 billion of consumer loans, primarily residential mortgages, and $3.0 billion of commercial loans, approximately 48% of which are to investment grade counterparties. At December 26, 2003, such loans consisted of $5.2 billion of consumer loans, primarily residential mortgages, and $2.4 billion of commercial loans, approximately 59% of which were to investment grade counterparties. For information on the accounting policy related to loans, notes, and mortgages, see Note 1 in the 2003 Annual Report.

Note 8. Commercial Paper, Short- and Long-Term Borrowings, and Bank Deposits

         ML & Co. is the primary issuer of all debt instruments. For local tax or regulatory reasons, debt is also issued by certain subsidiaries.

         Total borrowings at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003, which is comprised of Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings, Long-term borrowings and Long-term debt issued to TOPrS^SM partnerships, consisted of the following:

         These borrowing activities may create exposure to market risk, most notably interest rate, equity, and currency risk. Refer to Note 1 in the 2003 Annual Report, Derivatives section, for additional information on the use of derivatives to hedge these risks and the accounting for derivatives embedded in these instruments. Other subsidiary financing — non-recourse is primarily attributable to entities qualifying as VIEs, in accordance with FIN46R. Additional information regarding VIEs is provided in Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Variable Interest Entities section.

         Borrowings and Bank deposits at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003 are presented below:

         Long-term borrowings, including adjustments related to fair value hedges and various equity-linked or other indexed instruments, at September 24, 2004, mature as follows:

         Certain long-term borrowing agreements contain provisions whereby the borrowings are redeemable at the option of the holder at specified dates prior to maturity. Management believes, however, that a portion of such borrowings will remain outstanding beyond their earliest redemption date. A limited number of notes whose coupon or repayment terms are linked to the performance of individual equity securities, or baskets of securities, or equity or other indices, may be accelerated based on the value of a referenced index or security, in which case Merrill Lynch may be required to immediately settle the obligation for cash or other securities. Merrill Lynch typically hedges these notes with positions in derivatives and/or in the underlying securities. Merrill Lynch also makes markets buying and selling its debt instruments, including such notes.

         Senior debt issued by ML & Co. and senior debt issued by subsidiaries guaranteed by ML & Co. do not contain provisions that could, upon an adverse change in ML & Co.’s credit rating, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows, or ML & Co. stock price, trigger a requirement for an early payment, additional collateral support, changes in terms, acceleration of maturity, or the creation of an additional financial obligation.

         The effective weighted-average interest rates for borrowings, at September 24, 2004 and December 26, 2003 were:

         Merrill Lynch issues debt and certificates of deposit whose coupons or repayment terms are linked to the performance of individual equity securities, or baskets of securities, or equity or other indices (e.g., S&P 500). These instruments are assessed to determine if there is an embedded derivative that requires separate reporting and accounting. Beginning in 2004, in accordance with SEC guidance, Merrill Lynch amortizes any upfront profit associated with the embedded derivative into income as a yield adjustment over the life of the related debt instrument or certificate of deposit.

         On June 30, 2004, Merrill Lynch redeemed its Yen TOPrS^SM debentures, which were due on June 30, 2019, pursuant to the optional redemption provisions stated in the terms and conditions of the debentures. Such redemption resulted in a cash payment of $107.1 million. No gain or loss was recognized on the transaction.

Long-term borrowings/LYONs^®

         In March 2002, Merrill Lynch issued $2.3 billion of aggregate original principal amount of floating rate zero-coupon contingently convertible debt (Liquid Yield Option^TM notes or LYONs^®) at an issue price of $1,000 per note. At maturity, the LYONs^® holder will receive the original principal amount of $1,000 increased daily by a variable rate. The LYONs^® are unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Merrill Lynch with a maturity date of 30 years. Merrill Lynch will pay no interest prior to maturity unless, during any six-month period beginning June 1, 2007, the average market price of a LYONs^® for a certain period exceeds 120% of the accreted value of the LYONs^®. Holders of LYONs^® may convert each security into 13.8213 shares (i.e., the “conversion rate”) of Merrill Lynch common stock based on the conditions described below.

         In May 2001, Merrill Lynch issued $4.6 billion of aggregate original principal amount of fixed rate contingently convertible LYONs^® at an issue price of $511.08 per note, which resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $2.4 billion. Each note has a yield to maturity of 2.25% with a maturity value of $1,000 on May 23, 2031. Merrill Lynch is amortizing the issue discount using the effective interest method over the term of the LYONs^®. The LYONs^® are unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness of Merrill Lynch with a maturity of 30 years. Merrill Lynch will pay no interest prior to maturity unless, during any six-month period beginning June 1, 2006, the average market price of a LYONs^® for a certain period exceeds 120% of the accreted value of the LYONs^®. Holders of LYONs^® may convert each security into 5.6787 shares (i.e., the “conversion rate”) of common stock based on the conditions described below.

         Both Merrill Lynch LYONs^® issuances may be converted based on any of the following conditions:

	•		If the closing price of Merrill Lynch common stock for at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last day of the calendar quarter is more than the conversion trigger price. The conversion trigger price for the floating rate LYONs® at September 30, 2004 was $86.82. (That is, on and after October 1, 2004, a holder could have converted a floating rate LYONs® into 13.8213 shares of Merrill Lynch stock if the Merrill Lynch stock price had been greater than $86.82 for at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days ending September 30, 2004). The conversion trigger price for the fixed rate LYONs® at September 30, 2004 was $115.43. The conversion trigger price will change each calendar quarter based on the accreted value of the LYONs® at that date;
	•		During any period in which the credit rating of LYONs® is Baa1 or lower by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc., BBB+ or lower by Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services, or BBB+ or lower by Fitch, Inc;
	•		If the LYONs® are called for redemption;
	•		If Merrill Lynch is party to a consolidation, merger or binding share exchange; or
	•		If Merrill Lynch makes a distribution that has a per share value equal to more than 15% of the sale price of its shares on the day preceding the declaration date for such distribution.

         The conversion rate for both of Merrill Lynch’s LYONs^® will be adjusted for:

	•		Dividends or distributions payable in Merrill Lynch common stock.
	•		Distributions to all holders of Merrill Lynch common stock of certain rights to purchase the stock at less than the sale price of Merrill Lynch stock at that time.
	•		Distribution of Merrill Lynch assets to holders of Merrill Lynch common stock (excluding cash dividends that are not extraordinary dividends), or
	•		Certain corporate events, such as consolidation, merger or transfer of all, or substantially all, of Merrill Lynch’s assets.

         As of September 24, 2004 (fiscal quarter end) and September 30, 2004 (last conversion calculation date prior to issuance of this report), none of the conversion triggers above had been met and, as a result, the related shares have not been included in the diluted EPS calculation.

         Holders of LYONs^® may required Merrill Lynch to repurchase their convertible instruments at accreted value on various dates prior to maturity. The initial put date for holders of floating rate LYONs^® is March 13, 2005. The initial put date for fixed rate LYONs^® was May 23, 2004. Merrill Lynch elected to pay the purchase price for the $166.3 million fixed rate LYONs^® that were put back to Merrill Lynch on May 24, 2004 with cash. No gain or loss was recognized on the transaction. Holders of the LYONs ^® have the right to require Merrill Lynch to purchase the securities on certain specified dates. Pursuant to the indentures, Merrill Lynch had the right to elect to pay the purchase price payable upon exercise of such put rights in cash or common stock, or a combination thereof. Merrill Lynch entered into supplemental indentures on November 1, 2004 pursuant to which it surrendered the right to elect to pay such amounts in common stock and instead will be obligated to pay such amounts when and if required only in cash. The supplemental indentures do not affect Merrill Lynch’s obligation to deliver common stock upon conversion of the LYONs ^® should they become convertible.

         In October 2004, Merrill Lynch repurchased outstanding LYONs^® with a face value of $1.0 billion.

         For further information regarding Merrill Lynch LYONs^® issuances, refer to Note 1, New Accounting Pronouncements, and Note 10 to the 2003 Annual Report.

Note 9. Comprehensive Income

         The components of comprehensive income are as follows: