UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
X
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2009
|
|
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file
number: 1-7182
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-2740599
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of America Corporate Center
100 N. Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
|
28255
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
(704) 386-5681
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
X YES NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
X YES NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer X
|
Accelerated filer
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
Smaller reporting company
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
YES X NO
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE
ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
As of the close of business on November 6, 2009, there were
1,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding, all of which were
held by Bank of America Corporation.
The registrant is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of
America Corporation and meets the conditions set forth in
General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of
Form 10-Q
and is therefore filing this Form with a reduced disclosure
format as permitted by Instruction H(2).
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,573
|
)
|
Commissions
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
Managed accounts and other fee-based revenues
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
Investment banking
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Earnings from equity method investments
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
4,401
|
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses on AFS debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary
impairment losses on AFS debt securities
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Portion of
other-than-temporary
impairment losses recognized in OCI on AFS debt securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
4,824
|
|
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
Interest and dividend revenues
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
Less interest expense
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
|
7,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest profit
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net of interest expense
|
|
|
5,102
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
Communications and technology
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
Occupancy and related depreciation
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
Brokerage, clearing, and exchange fees
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Advertising and market development
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Office supplies and postage
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Other
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
Payment related to price reset on common stock offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
|
8,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax earnings/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
(8,251
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
(5,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss)
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.56
|
)
|
Basic loss per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.56
|
)
|
Diluted loss per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid per common share
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares used in computing losses per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
1,339.0
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
1,339.0
|
|
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings/(Loss) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
For the Period from
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 27, 2008
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
to December 31, 2008
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
4,047
|
|
|
|
$
|
(280
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,074
|
)
|
Commissions
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
Managed accounts and other fee-based revenues
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
4,249
|
|
Investment banking
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
Earnings from equity method investments
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(6,310
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses on AFS debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary
impairment losses on AFS debt securities
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Portion of
other-than-temporary
impairment losses recognized in OCI on AFS debt securities
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
16,115
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
Interest and dividend revenues
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
28,415
|
|
Less interest expense
|
|
|
8,831
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest profit
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net of interest expense
|
|
|
16,789
|
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
9,203
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
11,170
|
|
Communications and technology
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
Occupancy and related depreciation
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
Brokerage, clearing, and exchange fees
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
Advertising and market development
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
Office supplies and postage
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
Payment related to price reset on common stock offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
14,354
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
20,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax earnings/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(19,663
|
)
|
Income tax expense/(benefit)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(7,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(11,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss)
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
$
|
(153
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
$
|
(153
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.16
|
)
|
Basic loss per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.16
|
)
|
Diluted loss per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid per common share
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares used in computing losses per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
1,600.3
|
|
|
|
1,098.6
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
1,600.3
|
|
|
|
1,098.6
|
|
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,697
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes or
deposited with clearing organizations
|
|
|
23,796
|
|
|
|
|
32,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities financing transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements (includes $52,436 in 2009
and $62,146 in 2008 measured at fair value in accordance with
the fair value option election)
|
|
|
69,948
|
|
|
|
|
93,247
|
|
Receivables under securities borrowed transactions (includes
$993 in 2009 and $853 in 2008 measured at fair value in
accordance with the fair value option election)
|
|
|
53,062
|
|
|
|
|
35,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,010
|
|
|
|
|
128,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets, at fair value (includes securities pledged as
collateral that can be sold or repledged of $22,775 in 2009 and
$18,663 in 2008):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
58,190
|
|
|
|
|
89,477
|
|
Corporate debt and preferred stock
|
|
|
22,822
|
|
|
|
|
30,829
|
|
Equities and convertible debentures
|
|
|
28,018
|
|
|
|
|
26,160
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
21,538
|
|
|
|
|
6,107
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
|
13,786
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
|
5,253
|
|
Municipals, money markets and physical commodities
|
|
|
6,838
|
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,053
|
|
|
|
|
175,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities (includes $272 in 2009 and $2,770 in 2008
measured at fair value in accordance with the fair value option
election) (includes securities pledged as collateral that can be
sold or repledged of $0 in 2009 and $2,557 in 2008)
|
|
|
33,916
|
|
|
|
|
57,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities received as collateral, at fair value
|
|
|
15,224
|
|
|
|
|
11,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from Bank of America
|
|
|
21,446
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 in 2009
and $143 in 2008)
|
|
|
27,136
|
|
|
|
|
51,131
|
|
Brokers and dealers
|
|
|
10,411
|
|
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
Interest and other
|
|
|
14,750
|
|
|
|
|
26,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,297
|
|
|
|
|
89,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes, and mortgages (net of allowances for loan losses
of $114 in 2009 and $2,072 in 2008) (includes $4,765 in 2009 and
$979 in 2008 measured at fair value in accordance with the fair
value option election)
|
|
|
67,729
|
|
|
|
|
69,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and facilities (net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $571 in 2009 and $5,856 in 2008)
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
9,326
|
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,119
|
|
|
|
|
29,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
536,057
|
|
|
|
$
|
667,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities financing transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables under repurchase agreements (includes $49,501 in 2009
and $32,910 in 2008 measured at fair value in accordance with
the fair value option election)
|
|
$
|
65,966
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,654
|
|
Payables under securities loaned transactions
|
|
|
21,369
|
|
|
|
|
24,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,335
|
|
|
|
|
117,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings (includes $568 in 2009 and $3,387 in 2008
measured at fair value in accordance with the fair value option
election)
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
37,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
47,819
|
|
|
|
|
96,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
41,440
|
|
|
|
|
71,363
|
|
Equities and convertible debentures
|
|
|
12,715
|
|
|
|
|
7,871
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
19,906
|
|
|
|
|
4,345
|
|
Corporate debt and preferred stock
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
Municipals, money markets and other
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,214
|
|
|
|
|
89,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation to return securities received as collateral, at fair
value
|
|
|
15,224
|
|
|
|
|
11,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to Bank of America
|
|
|
26,864
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
|
|
|
38,547
|
|
|
|
|
44,924
|
|
Brokers and dealers
|
|
|
16,444
|
|
|
|
|
12,553
|
|
Interest and other (includes $287 in 2009 measured at fair value
in accordance with the fair value option election)
|
|
|
21,359
|
|
|
|
|
32,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,350
|
|
|
|
|
90,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings (includes $48,847 in 2009 and $49,521 in
2008 measured at fair value in accordance with the fair value
option election)
|
|
|
161,444
|
|
|
|
|
199,678
|
|
Junior subordinated notes (related to trust preferred securities)
|
|
|
3,546
|
|
|
|
|
5,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
497,482
|
|
|
|
|
647,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stockholders Equity; authorized
25,000,000 shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(liquidation preference of $30,000 per share; issued:
2008 244,100 shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidation preference of $1,000 per share; issued:
2008 115,000 shares; liquidation preference of
$100,000 per share; issued: 2009 17,000 shares;
issued: 2008 17,000 shares)
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
|
8,605
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (par value
$1.331/3
per share; authorized: 3,000,000,000 shares; issued:
2009 1,000 shares; issued: 2008
2,031,995,436 shares)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
34,969
|
|
|
|
|
47,232
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) (net of tax)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6,318
|
)
|
Retained earnings/ (Accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
|
(8,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,034
|
|
|
|
|
35,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Treasury stock, at cost (2009 None;
2008 431,742,565 shares)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
23,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Common Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
37,034
|
|
|
|
|
11,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
38,575
|
|
|
|
|
20,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
536,057
|
|
|
|
$
|
667,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss)
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11,768
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings/(loss) to cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
Payment related to price reset on common stock offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
|
(5,571
|
)
|
Gain on sale of Bloomberg L.P.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(4,296
|
)
|
Earnings/(loss) from equity method investments
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
|
21,400
|
|
|
|
|
45,311
|
|
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or deposited with clearing organizations
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
Receivables from Bank of America
|
|
|
(51,279
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements
|
|
|
33,799
|
|
|
|
|
57,151
|
|
Receivables under securities borrowed transactions
|
|
|
(17,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
33,544
|
|
Customer receivables
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
|
(13,359
|
)
|
Brokers and dealers receivables
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
(10,905
|
)
|
Proceeds from loans, notes, and mortgages held for sale
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
|
|
|
18,550
|
|
Other changes in loans, notes, and mortgages held for sale
|
|
|
(6,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,264
|
)
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
|
(11,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
(37,082
|
)
|
Payables under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
(21,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
(63,702
|
)
|
Payables under securities loaned transactions
|
|
|
(3,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,686
|
)
|
Payables to Bank of America
|
|
|
26,864
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Customer payables
|
|
|
(6,385
|
)
|
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
Brokers and dealers payables
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
Trading investment securities
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
|
(14,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
6,426
|
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (payments for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
5,692
|
|
|
|
|
5,978
|
|
Sales of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
9,613
|
|
|
|
|
27,218
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
(29,121
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
Equipment and facilities, net
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
Loans, notes, and mortgages held for investment
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
|
(11,240
|
)
|
Other investments
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
|
1,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
21,562
|
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (payments for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(36,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
Issuance and resale of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
7,102
|
|
|
|
|
64,851
|
|
Settlement and repurchases of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(46,489
|
)
|
|
|
|
(83,353
|
)
|
Capital contributions from Bank of America
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
7,514
|
|
|
|
|
(13,986
|
)
|
Derivative financing transactions
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
9,885
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
9,281
|
|
Other common stock transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used for) financing activities
|
|
|
(61,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(33,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,940
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period(1)
|
|
|
52,603
|
|
|
|
|
41,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
18,697
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (net of refunds)
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
9,739
|
|
|
|
|
26,529
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
In connection with the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank
of America, Merrill Lynch recorded purchase accounting
adjustments in the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
which were recorded as non-cash capital contributions. See
Note 2.
In connection with the sale of Merrill Lynch Bank USA to a
subsidiary of Bank of America, Merrill Lynch received a note
receivable as consideration for the net book value of assets and
liabilities transferred to Bank of America. See Note 21.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount for Successor Company is
as of January 1, 2009. |
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
September 26,
2008
|
|
September 26,
2008
|
Net earnings/(loss)
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,768
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
Net unrealized (loss) on investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
(680
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(2,358
|
)
|
Net deferred gain/(loss) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,801
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
September 30, 2009
Description
of Business
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (ML &
Co.) and together with its subsidiaries (Merrill
Lynch), provide investment, financing, insurance, and
related services to individuals and institutions on a global
basis through its broker, dealer, banking and other financial
services subsidiaries. For a complete discussion of significant
accounting policies, refer to the Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Merrill Lynchs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year-ended December 26, 2008 (the 2008 Annual
Report).
Bank of
America Acquisition
On January 1, 2009, Merrill Lynch (the Predecessor
Company) was acquired by Bank of America Corporation
(Bank of America) through the merger of a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America with and into
ML & Co. with ML & Co. (the Successor
Company) continuing as the surviving corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America. Upon completion of
the acquisition, each outstanding share of ML & Co.
common stock was converted into 0.8595 shares of Bank of
America common stock. As of the completion of the acquisition,
ML & Co. Series 1 through Series 8 preferred
stock were converted into Bank of America preferred stock with
substantially identical terms to the corresponding series of
Merrill Lynch preferred stock (except for additional voting
rights provided to the Bank of America securities). The Merrill
Lynch 9.00% Non-Voting Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative
Preferred Stock, Series 2, and 9.00% Non-Voting Mandatory
Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 3 that
were outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the
acquisition remained issued and outstanding subsequent to the
acquisition, but are now convertible into Bank of America common
stock.
Bank of Americas cost of acquiring Merrill Lynch has been
pushed down to form a new accounting basis for Merrill Lynch.
Accordingly, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements are presented for two periods, Predecessor and
Successor, which respectively correspond to the periods
preceding and succeeding the date of acquisition. The
Predecessor and Successor periods have been separated by a
vertical line on the face of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements to highlight the fact that the financial
information for such periods has been prepared under two
different cost bases of accounting. The components of the
Predecessor Companys shareholders equity (with the
exception of $1.5 billion of convertible preferred stock
discussed above) were reclassified to
paid-in-capital
on January 1, 2009.
Effective January 1, 2009, Merrill Lynch adopted calendar
quarter-end and year-end reporting periods to coincide with
those of Bank of America. The intervening period between Merrill
Lynchs previous fiscal year end (December 26,
2008) and the beginning of the current year
(January 1, 2009) (the stub period) is
presented separately on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings/(Loss) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Basis of
Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of Merrill Lynch. The Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements are presented in accordance with U.S. Generally
8
Accepted Accounting Principles. Intercompany transactions and
balances within Merrill Lynch have been eliminated. Transactions
and balances with Bank of America have not been eliminated. The
interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the
three and nine month periods and the stub period are unaudited;
however, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been
included.
During the third quarter of 2009, Merrill Lynch adjusted
previously reported prior period 2009 amounts related to the
valuation of certain long-term borrowings, primarily structured
notes. The impact of these adjustments reduced principal
transactions revenues by $252 million and $178 million
and net earnings by $176 million and $160 million for
the first and second quarters of 2009, respectively. The results
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are
appropriately stated. Historical quarterly results presented in
future filings will include the impact of these revisions.
These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated
Financial Statements included in the 2008 Annual Report, while
recognizing that two different bases of accounting are
presented. The nature of Merrill Lynchs business is such
that the results of any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Merrill Lynch evaluates
subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. In
addition, certain changes have been made to classifications in
the financial statements as of and for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 to conform to Bank of
Americas presentation of similar transactions. These
changes include:
|
|
|
The reclassification of bifurcated embedded derivatives from the
balance sheet classification of the host instrument (e.g.,
long-term borrowings for structured notes) to derivative
contracts within trading assets and liabilities;
|
|
|
The reclassification of derivatives that had been used for asset
and liability management hedging from other assets and other
payables-interest and other to derivative contracts within
trading assets and trading liabilities;
|
|
|
The reclassification of certain loans designated as held for
trading, held for sale or held for investment to either held for
sale or held for investment; and
|
|
|
The reclassification of the financing provided to Bloomberg,
Inc. in connection with the sale of Merrill Lynchs
interest in Bloomberg, L.P. from investment securities to loans,
notes and mortgages.
|
Merrill Lynch did not make any significant changes to its
Predecessor Company accounting policies in order to conform with
the accounting policies utilized by Bank of America.
In July 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 105, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, (ASC 105), which approved the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (the Codification) as the
single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The
Codification is effective for interim or annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards
have been superseded and all other accounting literature not
included in the Codification will be considered
nonauthoritative. The adoption of ASC 105 did not impact
Merrill Lynchs financial condition or results of
operations. All accounting references within this report are in
accordance with the new Codification.
9
Consolidation
Accounting Policies
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of Merrill Lynch, whose subsidiaries are generally
controlled through a majority voting interest. In certain cases,
Merrill Lynch subsidiaries may also be consolidated based on a
risks and rewards approach. Merrill Lynch does not consolidate
those special purpose entities that meet the criteria of a
qualified special purpose entity (QSPE).
Merrill Lynch determines whether it is required to consolidate
an entity by first evaluating whether the entity qualifies as a
voting rights entity (VRE), a variable interest
entity (VIE), or a QSPE.
VREs VREs are defined to include entities that have
both equity at risk that is sufficient to fund future operations
and have equity investors with decision making ability that
absorb the majority of the expected losses and expected returns
of the entity. In accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation,
(Consolidation Accounting), Merrill Lynch
generally consolidates those VREs where it holds a controlling
financial interest. For investments in limited partnerships and
certain limited liability corporations that Merrill Lynch does
not control, Merrill Lynch applies ASC 323,
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures
(Equity Method Accounting), which requires use
of the equity method of accounting for investors that have more
than a minor influence, which is typically defined as an
investment of greater than 3% of the outstanding equity in the
entity. For more traditional corporate structures, in accordance
with Equity Method Accounting, Merrill Lynch applies the equity
method of accounting where it has significant influence over the
investee. Significant influence can be evidenced by a
significant ownership interest (which is generally defined as a
voting interest of 20% to 50%), significant board of director
representation, or other contracts and arrangements.
VIEs Those entities that do not meet the VRE
criteria are generally analyzed for consolidation as either VIEs
or QSPEs. Merrill Lynch consolidates those VIEs in which it
absorbs the majority of the variability in expected losses
and/or the
variability in expected returns of the entity as required by
Consolidation Accounting. Merrill Lynch relies on a qualitative
and/or
quantitative analysis, including an analysis of the design of
the entity, to determine if it is the primary beneficiary of the
VIE and therefore must consolidate the VIE. Merrill Lynch
reassesses whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE upon
the occurrence of a reconsideration event.
QSPEs QSPEs are passive entities with significantly
limited permitted activities. QSPEs are generally used as
securitization vehicles and are limited in the type of assets
that they may hold, the derivatives into which they can enter
and the level of discretion that they may exercise through
servicing activities. In accordance with ASC 860, Transfers
and Servicing, (Financial Transfers and Servicing
Accounting), and Consolidation Accounting, Merrill Lynch
does not consolidate QSPEs.
Securitization
Activities
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch securitizes
commercial and residential mortgage loans; municipal,
government, and corporate bonds; and other types of financial
assets. Merrill Lynch may retain interests in the securitized
financial assets through holding tranches of the securitization.
In accordance with Financial Transfers and Servicing Accounting,
Merrill Lynch recognizes transfers of financial assets where it
relinquishes control as sales to the extent of cash and any
proceeds received. Control is considered to be relinquished when
all of the following conditions have been met:
|
|
|
The transferred assets have been legally isolated from the
transferor even in bankruptcy or other receivership;
|
10
|
|
|
The transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets it
received, or if the entity is a QSPE the beneficial interest
holders have the right to pledge or exchange their beneficial
interests; and
|
|
|
The transferor does not maintain effective control over the
transferred assets (e.g., the ability to unilaterally cause the
holder to return specific transferred assets).
|
Revenue
Recognition
Principal transactions revenues include both realized and
unrealized gains and losses on trading assets and trading
liabilities, investment securities classified as trading
investments and fair value changes associated with structured
debt. These instruments are recorded at fair value. Fair value
is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. Gains and losses on sales are recognized on a
trade date basis.
Commissions revenues include commissions, mutual fund
distribution fees and contingent deferred sales charge revenue,
which are all accrued as earned. Commissions revenues also
include mutual fund redemption fees, which are recognized at the
time of redemption. Commissions revenues earned from certain
customer equity transactions are recorded net of related
brokerage, clearing and exchange fees.
Managed accounts and other fee-based revenues primarily consist
of asset-priced portfolio service fees earned from the
administration of separately managed accounts and other
investment accounts for retail investors, annual account fees,
and certain other account-related fees.
Investment banking revenues include underwriting revenues and
fees for merger and acquisition advisory services, which are
accrued when services for the transactions are substantially
completed. Underwriting revenues are presented net of
transaction-related expenses. Transaction-related expenses,
primarily legal, travel and other costs directly associated with
the transaction, are deferred and recognized in the same period
as the related revenue from the investment banking transaction
to match revenue recognition.
Earnings from equity method investments include Merrill
Lynchs pro rata share of income and losses associated with
investments accounted for under the equity method.
Other revenues include gains/(losses) on investment securities,
including sales and
other-than-temporary-impairment
losses associated with certain
available-for-sale
securities, gains/(losses) on private equity investments and
gains/(losses) on loans and other miscellaneous items.
Contractual interest and dividends received and paid on trading
assets and trading liabilities, excluding derivatives, are
recognized on an accrual basis as a component of interest and
dividend revenues and interest expense. Interest and dividends
on investment securities are recognized on an accrual basis as a
component of interest and dividend revenues. Interest related to
loans, notes, and mortgages, securities financing activities and
certain short- and long-term borrowings are recorded on an
accrual basis with related interest recorded as interest revenue
or interest expense, as applicable. Contractual interest, if
any, on structured notes is recorded as a component of interest
expense.
Use of
Estimates
In presenting the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
management makes estimates regarding:
|
|
|
Valuations of assets and liabilities requiring fair value
estimates;
|
|
|
The allowance for credit losses;
|
11
|
|
|
Determination of
other-than-temporary
impairments for
available-for-sale
investment securities;
|
|
|
The outcome of litigation;
|
|
|
Assumptions and cash flow projections used in determining
whether VIEs should be consolidated and the determination of the
qualifying status of QSPEs;
|
|
|
The realization of deferred taxes and the recognition and
measurement of uncertain tax positions;
|
|
|
The carrying amount of goodwill and intangible assets;
|
|
|
The amortization period of intangible assets with definite lives;
|
|
|
Incentive-based compensation accruals and valuation of
share-based payment compensation arrangements; and
|
|
|
Other matters that affect the reported amounts and disclosure of
contingencies in the financial statements.
|
Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available
information. Therefore, actual results could differ from those
estimates and could have a material impact on the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, and it is possible that such
changes could occur in the near term.
Fair
Value Measurement
Merrill Lynch accounts for a significant portion of its
financial instruments at fair value or considers fair value in
their measurement. Merrill Lynch accounts for certain financial
assets and liabilities at fair value under various accounting
literature, including ASC 320, Investments Debt
and Equity Securities, (Investment Accounting),
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, (Derivatives
Accounting), and the fair value option election in
accordance with ASC 825-10-25, Financial
Instruments Recognition, (fair value
option election). Merrill Lynch also accounts for certain
assets at fair value under applicable industry guidance, namely
ASC 940 Financial Services Brokers and Dealers
(Broker-Dealer Guide) and ASC 946, Financial
Services Investment Companies (Investment
Company Guide).
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
(Fair Value Accounting) defined fair value,
established a framework for measuring fair value, established a
fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to
measure fair value and enhanced disclosure requirements for fair
value measurements.
Fair values for
over-the-counter
(OTC) derivative financial instruments, principally
forwards, options, and swaps, represent the present value of
amounts estimated to be received from or paid to a marketplace
participant in settlement of these instruments (i.e., the amount
Merrill Lynch would expect to receive in a derivative asset
assignment or would expect to pay to have a derivative liability
assumed). These derivatives are valued using pricing models
based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows
and directly observed prices from exchange-traded derivatives,
other OTC trades, or external pricing services, while taking
into account the counterpartys creditworthiness, or
Merrill Lynchs own creditworthiness, as appropriate.
Determining the fair value for OTC derivative contracts can
require a significant level of estimation and management
judgment.
New and/or
complex instruments may have immature or limited markets. As a
result, the pricing models used for valuation often incorporate
significant estimates and assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the instrument, which may impact the
results of operations reported in the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. For instance, on long-dated and illiquid
contracts
12
extrapolation methods are applied to observed market data in
order to estimate inputs and assumptions that are not directly
observable. This enables Merrill Lynch to mark to fair value all
positions consistently when only a subset of prices are directly
observable. Values for OTC derivatives are verified using
observed information about the costs of hedging the risk and
other trades in the market. As the markets for these products
develop, Merrill Lynch continually refines its pricing models to
correlate more closely to the market price of these instruments.
The recognition of significant inception gains and losses that
incorporate unobservable inputs is reviewed by management to
ensure such gains and losses are derived from observable inputs
and/or
incorporate reasonable assumptions about the unobservable
component, such as implied bid-offer adjustments.
Certain financial instruments recorded at fair value are
initially measured using mid-market prices which results in
gross long and short positions
marked-to-market
at the same pricing level prior to the application of position
netting. The resulting net positions are then adjusted to fair
value representing the exit price as defined in Fair Value
Accounting. The significant adjustments include liquidity and
counterparty credit risk.
Liquidity
Merrill Lynch makes adjustments to bring a position from a
mid-market to a bid or offer price, depending upon the net open
position. Merrill Lynch values net long positions at bid prices
and net short positions at offer prices. These adjustments are
based upon either observable or implied bid-offer prices.
Counterparty
Credit Risk
In determining fair value, Merrill Lynch considers both the
credit risk of its counterparties, as well as its own
creditworthiness. Merrill Lynch attempts to mitigate credit risk
to third parties by entering into netting and collateral
arrangements. Net counterparty exposure (counterparty positions
netted by offsetting transactions and both cash and securities
collateral) is then valued for counterparty creditworthiness and
this resultant value is incorporated into the fair value of the
respective instruments. Merrill Lynch generally calculates the
credit risk adjustment for derivatives on observable market
credit spreads.
Fair Value Accounting also requires that Merrill Lynch consider
its own creditworthiness when determining the fair value of
certain instruments, including OTC derivative instruments. The
approach to measuring the impact of Merrill Lynchs credit
risk on an instrument is done in the same manner as for third
party credit risk. The impact of Merrill Lynchs credit
risk is incorporated into the fair value, even when credit risk
is not readily observable, of instruments such as OTC
derivatives contracts. OTC derivative liabilities are valued
based on the net counterparty exposure as described above.
Legal
Reserves
Merrill Lynch is a party in various actions, some of which
involve claims for substantial amounts. Amounts are accrued for
the financial resolution of claims that have either been
asserted or are deemed probable of assertion if, in the opinion
of management, it is both probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
In many cases, it is not possible to determine whether a
liability has been incurred or to estimate the ultimate or
minimum amount of that liability until the case is close to
resolution, in which case no accrual is made until that time.
Accruals are subject to significant estimation by management
with input from outside counsel.
13
Income
Taxes
Merrill Lynch provides for income taxes on all transactions that
have been recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes
(Income Tax Accounting). Accordingly, deferred
taxes are adjusted to reflect the tax rates at which future
taxable amounts will likely be settled or realized. The effects
of tax rate changes on deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax
assets, as well as other changes in income tax laws, are
recognized in net earnings in the period during which such
changes are enacted. Valuation allowances are established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are
more-likely-than-not to be realized. Pursuant to Income Tax
Accounting, Merrill Lynch may assess various sources of evidence
in the conclusion as to the necessity of valuation allowances to
reduce deferred tax assets to amounts more-likely-than-not to be
realized, including the following: 1) past and projected
earnings, including losses, of Merrill Lynch and Bank of
America, as certain tax attributes such as U.S. net
operating losses (NOLs), U.S. capital loss
carryforwards and foreign tax credit carryforwards can be
utilized by Bank of America in certain income tax returns,
2) tax carryforward periods, and 3) tax planning
strategies and other factors of the legal entities, such as the
intercompany tax-allocation policy. Included within Merrill
Lynchs net deferred tax assets are carryforward amounts
generated in the U.S. and United Kingdom (U.K.)
that are deductible in the future as NOLs. Merrill Lynch has
concluded that these deferred tax assets are
more-likely-than-not to be fully utilized prior to expiration,
based on the projected level of future taxable income of Merrill
Lynch and Bank of America, which is relevant due to the
intercompany tax-allocation policy. For this purpose, future
taxable income was projected based on forecasts and historical
earnings after adjusting for the past market disruptions and the
anticipated impact of the differences between pre-tax earnings
and taxable income.
Merrill Lynch recognizes and measures its unrecognized tax
benefits in accordance with Income Tax Accounting. Merrill Lynch
estimates the likelihood, based on their technical merits, that
tax positions will be sustained upon examination considering the
facts and circumstances and information available at the end of
each period. Merrill Lynch adjusts the level of unrecognized tax
benefits when there is more information available, or when an
event occurs requiring a change. In accordance with Bank of
Americas policy, any new or subsequent change in an
unrecognized tax benefit related to a Bank of America state
consolidated, combined or unitary return in which Merrill Lynch
is a member will not be reflected in Merrill Lynchs
balance sheet. However, upon Bank of Americas resolution
of the item, any material impact determined to be attributable
to Merrill Lynch will be reflected in Merrill Lynchs
balance sheet. Merrill Lynch accrues income-tax-related interest
and penalties, if applicable, within income tax expense.
Beginning with the 2009 tax year, Merrill Lynchs results
of operations are included in the U.S. federal income tax
return and certain state income tax returns of Bank of America.
The method of allocating income tax expense is determined under
the intercompany tax allocation policy of Bank of America. This
policy specifies that income tax expense will be computed for
all Bank of America subsidiaries generally on a separate company
method, taking into account the tax position of the consolidated
group and the pro forma Merrill Lynch group. Under this policy,
tax benefits associated with net operating losses (or other tax
attributes) of Merrill Lynch are payable to Merrill Lynch upon
the earlier of the utilization in the filing of Bank of
Americas returns or the utilization in Merrill
Lynchs pro forma returns. See Note 16 for further
discussion of income taxes.
Securities
Financing Transactions
Merrill Lynch enters into repurchase and resale agreements and
securities borrowed and loaned transactions to accommodate
customers and earn interest rate spreads (also referred to as
matched-book transactions), obtain securities for
settlement and finance inventory positions.
14
Resale and repurchase agreements are accounted for as
collateralized financing transactions and may be recorded at
their contractual amounts plus accrued interest or at fair value
under the fair value option election. Resale and repurchase
agreements recorded at fair value are generally valued based on
pricing models that use inputs with observable levels of price
transparency.
Where the fair value option election has been made, changes in
the fair value of resale and repurchase agreements are reflected
in principal transactions revenues and the contractual interest
coupon is recorded as interest revenue or interest expense,
respectively. For further information refer to Note 4.
Resale and repurchase agreements recorded at their contractual
amounts plus accrued interest approximate fair value, as the
fair value of these items is not materially sensitive to shifts
in market interest rates because of the short-term nature of
these instruments
and/or
variable interest rates or to credit risk because the resale and
repurchase agreements are fully collateralized.
Merrill Lynchs policy is to obtain possession of
collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the
principal amount loaned under resale agreements. To ensure that
the market value of the underlying collateral remains
sufficient, collateral is generally valued daily and Merrill
Lynch may require counterparties to deposit additional
collateral or may return collateral pledged when appropriate.
Substantially all repurchase and resale activities are
transacted under master repurchase agreements that give Merrill
Lynch the right, in the event of default, to liquidate
collateral held and to offset receivables and payables with the
same counterparty. Merrill Lynch offsets certain repurchase and
resale agreement balances with the same counterparty on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Merrill Lynch may use securities received as collateral for
resale agreements to satisfy regulatory requirements such as
Rule 15c3-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Securities borrowed and loaned transactions may be recorded at
the amount of cash collateral advanced or received plus accrued
interest or at fair value under the fair value option election.
Securities borrowed transactions require Merrill Lynch to
provide the counterparty with collateral in the form of cash,
letters of credit, or other securities. Merrill Lynch receives
collateral in the form of cash or other securities for
securities loaned transactions. For these transactions, the fees
received or paid by Merrill Lynch are recorded as interest
revenue or expense. On a daily basis, Merrill Lynch monitors the
market value of securities borrowed or loaned against the
collateral value, and Merrill Lynch may require counterparties
to deposit additional collateral or may return collateral
pledged, when appropriate. The carrying value of these
instruments approximates fair value as these items are not
materially sensitive to shifts in market interest rates because
of their short-term nature
and/or their
variable interest rates.
All firm-owned securities pledged to counterparties where the
counterparty has the right, by contract or custom, to sell or
repledge the securities are disclosed parenthetically in trading
assets or, if applicable, in investment securities on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In transactions where Merrill Lynch acts as the lender in a
securities lending agreement and receives securities that can be
pledged or sold as collateral, it recognizes an asset on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value,
representing the securities received (securities received as
collateral), and a liability for the same amount, representing
the obligation to return those securities (obligation to return
securities received as collateral). The amounts on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets result from non-cash transactions.
15
Trading
Assets and Liabilities
Merrill Lynchs trading activities consist primarily of
securities brokerage and trading; derivatives dealing and
brokerage; commodities trading and futures brokerage; and
securities financing transactions. Trading assets and trading
liabilities consist of cash instruments (e.g., securities and
loans) and derivative instruments. Trading assets and trading
liabilities also include commodities inventory. See Note 6
for additional information on derivative instruments.
Trading assets and liabilities are generally recorded on a trade
date basis at fair value. Included in trading liabilities are
securities that Merrill Lynch has sold but did not own and will
therefore be obligated to purchase at a future date (short
sales). Commodities inventory is recorded at the lower of
cost or market value. Changes in fair value of trading assets
and liabilities (i.e., unrealized gains and losses) are
recognized as principal transactions revenues in the current
period. Realized gains and losses and any related interest
amounts are included in principal transactions revenues and
interest revenues and expenses, depending on the nature of the
instrument.
Investment
Securities
Investment securities consist of marketable investment
securities and non-qualifying investments. Refer to Note 8.
Marketable
Investments
ML & Co. and certain of its non-broker-dealer
subsidiaries, including Merrill Lynch banks, follow the guidance
within Investment Accounting for investments in debt and
publicly traded equity securities. Merrill Lynch classifies
those debt securities that it does not intend to sell as
held-to-maturity
securities.
Held-to-maturity
securities are carried at cost unless a decline in value is
deemed
other-than-temporary,
in which case the carrying value is reduced. For Merrill Lynch,
the trading classification under Investment Accounting generally
includes those securities that are bought and held principally
for the purpose of selling them in the near term, securities
that are economically hedged, or securities that may contain a
bifurcatable embedded derivative as defined in Derivatives
Accounting. Securities classified as trading are marked to fair
value through earnings. All other qualifying securities are
classified as
available-for-sale
and held at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported
in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
(OCI).
Realized gains and losses on investment securities are included
in current period earnings. For purposes of computing realized
gains and losses, the cost basis of each investment sold is
based on the specific identification method.
Merrill Lynch regularly (at least quarterly) evaluates each
held-to-maturity
and
available-for-sale
security whose value has declined below amortized cost to assess
whether the decline in fair value is
other-than-temporary.
A decline in a debt securitys fair value is considered to
be
other-than-temporary
if it is probable that all amounts contractually due will not be
collected or Merrill Lynch either plans to sell the security or
it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its amortized cost. Beginning in
2009, for unrealized losses on debt securities that are deemed
other-than-temporary,
the credit component of an
other-than-temporary
impairment is recognized in earnings and the noncredit component
is recognized in OCI when Merrill Lynch does not intend to sell
the security and it is more likely than not that Merrill Lynch
will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery.
Prior to January 1, 2009, unrealized losses (both the
credit and non-credit components) on
available-for-sale
debt securities that were deemed
other-than-temporary
were included in current period earnings.
16
Merrill Lynchs impairment review generally includes:
|
|
|
Identifying securities with indicators of possible impairment;
|
|
|
Analyzing individual securities with fair value less than
amortized cost for specific factors including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated length of time to recover from fair value to
amortized cost;
|
|
|
|
The severity and duration of the fair value decline from
amortized cost;
|
|
|
|
Deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer;
|
|
|
|
Discussing evidential matter, including an evaluation of the
factors that could cause individual securities to have an
other-than-temporary
impairment;
|
|
|
Determining whether Merrill Lynch intends to sell the security
or if it is more likely than not that Merrill Lynch will be
required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized
cost; and
|
|
|
Documenting the analysis and conclusions.
|
Non-Qualifying
Investments
Non-qualifying investments are those investments that are not
within the scope of Investment Accounting and primarily include
private equity investments accounted for at fair value and
securities carried at cost or under the equity method of
accounting.
Private equity investments that are held for capital
appreciation
and/or
current income are accounted for under the Investment Company
Guide and carried at fair value. Additionally, certain private
equity investments that are not accounted for under the
Investment Company Guide may be carried at fair value under the
fair value option election. The carrying value of private equity
investments reflects expected exit values based upon market
prices or other valuation methodologies including market
comparables of similar companies and expected cash flows.
Merrill Lynch has non-controlling investments in the common
shares of corporations and in partnerships that do not fall
within the scope of Investment Accounting or the Investment
Company Guide. Merrill Lynch accounts for these investments
using either the cost or the equity method of accounting based
on managements ability to influence the investees. See the
Consolidation Accounting Policies section of this Note for more
information.
For investments accounted for using the equity method, income is
recognized based on Merrill Lynchs share of the earnings
or losses of the investee. Dividend distributions are generally
recorded as reductions in the investment balance. Impairment
testing is based on the guidance provided in Equity Method
Accounting and the investment is reduced when an impairment is
deemed
other-than-temporary.
For investments accounted for at cost, income is recognized as
dividends are received. Impairment testing is based on the
guidance provided in Investment Accounting and the cost basis is
reduced when an impairment is deemed
other-than-temporary.
17
Loans,
Notes, and Mortgages, Net
Merrill Lynchs lending and related activities include loan
originations, syndications and securitizations. Loan
originations include corporate and institutional loans,
residential and commercial mortgages, asset-based loans, and
other loans to individuals and businesses. Merrill Lynch also
engages in secondary market loan trading (see the Trading Assets
and Liabilities section within this Note) and margin lending.
Loans included in loans, notes, and mortgages are classified for
accounting purposes as loans held for investment and loans held
for sale. Upon completion of the acquisition of
Merrill Lynch by Bank of America, certain loans carried by
Merrill Lynch were subject to the requirements of ASC
310-30,
Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit
Quality (Acquired Impaired Loan Accounting). See
Note 10.
Loans held for investment are carried at amortized cost, less an
allowance for loan losses. The provision for loan losses is
based on managements estimate of the amount necessary to
maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to
absorb probable incurred loan losses and is included in interest
revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings/(Loss). Managements estimate of loan losses is
influenced by many factors, including adverse situations that
may affect the borrowers ability to repay, current
economic conditions, prior loan loss experience, and the
estimated fair value of any underlying collateral. The fair
value of collateral is generally determined by third-party
appraisals in the case of residential mortgages, quoted market
prices for securities, or other types of estimates for other
assets.
Managements estimate of loan losses includes judgment
about collectibility based on available information at the
balance sheet date, and the uncertainties inherent in those
underlying assumptions.
While management has based its estimates on the best information
available, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses
may be necessary as a result of changes in the economic
environment or variances between actual results and the original
assumptions.
In general, loans are evaluated for impairment when they are
greater than 90 days past due or exhibit credit quality
weakness. Loans are considered impaired when it is probable that
Merrill Lynch will not be able to collect the contractual
principal and interest due from the borrower. All payments
received on impaired loans are applied to principal until the
principal balance has been reduced to a level where collection
of the remaining recorded investment is not in doubt. Typically,
when collection of principal on an impaired loan is not in
doubt, contractual interest will be credited to interest income
when received.
Loans held for sale are carried at lower of cost or fair value.
The fair value option election has been made for certain held
for sale loans, notes and mortgages. Estimation is required in
determining these fair values. The fair value of loans made in
connection with commercial lending activity, consisting mainly
of senior debt, is primarily estimated using the market value of
publicly issued debt instruments or discounted cash flows.
Merrill Lynchs estimate of fair value for other loans,
notes, and mortgages is determined based on the individual loan
characteristics. For certain homogeneous categories of loans,
including residential mortgages, automobile loans, and home
equity loans, fair value is estimated using a whole loan
valuation or an as-if securitized price based on
market conditions. An as-if securitized price is
based on estimated performance of the underlying asset pool
collateral, rating agency credit structure assumptions and
market pricing for similar securitizations previously executed.
Declines in the carrying value of loans held for sale and loans
accounted for at fair value under the fair value option election
are included in other revenues in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings/(Loss).
Nonrefundable loan origination fees, loan commitment fees, and
draw down fees received in conjunction with held for
investment loans are generally deferred and recognized over the
contractual
18
life of the loan as an adjustment to the yield. If, at the
outset, or any time during the term of the loan, it becomes
probable that the repayment period will be extended, the
amortization is recalculated using the expected remaining life
of the loan. When the loan contract does not provide for a
specific maturity date, managements best estimate of the
repayment period is used. At repayment of the loan, any
unrecognized deferred fee is immediately recognized in earnings.
If the loan is accounted for as held for sale, the fees received
are deferred and recognized as part of the gain or loss on sale
in other revenues. If the loan is accounted for under the fair
value option election, the fees are included in the
determination of the fair value and included in other revenue.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140
(SFAS No. 166), and
SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R) (SFAS No. 167). The
amendments will be effective January 1, 2010 for Merrill
Lynch. SFAS No. 166 revises ASC 860, Transfers and
Servicing (Financial Transfers and Servicing
Accounting), which establishes sale accounting criteria
for transfers of financial assets. Among other things,
SFAS No. 166 amends Financial Transfers and Servicing
Accounting to eliminate the concept of a QSPE. As a result,
existing QSPEs will be subject to consolidation in accordance
with the guidance provided in SFAS No. 167.
SFAS No. 167 amends Consolidation Accounting by
significantly changing the criteria by which an enterprise
determines whether it must consolidate a VIE. A VIE is an
entity, typically an SPE, which has insufficient equity at risk
or which is not controlled through voting rights held by equity
investors. Consolidation Accounting currently requires that a
VIE be consolidated by the enterprise that will absorb a
majority of the expected losses or expected residual returns
created by the assets of the VIE. SFAS No. 167 amends
Consolidation Accounting to require that a VIE be consolidated
by the enterprise that has both the power to direct the
activities that most significantly impact the VIEs
economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant
to the VIE. SFAS No. 167 also requires that an
enterprise continually reassess, based on current facts and
circumstances, whether it should consolidate the VIEs with which
it is involved. See Note 9 for Merrill Lynchs
involvement with VIEs.
The adoption in January 2010 of SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 will
result in the consolidation of certain QSPEs and VIEs that are
not currently recorded on Merrill Lynchs Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Based upon the evaluation performed
as of September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch expects to consolidate
certain vehicles, including credit-linked note entities,
collateralized debt obligations and municipal bond trusts, which
hold aggregate assets of approximately $15 billion. These
consolidations will result in an increase in trading assets and
long-term borrowings. Merrill Lynch continues to evaluate other
VIEs with which it is involved to determine the impact of
SFAS No. 167.
In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events,
which provides general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. In addition, ASC 855 requires the disclosure of the date
through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the
basis for that date. The adoption of ASC 855, effective
June 30, 2009, did not impact Merrill Lynchs
financial condition or results of operations. Merrill Lynch
evaluated subsequent events through the date of filing.
In April 2009, the FASB amended Fair Value Accounting to provide
guidance for determining whether a market is inactive and a
transaction is distressed. Merrill Lynch elected to early adopt
the amendments effective January 1, 2009. The adoption did
not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
19
In April 2009, the FASB amended Investment Accounting to require
that an entity recognize the credit component of an
other-than-temporary
impairment of a debt security in earnings and the noncredit
component in OCI when the entity does not intend to sell the
security and it is more likely than not that the entity will not
be required to sell the security prior to recovery. The
amendments also require expanded disclosures. Merrill Lynch
elected to early adopt the amendments effective January 1,
2009 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, as any OCI that
Merrill Lynch previously recorded was eliminated upon Bank of
Americas acquisition of Merrill Lynch. The amendments did
not change the recognition of
other-than-temporary
impairment for equity securities.
In April 2009, the FASB amended ASC 825, Financial
Instruments, to require expanded disclosures for all
financial instruments within its scope, such as loans that are
not measured at fair value through earnings. Merrill Lynch
adopted the amendments during the second quarter of 2009. Since
the amendments only require certain additional disclosures, they
did not affect Merrill Lynchs consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to
Note 5 for further information.
In April 2009, the FASB amended ASC
805-10,
Business Combinations, whereby assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from
contingencies should be recognized at fair value on the
acquisition date if fair value can be determined during the
measurement period. If fair value cannot be determined,
companies should typically account for the acquired
contingencies using existing guidance. This new guidance is
effective for new acquisitions consummated on or after
January 1, 2009. Bank of America applied this guidance to
its January 1, 2009 acquisition of Merrill Lynch, and
the effects of the adoption were not material to these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB amended Derivatives Accounting to
improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring
enhanced disclosures of an entitys derivative instruments
and hedging activities and their effects on the entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The
amendments apply to all derivative instruments within the scope
of Derivatives Accounting. The amendments also apply to
non-derivative hedging instruments and all hedged items
designated and qualifying as hedges under Derivatives
Accounting. The amendments require additional qualitative and
quantitative disclosures for derivative instruments and hedging
activities set forth in Derivatives Accounting and generally
increase the level of disaggregation required in an
entitys financial statements. Additional disclosures
include qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies
for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in
derivative agreements. Merrill Lynch adopted the amendments to
Derivatives Accounting on January 1, 2009, effective
prospectively. Since the amendments only resulted in certain
additional disclosures, they did not have an effect on Merrill
Lynchs consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. See Note 6 for further
information regarding these disclosures.
In February 2008, the FASB modified Financial Transfers and
Servicing Accounting. Under this new guidance, there is a
presumption that the initial transfer of a financial asset and
subsequent repurchase financing involving the same asset are
considered part of the same arrangement (i.e. a linked
transaction) under Financial Transfers and Servicing Accounting.
However, if certain criteria are met, the initial transfer and
repurchase financing will be evaluated as two separate
transactions under Financial Transfers and Servicing Accounting.
This new guidance was effective for new transactions entered
into in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
Early adoption was prohibited. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
20
In December 2007, the FASB amended Consolidation Accounting to
require noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (formerly known
as minority interests) initially to be measured at
fair value and classified as a separate component of equity.
Under the amendments, gains or losses on sales of noncontrolling
interests in subsidiaries are not recognized; instead, sales of
noncontrolling interests are accounted for as equity
transactions. However, in a sale of a subsidiarys shares
that results in the deconsolidation of the subsidiary, a gain or
loss is recognized for the difference between the proceeds of
that sale and the carrying amount of the interest sold and a new
fair value basis is established for any remaining ownership
interest. The amendments were effective for Merrill Lynch
beginning in 2009; earlier application was prohibited. The
amendments were required to be adopted prospectively, with the
exception of certain presentation and disclosure requirements
(e.g., reclassifying noncontrolling interests to appear in
equity), which are required to be adopted retrospectively. The
adoption of the amendments did not have a material impact on the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC
805-10,
Business Combinations, which significantly changed the
financial accounting and reporting for business combinations.
ASC 805-10
required, for example: (i) assets and liabilities to be
measured at fair value as of the acquisition date,
(ii) liabilities related to contingent consideration to be
remeasured at fair value in each subsequent reporting period
with changes reflected in earnings and not goodwill, and
(iii) all acquisition-related costs to be expensed as
incurred by the acquirer. Bank of America applied ASC
805-10 to
its January 1, 2009 acquisition of Merrill Lynch, the
effects of which are included in these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
As a result of the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of
America, Merrill Lynch recorded the following preliminary
purchase accounting adjustments. The allocation of the purchase
price will be finalized upon completion of Bank of
Americas analysis of the fair values of Merrill
Lynchs assets and liabilities in accordance with the
acquisition method of accounting.
21
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in billions, except
per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch common shares exchanged (in millions)
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
Exchange ratio
|
|
|
0.8595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of Americas common stock issued
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
Purchase price per share of Bank of Americas common
stock(1)
|
|
$
|
14.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total value of Bank of Americas common stock and cash
exchanged for fractional shares
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
Merrill Lynch preferred
stock(2)
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Fair value of outstanding employee stock awards
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary allocation of the purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
19.9
|
|
Merrill Lynch goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Pre-tax adjustments to reflect acquired assets and liabilities
at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and derivatives
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Loans
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
Intangible
assets(3)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Long-term
borrowings(4)
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax total adjustments
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax total adjustments
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary goodwill resulting from the acquisition by Bank
of
America(5)
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value of the shares of
common stock exchanged with Merrill Lynch shareholders was based
upon the closing price of Bank of Americas common stock at
December 31, 2008, the last trading day prior to the date
of acquisition. |
(2) |
|
Represents Merrill Lynchs
preferred stock exchanged for Bank of America preferred stock
having substantially identical terms and also includes
$1.5 billion of convertible preferred stock. |
(3) |
|
Consists of trade name of
$1.2 billion and customer relationship and core deposit
intangibles of $4.5 billion. The amortization life is
10 years for the customer relationship and core deposit
intangibles, which are primarily amortized on a straight-line
basis. |
(4) |
|
The change in the estimated
fair value of long-term borrowings of approximately
$400 million had an immaterial impact on net income for the
first and second quarters of 2009. |
(5) |
|
No goodwill is expected to be
deductible for federal income tax purposes. |
Subsequent to the Bank of America acquisition, certain assets
and liabilities were transferred at fair value between Merrill
Lynch and Bank of America. These transfers were made in
connection with efforts to manage risk in a more effective and
efficient manner at the consolidated Bank of America level. The
assets and liabilities transferred related to sales and trading
activities and included positions associated with the rates and
currency, equity and mortgage products trading businesses.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, these
transfers included approximately $47 billion each of assets
and liabilities transferred from Merrill Lynch to Bank of
America, primarily U.S. matched book repurchase positions
and mortgage positions. Approximately $42 billion of assets
and $19 billion of liabilities were transferred from Bank
of America to Merrill Lynch, primarily equity-related positions.
In addition to these transfers, Merrill Lynch also sold one of
its U.S. bank subsidiaries to Bank of America during the third
quarter of 2009. See Note 21.
22
Segment
Information
Prior to the acquisition by Bank of America, Merrill
Lynchs operations were organized and reported as two
operating segments in accordance with the criteria in ASC 280,
Segment Reporting (Segment Reporting): Global
Markets and Investment Banking (GMI) and Global
Wealth Management (GWM).
As a result of the acquisition by Bank of America, Merrill Lynch
reevaluated the provisions of Segment Reporting in the first
quarter of 2009. Pursuant to Segment Reporting, operating
segments represent components of an enterprise for which
separate financial information is available that is regularly
evaluated by the chief operating decision maker in determining
how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Based
upon how the chief operating decision maker of Merrill Lynch
reviews results in terms of allocating resources and assessing
performance, it was determined that Merrill Lynch does not
contain any identifiable operating segments under Segment
Reporting. As a result, the financial information of Merrill
Lynch is presented as a single segment.
Geographic
Information
Merrill Lynch conducts its business activities through offices
in the following five regions:
|
|
|
United States;
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA);
|
|
|
Pacific Rim;
|
|
|
Latin America; and
|
|
|
Canada.
|
The principal methodologies used in preparing the geographic
information below are as follows:
|
|
|
Revenues and expenses are generally recorded based on the
location of the employee generating the revenue or incurring the
expense;
|
|
|
Pre-tax earnings or loss from continuing operations include the
allocation of certain shared expenses among regions; and
|
|
|
Intercompany transfers are based primarily on service agreements.
|
23
The information that follows, in managements judgment,
provides a reasonable representation of each regions
contribution to the consolidated net revenues and pre-tax
earnings/(loss) from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
September 26,
2008
|
|
September 26,
2008
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa
|
|
$
|
1,577
|
|
|
$
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,061
|
|
Pacific Rim
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
2,233
|
|
|
|
7,204
|
|
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
United
States(1)
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
9,585
|
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
(3,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
5,102
|
|
|
$
|
16,789
|
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax earnings (loss) from continuing
operations(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,583
|
)
|
Pacific Rim
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
|
(2,593
|
)
|
|
|
(2,048
|
)
|
United
States(1)
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
(485
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,658
|
)
|
|
|
(17,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax earnings (loss) from continuing
operations(2)
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,663
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
U.S. results for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 included net losses of
$2.1 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively, which
resulted from the narrowing of Merrill Lynchs credit
spreads on the carrying values of certain long-term borrowings.
Losses for the three and nine months ended September 26,
2008 were partially offset by gains of $2.8 and
$5.0 billion, respectively, that resulted from the widening
of Merrill Lynchs credit spreads on the carrying
value of certain long-term borrowings, and a $4.3 billion
net gain related to the sale of Merrill Lynchs ownership
stake in Bloomberg L.P. (see Note 5 of the 2008 Annual
Report). |
(2) |
|
See Note 18 for further
information on discontinued operations. |
Note 4. Fair Value Disclosures
Fair
Value Accounting
Fair
Value Hierarchy
In accordance with Fair Value Accounting, Merrill Lynch has
categorized its financial instruments, based on the priority of
the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair
value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest
priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3).
24
Financial assets and liabilities recorded on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based on the inputs
to the valuation techniques as follows:
|
|
Level 1.
|
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on
unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in
an active market that Merrill Lynch has the ability to access
(examples include active exchange-traded equity securities,
exchange-traded derivatives, U.S. Government securities,
and certain other sovereign government obligations).
|
|
Level 2.
|
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on
quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs
that are observable either directly or indirectly for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 2 inputs include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a)
|
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets (examples include restricted stock and U.S. agency
securities);
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
non-active markets (examples include corporate and municipal
bonds, which trade infrequently);
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
Pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the
full term of the asset or liability (examples include most
over-the-counter
derivatives, including interest rate and currency
swaps); and
|
|
|
|
|
d)
|
Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data through correlation or
other means for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability (examples include certain residential and commercial
mortgage-related assets, including loans, securities and
derivatives).
|
|
|
Level 3. |
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on
prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both
unobservable and significant to the overall fair value
measurement. These inputs reflect managements own
assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use
in pricing the asset or liability (examples include certain
private equity investments, certain residential and commercial
mortgage-related assets (including loans, securities and
derivatives), and long-dated or complex derivatives (including
certain equity and currency derivatives and long-dated options
on gas and power)).
|
As required by Fair Value Accounting, when the inputs used to
measure fair value fall within different levels of the
hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is
categorized is based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. For
example, a Level 3 fair value measurement may include
inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and 2) and
unobservable (Level 3). Therefore gains and losses for such
assets and liabilities categorized within the Level 3 table
below may include changes in fair value that are attributable to
both observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) and
unobservable inputs (Level 3). Further, the following
tables do not take into consideration the offsetting effect of
Level 1 and 2 financial instruments entered into by Merrill
Lynch that economically hedge certain exposures to the
Level 3 positions.
A review of fair value hierarchy classifications is conducted on
a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of valuation
inputs may result in a reclassification for certain financial
assets or liabilities. Level 3 gains and losses represent
amounts incurred during the period in which the instrument was
classified as Level 3. Reclassifications impacting
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are reported as
transfers in/out of the Level 3 category as of the
beginning of the quarter in which the reclassifications occur.
Refer to the recurring and non-recurring sections within this
Note for further information on net transfers in and out.
25
Valuation
Techniques
The following outlines the valuation methodologies for the most
significant Level 3 positions:
Mortgage
related positions
In the most liquid markets, readily available or observable
prices are used in valuing mortgage related positions. In less
liquid markets, the lack of securitization activity and related
pricing necessitates the use of other available information and
modeling techniques to approximate the fair value for some of
these positions, including whole loans, derivatives, and
securities.
Residential
and commercial mortgages
For certain residential and commercial mortgages, Merrill Lynch
employs a fundamental cash flow valuation approach. This cash
flow analysis includes cumulative loss and prepayment
assumptions derived from multiple inputs including mortgage
remittance reports, property prices and other market data. In
addition, independent third party bids received on loans are
also considered for valuation purposes.
U.S. ABS
CDOs
The valuation for certain of Merrill Lynchs
U.S. super senior asset-backed collateralized debt
obligations (ABS CDO) positions is based on cash
flow analysis including cumulative loss assumptions. These
assumptions are derived from multiple inputs including mortgage
remittance reports, housing prices and other market data.
Relevant ABX indices are also analyzed as part of the overall
valuation process.
Corporate
debt, loans and auction rate securities
Certain corporate debt and loans, particularly those related to
emerging market, leveraged and distressed companies, and auction
rate securities have limited price transparency. For corporate
debt and loans, where credit spread pricing is unavailable for a
particular company, recent trades as well as proxy credit
spreads and trends may be considered in the valuation. For
leveraged loans, Merrill Lynch may also refer to certain credit
indices. For auction rate securities, the pricing methodology
relies upon a number of assumptions including weighted average
life, coupon, discount margin and liquidity discounts. In
addition, recent trades and issuer tenders may be considered in
the valuation.
Private
equity and principal investments
For certain private equity and principal investments held,
valuation methodologies include publicly traded comparables
derived by multiplying a key performance metric (e.g., earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of the
portfolio company by the relevant valuation multiple observed
for comparable companies, acquisition comparables, entry level
multiples and discounted cash flows, and are subject to
appropriate discounts for lack of liquidity or marketability.
Certain factors which may influence changes to the fair value
include, but are not limited to, recapitalizations, subsequent
rounds of financing, and offerings in the equity or debt capital
markets.
26
Derivatives
and structured notes with significant unobservable
correlation
Merrill Lynch enters into a number of derivative contracts and
issues structured notes where the performance is wholly or
partly dependent on the relative performance of two or more
assets. In these transactions, referred to as correlation
trades, correlation between the assets can be a significant
factor in the valuation. Examples of this type of transaction
include: equity or foreign exchange baskets, constant maturity
swap spreads (i.e., options where the performance is determined
based upon the fluctuations between two benchmark interest
rates), and commodity spread trades. Many correlations are
available through external pricing services. Where external
pricing information is not available, management uses estimates
based on historical data, calibrated to more liquid market
information. Unobservable credit correlation, such as that
influencing the valuation of complex structured CDOs, is
calibrated using a proxy approach (e.g., using implied
correlation from traded credit index tranches as a proxy for
calibrating correlation for a basket of single-name corporate
investment grade credits that are infrequently traded).
Derivatives
and structured notes with significant unobservable
volatility
Merrill Lynch enters into a number of derivative contracts and
issues structured notes whose values are dependent on
volatilities for which market observable values are not
available. These volatilities correspond to options with
long-dated expiration dates, strikes significantly in or out of
the money,
and/or in
the case of interest rate underlyings, a large tenor (i.e., an
underlying interest rate reference that itself is long-dated).
Merrill Lynch uses model-based extrapolation, proxy techniques,
or historical analysis to derive the unobservable volatility.
These methods are selected based on available market information
and are used across all asset classes. Volatility estimation can
have a significant impact on valuations.
27
Recurring
Fair Value
The following tables present Merrill Lynchs fair value
hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
Successor Company as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Adj(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited with
clearing organizations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,045
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,045
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited
with clearing organizations
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
8,877
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52,436
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52,436
|
|
Receivables under securities borrowed transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
Trading assets, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
16,537
|
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,480
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,538
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,538
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
|
|
4,024
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
8,796
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,422
|
|
Preferred
stock(2)
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
18,317
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,538
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
Municipals and money markets
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,145
|
|
Commodities and related contracts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
38,863
|
|
|
|
30,075
|
|
|
|
20,925
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
89,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
820,966
|
|
|
|
21,119
|
|
|
|
(789,874
|
)
|
|
|
58,190
|
|
Investment securities trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
Municipals and money markets
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities trading
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agency collateralized
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,818
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,818
|
|
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities non-agency MBSs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
Corporate/agency bonds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other taxable securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,447
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities non-qualifying
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
13,205
|
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities received as collateral
|
|
|
14,849
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,224
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
Successor Company as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Adj(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables under repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
49,501
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
49,501
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
11,469
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,561
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
18,990
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,906
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
Municipals, money markets and other
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
32,257
|
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
5,497
|
|
|
|
823,251
|
|
|
|
15,316
|
|
|
|
(802,624
|
)
|
|
|
41,440
|
|
Obligation to return securities received as collateral
|
|
|
14,849
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,224
|
|
Other payables interest and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
43,769
|
|
|
|
5,078
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
48,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents counterparty and
cash collateral netting. |
(2) |
|
Primarily represents auction
rate securities. |
Level 3 derivative contracts (assets) primarily relate to
derivative positions on U.S. ABS CDOs and other mortgages
of $5.7 billion, $9.6 billion of other credit
derivatives that incorporate unobservable correlation, and
$5.8 billion of equity, currency, interest rate and
commodity derivatives that are long-dated
and/or have
an unobservable model valuation input(s).
Level 3 non-qualifying investment securities primarily
relate to private equity and principal investment positions.
Level 3 loans, notes and mortgages primarily relate to
mortgage and corporate loans.
Level 3 derivative contracts (liabilities) primarily relate
to derivative positions on U.S. ABS CDOs and other
mortgages of $4.0 billion, $6.3 billion of other
credit derivatives that incorporate unobservable correlation,
and $5.0 billion of equity, currency, interest rate and
commodity derivatives that are long-dated
and/or have
unobservable correlation.
Level 3 long-term borrowings primarily relate to
equity-linked structured notes of $4.1 billion that are
long-dated
and/or have
unobservable correlation.
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
Predecessor Company as of December 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Adj(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited with
clearing organizations
|
|
$
|
1,421
|
|
|
$
|
10,156
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
11,577
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62,146
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62,146
|
|
Receivables under securities borrowed transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
Trading assets, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
30,106
|
|
|
|
33,902
|
|
|
|
22,120
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
86,128
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
8,538
|
|
|
|
1,239,225
|
|
|
|
37,325
|
|
|
|
(1,195,611
|
)
|
|
|
89,477
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
29,254
|
|
|
|
3,279
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,813
|
|
Securities received as collateral
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,658
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Other
assets(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,046
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,046
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,910
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,910
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
Trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
14,098
|
|
|
|
4,010
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,108
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
8,438
|
|
|
|
1,254,158
|
|
|
|
35,018
|
|
|
|
(1,226,251
|
)
|
|
|
71,363
|
|
Obligation to return securities received as collateral
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,658
|
|
Other payables interest and
other(2)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
672
|
|
Long-term
borrowings(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41,575
|
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents counterparty and
cash collateral netting. |
(2) |
|
Primarily represents certain
derivatives used for non-trading purposes. |
(3) |
|
Includes bifurcated embedded
derivatives carried at fair value. |
Level 3 trading assets primarily include U.S. ABS CDOs
of $9.4 billion, corporate bonds and loans of
$5.0 billion and auction rate securities of
$3.9 billion.
Level 3 derivative contracts (assets) primarily relate to
derivative positions on U.S. ABS CDOs of $5.8 billion,
$23.6 billion of other credit derivatives that incorporate
unobservable correlation, and $7.9 billion of equity,
currency, interest rate and commodity derivatives that are
long-dated
and/or have
unobservable correlation.
Level 3 investment securities primarily relate to certain
private equity and principal investment positions of
$2.6 billion.
Level 3 derivative contracts (liabilities) primarily relate
to derivative positions on U.S. ABS CDOs of
$6.1 billion, $22.3 billion of other credit
derivatives that incorporate unobservable correlation, and
$4.8 billion of equity derivatives that are long-dated
and/or have
unobservable correlation.
Level 3 long-term borrowings primarily relate to structured
notes with embedded equity derivatives of $6.3 billion that
are long-dated
and/or have
unobservable correlation.
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Total Realized and Unrealized Gains or (Losses)
|
|
Total Realized and
|
|
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in Income
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
or (Losses)
|
|
Losses to
|
|
and
|
|
Transfers
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
included in Income
|
|
OCI
|
|
Settlements
|
|
in (out)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,177
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4,024
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
4,004
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
8,796
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
6,591
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
Municipals and money markets
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
19,723
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
20,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts, net
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
5,803
|
|
Investment securities trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities trading
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
non-agency
MBSs
|
|
|
3,227
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(1,691
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
3,227
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(1,691
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities non-qualifying
|
|
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
6,271
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(1,746
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,052
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities interest and other
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
5,289
|
|
|
|
(468
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
5,078
|
|
|
|
Net losses in principal transactions related to net derivative
contracts were primarily due to the narrowing of credit spreads,
primarily related to monoline hedges of mortgage-related
positions.
Decreases in purchases, issuances and settlements related to
mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are
primarily due to the reclassification of certain positions to
corporate debt during the third quarter of 2009. Increases in
purchases, issuances and settlements related to corporate debt
primarily relates to the reclassification of certain positions
from mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities
during the third quarter of 2009 in addition to the recording of
assets for which the exposure was previously recognized as a
derivative contract (total return swap). Decreases in purchases,
issuances and settlements related to
available-for-sale
mortgage-backed securities non-agency primarily
relates to the sale of certain positions. Decreases in
purchases, issuances and settlements related to loans, notes and
mortgages were due to the sale of certain held for investment
loans associated with the sale of Merrill Lynch Bank USA
(MLBUSA) to Bank of America during the third quarter
of 2009. See Note 21.
Net transfers in for net derivative contracts is primarily due
to an increase in the impact of credit valuation adjustments in
relation to the overall pricing of certain corporate bespoke CDO
positions.
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Total Realized and Unrealized Gains or (Losses)
|
|
Total Realized and
|
|
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in Income
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
or (Losses)
|
|
Gains to
|
|
and
|
|
Transfers
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
included in Income
|
|
OCI
|
|
Settlements
|
|
in (out)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
|
4,024
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
10,149
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
(3,874
|
)
|
|
|
8,796
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
3,344
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
Municipals and money markets
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
22,120
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,539
|
|
|
|
(5,651
|
)
|
|
|
20,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts, net
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
4,815
|
|
|
|
5,803
|
|
Investment securities trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities trading
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities -non- agency MBSs
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(2,201
|
)
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(2,201
|
)
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities non-qualifying
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
3,279
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(2,283
|
)
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
5,858
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities interest and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
(2,032
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,165
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(4,229
|
)
|
|
|
5,078
|
|
|
|
Net losses in principal transactions related to net derivative
contracts were primarily due to the narrowing of credit spreads
during the third quarter of 2009, primarily related to monoline
hedges of mortgage-related positions. Net losses in principal
transactions related to long-term borrowings were primarily due
to the narrowing of Merrill Lynchs credit spreads on
certain equity linked notes.
Increases in purchases, issuances and settlements related to
corporate debt primarily relates to the reclassification of
certain positions from mortgages, mortgage-backed and
asset-backed securities during the third quarter of 2009 in
addition to the recording of assets for which the exposure was
previously recognized as a derivative contract (total return
swap). Increases in purchases, issuances and settlements of
preferred stock were primarily attributable to the purchase of
auction rate securities in the first quarter of 2009. Decreases
in purchases, issuances and settlements related to
available-for-sale
mortgage-backed securities non agency primarily
relates to the sale of certain positions. Decreases in
purchases, issuances and settlements related to loans, notes and
mortgages were due to the sale of certain held for investment
loans associated with the sale of MLBUSA to Bank of America
during the third quarter of 2009. See Note 21.
Net transfers out for mortgages, mortgage-backed and
asset-backed securities primarily relates to increased price
transparency (e.g. trading activity and external vendor quotes)
for certain
32
U.S. ABS CDO underlying collateral types. Net
transfers out for corporate debt primarily relates to the
reclassification in the first quarter of 2009 of certain loans
from trading assets to loans, notes and mortgages held for
investment, which are not measured at fair value. Net transfers
in for net derivative contracts primarily relates to decreased
price observability for certain underlying U.S. ABS CDOs
and other mortgage positions. Net transfers in for
available-for-sale
mortgage-backed securities non agency is the result
of changes in price transparency. Net transfers in for loans,
notes and mortgages relates to the fair value option election by
Merrill Lynch for certain mortgage, corporate and leveraged
loans as a result of its acquisition by Bank of America. Net
transfers in for other payables interest and other
relates to the fair value option election by Merrill Lynch for
certain loan commitments as a result of its acquisition by Bank
of America. Net transfers out for long-term borrowings were
primarily due to decreases in the significance of unobservable
pricing inputs for certain equity linked notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Total Realized and Unrealized Gains
|
|
Total Realized and
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or (Losses) included in Income
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
or (Losses)
|
|
and
|
|
Transfers
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
included in Income
|
|
Settlements
|
|
in (out)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited with
clearing organizations
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
|
20,190
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
(3,374
|
)
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
17,823
|
|
Derivative contracts, net
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
|
|
(8,792
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,792
|
)
|
|
|
13,348
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
4,589
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4,202
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
12,749
|
|
|
|
3,788
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
11,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Realized and
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Realized and Unrealized Gains or (Losses) included in
Income
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
or (Losses)
|
|
and
|
|
Transfers
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
included in Income
|
|
Settlements
|
|
in (out)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited with
clearing organizations
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
|
9,773
|
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(2,658
|
)
|
|
|
7,025
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
|
|
17,823
|
|
Derivative contracts, net
|
|
|
(9,069
|
)
|
|
|
(9,849
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(9,844
|
)
|
|
|
25,467
|
|
|
|
(2,854
|
)
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
5,491
|
|
|
|
(895
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,186
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
4,202
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
7,791
|
|
|
|
11,535
|
|
|
|
33
The following tables provide the portion of gains or losses
included in income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and September 26, 2008 attributable
to unrealized gains or losses relating to those Level 3
assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2009 and
September 26, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains or (Losses) for Level 3 Assets and
Liabilities Still Held
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
Total
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Municipals and money markets
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts, net
|
|
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
Investment securities trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities trading
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
non-agency
MBSs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities non-qualifying
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities, excluding derivative contracts
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities interest and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(2,266
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,399
|
)
|
|
|
Net losses in principal transactions related to net derivative
contracts were primarily due to the narrowing of credit spreads,
primarily related to monoline hedges of mortgage-related
positions. Net losses in principal transactions related to
long-term borrowings were primarily due to the narrowing of
Merrill Lynchs credit spreads on certain equity linked
notes.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains or (Losses) for Level 3 Assets and
Liabilities Still Held
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 26, 2008
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 26, 2008
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
Total
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Interest
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited with
clearing organizations
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
(2,753
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(2,679
|
)
|
Derivative contracts, net
|
|
|
(3,979
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,979
|
)
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
Loans, notes, and mortgages
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
3,811
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,082
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
|
|
Non-recurring
Fair Value
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis and are not included in the tables above.
These assets and liabilities primarily include loans and loan
commitments held for sale and reported at lower of cost or fair
value and loans held for investment that were initially measured
at cost and have been written down to fair value as a result of
an impairment. The following table shows the fair value
hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Non-Recurring Basis
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
as of September 30, 2009
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
941
|
|
|
$
|
2,865
|
|
|
$
|
3,806
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables interest and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Non-Recurring Basis
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
as of December 26, 2008
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes, and mortgages
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,386
|
|
|
$
|
6,727
|
|
|
$
|
11,113
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables interest and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes, and mortgages includes held for sale loans that
are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and for which the
fair value was below the cost basis at September 30, 2009
and December 26, 2008, respectively. It also includes
certain impaired held for investment loans where an allowance
for loan losses has been calculated based upon the fair value of
the loans or collateral. Level 3 assets as of
35
September 30, 2009 primarily relate to residential and
commercial real estate loans that are classified as held for
sale where there continues to be significant illiquidity in the
loan trading and securitization markets. Level 3 assets as
of December 26, 2008 primarily related to U.K. and other
European residential and commercial real estate loans that are
classified as held for sale of $4.6 billion.
Other payables interest and other include amounts
recorded for loan commitments at lower of cost or fair value
where the funded loan will be held for sale.
Fair
Value Option Election
The fair value option election allows companies to irrevocably
elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement
attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities. Changes
in fair value for assets and liabilities for which the election
is made will be recognized in earnings as they occur. The fair
value option election is permitted on an instrument by
instrument basis at initial recognition of an asset or liability
or upon an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting
for that instrument. As discussed above, certain of Merrill
Lynchs financial instruments are required to be accounted
for at fair value under Investment Accounting and Derivatives
Accounting, as well as industry level guidance. For certain
financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value
under other applicable accounting guidance, the fair value
option election has been made.
The following tables provide information about where in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings/(Loss) changes in
fair values of assets and liabilities, for which the fair value
option election has been made, are included for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 26,
2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for Items Measured at Fair Value
Pursuant to the Fair Value Option Election
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Total
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(losses)
|
|
(losses)
|
|
Changes
|
|
(losses)
|
|
(losses)
|
|
Changes
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
in Fair
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
in Fair
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Value
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
Other payables interest and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
Long-term
borrowings(1)
|
|
|
(3,438
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
(7,195
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(7,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other revenues primarily
represent fair value changes on non-recourse long-term
borrowings issued by consolidated SPEs. |
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for Items Measured at Fair Value
Pursuant to the Fair Value Option Election
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Total
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Gains/
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(losses)
|
|
(losses)
|
|
Changes
|
|
(losses)
|
|
(losses)
|
|
Changes
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
in Fair
|
|
Principal
|
|
Other
|
|
in Fair
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Value
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Long-term
borrowings(1)
|
|
|
8,632
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
12,578
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
14,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other revenues primarily
represent fair value changes on non-recourse long-term
borrowings issued by consolidated SPEs. |
The following describes the rationale for electing to account
for certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, as
well as the impact of instrument-specific credit risk on the
fair value.
Resale
and repurchase agreements:
Merrill Lynch made the fair value option election for certain
resale and repurchase agreements. The fair value option election
was made based on the tenor of the resale and repurchase
agreements, which reflects the magnitude of the interest rate
risk. The majority of resale and repurchase agreements
collateralized by U.S. government securities were excluded
from the fair value option election as these contracts are
generally short-dated and therefore the interest rate risk is
not considered significant. Amounts loaned under resale
agreements require collateral with a market value equal to or in
excess of the principal amount loaned resulting in minimal
credit risk for such transactions.
Loans,
notes and mortgages and loan commitments:
Merrill Lynch made the fair value option election for automobile
and certain corporate loans because the loans are risk managed
on a fair value basis. Upon the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by
Bank of America, Merrill Lynch also made the fair value option
election for certain mortgage, corporate, and leveraged loans
and loan commitments. The change in the fair value of loans,
notes and mortgages and loan commitments for which the fair
value option election was made that was attributable to changes
in borrower-specific credit risk were gains of $70 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and gains of
$320 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The change in the fair value of loans, notes and mortgages
for which the fair value option election was made that was
attributable to changes in borrower-specific credit risk was not
material for the three and nine months ended September 26,
2008.
For those loans, notes and mortgages for which the fair value
option election has been made, the aggregate fair value of loans
that are 90 days or more past due and in non-accrual status
is not material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
37
Short-term
and long-term borrowings:
Merrill Lynch made the fair value option election for certain
short-term and long-term borrowings that are risk managed on a
fair value basis, including structured notes, and for which
hedge accounting under Derivatives Accounting had been difficult
to obtain. The majority of the fair value changes on long-term
borrowings is from structured notes with coupon or repayment
terms that are linked to the performance of debt and equity
securities, indices, currencies or commodities. Excluding losses
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
gains for the three and nine months ended September 26,
2008 related to changes in Merrill Lynchs credit spreads,
the majority of (losses)/gains for the respective periods are
offset by gains/(losses) on derivatives that economically hedge
these borrowings and that are accounted for at fair value under
Derivatives Accounting. The changes in the fair value of
liabilities for which the fair value option election was made
that were attributable to changes in Merrill Lynch credit
spreads were losses of approximately $2.1 billion and
$3.5 billion for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and gains of $2.8 billion and
$5.0 billion for the three and nine months ended
September 26, 2008. Changes in Merrill Lynch specific
credit risk are derived by isolating fair value changes due to
changes in Merrill Lynchs credit spreads as observed in
the secondary cash market.
The fair value option election was also made for certain
non-recourse long-term borrowings issued by consolidated SPEs.
The fair value of these long-term borrowings is unaffected by
changes in Merrill Lynchs creditworthiness.
The following tables present the difference between fair values
and the aggregate contractual principal amounts of receivables
under resale agreements, loans, notes, and mortgages and
long-term borrowings for which the fair value option election
has been made as of September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
Due Upon
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements
|
|
$
|
52,436
|
|
|
$
|
52,083
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
9,127
|
|
|
|
(4,362
|
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
borrowings(1)
|
|
|
48,847
|
|
|
|
55,604
|
|
|
|
(6,757
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The majority of the difference
relates to the impact of the widening of Merrill Lynchs
credit spreads, the change in fair value of non-recourse debt,
and zero coupon notes issued at a substantial discount from the
principal amount. |
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
Due Upon
|
|
|
|
|
December 26,
2008
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements
|
|
$
|
62,146
|
|
|
$
|
61,466
|
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
Receivables under securities borrowed transactions
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loans, notes and mortgages
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
borrowings(1)
|
|
|
49,521
|
|
|
|
62,244
|
|
|
|
(12,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The majority of the difference
relates to the impact of the widening of Merrill Lynchs
credit spreads, the change in fair value of non-recourse debt,
and zero coupon notes issued at a substantial discount from the
principal amount. |
Concentration
of risk to the mortgage markets
At September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch had sizeable exposure
to the mortgage market through securities, derivatives, loans
and loan commitments. This exposure primarily related to:
|
|
|
Net exposures of $33.3 billion in U.S. Prime
residential mortgage-related positions and $2.6 billion in
other residential mortgage-related positions, excluding Merrill
Lynchs investment securities portfolio; and
|
|
|
Net exposure of $5.9 billion in commercial real estate
related positions, excluding First Republic, and
$5.3 billion in First Republic commercial real estate
related positions.
|
In September 2008, Merrill Lynch sold $30.6 billion gross
notional amount of U.S. super senior ABS CDOs (the
Portfolio) to an affiliate of Lone Star Funds for a
sales price of $6.7 billion. In connection with this sale,
Merrill Lynch provided financing to the purchaser for
approximately 75% of the purchase price. The recourse on this
loan is limited to the assets of the purchaser, which consist
solely of the Portfolio. All cash flows and distributions from
the Portfolio (including sale proceeds) will be applied in
accordance with a specified priority of payments. The loan had a
carrying value of $4.5 billion at September 30, 2009.
Events of default under the loan are customary events of
default, including failure to pay interest when due and failure
to pay principal at maturity.
Valuation of these exposures will continue to be impacted by
external market factors including default rates, rating agency
actions, and the prices at which observable market transactions
occur. Merrill Lynchs ability to mitigate its risk by
selling or hedging its exposures is also limited by the market
environment.
Concentration
of risk to financial guarantors
To economically hedge certain ABS CDO and
U.S. sub-prime
mortgage positions, Merrill Lynch entered into credit
derivatives with various counterparties, including monolines and
other financial guarantors. At September 30, 2009, the
carrying value of our hedges with financial guarantors related
to U.S. super senior ABS CDOs was $1.0 billion.
39
In addition to hedges with financial guarantors on
U.S. super senior ABS CDOs, we also have hedges on certain
long exposures related to corporate Collateralized Debt
Obligations (CDOs), Collateralized Loan Obligations
(CLOs), Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
(RMBS) and Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
(CMBS). At September 30, 2009, the carrying
value of our hedges with financial guarantors related to these
types of exposures was $4.2 billion.
Disclosure is required on an interim and annual basis of the
estimated fair value of financial instruments, including those
financial instruments for which Merrill Lynch did not make the
fair value option election. The fair values of such instruments
have been derived, in part, by managements assumptions,
the estimated amount and timing of future cash flows and
estimated discount rates. Different assumptions could
significantly affect these estimated fair values. Accordingly,
the net realizable values could be materially different from the
estimates presented below. In addition, the estimates are only
indicative of the value of individual financial instruments and
should not be considered an indication of the fair value of
Merrill Lynch.
Disclosure of the fair value of lease financing arrangements and
nonfinancial instruments, including goodwill and intangible
assets, is not required.
The following disclosures represent financial instruments for
which the ending balances at September 30, 2009 are not
carried at fair value in their entirety on Merrill Lynchs
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Short-term
Financial Instruments
The carrying value of short-term financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, certain securities
financing transactions, customer and broker-dealer receivables
and payables, and commercial paper and other short-term
borrowings, approximates the fair value of these instruments.
These financial instruments generally expose Merrill Lynch to
limited credit risk and have no stated maturities or have
short-term maturities and carry interest rates that approximate
market. Merrill Lynch applied the fair value option election for
certain securities financing transactions.
Loans,
Notes and Mortgages
Fair values were generally determined by discounting both
principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected using
an observable discount rate for similar instruments with
adjustments that management believes a market participant would
consider in determining fair value. Merrill Lynch estimates the
cash flows expected to be collected using internal credit risk,
interest rate and prepayment risk models that incorporate
managements best estimate of current key assumptions, such
as default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds for the
life of the loan. Merrill Lynch made the fair value option
election for certain loans and loan commitments. See Note 4
for additional information on loans for which Merrill Lynch made
the fair value option election.
Deposits
The fair value for certain deposits with stated maturities was
calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using current
market rates for instruments with similar maturities. For
deposits with no stated maturities, the carrying amount was
considered to approximate fair value and does not take into
40
account the significant value of the cost advantage and
stability of Merrill Lynchs long-term relationships with
depositors.
Long-term
Borrowings
Merrill Lynch uses quoted market prices for its long-term
borrowings when available. When quoted market prices are not
available, fair value is estimated based on current market
interest rates and credit spreads for debt with similar
maturities. Merrill Lynch made the fair value option election
for certain long-term borrowings, including structured notes,
for which hedge accounting had been difficult to obtain. See
Note 4 for additional information.
The book and fair values of certain financial instruments at
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, notes and
mortgages(1)
|
|
$
|
67,729
|
|
|
$
|
66,301
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
47,819
|
|
|
|
47,872
|
|
Long-term
borrowings(2)
|
|
|
164,990
|
|
|
|
171,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loans are presented net of
allowance for loan losses and exclude leases. The fair value is
determined based on the present value of future cash flows using
credit spreads or risk adjusted rates of return that a buyer of
the portfolio would require. Merrill Lynch expects to collect
the principal cash flows underlying the book values as well as
the related interest cash flows. |
(2) |
|
Includes junior subordinated
notes (related to trust preferred securities). |
A derivative is an instrument whose value is derived from an
underlying instrument or index, such as interest rates, equity
security prices, currencies, commodity prices or credit spreads.
Derivatives include futures, forwards, swaps, or option
contracts, or other financial instruments with similar
characteristics. Derivative contracts often involve future
commitments to exchange interest payment streams or currencies
based on a notional or contractual amount (e.g., interest rate
swaps or currency forwards) or to purchase or sell other
financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date
(e.g., options to buy or sell securities or currencies).
Derivatives Accounting establishes accounting and reporting
standards for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
(embedded derivatives) and for hedging activities.
Derivatives Accounting requires that an entity recognize all
derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those
instruments at fair value. The fair value of all derivatives is
recorded on a
net-by-counterparty
basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets where
management believes a legal right of setoff exists under an
enforceable netting agreement. All derivatives, including
bifurcated embedded derivatives within structured notes, are
reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as trading
assets and liabilities.
The accounting for changes in fair value of a derivative
instrument depends on its intended use and if it is designated
and qualifies as an accounting hedging instrument under
Derivatives Accounting.
41
Trading
derivatives
Merrill Lynch enters into derivatives to facilitate client
transactions, for proprietary trading and financing purposes,
and to manage risk exposures arising from trading assets and
liabilities. Changes in fair value for these derivatives are
reported in current period earnings as principal transactions
revenues.
Non-trading
derivatives
Merrill Lynch also enters into derivatives in order to manage
risk exposures arising from assets and liabilities not carried
at fair value as follows:
|
|
1. |
Merrill Lynchs debt was issued in a variety of maturities
and currencies to achieve the lowest cost financing possible.
Merrill Lynch enters into derivative transactions to hedge these
liabilities. Derivatives used most frequently include swap
agreements that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert fixed-rate interest payments into variable payments;
|
|
|
|
Change the underlying interest rate basis or reset
frequency; and
|
|
|
|
Change the settlement currency of a debt instrument.
|
Changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives are
reported in interest expense when hedge accounting is applied;
otherwise changes in fair value are reported in other revenue.
Changes in the fair value of foreign currency derivatives are
reported in other revenue.
|
|
2.
|
Merrill Lynch uses foreign-exchange forward contracts,
foreign-exchange options, and currency swaps to hedge its net
investments in foreign operations, as well as other foreign
currency exposures (e.g.,
non-U.S. dollar
denominated debt and expenses). These derivatives are used to
mitigate the impact of changes in exchange rates. Changes in the
fair value of these derivatives are reported in other revenue,
unless net investment hedge accounting is applied.
|
|
3.
|
Merrill Lynch enters into futures, swaps, options and forward
contracts to manage the price risk of certain commodity
inventory and forecasted commodity purchases and sales. Changes
in fair value of these derivatives are reported in principal
transaction revenues, unless cash flow hedge accounting is
applied.
|
|
4.
|
Merrill Lynch enters into credit default swaps to manage the
credit risk on certain loans that are not part of trading
activities. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are
reported in other revenue.
|
Derivatives that qualify as accounting hedges under the guidance
in Derivatives Accounting are designated as one of the following:
|
|
1. |
A hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability
(fair value hedge). Changes in the fair value of
derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges
of interest rate risk, along with the gain or loss on the hedged
liability that is attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded
in current period earnings as interest expense. Changes in the
fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as
fair value hedges of commodity price risk, along with the gain
or loss on the hedged asset that is attributable to the hedged
risk, are recorded in current period earnings in principal
transactions.
|
42
|
|
2.
|
A hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid
related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow
hedge). Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are
designated and qualify as effective cash flow hedges are
recorded in OCI until earnings are affected by the variability
of cash flows of the hedged asset or liability. For commodity
hedges, the amount is reclassified out of OCI and recorded in
principal transactions when the forecasted purchase or sale of
the commodity occurs.
|
|
3.
|
A hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as
hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation are recorded
in the foreign currency translation adjustment account within
OCI. Changes in the fair value of the hedge instruments that are
associated with the difference between the spot rate and the
contracted forward rate are recorded in current period earnings
in other revenues.
|
Merrill Lynch formally assesses, both at the inception of the
hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging derivatives
are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash
flows of hedged items. Merrill Lynch uses regression analysis at
the hedges inception and for each reporting period
thereafter to assess whether the derivative used in its hedging
transaction is expected to be and has been highly effective in
offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged
item. When assessing hedge effectiveness on interest rate hedges
and fair value hedges of commodity price risk, there are no
attributes of the derivatives used to hedge the fair value
exposure that are excluded from the assessment. For cash flow
hedges of commodity price risk, the difference between the spot
rate and the contracted forward rate which represents the time
value of money is excluded from the assessment of hedge
effectiveness and is recorded in principal transactions
revenues. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly
effective as a hedge, Merrill Lynch discontinues hedge
accounting.
Hedge accounting activity for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 included the following:
Fair
value hedges of interest rate risk on long-term
borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Account location
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income on the derivative
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
(1,581
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income on the long-term borrowing
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(1,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
981
|
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income due to hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(212
|
)
|
|
$
|
(600
|
)
|
Carrying value of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Notional amount of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in an asset position
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,845
|
|
|
$
|
59,845
|
|
in a liability position
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,480
|
|
|
$
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
43
Fair
value hedges of commodity price risk on commodity
inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Account location
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income on the derivative
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income on the commodity inventory
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income due to hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Carrying value of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Notional amount of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in an asset position
|
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
in a liability position
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
Cash
flow hedges of commodity price risk on forecasted purchases and
sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Account location
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) on the derivative deferred in equity
|
|
Accumulated other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Gain/(loss) reclassified into earnings in the current period
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income due to hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Amount that is expected to be reclassified into earnings in the
next 12 months as of September 30, 2009
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Carrying value of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Notional amount of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in an asset position
|
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
in a liability position
|
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
44
Net
investment hedges of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Account location
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) on the derivative and non-derivative hedges deferred
in equity
|
|
Accumulated other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(421
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,682
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income due to hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Gain/(loss) recognized in income from the unused portion (time
value) of the hedging derivative
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
Carrying value of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
Carrying value of non-derivative hedges as of September 30,
2009
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
Notional amount of hedging derivatives as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in an asset position
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,058
|
|
|
$
|
11,058
|
|
in a liability position
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,266
|
|
|
$
|
11,266
|
|
|
|
Gains/(losses)
on non-trading derivatives not in hedge
relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Account location
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Interest rate risk
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
(594
|
)
|
Foreign currency risk
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Credit risk
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
The above amounts represent net gains/(losses) on derivatives
that are not used for trading purposes and are not used in
hedging relationships. Interest rate risk primarily relates to
derivatives used to hedge long-term debt where hedge accounting
is not applied and derivatives with third parties that are
recorded by Merrill Lynch and utilized by Bank of America at the
consolidated level for hedge accounting purposes. As the hedged
item is not held by Merrill Lynch, hedge accounting is not
applied by Merrill Lynch. Foreign currency risk primarily
relates to economic hedges of foreign currency denominated
transactions that generate earnings upon remeasurement in
accordance with ASC
830-20
Foreign Currency Transactions (Foreign Currency
Transactions). As both the remeasurement of the
foreign currency risk on the transaction and the changes in fair
value of the derivative are recorded in earnings, hedge
accounting is not applied. Credit risk relates to credit default
swaps used to economically manage the credit risk on certain
loans not included in trading activities.
45
Derivative
balances by primary risk
Derivative instruments contain numerous market risks. In
particular, most derivatives have interest rate risk, as they
contain an element of financing risk which is affected by
changes in interest rates. Additionally, derivatives expose
Merrill Lynch to counterparty credit risk, although this is
generally mitigated by collateral margining and netting
arrangements. For disclosure purposes below, the primary risk of
a derivative is largely determined by the business that is
engaging in the derivative activity. For instance, a derivative
that is initiated by an equities derivative desk will generally
have equity price risk as its primary underlying market risk and
is classified as such for the purposes of this disclosure,
despite the fact that there may be other market risks that
affect the value of the instrument.
The following table identifies the primary risk for derivative
instruments at September 30, 2009. The primary risk is
provided on a gross basis, prior to the application of the
impact of counterparty and cash collateral netting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Contract/
|
|
Trading Assets-
|
|
Contract/
|
|
Trading Liabilities-
|
|
|
Notional(1)
|
|
Derivative Contracts
|
|
Notional(1)
|
|
Derivative Contracts
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
$
|
12,319,763
|
|
|
$
|
582,168
|
|
|
$
|
11,215,975
|
|
|
$
|
571,174
|
|
Futures and forwards
|
|
|
1,635,948
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
1,651,469
|
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
Written options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,398,659
|
|
|
|
51,393
|
|
Purchased options
|
|
|
1,214,564
|
|
|
|
51,208
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
104,920
|
|
|
|
14,289
|
|
|
|
113,462
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
Spot, futures and forwards
|
|
|
315,051
|
|
|
|
13,314
|
|
|
|
292,323
|
|
|
|
11,935
|
|
Written options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
292,876
|
|
|
|
12,760
|
|
Purchased options
|
|
|
304,853
|
|
|
|
12,821
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
16,557
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
14,486
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
Futures and forwards
|
|
|
51,890
|
|
|
|
4,510
|
|
|
|
48,241
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
Written options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
333,942
|
|
|
|
25,710
|
|
Purchased options
|
|
|
290,647
|
|
|
|
22,954
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
40,637
|
|
|
|
8,894
|
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
|
|
8,260
|
|
Futures and forwards
|
|
|
1,029,546
|
|
|
|
14,817
|
|
|
|
1,062,483
|
|
|
|
13,567
|
|
Written options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96,850
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
Purchased options
|
|
|
94,897
|
|
|
|
5,994
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Credit derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased protection:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps
|
|
|
1,211,026
|
|
|
|
87,250
|
|
|
|
603,170
|
|
|
|
24,229
|
|
Total return swaps
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Other Credit Derivatives
|
|
|
5,547
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Written protection:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps
|
|
|
599,394
|
|
|
|
23,274
|
|
|
|
1,318,012
|
|
|
|
90,273
|
|
Total return swaps
|
|
|
2,613
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
11,870
|
|
|
|
4,491
|
|
Other Credit Derivatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,267
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
Gross derivative assets/liabilities
|
|
$
|
19,240,387
|
|
|
$
|
848,064
|
|
|
$
|
18,497,636
|
|
|
$
|
844,064
|
|
Less: Legally enforceable master netting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(759,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(759,009
|
)
|
|
|
Less: Cash collateral applied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,615
|
)
|
|
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts include trading
derivatives, non-trading derivatives and bifurcated embedded
derivatives. |
46
Trading
revenues
Merrill Lynch enters into trading derivatives and non-derivative
cash instruments to facilitate client transactions, for
proprietary trading and financing purposes, and to manage risk
exposures arising from trading assets and liabilities. The
resulting risk from derivative and non-derivative cash
instruments is managed on a portfolio basis as part of Merrill
Lynchs sales and trading activities and the related
revenue is recorded on different income statement line items
including principal transactions, commissions, other revenues
and net interest profit/(loss). The following table identifies
the amounts in the income statement line items attributable to
trading and non-trading activities including both derivatives
and non-derivative cash instruments categorized by primary risk
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Non-trading amounts relate to activities in connection with
principal investment, wealth management, and certain lending
activities; economic hedging activity discussed in the
Non-trading derivatives section above, and the impact of
changes in Merrill Lynchs own creditworthiness on
borrowings accounted for at fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
For the Three Months
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Net Interest
|
|
|
Ended Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Commissions
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
Profit/(Loss)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
Foreign Exchange Risk
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Equity Risk
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
Commodity Risk
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading related
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
4,210
|
|
Non-trading related
|
|
|
(2,322
|
)
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
|
$
|
1,352
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Net Interest
|
|
|
Ended Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Commissions
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
Profit/(Loss)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
445
|
|
|
$
|
1,944
|
|
Foreign Exchange Risk
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Equity Risk
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
2,522
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
4,455
|
|
Commodity Risk
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
630
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
3,445
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading related
|
|
|
8,161
|
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
12,315
|
|
Non-trading related
|
|
|
(4,114
|
)
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,047
|
|
|
$
|
4,049
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
11,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes other income and
other-than-temporary impairment losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities. |
Derivatives
as guarantees
Merrill Lynch enters into certain derivative contracts that meet
the definition of a guarantee under ASC 460, Guarantees
(Guarantees Accounting). Guarantees are defined
to include derivative contracts that contingently require a
guarantor to make payment to a guaranteed party based on
47
changes in an underlying (such as changes in the value of
interest rates, security prices, currency rates, commodity
prices, indices, etc.), that relate to an asset, liability or
equity security of a guaranteed party. Derivatives that meet the
definition of guarantees include certain written options (e.g.,
written interest rate and written currency options). Merrill
Lynch does not track, for accounting purposes, whether its
clients enter into these derivative contracts for speculative or
hedging purposes. Accordingly, Merrill Lynch has disclosed
information about all credit derivatives and certain types of
written options that can potentially be used by clients to
protect against changes in an underlying, regardless of how the
contracts are actually used by the client.
Merrill Lynchs derivatives that act as guarantees at
September 30, 2009 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout/
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
1 year
|
|
1+
- 3 years
|
|
3+
- 5 years
|
|
Over 5 years
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
grade(2)
|
|
$
|
750,963
|
|
|
$
|
62,747
|
|
|
$
|
151,832
|
|
|
$
|
338,599
|
|
|
$
|
197,785
|
|
|
$
|
28,731
|
|
Non-investment
grade(2)
|
|
|
1,180,926
|
|
|
|
82,472
|
|
|
|
247,402
|
|
|
|
404,292
|
|
|
|
446,760
|
|
|
|
66,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit derivatives
|
|
|
1,931,889
|
|
|
|
145,219
|
|
|
|
399,234
|
|
|
|
742,891
|
|
|
|
644,545
|
|
|
|
94,764
|
|
Other derivatives
|
|
|
1,819,409
|
|
|
|
569,356
|
|
|
|
497,093
|
|
|
|
284,643
|
|
|
|
468,317
|
|
|
|
82,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
3,751,298
|
|
|
$
|
714,575
|
|
|
$
|
896,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,027,534
|
|
|
$
|
1,112,862
|
|
|
$
|
177,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derivative contracts are shown
on a gross basis prior to cash collateral or counterparty
netting. |
(2) |
|
Refers to the creditworthiness
of the underlying reference obligations. |
Credit
derivatives
Credit derivatives derive value based on an underlying third
party referenced obligation or a portfolio of referenced
obligations. Merrill Lynch is both a seller and a buyer of
credit protection. A seller of credit protection is required to
make payments to a buyer upon the occurrence of a predefined
credit event. Such credit events generally include bankruptcy of
the referenced credit entity and failure to pay under their
credit obligations, as well as acceleration of indebtedness and
payment repudiation or moratorium. Merrill Lynch considers
credit derivatives to be guarantees where it is the seller of
credit protection. For credit derivatives based on a portfolio
of referenced credits or credit indices, Merrill Lynch as a
seller of credit protection may not be required to make payment
until a specified amount of loss has occurred
and/or may
only be required to make payment up to a specified amount.
For most credit derivatives, the notional value represents the
maximum amount payable by Merrill Lynch as a seller of
credit protection. However, Merrill Lynch does not exclusively
monitor its exposure to credit derivatives based on notional
value. Instead, a risk framework is used to define risk
tolerances and establish limits to help to ensure that certain
credit risk-related losses occur within acceptable, predefined
limits. Merrill Lynch discloses internal categorizations (i.e.,
investment grade, non-investment grade) consistent with how risk
is managed to evaluate the payment status of its freestanding
credit derivative instruments.
Merrill Lynch economically hedges its exposure to credit
derivatives by entering into a variety of offsetting derivative
contracts and security positions. For example, in certain
instances, Merrill Lynch purchases credit protection with
identical underlying referenced names to offset its exposure. At
48
September 30, 2009, the notional value and carrying value
of credit protection purchased and credit protection sold by
Merrill Lynch with identical underlying referenced names was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout/
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
1 year
|
|
1+
- 3 years
|
|
3+
- 5 years
|
|
Over 5 years
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Credit derivatives purchased
|
|
$
|
1,786,772
|
|
|
$
|
138,700
|
|
|
$
|
383,858
|
|
|
$
|
716,000
|
|
|
$
|
548,214
|
|
|
$
|
77,886
|
|
Credit derivatives sold
|
|
|
1,901,795
|
|
|
|
142,663
|
|
|
|
396,678
|
|
|
|
736,501
|
|
|
|
625,953
|
|
|
|
85,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derivative contracts are shown
on a gross basis prior to cash collateral or counterparty
netting. |
Other
derivative contracts
Other derivative contracts in the guarantees table above
primarily represent written interest rate options and written
currency options. For such contracts the maximum payout could
theoretically be unlimited, because, for example, the rise in
interest rates or changes in foreign exchange rates could
theoretically be unlimited. Merrill Lynch does not monitor its
exposure to derivatives based on the theoretical maximum payout
because that measure does not take into consideration the
probability of the occurrence. As such, rather than including
the maximum payout, the notional value of these contracts has
been included to provide information about the magnitude of
involvement with these types of contracts. However, it should be
noted that the notional value is not a reliable indicator of
Merrill Lynchs exposure to these contracts. Instead,
as previously noted, a risk framework is used to define risk
tolerances and establish limits to help ensure that certain
risk-related losses occur within acceptable, predefined limits.
As the fair value and risk of payment under these derivative
contracts are based upon market factors, such as changes in
interest rates or foreign exchange rates, the carrying values in
the table above reflect the best estimate of Merrill
Lynchs performance risk under these transactions at
September 30, 2009. Merrill Lynch economically hedges its
exposure to these contracts by entering into a variety of
offsetting derivative contracts and security positions.
Credit
risk management of derivatives
Merrill Lynch defines counterparty credit risk as the potential
for loss that can occur as a result of an individual,
counterparty, or issuer being unable or unwilling to honor its
contractual obligations. Merrill Lynch mitigates its credit risk
to counterparties through a variety of techniques, including,
where appropriate, the right to require initial collateral or
margin, the right to terminate transactions or to obtain
collateral should unfavorable events occur, the right to call
for collateral when certain exposure thresholds are exceeded,
the right to call for third party guarantees, and the purchase
of credit default protection.
Merrill Lynch enters into International Swaps and Derivatives
Association, Inc. (ISDA) master agreements or their
equivalent (master netting agreements) with almost
all derivative counterparties. Master netting agreements provide
protection in bankruptcy in certain circumstances and, in some
cases, enable receivables and payables with the same
counterparty to be offset for accounting and risk management
purposes. Netting agreements are generally negotiated
bilaterally and can require complex terms. While Merrill Lynch
makes reasonable efforts to execute such agreements, it is
possible that a counterparty may be unwilling to sign such an
agreement and, as a result, would subject Merrill Lynch to
additional credit risk. The enforceability of master netting
agreements under bankruptcy laws in certain countries or in
certain industries is not free from doubt, and receivables and
payables with counterparties in these countries or industries
are accordingly recorded on a gross basis.
Where Merrill Lynch has entered into legally enforceable netting
agreements with counterparties, it reports derivative assets and
liabilities, and any related cash collateral, net in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASC
210-20,
Balance Sheet-Offsetting. At September 30, 2009,
cash collateral received of $30.9 billion and cash
collateral paid of $43.6 billion was netted against
derivative assets and liabilities, respectively.
49
Merrill Lynch considers the impact of counterparty credit risk
on the valuation of derivative contracts. Factors used to
determine the credit valuation adjustments on the derivatives
portfolio include current exposure levels (i.e., fair value
prior to credit valuation adjustments) and expected exposure
levels profiled over the maturity of the contracts. Credit
default swaps market information, including either quoted single
name credit default swaps or index or other proxy credit default
swaps, is also considered. In addition, the credit valuation
adjustments also take into account the netting and credit
provisions of relevant agreements including collateral margin
agreements and legally enforceable netting agreements. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
valuation adjustments of approximately $1.1 billion and
$1.2 billion, respectively were recognized as gains in
principal transactions for counterparty credit risk. At
September 30, 2009, the cumulative counterparty credit risk
valuation adjustment that was reflected in derivative assets was
$6.8 billion. In addition, the fair value of derivative
liabilities is adjusted to reflect the impact of Merrill
Lynchs credit quality. During the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, valuation adjustments of
approximately $0.4 billion and $0.5 billion,
respectively, were recognized as losses in principal
transactions for changes in Merrill Lynchs credit risk. At
September 30, 2009, the cumulative credit risk valuation
adjustment that was reflected in the derivative liabilities
balance was $0.5 billion.
Bank of America has guaranteed the performance of Merrill Lynch
on certain derivative transactions. The aggregate amount of such
derivative liabilities was approximately $270 million at
September 30, 2009.
Credit-risk
related contingent features
The majority of Merrill Lynchs derivative contracts
contain credit-risk-related contingent features, primarily
within the ISDA agreements, that help to reduce the credit risk
of these instruments as compared to other obligations of the
respective counterparty with whom Merrill Lynch has transacted
(e.g., other senior debt). These contingent features may be for
the benefit of Merrill Lynch or may benefit Merrill Lynchs
counterparties in respect of changes in Merrill Lynch
creditworthiness. At September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch
posted collateral of $48.8 billion under derivative
contracts that were in a liability position, of which
$43.6 billion represented cash collateral, as noted above.
In connection with certain OTC derivatives transactions and
other trading agreements, Merrill Lynch could be required to
provide additional collateral to or terminate transactions with
certain counterparties in the event of a downgrade of the senior
debt ratings of ML & Co. The amount of additional
collateral required depends on the contract and is usually a
fixed incremental amount
and/or an
amount related to the market value of the exposure. At
September 30, 2009, the amount of additional collateral and
termination payments that would be required for such derivatives
transactions and trading agreements was approximately
$1.6 billion in the event of a downgrade to low single-A by
all credit agencies. A further downgrade of ML &
Co.s long-term senior debt credit rating to the BBB+ or
equivalent level would require approximately $0.6 billion
of additional collateral.
Merrill Lynch enters into secured borrowing and lending
transactions in order to meet customers needs and earn
residual interest rate spreads, obtain securities for settlement
and finance trading inventory positions.
Under these transactions, Merrill Lynch either receives or
provides collateral, including U.S. Government and agency
securities, asset-backed, corporate debt, equity, and
non-U.S. government
and agency securities. Merrill Lynch receives collateral in
connection with resale agreements, securities borrowed
transactions, customer margin loans and other loans. Under most
agreements, Merrill Lynch is permitted to sell or repledge the
securities received (e.g., use the securities to secure
repurchase agreements, enter into securities lending
transactions, or deliver to counterparties to cover short
positions). At September 30, 2009 and December 26,
2008, the fair value of securities received as
50
collateral where Merrill Lynch is permitted to sell or repledge
the securities was $314 billion and $327 billion,
respectively, and the fair value of the portion that has been
sold or repledged was $259 billion and $251 billion,
respectively. Merrill Lynch may use securities received as
collateral for resale agreements to satisfy regulatory
requirements such as
Rule 15c3-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Merrill Lynch additionally receives securities as collateral in
connection with certain securities transactions in which Merrill
Lynch is the lender. In instances where Merrill Lynch is
permitted to sell or repledge securities received, Merrill Lynch
reports the fair value of such securities received as collateral
and the related obligation to return securities received as
collateral in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The carrying value and classification of securities owned by
Merrill Lynch that have been pledged to counterparties where
those counterparties do not have the right to sell or repledge
at September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
December 26,
2008
|
|
|
Trading asset category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt and preferred stock
|
|
$
|
6,318
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,024
|
|
Equities and convertible debentures
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
|
|
|
10,995
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
Mortgages, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
|
|
|
12,462
|
|
Municipals and money markets
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments and agencies
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,358
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, Merrill Lynch has pledged approximately
$2.8 billion and $18.6 billion of loans, and
$895 million and $4.4 billion of investment securities
to counterparties at September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, respectively, where those counterparties
do not have the right to sell or repledge those assets. In some
cases, Merrill Lynch has transferred assets to consolidated VIEs
where those restricted assets serve as collateral for the
interests issued by the VIEs. These restricted assets are
included in the amounts above. These transactions are also
described in Note 9.
Generally, when Merrill Lynch transfers financial instruments
that are not recorded as sales (i.e., secured borrowing
transactions), the liability is recorded as either payables
under repurchase agreements or payables under securities loaned
transactions; however, in instances where Merrill Lynch
transfers financial assets to a consolidated VIE, the
liabilities of the consolidated VIE will be reflected in long or
short term borrowings (see Note 9). In either case, at the
time of transfer, the related liability is equal to the cash
received in the transaction. In most cases the lenders in
secured borrowing transactions have full recourse to Merrill
Lynch (i.e., recourse beyond the assets pledged). Instances
where the lenders do not have full recourse to Merrill Lynch are
generally related to failed securitization transactions where
residential and commercial mortgages are transferred to VIEs
that do not meet QSPE conditions (typically as a result of
derivatives entered into by the VIE that pertain to interests
held by Merrill Lynch).
51
Investment securities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets include:
|
|
|
Investments within the scope of Investment Accounting that are
held by ML & Co. and certain of its non-broker-dealer
entities, including Merrill Lynch banks, and consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities, including debt
held-for-investment
and liquidity and collateral management purposes that are
classified as
available-for-sale,
debt securities held for trading purposes, and debt securities
that Merrill Lynch intends to hold until maturity;
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities, which are generally classified as
available-for-sale.
|
|
|
|
Non-qualifying investments are those that are not within the
scope of Investment Accounting and consist principally of equity
investments, including investments in partnerships and joint
ventures. Included in equity investments are investments
accounted for under the equity method of accounting, which
consist of investments in (i) partnerships and certain
limited liability corporations where Merrill Lynch has more than
a minor influence (generally defined as greater than a three
percent interest) and (ii) corporate entities where Merrill
Lynch has the ability to exercise significant influence over the
investee (generally defined as ownership and voting interest of
20% to 50%). Also included in equity investments are private
equity investments that Merrill Lynch holds for capital
appreciation
and/or
current income and which are accounted for at fair value in
accordance with the Investment Company Guide, as well as private
equity investments accounted for at fair value under the fair
value option election. The carrying value of such private equity
investments reflects expected exit values based upon market
prices or other valuation methodologies, including discounted
expected cash flows and market comparables of similar companies.
|
Investment securities reported on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2009 and December 26,
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
December 26,
2008
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale(1)
|
|
$
|
18,288
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,103
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
Held-to-maturity(2)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
Non-qualifying(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
investments(4)
|
|
|
18,190
|
|
|
|
|
24,306
|
|
Investments in trust preferred securities and other investments
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
39,961
|
|
|
|
$
|
66,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, includes $6.0 billion and
$9.2 billion, respectively, of investment securities
reported in cash and securities segregated for regulatory
purposes or deposited with clearing organizations. The decline
in available-for-sale securities from June 30, 2009
primarily reflected asset sales and the sale of MLBUSA to Bank
of America. |
(2) |
|
The 2008 balance primarily
relates to notes issued by Bloomberg, Inc. in connection with
the sale of Merrill Lynchs 20% stake in Bloomberg L.P.,
which was reclassified to loans held for investment in 2009
pursuant to the acquisition by Bank of America. |
(3) |
|
Non-qualifying for Investment
Accounting purposes. |
(4) |
|
Includes Merrill Lynchs
investment in BlackRock, Inc. |
52
As a result of the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of
America, all securities have a new cost basis as of
January 1, 2009. For the three and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009,
other-than-temporary
impairment charges related to non-agency mortgage-backed
available-for-sale
securities were $306 million and $603 million,
respectively. The credit-related portions of these amounts were
$305 million and $599 million for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
In the three and nine months ended September 26, 2008,
Merrill Lynch recorded
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $847 million and $2.9 billion,
respectively, primarily related to certain mortgage and
asset-backed securities. Refer to Note 1 for Merrill
Lynchs accounting policies regarding
other-than-temporary-impairment
of investment securities.
Information regarding investment securities subject to
Investment Accounting follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
$
|
15,763
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(134
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,863
|
|
Non-agency
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
Corporate/Agency bonds
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other taxable securities
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Available-for-Sale
Securities
|
|
$
|
18,661
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
(876
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt and municipal
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,914
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
(876
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of
America, and the new cost bases established on January 1,
2009, there were no
available-for-sale
securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than one
year. The following table presents fair value and unrealized
losses, after hedges, for
available-for-sale
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time
that the individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position at December 26, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
More than 1 Year
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
Asset category
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed
|
|
$
|
8,449
|
|
|
$
|
(4,132
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,291
|
|
|
$
|
(5,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,740
|
|
|
$
|
(10,042
|
)
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
8,454
|
|
|
|
(4,134
|
)
|
|
|
22,483
|
|
|
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
|
30,937
|
|
|
|
(10,122
|
)
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
8,455
|
|
|
$
|
(4,136
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,538
|
|
|
$
|
(6,008
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,993
|
|
|
$
|
(10,144
|
)
|
|
|
53
The amortized cost and fair value of
available-for-sale
debt securities by expected maturity for mortgage-backed
securities and contractual maturity for other debt securities at
September 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
623
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
9,045
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
8,386
|
|
|
|
8,395
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
$
|
18,661
|
|
|
$
|
18,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Actual maturities may differ
from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right
to call or prepay their obligations with or without prepayment
penalties. |
The proceeds and gross realized gains/(losses) from the sale of
available-for-sale
securities during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Proceeds(1)
|
|
$
|
5,655
|
|
|
$
|
11,499
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes approximately $2
billion related to the sale of MLBUSA to Bank of America during
the third quarter of 2009. |
Equity
Method Investments
Summarized aggregate financial information for Merrill
Lynchs most significant equity method investees (BlackRock
Inc., Warburg Pincus Funds IX and X, L.P. and WCG Master
Fund Ltd.) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
$
|
3,579
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
54
The following provides information for consolidated VIEs, for
VIEs in which Merrill Lynch is the sponsor as defined below or
is a significant variable interest holder
(Sponsor/Significant VIH) and for VIEs that are
established for securitizations and asset-backed financing
arrangements.
Merrill Lynch has defined sponsor to include all
transactions where Merrill Lynch has transferred assets to a VIE
and/or
structured the VIE, regardless of whether or not the asset
transfer has met the sale conditions in Financial Transfers and
Servicing Accounting. Merrill Lynch discloses all instances
where continued involvement with the assets exposes it to
potential economic gain/(loss), regardless of whether or not
that continued involvement is considered to be a variable
interest in the VIE.
Continued involvement includes:
|
|
|
Retaining or holding an interest in the VIE,
|
|
|
Providing liquidity or other support to the VIE or directly to
the investors in the VIE. This includes liquidity facilities,
guarantees, and derivatives that absorb the risk of the assets
in the VIE, including total return swaps and written credit
default swaps,
|
|
|
Servicing the assets in the VIE, and
|
|
|
Acting as counterparty to derivatives that do not absorb the
risk of the assets in the VIE. These include derivatives that
introduce risk into the VIE such as credit default swaps where
the VIE takes credit risk (generally found in credit-linked note
structures) or equity derivatives where the VIE takes equity
risk (generally found in equity-linked note structures);
however, Merrill Lynch excludes transactions where it only acts
as counterparty to interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives.
|
Merrill Lynch has not provided financial support to any VIE
beyond that which is contractually required. Quantitative
information on contractually required support is reflected in
the tables provided below and in Note 14.
Transactions with VIEs are categorized as follows:
Primary Beneficiary Includes transactions
where Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary and consolidates
the VIE.
Sponsor/Significant VIH Includes transactions
where Merrill Lynch is the sponsor and has continued involvement
with the VIE or is a significant variable interest holder in the
VIE. This category excludes most transactions where
Merrill Lynch transferred financial assets and the transfer was
accounted for as a sale (these transactions are included in
securitization transactions as described below). However,
unconsolidated credit linked note VIEs (CLNs) and CDOs/CLOs
are included in this category, regardless of whether or not
Merrill Lynch transferred financial assets and accounted for the
transfer as a sale.
Securitization transactions Securitization
transactions include transactions where Merrill Lynch
transferred financial assets and accounted for the transfer as a
sale (with the exception noted above). These transactions also
include asset-backed financing arrangements. This category
includes both QSPEs and non-QSPEs and is reflected in the
securitization section of this Note. QSPEs are commonly used by
Merrill Lynch in mortgage and municipal bond securitization
transactions as described below. Merrill Lynch does not
consolidate QSPEs.
55
Merrill Lynch has entered into transactions with different types
of VIEs which are described as follows:
Loan and
Real Estate VIEs
Merrill Lynch has involvement with VIEs that hold mortgage
related loans or real estate. These VIEs include entities that
are primarily designed to obtain exposure to mortgage related
assets or invest in real estate for both clients and Merrill
Lynch. Loan and real estate VIEs include failed securitization
transactions where residential and commercial mortgages are
transferred to VIEs that do not meet QSPE conditions (typically
as a result of derivatives entered into by the VIE that pertain
to interests held by Merrill Lynch) and loan VIEs that hold
mortgage loans where Merrill Lynch holds most or all of the
issued financing but does not have voting control. Loan and real
estate VIEs are reported in the Consolidated VIEs table and the
Sponsor/Significant VIH table. In addition, many loan VIEs,
specifically those related to residential and commercial
mortgages, are securitization VIEs that meet the QSPE criteria.
Transactions where Merrill Lynch is the transferor of loans to a
VIE or QSPE and accounts for the transaction as a sale are
reflected in the Securitization Transactions table of this Note.
Merrill Lynch generally consolidates failed securitization VIEs
where it retains the residual interests in the VIE and therefore
absorbs the majority of the VIEs expected losses, gains or
both. As a result of the illiquidity in the securitization
markets, Merrill Lynch has been unable to sell certain
securities, which has prohibited these VIEs from being
considered QSPEs. Depending upon the liquidity in the
securitization market, these transactions and future
transactions could continue to fail QSPE status and may require
consolidation and related disclosures. Given that these VIEs
have been designed to meet the QSPE requirements, Merrill Lynch
has no control over the assets held by these VIEs. These assets
have been pledged to the noteholders in the VIEs, and are
therefore included in the firm-owned assets pledged balance
reported in Note 7. In most instances, the beneficial
interest holders in these VIEs have no recourse to the general
credit of Merrill Lynch; rather their investments are paid
exclusively from the assets in the VIE. Securitization VIEs that
hold loan assets are typically financed through the issuance of
several classes of debt (i.e., tranches) with ratings that range
from AAA to unrated residuals.
Loan VIEs that hold mortgage loans and are not securitization
VIEs are typically wholly owned or have a small amount of
financing provided by investors (which may include the
investment manager) through different classes of loans or
securities. Where Merrill Lynch consolidates these VIEs, Merrill
Lynch has the ability to use the assets to fund operations.
Real estate VIEs that hold property are typically financed
through the issuance of one or more classes of loans or
securities (e.g. senior, junior, and mezzanine) and an equity
tranche. The investors have recourse only to the real estate
assets held by these VIEs. In most real estate entities, the
equity tranche is considered sufficient to finance the
activities of the entity, and the entity would meet the
conditions to be considered a VRE. The real estate entities
included in this disclosure are VIEs because generally they do
not have sufficient equity to finance their activities.
Equity
Funds
Merrill Lynch has made certain investments in equity funds that
are VIEs. Merrill Lynch may be the primary beneficiary of these
funds as a result of a majority investment in the fund. In
instances where Merrill Lynch is not the primary beneficiary, it
is considered the sponsor and generally has continued
involvement through equity derivatives with these VIEs. VIEs
where Merrill Lynch is the sponsor and has continued involvement
are reflected in the Sponsor/
56
Significant VIH table. These VIEs are typically financed by a
single tranche of limited life preferred shares or similar debt
instruments that pass through the economics of the underlying
assets and derivative contracts.
Merrill Lynch sponsors a limited number of equity funds that
provide a guaranteed return to investors at the maturity of the
fund. The guarantees may include a guarantee of the return of an
initial investment or the initial investment plus an agreed upon
return depending on the terms of the VIE. Investors in certain
of these VIEs have recourse to Merrill Lynch to the extent that
the value of the assets held by the VIEs at maturity is less
than the guaranteed amount. In these instances, Merrill Lynch is
the primary beneficiary and consolidates the VIEs. These VIEs
are typically financed by a single tranche of limited life
preferred shares or similar debt instruments that pass through
the economics of the underlying assets and derivative contracts.
Credit-Linked
Note and Other VIEs
Merrill Lynch has entered into transactions with VIEs where
Merrill Lynch typically purchases credit protection from the VIE
in the form of a credit default swap in order to provide
investors exposure to a specific credit risk. These are commonly
known as CLNs. Merrill Lynch may also enter into interest rate
swaps and/or
cross currency swaps with these CLNs. The assets held by the VIE
provide collateral for the derivatives that Merrill Lynch has
entered into with the VIE. Most CLNs issue a single
credit-linked note, which is often held by a single investor.
Typically the assets held by the CLNs can be substituted for
other assets by the investors. For these transactions, Merrill
Lynch generally transfers the financial assets to the VIE and
accounts for that transfer as a sale.
In certain transactions Merrill Lynch takes exposure through
total return swaps to the underlying collateral held in the
CLNs, including super senior
U.S. sub-prime
ABS CDOs. Generally, the assets held by these VIEs were not
transferred into these VIEs by Merrill Lynch. Unconsolidated CLN
transactions are reported in the Sponsor/Significant VIH table.
Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary of two VIEs that invest
in alternative investment funds which are controlled by third
party fund managers. These entities are considered VIEs because
the equity holders do not have control through voting rights.
Collateralized
Debt Obligations/Collateralized Loan Obligations
(CDO/CLOs)
Merrill Lynch has entered into transactions with entities that
issue CDOs, synthetic CDOs and CLOs. These entities are
generally considered VIEs. CDOs hold pools of corporate debt or
asset-backed securities and issue various classes of rated debt
and an unrated equity tranche. Synthetic CDOs purchase assets
and enter into a portfolio of credit default swaps to
synthetically create exposure to corporate or asset-backed
securities. CLOs hold pools of loans (corporate, commercial
mortgages and residential mortgages) and issue various classes
of rated debt and an unrated equity tranche. CDOs, synthetic
CDOs and CLOs are typically managed by third party portfolio
managers. Merrill Lynch transfers assets to these VIEs, holds
interests in the issuances of the VIEs and may be a derivative
counterparty to the VIEs (including a credit default swap
counterparty for synthetic CDOs). Merrill Lynch typically owns
less than half of any tranche issued by the VIE and is therefore
not the primary beneficiary. Where Merrill Lynch holds more than
half of any tranche issued by a VIE, a quantitative analysis is
performed to determine whether or not Merrill Lynch is the
primary beneficiary. Most transactions with these VIEs are
reflected in the Sponsor/Significant VIH table. Transactions
with CDO/CLOs where Merrill Lynch is the primary beneficiary are
reported in the Consolidated VIEs table.
57
Municipal
Bond Securitizations
Municipal Bond Securitizations are transactions where Merrill
Lynch transfers municipal bonds to SPEs and those SPEs issue
puttable floating rate instruments and a residual interest in
the form of an inverse floater. Most of these SPEs are QSPEs and
are therefore not consolidated by Merrill Lynch. Merrill
Lynch reports these SPEs in the Securitization Transactions
table below. Municipal Bond transactions where Merrill Lynch is
the primary beneficiary are reported in the Consolidated VIEs
table.
In the normal course of dealer market-making activities, Merrill
Lynch acts as liquidity provider for municipal bond
securitization SPEs. Specifically, the holders of beneficial
interests issued by municipal bond securitization SPEs have the
right to tender their interests for purchase by
Merrill Lynch on specified dates at a specified price.
Beneficial interests that are tendered are then sold by Merrill
Lynch to investors through a best efforts remarketing where
Merrill Lynch is the remarketing agent. If the beneficial
interests are not successfully remarketed, the holders of
beneficial interests are paid from funds drawn under a standby
liquidity facility issued by Merrill Lynch.
In addition to standby liquidity facilities, Merrill Lynch also
provides default protection or credit enhancement to investors
in securities issued by certain municipal bond securitization
SPEs. Interest and principal payments on beneficial interests
issued by these SPEs are secured by a guarantee issued by
Merrill Lynch. In the event that the issuer of the underlying
municipal bond defaults on any payment of principal
and/or
interest when due, the payments on the bonds will be made to
beneficial interest holders from an irrevocable guarantee by
Merrill Lynch. Additional information regarding these
commitments is provided in Note 14.
Variable
Interest Entities
Consolidation Accounting requires an entity to consolidate a VIE
if that entity holds a variable interest that will absorb a
majority of the VIEs expected losses, receive a majority
of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both. The entity
required to consolidate a VIE is known as the primary
beneficiary. VIEs are reassessed for consolidation when
reconsideration events occur. Reconsideration events include,
changes to the VIEs governing documents that reallocate
the expected losses/returns of the VIE between the primary
beneficiary and other variable interest holders or sales and
purchases of variable interests in the VIE. Refer to Note 1
for further information.
58
The table below provides the disclosure information required for
VIEs that are consolidated by Merrill Lynch. The table
excludes consolidated VIEs where Merrill Lynch also holds a
majority of the voting interests in the entity unless the
activities of the VIE are primarily related to securitization or
other forms of asset-backed financings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets after intercompany
|
|
Liabilities after
|
|
Maximum
|
Consolidated VIEs
|
|
Total
|
|
eliminations
|
|
intercompany
|
|
Exposure
|
Type of VIE
|
|
Assets
|
|
Unrestricted
|
|
Restricted(1)
|
|
eliminations
|
|
to
Loss(2)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and real estate
VIEs(3)
|
|
$
|
3,753
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
$
|
2,578
|
|
|
$
|
1,151
|
|
|
$
|
2,311
|
|
Equity
Funds(4)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Credit-linked note and other
VIEs(5)
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
CDOs/CLOs(6)
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
Municipal
Bonds(7)
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and real estate
VIEs(3)
|
|
$
|
9,080
|
|
|
$
|
2,475
|
|
|
$
|
2,680
|
|
|
$
|
4,769
|
|
|
$
|
3,479
|
|
Equity
Funds(4)
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Credit-linked note and other
VIEs(5)
|
|
|
1,643
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
CDOs/CLOs(6)
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assets are considered
restricted when they cannot be freely pledged or sold by Merrill
Lynch. |
(2) |
|
This column reflects Merrill
Lynchs maximum exposure to loss associated with the VIE.
It includes the value of on balance sheet assets plus the
maximum exposure associated with off balance sheet instruments
(e.g., total return swaps) less any liabilities where the
investors do not have recourse to Merrill Lynch. |
(3) |
|
For Loan and real estate VIEs,
assets are primarily recorded in loans, notes and mortgages.
Assets related to VIEs that hold real estate investments are
included in other assets. Liabilities are primarily recorded in
short and long-term borrowings. |
(4) |
|
For Equity funds, assets are
recorded in trading assets and liabilities are recorded in
long-term borrowings. |
(5) |
|
For CLNs and other VIEs, assets
are recorded in trading assets and investment securities and
liabilities are recorded in long-term borrowings. |
(6) |
|
For CDOs/CLOs, assets are
primarily recorded in loans, notes and mortgages and liabilities
are recorded in long-term borrowings. Certain consolidated CDOs
are established to provide full recourse secured financing to
Merrill Lynch. |
(7) |
|
For Municipal bonds, assets are
recorded in trading assets. |
Merrill Lynch may also be a Sponsor/Significant VIH in VIEs.
Where Merrill Lynch has involvement as a Sponsor/Significant
VIH, it is required to disclose the size of the VIE, the assets
and liabilities on its balance sheet related to transactions
with the VIE, and its maximum exposure to loss as a result of
its interest in the VIE.
59
The following table summarizes Merrill Lynchs involvement
with Sponsor/Significant VIH VIEs as of September 30, 2009
and December 26, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets on
|
|
Liabilities on
|
|
Maximum
|
Sponsor/Significant VIH
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynchs
|
|
Merrill Lynchs
|
|
Exposure
|
Type of VIE
|
|
Size of
VIE(1)
|
|
Balance
Sheet(2)
|
|
Balance
Sheet(2)
|
|
to
Loss(3)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and real estate
VIEs(4)
|
|
$
|
776
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
Equity
Funds(5)
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Credit-linked note and other
VIEs(6)
|
|
|
12,236
|
|
|
|
4,487
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
9,591
|
|
CDOs/CLOs(7)
|
|
|
53,465
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
6,438
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and real estate
VIEs(4)
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
Equity
Funds(5)
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Credit-linked note and other
VIEs(6)
|
|
|
13,257
|
|
|
|
6,889
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
10,452
|
|
CDOs/CLOs(7)
|
|
|
59,475
|
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
8,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Size generally reflects the
estimated principal of securities issued by the VIE or the
principal of the underlying assets held by the VIE and serves to
provide information on the relative size of the VIE as compared
to Merrill Lynchs involvement with the VIE. |
(2) |
|
Assets and Liabilities on
Merrill Lynchs Balance Sheet reflect the effect of
netting, if applicable. |
(3) |
|
The maximum exposure to loss
includes: the assets held by Merrill Lynch including
the value of derivatives that are in an asset position, and the
notional amount of liquidity and other support provided to VIEs
generally through total return swaps over the assets of the VIE.
The maximum exposure to loss for liquidity and other support
assumes a total loss on the referenced assets held by the
VIE. |
(4) |
|
Loan and real estate VIE assets
primarily include loans recorded in loans, notes and mortgages
and derivatives recorded in trading assets. Liabilities include
derivatives recorded in trading liabilities. |
(5) |
|
Equity fund assets include cash
instruments and derivatives recorded in trading assets.
Liabilities are recorded in payables under repurchase agreements
in instances where assets were transferred but the transfer did
not meet the sale requirements of Financial Transfers and
Servicing Accounting, or trading liabilities for
derivatives. |
(6) |
|
CLN and other VIE assets
include derivatives and are recorded in trading assets.
Liabilities are recorded in payables under repurchase agreements
in instances where assets were transferred but the transfer did
not meet the sale requirements of Financial Transfers and
Servicing Accounting, or trading liabilities for derivatives. In
certain transactions, Merrill Lynch enters into total return
swaps over assets held by the VIEs. Maximum exposure to loss
represents the sum of the notional amount of these derivatives
and the value of any assets on Merrill Lynchs balance
sheet. |
(7) |
|
CDO/CLO assets and liabilities
are primarily derivatives recorded in trading
assets/liabilities. |
Securitizations
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch securitizes
commercial and residential mortgage loans, municipal,
government, and corporate bonds, and other types of financial
assets (as described above). In addition, Merrill Lynch sells
financial assets to entities that are controlled and
consolidated by third parties and provides financing to these
entities under asset-backed financing arrangements (these
transactions are reflected in Non-QSPEs Loans and real estate
entities below). Merrill Lynchs involvement with VIEs that
are used to securitize financial assets includes: structuring
and/or
establishing VIEs; selling assets to VIEs; managing or servicing
assets held by VIEs; underwriting, distributing, and making
loans to VIEs; making markets in securities issued by VIEs;
engaging in derivative transactions with VIEs; owning notes or
certificates issued by VIEs;
and/or
providing liquidity facilities and other guarantees to, or for
the benefit of, VIEs. In many instances Merrill Lynch
60
has continued involvement with the transferred assets, including
servicing, retaining or holding an interest in the issuances of
the VIE, providing liquidity and other support to the VIEs or
investors in the VIEs, and entering into derivative contracts
with the VIEs.
The table below categorizes securitization transactions between
QSPEs and non-QSPEs. Transactions with CLNs and CDO/CLOs that
have been accounted for as sales under Financial Transfers and
Servicing Accounting are reflected in the Sponsor/Significant
VIH table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Year-to-date
|
Securitization Transactions
|
|
Size/Principal
|
|
Assets on
|
|
Liabilities on
|
|
Exposure to
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Cash
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Outstanding(1)
|
|
Balance
Sheet(2)
|
|
Balance
Sheet(2)
|
|
Loss(3)
|
|
on Sale
|
|
Flows
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QSPEs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage
Loans(4)
|
|
$
|
45,062
|
|
|
$
|
1,305
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
1,314
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Municipal
Bonds(5)
|
|
|
5,379
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
6,175
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Commercial Loans and
Other(6)
|
|
|
10,261
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Non-QSPEs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and real estate
VIEs(7)
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
7,068
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,151
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QSPEs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage
Loans(4)
|
|
$
|
78,162
|
|
|
$
|
1,667
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,141
|
|
Municipal
Bonds(5)
|
|
|
9,377
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
8,644
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,824
|
|
Commercial Loans and
Other(6)
|
|
|
18,366
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
Non-QSPEs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and real estate
VIEs(7)
|
|
|
10,182
|
|
|
|
6,757
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,757
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Size/Principal Outstanding
reflects the estimated principal of the underlying assets held
by the VIE/SPEs. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Assets and Liabilities on
Merrill Lynchs Balance Sheet reflect the effect of Balance
Sheet-Offsetting Accounting, if applicable. |
(3) |
|
The maximum exposure to loss
includes the following: the assets held by Merrill
Lynch including the value of derivatives that are in
an asset position and retained interests in the VIEs/SPEs; and
the notional amount of liquidity and other support generally
provided through total return swaps. The maximum exposure to
loss for liquidity and other support assumes a total loss on the
referenced assets held by the VIE. |
(4) |
|
Residential mortgage loan QSPE
assets primarily include servicing advances recorded in other
assets and cash instruments recorded in investment securities
and trading assets. Liabilities include derivatives recorded in
trading liabilities. |
(5) |
|
Municipal bond QSPE assets
include cash instruments recorded in trading assets and
investment securities. Liabilities include derivatives recorded
in trading liabilities. At September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, the carrying value of the liquidity and
other support related to these transactions was
$281 million and $674 million, respectively. |
(6) |
|
Commercial loans and other
QSPEs primarily include commercial mortgage securitizations.
Assets include cash instruments and derivatives, primarily
recorded in trading assets. Liabilities include derivatives
recorded in trading liabilities. |
(7) |
|
Loan and real estate entity
assets are recorded in loans, notes and mortgages and relate to
asset-backed financing arrangements, which include the sale of
U.S. super senior ABS CDOs in 2008 to an affiliate of Lone Star
Funds. |
In certain instances, Merrill Lynch retains interests in the
senior tranche, subordinated tranche,
and/or
residual tranche of securities issued by VIEs that are created
to securitize assets. The gain or loss on the sale of the assets
is determined with reference to the previous carrying amount of
the financial assets transferred, which is allocated between the
assets sold and the retained interests, if any, based on their
relative fair values at the date of transfer.
61
Generally, retained interests and contracts that are used to
provide support to the VIE or the investors are recorded in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. To obtain
fair values, observable market prices are used if available.
Where observable market prices are unavailable,
Merrill Lynch generally estimates fair value based on the
present value of expected future cash flows using
managements best estimates of credit losses, prepayment
rates, forward yield curves, and discount rates, commensurate
with the risks involved. Retained interests are either held as
trading assets, with changes in fair value recorded in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings/(Loss), or as
investment securities
available-for-sale,
with changes in fair value included in OCI.
Retained interests held as
available-for-sale
securities are reviewed periodically for impairment. In certain
cases liquidity facilities are accounted for as guarantees under
Guarantees Accounting (refer to Note 14 for more
information) and a liability is recorded at fair value at the
inception of the transaction.
Retained interests in securitized assets were approximately
$1.4 billion and $1.8 billion at September 30,
2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively, which primarily
relates to municipal bond securitization transactions. Retained
interests in securitized assets do not include loans made to
entities under asset-backed financing arrangements.
The following table presents information on retained interests
excluding the offsetting benefit of financial instruments used
to hedge risks, held by Merrill Lynch as of September 30,
2009, which arise from Merrill Lynchs municipal bond
securitization transactions. The pre-tax sensitivities of the
current fair value of the retained interests to an immediate
100 basis point and 200 basis point increase and
decrease in the discount rate are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
Retained interest amount
|
|
$
|
1,253
|
|
Weighted average credit losses (rate per
annum)(1)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
6.19
|
%
|
Impact on fair value of 100 basis point decrease in discount rate
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Impact on fair value of 200 basis point decrease in discount rate
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Impact on fair value of 100 basis point increase in discount rate
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 200 basis point increase in discount rate
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Weighted average life (in years)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted average prepayment speed
(CPR)(2)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
CPR=Constant Prepayment
Rate
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Credit losses are computed only
on positions for which expected credit loss is either a key
assumption in the determination of fair value or is not
reflected in the discount rate. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Relates to select
securitization transactions where assets are prepayable. Merrill
Lynch does not hold any retained interest where the underlying
assets are prepayable. |
The preceding sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and should be
used with caution. In particular, the effect of a variation in a
particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest
is calculated independent of changes in any other assumption; in
practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in
another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
Further, changes in the fair value disclosed above generally
cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in
the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Also, the sensitivity analysis does not include the offsetting
benefit of financial instruments that Merrill Lynch utilizes to
hedge risks, including credit, interest rate, and prepayment
risk, that are inherent in the retained interests. These hedging
strategies are structured to take into consideration the
hypothetical stress scenarios above, such that they would be
effective in principally offsetting Merrill Lynchs
exposure to loss in the event that these scenarios occur.
62
Loans, notes, mortgages and related commitments to extend credit
include:
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans, which are substantially secured, including
residential mortgages, home equity loans, and other loans to
individuals for household, family, or other personal
expenditures; and
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans including corporate and institutional loans
(including corporate and financial sponsor, non-investment grade
lending commitments), commercial mortgages, asset-based loans,
small- and middle-market business loans, and other loans to
businesses.
|
Loans, notes, mortgages and related commitments to extend credit
at September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008, are
presented below. This disclosure includes commitments to extend
credit that, if drawn upon, will result in loans held for
investment or loans held for sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Commitments(1)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 26,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 26,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009(2)(3)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,397
|
|
|
$
|
7,499
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,269
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
Commercial and small- and middle-market business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade
|
|
|
12,566
|
|
|
|
|
17,321
|
|
|
|
8,256
|
|
|
|
|
28,269
|
|
Non-investment grade
|
|
|
18,969
|
|
|
|
|
23,184
|
|
|
|
6,455
|
|
|
|
|
9,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,843
|
|
|
|
|
71,262
|
|
|
|
22,609
|
|
|
|
|
48,411
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,072
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reserve for lending-related
commitments(4)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, net
|
|
$
|
67,729
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,190
|
|
|
$
|
21,586
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Commitments are outstanding as
of the date the commitment letter is issued and are comprised of
closed and contingent commitments. Closed commitments represent
the unfunded portion of existing commitments available for draw
down. Contingent commitments are contingent on the borrower
fulfilling certain conditions or upon a particular event, such
as an acquisition. A portion of these contingent commitments may
be syndicated among other lenders or replaced with capital
markets funding. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
See Note 14 for a maturity
profile of these commitments. |
(3) |
|
In addition to the loan
origination commitments included in the table above, Merrill
Lynch had agreements to purchase $478 million of loans
that, upon settlement of the commitment, will be classified in
loans held for investment and loans held for sale. See
Note 14 for additional information. |
(4) |
|
Amounts are included within
other payables on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets. |
63
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
September 26,
2008
|
|
Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of
period(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses, at end of period
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
|
$
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The allowance for loan losses
as of December 26, 2008 was eliminated as of
January 1, 2009 as a result of purchase accounting
adjustments. |
(2) |
|
The amount for 2009 includes
$100 million of allowance for loan losses transferred to
Bank of America, N.A., a subsidiary of Bank of America, in
connection with the sale of MLBUSA. See Note 21 regarding
the sale of MLBUSA. |
Consumer loans, substantially all of which are collateralized,
consisted of approximately 290,000 individual loans at
September 30, 2009. Commercial loans consisted of
approximately 12,000 separate loans. The principal balance of
non-accrual loans was $3.3 billion at September 30,
2009 and $2.5 billion at December 26, 2008. The
investment grade and non-investment grade categorization is
determined using the credit rating agency equivalent of internal
credit ratings. Non-investment grade counterparties are those
rated lower than the BBB- category.
The above amounts include $7.9 billion and
$11.5 billion of loans held for sale at September 30,
2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively. Loans held for
sale are loans that management expects to sell prior to
maturity. At September 30, 2009, such loans consisted of
$3.7 billion of consumer loans, primarily residential
mortgages and automobile loans, and $4.2 billion of
commercial loans, approximately 16% of which are to investment
grade counterparties. At December 26, 2008, such loans
consisted of $4.0 billion of consumer loans, primarily
residential mortgages and automobile loans, and
$7.5 billion of commercial loans, approximately 15% of
which were to investment grade counterparties.
In some cases, Merrill Lynch enters into single name and index
credit default swaps to mitigate credit exposure related to
funded and unfunded commercial loans. The notional value of
these swaps totaled $3.5 billion and $13.2 billion at
September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008,
respectively. The following tables provide information regarding
Merrill Lynchs net credit default protection associated
with its funded and unfunded commercial loans as of
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Net Credit Default Protection by Maturity Profile
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Less than or equal to one year
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Greater than one year and less than or equal to five years
|
|
|
83
|
|
Greater than five years
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net credit default protection
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Credit Default Protection by Credit Exposure Debt
Rating
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Ratings(1)
|
|
Notional
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
(465
|
)
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
A
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
BB
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
B
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
CCC and below
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
NR
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net credit default protection
|
|
$
|
(3,458
|
)
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Merrill Lynch considers ratings
of BBB- or higher to meet the definition of investment
grade. |
Effect of
the Acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America
Upon completion of the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of
America, Merrill Lynch adjusted the carrying value of its loans
to fair value. Certain of these loans were subject to the
requirements of Acquired Impaired Loan Accounting, which
addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash
flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an
investors initial investment in loans if those differences
are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. Acquired
Impaired Loan Accounting requires impaired loans to be recorded
at estimated fair value and prohibits carrying over
or the creation of valuation allowances in the initial
accounting for loans acquired in a transfer that are within the
scope of Acquired Impaired Loan Accounting.
The estimated fair values for loans within the scope of Acquired
Impaired Loan Accounting are determined by discounting cash
flows expected to be collected using a discount rate for similar
instruments with adjustments that management believes a market
participant would consider in determining fair value. Cash flows
expected to be collected at acquisition are estimated using
internal prepayment, interest rate and credit risk models that
incorporate managements best estimate of certain key
assumptions, such as default rates, loss severity and prepayment
speeds. All other loans were remeasured at the present value of
contractual payments discounted to the prevailing interest rates
on the date of acquisition.
Under Acquired Impaired Loan Accounting, the excess of cash
flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is
referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in
interest income over the remaining life of the loans. The
difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at
acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference.
Changes in the expected cash flows from the date of acquisition
will either impact the accretable yield or result in a charge to
the provision for credit losses. Subsequent decreases to
expected principal cash flows will result in a charge to
provision for credit losses and a corresponding increase to
allowance for loan losses. Subsequent increases in expected
principal cash flows will result in recovery of any previously
recorded allowance for loan losses, to the extent applicable,
and an increase from expected cash flows to accretable yield for
any remaining increase. All changes in expected interest cash
flows will result in an increase or decrease of accretable yield.
65
In connection with Merrill Lynchs acquisition by Bank of
America, loans within the scope of Acquired Impaired Loan
Accounting had an unpaid principal balance of $5.6 billion
($2.7 billion consumer and $2.9 billion commercial)
and a carrying value of $4.2 billion ($2.3 billion
consumer and $1.9 billion commercial) as of January 1,
2009. These loans had an unpaid principal balance of
$3.1 billion ($1.2 billion consumer and
$1.9 billion commercial) and a carrying value of
$1.9 billion ($1.0 billion consumer and
$0.9 billion commercial, net of allowance for loan losses)
as of September 30, 2009. The following table provides
details of these loans.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Impaired Loans
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
As of January 1, 2009
|
|
|
Contractually required payments including interest
|
|
$
|
6,205
|
|
Less: Nonaccretable difference
|
|
|
(1,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows expected to be
collected(1)
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
Less: Accretable yield
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of loans acquired
|
|
$
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents undiscounted
expected principal and interest cash flows at the acquisition
date (January 1, 2009). |
The following table provides activity for the accretable yield
of loans within the scope of Acquired Impaired Loan Accounting
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accretable yield, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
Impact of sale of MLBUSA to Bank of America
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Accretions
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Decrease in expected cash
flows(1)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretable yield, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents reclassifications
to/from nonaccretable difference, increases/decreases in
interest cash flows due to prepayments and/or changes in
interest. |
In connection with the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of
America, the carrying value of Merrill Lynchs goodwill as
of December 26, 2008 was eliminated. New goodwill was
recorded on January 1, 2009. In addition, as of
January 1, 2009, certain intangible assets were adjusted to
their fair value and new intangible assets (e.g., trade name)
were recorded. Refer to Note 2 for further information.
Goodwill
Goodwill is the cost of an acquired company in excess of the
fair value of identifiable net assets at the acquisition date.
Goodwill is tested annually (or more frequently under certain
conditions) for impairment at the reporting unit level in
accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and
Other, (Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Accounting). If the fair value of the reporting unit
exceeds its carrying value, its goodwill is not deemed to be
impaired. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, a
further analysis is required to determine the amount of
impairment, if any. In connection with
66
the acquisition by Bank of America, Merrill Lynch changed its
annual impairment test date from September 30, 2009 to
June 30, 2009 in order to conform to Bank of Americas
annual test date. Based on the impairment analysis completed
during the third quarter of 2009, Merrill Lynch determined that
there was no impairment of goodwill as of the June 30, 2009
annual test date.
The following table sets forth the carrying amount of Merrill
Lynchs goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company -
Goodwill, December 26,
2008(1)
|
|
$
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company -
Goodwill, January 1,
2009(2)
|
|
$
|
5,044
|
|
Dispositions(3)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
Purchase Accounting
Adjustments(4)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
4,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Predecessor Company goodwill as of December 26, 2008 was
eliminated as of January 1, 2009 as a result of purchase
accounting adjustments. |
(2) |
|
Refer to Note 2 for further information. |
(3) |
|
Relates to the sale of MLBUSA to a subsidiary of Bank of
America on July 1, 2009. Refer to Note 21 for further
information. |
(4) |
|
Represents adjustments to the preliminary purchase accounting
established as of January 1, 2009 in conjunction with the
acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America. |
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets with definite lives at September 30, 2009
and December 26, 2008 consist primarily of value assigned
to customer relationships and core deposits. Intangible assets
with definite lives are tested for impairment in accordance with
ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment whenever certain
conditions exist which would indicate the carrying amounts of
such assets may not be recoverable. Intangible assets with
definite lives are amortized over their respective estimated
useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite lives consist of
value assigned to the Merrill Lynch brand and are tested for
impairment in accordance with Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Accounting. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not
amortized.
The gross carrying amounts of intangible assets with definite
lives were $4.0 billion and $611 million as of
September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008,
respectively. Accumulated amortization of intangible assets
amounted to $297 million and $216 million at
September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008,
respectively. The gross carrying amounts of intangible assets
with indefinite lives were $1.2 billion as of
September 30, 2009. During the third quarter of 2009,
approximately $500 million of net core deposit intangible
assets were transferred to Bank of America in connection with
the sale of MLBUSA.
Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was $99 million and
$297 million, respectively, compared with $20 million
and $73 million for the three and nine months ended
September 26, 2008. Aggregate amortization expense is
expected to be approximately $396 million per year for each
of the next five years through 2014.
Prior to Merrill Lynchs acquisition by Bank of America,
ML & Co. was the primary issuer of all of Merrill
Lynchs debt instruments. Debt instruments were also issued
by certain subsidiaries. ML & Co. is no longer a
primary issuer of new unsecured borrowings under the Bank of
America platform.
67
Following the completion of Bank of Americas acquisition
of Merrill Lynch, ML & Co. became a subsidiary of Bank
of America and established intercompany lending and borrowing
arrangements to facilitate centralized liquidity management.
Included in these intercompany agreements is an initial
$75 billion one-year, revolving unsecured line of credit
that allows ML & Co. to borrow funds from Bank of
America for operating requirements at a spread to LIBOR that is
reset periodically and is consistent with other intercompany
agreements. The maturity date for this credit line is
January 1, 2010. The credit line will automatically be
extended by one year to the succeeding
January 1st unless Bank of America provides written
notice not to extend at least 45 days prior to the maturity
date. The agreement does not contain any financial or other
covenants. During the first nine months of 2009, ML &
Co. periodically borrowed against the line of credit. There were
no outstanding borrowings against the line of credit at
September 30, 2009.
The value of Merrill Lynchs debt instruments as recorded
on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets does not
necessarily represent the amount that will be repaid at
maturity. This is due to the following:
|
|
|
As a result of the acquisition by Bank of America, all debt
instruments were adjusted to their fair value on January 1,
2009;
|
|
|
Certain debt issuances are accounted for at fair value and
incorporate changes in Merrill Lynchs creditworthiness as
well as other underlying risks (see Note 4);
|
|
|
Certain structured notes whose coupon or repayment terms are
linked to the performance of debt and equity securities,
indices, currencies or commodities reflect the fair value of
those risks; and
|
|
|
Certain debt issuances are adjusted for the impact of fair value
hedge accounting (see Note 6).
|
Total borrowings at September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, which are comprised of short-term
borrowings, long-term borrowings and junior subordinated notes
(related to trust preferred securities), consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 26,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Senior debt issued by ML & Co.
|
|
$
|
87,586
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,615
|
|
Senior debt issued by subsidiaries guaranteed by
ML & Co.
|
|
|
7,465
|
|
|
|
|
11,598
|
|
Senior structured notes issued by ML & Co.
|
|
|
33,386
|
|
|
|
|
34,541
|
|
Senior structured notes issued by subsidiaries
guaranteed by ML & Co.
|
|
|
18,392
|
|
|
|
|
24,048
|
|
Subordinated debt issued by ML & Co.
|
|
|
11,903
|
|
|
|
|
13,317
|
|
Junior subordinated notes (related to trust preferred securities)
|
|
|
3,546
|
|
|
|
|
5,256
|
|
Other subsidiary financing
non-recourse(1)
and/or not guaranteed by ML & Co.
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
|
13,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
165,676
|
|
|
|
$
|
242,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other subsidiary
financing non-recourse is primarily attributable to
collateralized borrowings of subsidiaries. |
68
Borrowings and deposits at September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 26,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
paper(1)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,104
|
|
Secured short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
14,137
|
|
Other unsecured short-term borrowings
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
3,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
borrowings(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
obligations(3)
|
|
$
|
78,243
|
|
|
|
$
|
101,403
|
|
Variable-rate
obligations(4)(5)
|
|
|
83,186
|
|
|
|
|
96,511
|
|
Zero-coupon contingent convertible debt
(LYONs®)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
161,444
|
|
|
|
$
|
199,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
32,430
|
|
|
|
$
|
79,528
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
15,389
|
|
|
|
|
16,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
47,819
|
|
|
|
$
|
96,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The decrease in commercial
paper reflects the repayment of borrowings under the Federal
Reserves liquidity backstop for U.S. issuers of commercial
paper and the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee
Program. |
(2) |
|
Excludes junior subordinated
notes (related to trust preferred securities). |
(3) |
|
Fixed-rate obligations are
generally swapped to variable-rates. |
(4) |
|
Variable interest rates are
generally based on rates such as LIBOR, the U.S. Treasury Bill
Rate, or the Federal Funds Rate. |
(5) |
|
Includes structured
notes. |
See Note 5 for additional information on the fair value of
the long-term borrowings.
The weighted-average interest rates for borrowings at
September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008 (excluding
structured products) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 26,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
|
Junior subordinated notes (related to trust preferred securities)
|
|
|
6.93
|
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch also obtains standby letters of credit from
issuing banks to satisfy various counterparty collateral
requirements, in lieu of depositing cash or securities
collateral. Such standby letters of credit aggregated
$0.8 billion and $2.6 billion at September 30,
2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively.
69
Long-Term
Borrowings
At September 30, 2009, long-term borrowings mature as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
$
|
36,874
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
1 2 years
|
|
|
16,288
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
2+
3 years
|
|
|
24,846
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
3+
4 years
|
|
|
17,540
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
4+
5 years
|
|
|
21,336
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Greater than 5 years
|
|
|
44,560
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
161,444
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
Certain long-term borrowing agreements contain provisions
whereby the borrowings are redeemable at the option of the
holder (put options) at specified dates prior to
maturity. These borrowings are reflected in the above table as
maturing at their put dates, rather than their contractual
maturities. Management believes, however, that a portion of such
borrowings will remain outstanding beyond their earliest
redemption date.
Certain structured notes whose coupon or repayment terms are
linked to the performance of debt and equity securities,
indices, currencies or commodities maturities may be accelerated
based on the value of a referenced index or security, in which
case Merrill Lynch may be required to immediately settle the
obligation for cash or other securities. These notes are
included in the portion of long-term debt maturing in less than
a year.
Senior and subordinated debt obligations issued by
ML & Co. and senior debt issued by subsidiaries and
guaranteed by ML & Co. did not contain provisions that
could, upon an adverse change in ML & Co.s
credit rating, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows, trigger a
requirement for an early payment, additional collateral support,
changes in terms, acceleration of maturity, or the creation of
an additional financial obligation, except for an immaterial
amount of Floating Rate
LYONs®.
Floating
Rate LYONs
The completion of Bank of Americas acquisition of Merrill
Lynch on January 1, 2009, constituted a change in control
event under the terms of the LYONs. This required Merrill Lynch
to offer to repurchase the LYONs at the accreted price of
$1,095.98 for each $1,000 original principal amount. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch
repurchased $1.6 billion original principal amount of LYONs
for an aggregate price of approximately $1.75 billion. At
September 30, 2009, $2.3 million of original principal
amount of the LYONs remained outstanding.
Committed
Credit Facilities
Prior to Merrill Lynchs acquisition by Bank of America,
Merrill Lynch maintained committed unsecured and secured credit
facilities to cover regular and contingent funding needs.
Following the completion of Bank of Americas acquisition
of Merrill Lynch on January 1, 2009, certain sources of
liquidity were centralized. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, ML & Co. repaid all outstanding
amounts and terminated all of its external committed unsecured
and secured credit facilities.
See Note 9 of the 2008 Annual Report for additional
information on Borrowings.
70
Preferred
Equity
As of the completion of the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank
of America, ML & Co. Series 1 through
Series 8 preferred stock that were outstanding as of
December 26, 2008 were converted into Bank of America
preferred stock with substantially identical terms of the
corresponding series of ML & Co. preferred stock
(except for additional voting rights provided to the Bank of
America securities).
Mandatory
Convertible
On July 28, 2008, holders of $4.9 billion of the
$6.6 billion of then-outstanding Series 1 convertible
preferred stock agreed to exchange their Series 1
convertible preferred stock for approximately 177 million
shares of Merrill Lynch common stock, plus $65 million in
cash. Holders of the remaining $1.7 billion of
Series 1 convertible preferred stock agreed to exchange
their preferred stock for new mandatory convertible preferred
stock described below. Because all holders of Series 1
convertible preferred stock exchanged their shares, the reset
feature associated with the Series 1 convertible preferred
stock was eliminated. In connection with the exchange of the
Series 1 convertible preferred stock and in satisfaction of
its obligations under the reset provisions of the Series 1
convertible preferred stock, Merrill Lynch recorded additional
preferred dividends of $2.1 billion in the third quarter of
2008.
On July 28, 2008 Merrill Lynch issued an aggregate of
12,000 shares of newly issued 9% Non-Voting Mandatory
Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 2, par
value $1.00 per share and liquidation preference $100,000 per
share (the Series 2 convertible preferred
stock). On July 29, 2008 Merrill Lynch issued an
aggregate of 5,000 shares of newly issued 9% Non-Voting
Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series 3, par value $1.00 per share and liquidation
preference $100,000 per share (the Series 3
convertible preferred stock and, together with the
Series 2 convertible preferred stock, the new
convertible preferred stock). The new convertible
preferred stock remained issued and outstanding subsequent to
the acquisition by Bank of America, but is now convertible into
Bank of America common stock. Each share of the Series 2
and Series 3 convertible preferred stock will be converted
on October 15, 2010 into a maximum of 2,605 shares and
3,820 shares, respectively, of Bank of Americas
common stock; however, they are optionally convertible prior to
that date into 2,227 shares and 3,265 shares,
respectively, of Bank of Americas common stock.
Common
Stock
As of the completion of the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank
of America, each outstanding share of ML & Co. common
stock was converted into 0.8595 shares of Bank of America
common stock. Since January 1, 2009, there have been
1,000 shares of ML & Co. common stock
outstanding, all of which are owned by Bank of America.
In connection with Merrill Lynchs July 2008 offering of
common stock, a $2.5 billion payment to affiliates and
transferees of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited was recorded
as an expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings/(Loss) for the three and nine months ended
September 26, 2008.
71
Earnings
Per Share
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing earnings applicable to
common stockholders by the
weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is similar to
basic EPS, but adjusts for the effect of the potential issuance
of common shares. The following table presents the computations
of basic and diluted EPS for 2008. For 2009, such amounts are
not presented as Merrill Lynch is now a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Bank of America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 26,
|
|
Ended September 26,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,120
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,723
|
)
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
(2,319
|
)
|
|
|
(2,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) applicable to common
shareholders for basic EPS
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,471
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) applicable to common
shareholders for diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,471
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(shares in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average basic shares
outstanding(1)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
1,338,963
|
|
|
|
1,098,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock
options(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
FACAAP
shares(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted shares and
units(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible
LYONs®(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
ESPP
shares(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
Shares(4)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
1,338,963
|
|
|
|
1,098,630
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.16
|
)
|
Basic EPS from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.16
|
)
|
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding at period end
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
1,600,100
|
|
|
|
1,600,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Earnings per share data is not
provided for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, as Merrill Lynch was a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Bank of America during that period. |
(1) |
|
Includes shares exchangeable
into common stock in 2008. |
(2) |
|
See Note 13 of the 2008
Annual Report for a description of these items. |
(3) |
|
See Note 12 for additional
information on LYONs.
|
(4) |
|
Due to the net loss for the
three and nine months ended September 26, 2008, the diluted
EPS calculation excludes 300 million equity-related
instruments as they were antidilutive. |
72
Basic and diluted loss per common share for the period from
December 27, 2008 to December 31, 2008 were both
$(0.10) per common share. The related weighted average shares
outstanding used to compute both basic and diluted loss per
common share was 1,600.3 million shares.
Litigation
Merrill Lynch has been named as a defendant in various legal
actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other
litigation arising in connection with its activities as a global
diversified financial services institution.
Some of the legal actions include claims for substantial
compensatory
and/or
punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages.
In some cases, the issuers that would otherwise be the primary
defendants in such cases are bankrupt or otherwise in financial
distress. Merrill Lynch is also involved in investigations
and/or
proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies.
Merrill Lynch believes it has strong defenses to, and where
appropriate, will vigorously contest many of these matters.
Given the number of these matters, some are likely to result in
adverse judgments, penalties, injunctions, fines, or other
relief. Merrill Lynch may explore potential settlements before a
case is taken through trial because of the uncertainty, risks,
and costs inherent in the litigation process. In accordance with
ASC 450, Contingencies, Merrill Lynch will accrue a
liability when it is probable of being incurred and the amount
of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In many lawsuits and
arbitrations, including almost all of the class action lawsuits,
it is not possible to determine whether a liability has been
incurred or to estimate the ultimate or minimum amount of that
liability until the case is close to resolution, in which case
no accrual is made until that time. In view of the inherent
difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters,
particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or
indeterminate damages, Merrill Lynch cannot predict or estimate
what the eventual loss or range of loss related to such matters
will be. Merrill Lynch continues to assess these cases and
believes, based on information available to it, that the
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition of Merrill Lynch as set forth
in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but may be
material to Merrill Lynchs operating results or cash flows
for any particular period and may impact ML &
Co.s credit ratings.
Commitments
At September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynchs commitments had
the following expirations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment expiration
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
1+ - 3
|
|
3+ -
5
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1 year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
|
Lending commitments
|
|
$
|
22,609
|
|
|
$
|
7,747
|
|
|
$
|
6,174
|
|
|
$
|
3,691
|
|
|
$
|
4,997
|
|
Purchasing and other commitments
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
Commitments to enter into forward dated resale and securities
borrowing agreements
|
|
|
69,616
|
|
|
|
69,616
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commitments to enter into forward dated repurchase and
securities lending agreements
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
187,353
|
|
|
$
|
165,700
|
|
|
$
|
8,447
|
|
|
$
|
5,890
|
|
|
$
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
73
Lending
Commitments
Merrill Lynch enters into commitments to extend credit,
predominantly at variable interest rates, in connection with
corporate finance, corporate and institutional transactions and
asset-based lending transactions. Clients may also be extended
loans or lines of credit collateralized by first and second
mortgages on real estate, certain liquid assets of small
businesses, or securities. These commitments usually have a
fixed expiration date and are contingent on certain contractual
conditions that may require payment of a fee by the
counterparty. Once commitments are drawn upon, Merrill Lynch may
require the counterparty to post collateral depending upon
creditworthiness and general market conditions. See Note 10
for additional information.
The contractual amounts of these commitments represent the
amounts at risk should the contract be fully drawn upon, the
client defaults, and the value of the existing collateral
becomes worthless. The total amount of outstanding commitments
may not represent future cash requirements, as commitments may
expire without being drawn.
For lending commitments where the loan will be classified as
held for sale upon funding, liabilities associated with unfunded
commitments are calculated at the lower of cost or fair value,
capturing declines in the fair value of the respective credit
risk. For loan commitments where the loan will be classified as
held for investment upon funding, liabilities are calculated
considering both market and historical loss rates. Loan
commitments held by entities that apply broker-dealer industry
level accounting are accounted for at fair value.
Purchasing
and Other Commitments
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch enters into
institutional and margin-lending transactions, some of which are
on a committed basis, but most of which are not. Margin lending
on a committed basis only includes amounts where Merrill Lynch
has a binding commitment. There were no binding margin lending
commitments outstanding at September 30, 2009 or
December 26, 2008.
Merrill Lynch had commitments to purchase partnership interests,
primarily related to private equity and principal investing
activities, of $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion at
September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008,
respectively. Merrill Lynch also has entered into agreements
with providers of market data, communications, systems
consulting, and other office-related services. At
September 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008, minimum fee
commitments over the remaining life of these agreements totaled
$1.8 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. Merrill
Lynch entered into commitments to purchase loans of
$2.5 billion (which upon settlement of the commitment will
be included in trading assets, loans held for investment or
loans held for sale) at September 30, 2009. Such
commitments totaled $3.9 billion at December 26, 2008.
Other purchasing commitments amounted to $0.6 billion and
$0.7 billion at September 30, 2009 and
December 26, 2008, respectively.
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch enters into
commitments for underwriting transactions. Settlement of these
transactions as of September 30, 2009 would not have a
material effect on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of
Merrill Lynch.
In connection with trading activities, Merrill Lynch enters into
commitments to enter into resale and securities borrowing and
also repurchase and securities lending agreements.
74
Operating
Leases
Merrill Lynch has entered into various non-cancelable long-term
lease agreements for premises that expire through 2028. Merrill
Lynch has also entered into various non-cancelable short-term
lease agreements, which are primarily commitments of less than
one year under equipment leases.
Guarantees
Merrill Lynch issues various guarantees to counterparties in
connection with certain leasing, securitization and other
transactions. Merrill Lynch is required to disclose information
for guarantee arrangements such as the maximum potential amount
of future payments under the guarantee, the term and carrying
value of the guarantee, the nature of any collateral or recourse
provisions and the current payment status of the guarantee.
Merrill Lynchs guarantee arrangements and their expiration
at September 30, 2009 are summarized as follows (see
Note 6 for information related to derivative financial
instruments within the scope of Guarantees Accounting):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
year
|
|
1+
- 3 years
|
|
3+
- 5 years
|
|
Over 5 years
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Standby liquidity facilities
|
|
$
|
4,950
|
|
|
$
|
2,178
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2,770
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
Auction rate security guarantees
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Residual value guarantees
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Standby letters of credit and other guarantees
|
|
|
29,455
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
27,362
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
Standby
Liquidity Facilities
Merrill Lynch provides standby liquidity facilities to certain
municipal bond securitization SPEs. In these arrangements,
Merrill Lynch is required to fund these standby liquidity
facilities if the fair value of the assets held by the SPE
declines below par value and certain other contingent events
take place. In those instances where the residual interest in
the securitized trust is owned by a third party, any payments
under the facilities are offset by economic hedges entered into
by Merrill Lynch. In those instances where the residual interest
in the securitized trust is owned by Merrill Lynch, any
requirement to pay under the facilities is considered remote
because Merrill Lynch, in most instances, will purchase the
senior interests issued by the trust at fair value as part of
its dealer market-making activities. However, Merrill Lynch will
have exposure to these purchased senior interests. In certain of
these facilities, Merrill Lynch is required to provide liquidity
support within seven days, while the remainder have third-party
liquidity support for between 30 and 364 days before
Merrill Lynch is required to provide liquidity. A portion of the
facilities where Merrill Lynch is required to provide liquidity
support within seven days are net liquidity
facilities where upon draw Merrill Lynch may direct the trustee
for the SPE to collapse the SPE trusts and liquidate the
municipal bonds, and Merrill Lynch would only be required to
fund any difference between par and the sale price of the bonds.
Gross liquidity facilities require Merrill Lynch to
wait up to 30 days before directing the trustee to
75
liquidate the municipal bonds. Details of these liquidity
facilities as of September 30, 2009, are illustrated in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch Liquidity Facilities Can Be Drawn:
|
|
Municipal Bonds to
|
|
|
|
|
In 7 Days with
|
|
After 7 and
|
|
|
|
Which Merrill Lynch
|
|
|
In 7 Days with
|
|
Gross
|
|
Up to 364
|
|
|
|
Has Recourse if
|
|
|
Net
Liquidity
|
|
Liquidity
|
|
Days(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
Facilities Are Drawn
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch provides standby liquidity facilities
|
|
$
|
1,370
|
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
$
|
2,757
|
|
|
$
|
4,921
|
|
|
$
|
5,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Initial liquidity support is
provided by third parties within seven days, to be reimbursed by
Merrill Lynch within 364 days. |
Refer to Note 9 for further information.
Auction
Rate Security (ARS) Guarantees
Under the terms of its announced purchase program, as augmented
by the global agreement reached with the New York Attorney
General, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Massachusetts Securities Division and other state securities
regulators, Merrill Lynch agreed to purchase ARS at par from its
retail clients, including individual,
not-for-profit,
and small business clients. Certain retail clients with less
than $4 million in assets with Merrill Lynch as of
February 13, 2008 were eligible to sell eligible ARS to
Merrill Lynch starting on October 1, 2008. Other eligible
retail clients meeting specified asset requirements were
eligible to sell ARS to Merrill Lynch beginning on
January 2, 2009. The final date of the ARS purchase program
is January 15, 2010. Under the ARS purchase program, the
eligible ARS held in accounts of eligible retail clients at
Merrill Lynch as of September 30, 2009 was
$505 million. As of September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch
had purchased $8.1 billion of ARS from eligible clients. In
addition, under the ARS purchase program, Merrill Lynch has
agreed to purchase ARS from retail clients who purchased their
securities from Merrill Lynch and transferred their accounts to
other brokers prior to February 13, 2008. Payment risk
related to ARS guarantees is based largely upon the
clients overall financial objectives. At
September 30, 2009, a liability of $41 million has
been recorded for the difference between the fair value and par
value of all outstanding ARS that are subject to this guarantee.
Residual
Value Guarantees
At September 30, 2009, residual value guarantees of
$738 million include amounts associated with the Hopewell,
NJ campus, aircraft leases and certain power plant facilities.
Payments under these guarantees would only be required if the
fair value of such assets declined below their guaranteed value.
As of September 30, 2009, no payments have been made under
this guarantee, as Merrill Lynch believes that the estimated
fair value of such assets was in excess of their guaranteed
value.
Standby
Letters of Credit and Other Guarantees
Merrill Lynch provides guarantees to certain counterparties in
the form of standby letters of credit in the amount of
$1.0 billion. Payment risk is evaluated based upon
historical payment activity.
In connection with residential mortgage loan and other
securitization transactions, Merrill Lynch typically makes
representations and warranties about the underlying assets. If
there is a material breach of such representations and
warranties, Merrill Lynch may have an obligation to repurchase
the assets
76
or indemnify the purchaser against any loss. For residential
mortgage loan and other securitizations, the maximum potential
amount that could be required to be repurchased is the current
outstanding asset balance. Specifically related to First
Franklin activities, there is currently approximately
$27 billion (including loans serviced by others) of
outstanding loans that First Franklin sold in various asset
sales and securitization transactions where there may be an
obligation to repurchase the asset or indemnify the purchaser
against the loss if claims are made and it is ultimately
determined that there has been a material breach related to such
loans. The risk of repurchase under the First Franklin
representations and warranties is evaluated by management based
on an analysis of the unpaid principal balance on the loans sold
along with historical payment experience and general market
conditions. The repurchase reserve liability arising from these
First Franklin residential mortgage sales and securitization
transactions was approximately $500 million at
September 30, 2009.
See Note 11 of the 2008 Annual Report for additional
information on guarantees.
77
Merrill Lynch provides pension and other postretirement benefits
to its employees worldwide through defined contribution pension,
defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. These
plans vary based on the country and local practices. Merrill
Lynch reserves the right to amend or terminate these plans at
any time. Refer to Note 12 of the 2008 Annual Report for a
complete discussion of employee benefit plans.
Effective January 1, 2009, Merrill Lynchs employee
benefit plans were assumed by Bank of America.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
Pension cost for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and September 26, 2008, for Merrill
Lynchs defined benefit pension plans, included the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
Total
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total defined benefit pension cost
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
Total
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Amortization of net (gains)/losses, prior
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
service costs and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total defined benefit pension cost
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch disclosed in its 2008 Annual Report that it
expected to pay $1 million of benefit payments to
participants in the U.S. non-qualified pension plan and
that it expected to contribute $120 million and
$55 million, respectively, to its U.S. and
non-U.S. defined
benefit pension plans in 2009. Merrill Lynch does not expect its
contributions to differ significantly from amounts previously
disclosed.
Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions
Other postretirement benefit cost for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 were $4 million and
$13 million, respectively, and were $2 million for
both the three and nine months ended September 26, 2008.
Approximately 93% of the postretirement benefit cost components
for the period relate to the U.S. postretirement plan.
78
On September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynchs net deferred
tax asset was approximately $16 billion. This balance
included the January 1, 2009 impact of measuring Merrill
Lynchs deferred tax assets and liabilities under the
acquisition method of accounting and also reflects the sale of
MLBUSA to a subsidiary of Bank of America during the third
quarter of 2009. This measurement process resulted in an
adjustment to certain deferred tax assets and liabilities,
including a $1 billion reduction to valuation allowances
primarily associated with the U.S. federal capital losses
and foreign tax credit carryforwards. The remeasured net
deferred tax asset includes carryforward amounts generated in
the U.S. and U.K. that are deductible in the future as net
operating losses (NOLs). The U.K. NOL deferred tax
asset of approximately $10 billion has an unlimited
carryforward period but, due to
change-in-control
limitations in the three years prior to and following the change
in ownership, can be jeopardized by certain major changes in the
nature or conduct of the U.K. businesses. The U.S. federal
NOL of $12 billion, which is represented by a deferred tax
asset of approximately $4 billion, can be carried forward
against future tax periods of Bank of America until 2028.
Merrill Lynch has concluded that no valuation allowances are
necessary to reduce NOL deferred tax assets since estimated
future taxable income will more likely than not be sufficient to
utilize the assets prior to expiration. Due to capital gains
recognized by Bank of America during the nine month period ended
September, 30, 2009, Merrill Lynchs effective tax rate
reflects the release of $750 million of a valuation
allowance attributable to its federal capital loss carryforward
during 2009.
Merrill Lynch is under examination by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) and other tax authorities in countries
and states in which Merrill Lynch has significant business
operations. The tax years under examination vary by
jurisdiction. The IRS audits for the years 2005, 2006 and
2007 may be completed in 2009. The IRS proposed adjustments
for two issues in the audit for the tax year 2004 which
Merrill Lynch has protested to the Appeals office. The
issues involve eligibility for the dividend received deduction
and foreign tax credits with respect to certain transactions.
Similarly, Merrill Lynch intends to protest any proposed
adjustments for these two issues for the years 2005, 2006 and
2007. During 2008, the Japanese tax authorities completed the
audit of the fiscal tax years April 1, 2003 through
March 31, 2007. An assessment reflecting the Japanese tax
authorities view that certain income on which Merrill
Lynch previously paid income tax to other international
jurisdictions, primarily the U.S., should have been allocated to
Japan was issued and paid in 2008. Similar to another Japan tax
assessment received in 2005, Merrill Lynch is in the process of
obtaining clarification from international authorities
(Competent Authority) on the appropriate allocation of income
among multiple jurisdictions to prevent double taxation. The
audits in the U.K. for the tax year 2006 and in Germany for the
tax year 2007 are also in progress and may be completed during
2009. The Canadian tax authorities completed the audit for the
tax years 2004 and 2005 during the first quarter of 2009. In
October of 2009, Merrill Lynch reached agreements with New York
State and New York City on the examinations for the years 2002
through 2006. While the settlement will not have a material
impact to income tax expense, the unrecognized tax benefits
balance will decrease in the fourth quarter of 2009 by the
settled amount.
Depending on the outcomes of multi-jurisdictional global audits
and the ongoing Competent Authority proceeding with respect to
the Japan assessments, it is reasonably possible Merrill
Lynchs unrecognized tax benefits, which were approximately
$2 billion as of September 30, 2009, may be reduced
during the next 12 months, either because Merrill
Lynchs tax positions are sustained on audit or Merrill
Lynch agrees to settle certain issues. Merrill Lynchs
unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by as much as
$878 million during that period since resolved items would
be removed from the unrecognized tax benefit balance whether
their resolution resulted in payment or recognition.
79
Prior to its acquisition by Bank of America, Merrill Lynch was a
consolidated supervised entity subject to group-wide supervision
by the SEC and capital requirements generally consistent with
the standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. As
such, Merrill Lynch computed allowable capital and risk
allowances consistent with Basel II capital standards;
permitted the SEC to examine the books and records of
ML & Co. and any affiliate that did not have a
principal regulator; and had various additional SEC reporting,
record-keeping, and notification requirements.
As a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America, a bank holding
company that is also a financial holding company, Merrill Lynch
is subject to the oversight of, and inspection by, the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Certain U.S. and
non-U.S. subsidiaries
are subject to various securities and banking regulations and
capital adequacy requirements promulgated by the regulatory and
exchange authorities of the countries in which they operate.
These regulatory restrictions may impose regulatory capital
requirements and limit the amounts that these subsidiaries can
pay in dividends or advance to Merrill Lynch.
Merrill Lynchs principal regulated subsidiaries are
discussed below.
Securities
Regulation
As a registered broker-dealer, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S)
is subject to the net capital requirements of
Rule 15c3-1
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Rule). Under the alternative method permitted by the Rule,
the minimum required net capital, as defined, shall be the
greater of 2% of aggregate debit items (ADI) arising
from customer transactions or $500 million in accordance
with Appendix E of the Rule. At September 30, 2009,
MLPF&Ss regulatory net capital of $5.4 billion
was approximately 45% of ADI, and its regulatory net capital in
excess of the SEC minimum required was $4.9 billion.
As a futures commission merchant, MLPF&S is also subject to
the capital requirements of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC), which requires that minimum net
capital should not be less than 8% of the total customer risk
margin requirement plus 4% of the total non-customer risk margin
requirement. At September 30, 2009, MLPF&S regulatory
net capital of $5.4 billion exceeded the CFTC minimum
requirement of $614 million by $4.8 billion.
Merrill Lynch International (MLI), a U.K. regulated
investment firm, is subject to capital requirements of the
Financial Services Authority (FSA). Financial
resources, as defined, must exceed the total financial resources
requirement set by the FSA. At September 30, 2009,
MLIs financial resources were $18.4 billion,
exceeding the minimum requirement by $1.9 billion.
Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co., Ltd. (MLJS), a
Japan-based regulated broker-dealer, is subject to capital
requirements of the Japanese Financial Services Agency
(JFSA). Net capital, as defined, must exceed 120% of
the total risk equivalents requirement of the JFSA. At
September 30, 2009, MLJSs net capital was
$1.6 billion, exceeding the minimum requirement by
$978 million.
Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc. (MLGSI) was
a primary dealer in U.S. Government securities. As a result
of the Bank of America acquisition of Merrill Lynch, MLGSI was
delisted as a primary U.S. Government securities dealer in
February 2009.
80
Banking
Regulation
MLBUSA is a Utah-chartered industrial bank, regulated by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the
State of Utah Department of Financial Institutions
(UTDFI). Merrill Lynch Bank &
Trust Co., FSB (MLBT-FSB) is a full service
thrift institution regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS), whose deposits are insured by the FDIC. Both
MLBUSA and MLBT-FSB are required to maintain capital levels that
at least equal minimum capital levels specified in federal
banking laws and regulations. Failure to meet the minimum levels
will result in certain mandatory, and possibly additional
discretionary, actions by the regulators that, if undertaken,
could have a direct material effect on the banks. MLBUSA was
sold to a subsidiary of Bank of America on July 1, 2009.
The following table illustrates the actual capital ratios and
capital amounts for MLBT-FSB as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Well
|
|
MLBT-FSB
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Actual
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tier 1 leverage
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
10.06%
|
|
|
$
|
3,596
|
|
Tier 1 capital
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
14.57%
|
|
|
|
3,596
|
|
Total capital
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
15.14%
|
|
|
|
3,737
|
|
|
|
As a result of its ownership of MLBT-FSB, ML & Co. is
registered with the OTS as a savings and loan holding company
(SLHC) and is subject to regulation and examination
by the OTS as a SLHC. As a result of the Bank of America
acquisition, ML & Co. has requested that it be
deregistered as a SLHC.
Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited (MLIB), an
Ireland-based regulated bank, is subject to the capital
requirements of the Irish Financial Services Regulatory
Authority (IFSRA). MLIB is required to meet minimum
regulatory capital requirements under the European Union
(EU) banking law as implemented in Ireland by the
IFSRA. At September 30, 2009, MLIBs financial
resources were $15.0 billion, exceeding the minimum
requirement by $2.7 billion.
During the three and nine months ended September 26, 2008,
Merrill Lynch recorded pre-tax losses of $53 million and
$110 million, and net losses of $32 million and
$45 million within discontinued operations. Such results
were associated with Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company and ML
Life Insurance Company of New York, which were sold in 2007, and
Merrill Lynch Capital, which was sold in 2008.
Merrill Lynch recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of
approximately $486 million during 2008, of which
$39 million and $484 million was recorded in the three
and nine months ended September 26, 2008, respectively. The
full year 2008 charge was comprised of severance costs of
$348 million and expenses related to the accelerated
amortization of previous granted equity-based compensation
awards of $138 million.
During 2008, Merrill Lynch made cash payments, primarily
severance related, of $331 million, resulting in a
remaining liability balance of $17 million as of
December 26, 2008. During the first nine months of 2009,
Merrill Lynch made cash payments, primarily severance related,
of $11 million, resulting in a remaining liability balance
of $6 million as of September 30, 2009. This liability
is recorded in other payables on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
81
Merrill Lynch has entered into various transactions with Bank of
America, primarily in connection with certain sales and trading
and financing activities. Details on amounts receivable from and
payable to Bank of America as of September 30, 2009 are
presented below:
Receivables from Bank of America are comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
10,796
|
|
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowed
transactions
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
|
471
|
|
Intercompany funding receivable
|
|
|
4,115
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to Bank of America are comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Payables under repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
12,217
|
|
Payables under securities loaned transactions
|
|
|
10,187
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
|
338
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and expenses related to transactions with Bank of
America were not material for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
During the second quarter of 2009, the separate boards of
directors of MLBUSA and MLBT-FSB approved the sale of their
respective entities to a subsidiary of Bank of America.
In both transactions, Merrill Lynch sold the shares of the
respective entity to Bank of America. The sale price of each
entity was equal to its net book value as of the date of
transfer. Consideration for the sale of MLBUSA was in the form
of an $8.9 billion floating rate demand note payable from
Bank of America to Merrill Lynch, while MLBT-FSB was sold for
cash of approximately $4.4 billion. The demand note
received by Merrill Lynch in connection with the MLBUSA sale had
a stated interest rate that was a market rate at the time of
sale.
The MLBUSA sale was completed on July 1, 2009. At that
time, MLBUSA was merged into Bank of America, N.A., a subsidiary
of Bank of America. The sale of MLBT-FSB was completed on
November 2, 2009. At that time, MLBT-FSB was also merged
into Bank of America, N.A. At September 30, 2009, the total
assets of MLBT-FSB were $37.7 billion. In October, 2009,
Bank of America announced that it had reached a definitive
agreement to sell First Republic Bank, a division of MLBT-FSB,
to a group of third party investors. The sale is expected to
close in the second quarter of 2010, subject to receipt of all
regulatory approvals.
82
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Forward-Looking
Statements and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We have included certain statements in this report which may be
considered forward-looking, including those about management
expectations and intentions, the impact of off-balance sheet
exposures, significant contractual obligations and anticipated
results of litigation and regulatory investigations and
proceedings. These forward-looking statements represent only
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.s (ML &
Co. and, together with its subsidiaries, Merrill
Lynch, the Company, the
Corporation, we, our or
us) beliefs regarding future performance, which is
inherently uncertain. There are a variety of factors, many of
which are beyond our control, which affect our operations,
performance, business strategy and results and could cause our
actual results and experience to differ materially from the
expectations and objectives expressed in any forward-looking
statements. These factors include, but are not limited to,
actions and initiatives taken by both current and potential
competitors and counterparties, general economic conditions,
market conditions, the effects of current, pending and future
legislation, regulation and regulatory actions, the actions of
rating agencies and the other risks and uncertainties detailed
in this report. See Risk Factors in Part I,
Item 1A in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 26, 2008 (the 2008 Annual
Report). Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance
on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates
on which they are made. We do not undertake to update
forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of
circumstances or events that arise after the dates they are
made. The reader should, however, consult further disclosures we
may make in future filings of our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K.
From time to time, we may also disclose financial information on
a non-GAAP basis where management uses this information and
believes this information will be valuable to investors in
gauging the quality of our financial performance, identifying
trends in our results and providing more meaningful
period-to-period
comparisons.
Introduction
Merrill Lynch was formed in 1914 and became a publicly traded
company on June 23, 1971. In 1973, we created the holding
company, ML & Co., a Delaware corporation that,
through its subsidiaries, is one of the worlds leading
capital markets, advisory and wealth management companies. We
are a leading global trader and underwriter of securities and
derivatives across a broad range of asset classes, and we serve
as a strategic advisor to corporations, governments,
institutions and individuals worldwide. In addition, as of
September 30, 2009, we owned approximately 48 percent
of the economic interest of BlackRock, Inc.
(BlackRock), one of the worlds largest
publicly traded investment management companies with
approximately $1.4 trillion in assets under management at
September 30, 2009. See Executive
Overview Other Events for additional
information regarding our investment in BlackRock.
Bank of
America Acquisition and Basis of Presentation
On January 1, 2009, Merrill Lynch was acquired by Bank of
America Corporation (Bank of America) through the
merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America with and
into ML & Co. with ML & Co. continuing as
the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank
of America. Upon completion of the acquisition, each outstanding
share of ML & Co. common stock was converted into
0.8595 shares of Bank of America common stock. As of the
completion of the acquisition, ML & Co. Series 1
through Series 8 preferred stock were converted into Bank
of America preferred stock with substantially identical terms to
the corresponding series of Merrill Lynch preferred
83
stock (except for additional voting rights provided to the Bank
of America securities). The Merrill Lynch 9.00% Non-Voting
Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series 2, and 9.00% Non-Voting Mandatory Convertible
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 3 that was
outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the
acquisition remained issued and outstanding subsequent to the
acquisition, but are now convertible into Bank of America common
stock.
Bank of Americas cost of acquiring Merrill Lynch has been
pushed down to form a new accounting basis for Merrill Lynch.
Accordingly, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
appearing in Part I, Item 1 of this
Form 10-Q
are presented for Merrill Lynch for periods occurring prior to
the acquisition by Bank of America (the Predecessor
Company) and subsequent to the January 1, 2009
acquisition (the Successor Company). The Predecessor
Company and Successor Company periods have been separated by a
vertical line on the face of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements to highlight the fact that the financial
information for such periods has been prepared under two
different cost bases of accounting.
Effective January 1, 2009, Merrill Lynch adopted calendar
quarter-end and year-end reporting periods to coincide with
those of Bank of America. As a result, the following discussion
of the results of operations for the third quarter of 2009
refers to the period from July 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2009, and the first nine months of 2009
refers to the period from January 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2009. The third quarter of 2008 refers to the
period from June 28, 2008 through September 26, 2008,
and the first nine months of 2008 refers to the period from
December 29, 2007 through September 26, 2008. The
intervening period between Merrill Lynchs previous fiscal
year end (December 26, 2008) and the beginning of the
first quarter of 2009 (January 1, 2009) is presented
separately on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings/(Loss).
In connection with our acquisition by Bank of America, we
evaluated the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 280, Segment Reporting (Segment
Reporting), in the first quarter of 2009. Pursuant to
Segment Reporting, operating segments represent components of an
enterprise for which separate financial information is available
that is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision
maker in determining how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. Based upon how the chief operating decision maker
of Merrill Lynch reviews our results, it was determined that
Merrill Lynch does not contain any identifiable operating
segments. As a result, the financial information of Merrill
Lynch is presented as a single segment.
During the third quarter of 2009, Merrill Lynch adjusted
previously reported prior period 2009 amounts related to the
valuation of certain long-term borrowings, primarily structured
notes. The impact of these adjustments reduced principal
transactions revenues by $252 million and $178 million
and net earnings by $176 million and $160 million for
the first and second quarters of 2009, respectively. The results
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are
appropriately stated. Historical quarterly results presented in
future filings will include the impact of these revisions.
As a result of the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of
America, certain information is not required in this
Form 10-Q
as permitted by general Instruction H of
Form 10-Q.
We have also abbreviated Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as
permitted by general Instruction H.
84
Company
Results
We reported net earnings from continuing operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 of
$690 million and $2.2 billion. These results compare
with net losses from continuing operations of
$(5.1) billion and $(11.7) billion for the three and
nine months ended September 26, 2008. Revenues, net of
interest expense (net revenues) for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $5.1 billion
and $16.8 billion, compared with $16 million and
$834 million in the three and nine months ended
September 26, 2008. Pre-tax earnings from continuing
operations were $509 million and $2.4 billion for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. Pre-tax losses from continuing operations were
$(8.3) billion and $(19.7) billion in the three and
nine months ended September 26, 2008.
The results for the third quarter of 2009 reflected improved
sales and trading results as compared with the prior year. Net
revenues increased due primarily to higher revenues from fixed
income trading activities, including mortgage and credit
products, which generated positive trading revenues in the
current year as compared with significant net write-downs
recorded in the prior year period. These increases were
partially offset by lower equity and commodity net revenues. In
addition, net revenues for the third quarter of 2009 were
adversely affected by net losses of $2.1 billion due to the
impact of the narrowing of Merrill Lynchs credit spreads
on the carrying value of certain of our long-term debt
liabilities. The results for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009 also reflected higher revenues from
fixed income trading as compared with the net losses recorded in
the prior year. The results for the first nine months of 2009
also included a $3.5 billion net loss due to the impact of
the narrowing of Merrill Lynchs credit spreads on the
carrying value of certain of our long-term debt liabilities. The
results for both the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2009 reflected lower investment banking
revenues and lower revenues from our global wealth management
activities.
In the third quarter of 2008, net revenues and net earnings were
materially affected by a number of significant items, which
included: net write-downs of $5.7 billion resulting from
the sale of U.S. asset-backed collateralized debt
obligations (ABS CDOs) and the termination and
settlement of related hedges; a net gain of $4.3 billion
from the sale of our 20% ownership stake in Bloomberg, L.P.; net
write-downs of $3.8 billion associated with real
estate-related assets and losses related to certain
government-sponsored entities and major U.S. broker
dealers, as well as the default of a major
U.S. broker-dealer; net gains of $2.8 billion due to
the impact of the widening of Merrill Lynchs credit
spreads on the carrying value of certain of our long-term debt
liabilities; net losses of $2.6 billion across residential
and commercial mortgage exposures; a $2.5 billion
non-deductible payment to affiliates and transferees of Temasek
Holdings (Private) Limited (Temasek) related to our
July 2008 offering of common stock; and a $425 million
expense, including a $125 million fine, arising from
Merrill Lynchs offer to repurchase auction rate securities
(ARS) from our private clients and the associated
settlement with regulators.
The results for the nine months ended September 26, 2008
included net losses related to U.S. ABS CDOs of
$9.8 billion; credit valuation adjustments related to
hedges with financial guarantors of $7.2 billion; net
losses related to certain residential mortgage exposures of
$4.3 billion; net losses related to the investment
securities portfolio of Merrill Lynchs U.S. banks of
$2.9 billion; net losses of $2.1 billion related to
U.S. broker-dealers and certain government-sponsored
entities; and leveraged finance commitment write-downs of
$1.8 billion. In addition, the results for the nine months
ended September 26, 2008 included a restructuring charge of
$484 million arising from staff reductions completed during
the period. These results were partially offset by a net gain of
$4.3 billion from the sale of our ownership stake in
Bloomberg, L.P. as well as a net benefit of $5.0 billion
related to the widening of Merrill Lynchs credit spreads
on the carrying value of certain of our long-term debt
liabilities.
85
Our net loss applicable to common shareholders for the three and
nine months ended September 26, 2008 included
$2.1 billion of additional preferred dividends associated
with the exchange of Merrill Lynchs mandatory convertible
preferred stock, which occurred in July 2008.
Transactions
with Bank of America
Asset and
Liability Transfers
Subsequent to the Bank of America acquisition, certain assets
and liabilities were transferred at fair value between Merrill
Lynch and Bank of America. These transfers were made in
connection with efforts to manage risk in a more effective and
efficient manner at the consolidated Bank of America level. The
assets and liabilities transferred related to sales and trading
activities and included positions associated with the rates and
currency, equity and mortgage products trading businesses.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, these
transfers included approximately $47 billion each of assets
and liabilities transferred from Merrill Lynch to Bank of
America, primarily U.S. matched book repurchase positions
and mortgage positions. Approximately $42 billion of assets
and $19 billion of liabilities were transferred from Bank
of America to Merrill Lynch, primarily equity-related positions.
In the future, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America may continue to
transfer certain assets and liabilities to (and from) each other.
Sale of
U.S. Banks to Bank of America
During the second quarter of 2009, the separate boards of
directors of Merrill Lynch Bank USA (MLBUSA) and
Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust Co., FSB
(MLBT-FSB) approved the sale of their respective
entities to a subsidiary of Bank of America.
In both transactions, Merrill Lynch sold the shares of the
respective entity to Bank of America. The sale price of each
entity was equal to its net book value as of the date of
transfer. Consideration for the sale of MLBUSA was in the form
of an $8.9 billion floating rate demand note payable from
Bank of America to Merrill Lynch, while MLBT-FSB was sold for
cash of approximately $4.4 billion. The demand note
received by Merrill Lynch in connection with the MLBUSA sale had
a stated interest rate that was a market rate at the time of
sale.
The MLBUSA sale was completed on July 1, 2009. At that
time, MLBUSA was merged into Bank of America, N.A., a subsidiary
of Bank of America. The sale of MLBT-FSB was completed on
November 2, 2009. At that time, MLBT-FSB was also merged
into Bank of America, N.A. At September 30, 2009, the total
assets of MLBT-FSB were $37.7 billion. In October, 2009,
Bank of America announced that it had reached a definitive
agreement to sell First Republic Bank, a division of MLBT-FSB,
to a group of third party investors. The sale is expected to
close in the second quarter of 2010, subject to receipt of all
regulatory approvals.
Other
Events
On June 12, 2009, BlackRock agreed to purchase Barclays
Global Investors from Barclays, Plc. and upon the closing of
this transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the fourth
quarter of 2009, we will record an adjustment to our investment
in BlackRock. This acquisition has the effect of diluting our
ownership interest in BlackRock, which for accounting purposes
will be treated as a sale of a portion of our ownership
interest. As a result, our economic interest in BlackRock will
be reduced from approximately 48 percent to approximately
34 percent.
On September 21, 2009, Bank of America reached an agreement
to terminate its term sheet with the U.S. government under
which the U.S. government agreed in principle to provide
protection against the possibility of unusually large losses on
a pool of Bank of Americas financial instruments that were
acquired from Merrill Lynch. In connection with the termination
of the term sheet, Bank of America paid a total of
$425 million in the third quarter to the
U.S. government to be allocated among the
U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation.
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change between the
|
|
% Change between the
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009 and
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009 and
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
the Three Months
|
|
the Nine Months
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 26,
|
|
Sept. 26,
|
|
|
Ended Sept. 26,
|
|
Ended Sept. 26,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
4,047
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,573
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
%
|
Commissions
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Managed account and other fee-based revenues
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
4,249
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Investment banking
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Earnings from equity method investments
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
4,401
|
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
|
|
(6,310
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
4,824
|
|
|
|
16,115
|
|
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Interest and dividend revenues
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
28,415
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Less interest expense
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
8,831
|
|
|
|
|
7,830
|
|
|
|
25,754
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest profit
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
2,661
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net of interest expense
|
|
|
5,102
|
|
|
|
16,789
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
9,203
|
|
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
11,170
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Communications and technology
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Brokerage, clearing, and exchange fees
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Occupancy and related depreciation
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Advertising and market development
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Office supplies and postage
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Payment related to price reset on common stock offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
14,354
|
|
|
|
|
8,267
|
|
|
|
20,497
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax earnings/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
|
(8,251
|
)
|
|
|
(19,663
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Income tax (benefit)/expense
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
(3,131
|
)
|
|
|
(7,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
|
(5,120
|
)
|
|
|
(11,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss)
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
|
(5,152
|
)
|
|
|
(11,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings/(loss) applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,471
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Basic loss per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Diluted loss per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.59
|
|
|
$
|
18.59
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Successor Company amounts
include other income and other-than-temporary impairment losses
on
available-for-sale
debt securities. The other-than-temporary impairment losses were
$305 million and $599 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, respectively. |
Note: Certain prior period
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
N/M = Not meaningful.
N/A = Earnings per share
information is not applicable to the Successor Company periods
since Merrill Lynch is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of
America.
Quarterly
Consolidated Results of Operations
Our net earnings from continuing operations for the third
quarter of 2009 was $690 million compared with a net loss
of $5.1 billion for the third quarter of 2008. Net revenues
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 were
$5.1 billion compared with $16 million for the prior
year period. The results in 2009 primarily reflected improved
performance from our fixed income trading businesses. The
quarters results also included a $2.1 billion loss
due to the impact of the narrowing of Merrill Lynchs
credit spreads on the carrying value of certain of our long-term
debt liabilities. The net losses for the quarter ended
September 26, 2008 were primarily driven by our fixed
income businesses and were materially impacted by the
challenging market environment that existed during that period.
Losses incurred during the third quarter of 2008 included
write-downs from the sale of U.S. ABS CDOs and the
termination of related hedges, losses across residential and
commercial mortgage-related exposures, real estate asset
write-downs and losses related to certain government sponsored
entities and major U.S. broker-dealers, including the
default of a major U.S broker-dealer.
Principal transactions revenues include both realized and
unrealized gains and losses on trading assets and trading
liabilities and investment securities classified as trading.
Principal transactions revenues were $214 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 compared with
negative $6.6 billion for the three months ended
September 26, 2008. Principal transactions revenues in the
third quarter of 2009 were adversely affected by a
$2.1 billion loss due to the impact of the narrowing of
Merrill Lynchs credit spreads on the carrying value of
certain of our long-term debt liabilities. Equity trading
revenues increased as compared with the prior year, primarily
reflecting higher revenues from cash and derivative products.
Credit products revenues increased, reflecting strong liquidity
and client activity, augmented by strong new issuance volume, as
well as more favorable market conditions as compared with the
prior year. Revenues from certain other fixed income trading
activities also increased, including mortgage products,
reflecting improved results in the current year as compared with
the significant net write-downs recorded in the prior year
period. These increases were partially offset by lower revenues
from commodities and rates and currencies as compared with the
prior year. In the third quarter of 2008, the negative principal
transaction revenues were driven primarily by net losses in our
fixed income trading businesses, including losses related to the
sale of ABS CDOs and the termination and settlement of related
hedges, net losses associated with real estate-related assets,
and net losses from credit spread widening across most asset
classes to significantly higher levels during that period. Net
losses were also recorded as a result of severe market
dislocations that occurred in September 2008, including the
impact of the default of a major U.S. broker-dealer and the
U.S. governments conservatorship of certain
government sponsored entities. Such losses were partially offset
by strong net revenues generated by our interest rate and
currencies and commodities businesses, as well as gains arising
from the widening of Merrill Lynchs credit spreads on the
carrying value of certain of our long-term debt liabilities.
Net interest profit is a function of (i) the level and mix
of total assets and liabilities, including trading assets owned,
deposits, financing and lending transactions, and trading
strategies associated with our businesses, and (ii) the
prevailing level, term structure and volatility of interest
rates. Net interest profit is an integral component of trading
activity. In assessing the profitability of our client
facilitation and trading activities, we view principal
transactions and net interest profit in the aggregate as net
trading
88
revenues. Changes in the composition of trading inventories and
hedge positions can cause the mix of principal transactions and
net interest profit to fluctuate from period to period. Net
interest profit was $278 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared with $1.2 billion in
the prior year period. Interest revenues declined as a result of
lower asset levels and stated interest rates on those assets.
Interest expense also decreased due to reduced funding levels
and lower interest rates on such funding in our sales and
trading businesses. The decline in net interest profit also
reflected the amortization of purchase accounting adjustments
related to the fair value of certain long-term borrowings that
were recorded in connection with the acquisition of Merrill
Lynch by Bank of America.
Commissions revenues primarily arise from agency transactions in
listed and OTC equity securities and commodities, insurance
products and options. Commissions revenues also include
distribution fees for promoting and distributing mutual funds.
Commissions revenues were $1.3 billion for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, down 25% from the prior year
period, driven primarily by lower revenues from our global cash
equity trading business resulting from lower transaction
volumes. Commission revenues from our global wealth management
activities also declined as compared with the prior year.
Managed accounts and other fee-based revenues primarily consist
of asset-priced portfolio service fees earned from the
administration of separately managed and other investment
accounts for retail investors, annual account fees, and certain
other account-related fees. Managed accounts and other fee-based
revenues were $1.0 billion for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease of 29% from the prior year
period. The decline was primarily due to lower fee-based
revenues from our global wealth management activities, driven by
lower levels of fee-based assets from which such revenues are
generated, reflecting market prices and net outflows of client
assets.
Investment banking revenues include (i) origination
revenues representing fees earned from the underwriting of debt,
equity and equity-linked securities, as well as loan syndication
and commitment fees and (ii) strategic advisory services
revenues including merger and acquisition and other investment
banking advisory fees. Investment banking revenues were
$732 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009, down 13% from the prior year period. Underwriting revenues
increased 23% to $602 million. Revenues from strategic
advisory services declined 63% to $130 million, reflecting
an industry-wide decline in transaction volumes. As a result of
Bank of Americas acquisition of Merrill Lynch, beginning
in 2009, certain debt origination activities that were formerly
conducted by Merrill Lynch are now being conducted within the
Bank of America platform, while certain equity origination
activities that were formerly conducted by Bank of America are
now being conducted within the Merrill Lynch platform.
Earnings from equity method investments include our pro rata
share of income and losses associated with investments accounted
for under the equity method of accounting. Earnings from equity
method investments were $213 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared with $4.4 billion
for the three months ended September 26, 2008, which
included a net pre-tax gain of $4.3 billion from the sale
of our 20% ownership stake in Bloomberg, L.P. Excluding this
gain, prior year revenues were $105 million. The year over
year increase primarily reflected higher revenues from certain
investments, including partnerships and alternative investment
management companies. Refer to Note 5 of the 2008 Annual
Report for further information on equity method investments.
Other revenues include gains and losses on investment
securities, including certain
available-for-sale
securities, gains and losses on private equity investments, and
gains and losses on loans and other miscellaneous items. Other
revenues were $1.4 billion for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, compared with negative
$3.0 billion in the prior year period. Other revenues in
the third quarter of 2009 were primarily associated with an
increase in the fair value of certain private equity
investments. The negative revenues for 2008 primarily reflected
net losses from asset sales across residential and commercial
mortgage exposures,
other-than-temporary
impairment charges on
available-for-sale
securities within our U.S. banks investment securities
portfolio, write-downs on leveraged finance
89
commitments, and a decrease in the value of certain private
equity investments due primarily to the decline in the value of
certain non-public investments.
Compensation and benefits expenses were $2.8 billion for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
$3.5 billion in the prior year period. The year over year
decrease primarily reflects lower compensation costs as a result
of reduced headcount levels. Amortization expense associated
with prior year stock-based compensation awards also decreased
as a result of the revaluation of these awards due to purchase
accounting adjustments that were recorded in connection with the
acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America. In addition,
the decline in compensation expense reflects a change in
compensation that delivers a greater portion of incentive
compensation over time.
Non-compensation expenses were $1.8 billion for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 and $4.8 billion in the prior
year period. Brokerage, clearing and exchange fees were
$240 million, down 31% primarily associated with decreased
transaction volumes. Professional fees were $148 million,
down 39% primarily due to lower legal and consulting fees.
Advertising and market development costs were $89 million,
down 44% primarily due to lower travel and entertainment
expenses as well as lower promotion and marketing expenses.
Other expenses were $495 million, a decrease of 16% from
the prior year. Other expenses for 2008 included a charge of
$425 million related to Merrill Lynchs offer to
repurchase ARS from our private clients and the associated
settlement with regulators. Excluding this item, other expenses
increased $332 million, which included an additional
$80 million of amortization expense due to intangible
assets that were recorded in connection with the acquisition of
Merrill Lynch by Bank of America, and an additional
$150 million of expense associated with non-controlling
interests of certain principal investments, including private
equity investments. Non-compensation expenses for the third
quarter of 2008 included a $2.5 billion non-tax deductible
payment to Temasek related to Merrill Lynchs July 2008
common stock offering, as well as a restructuring charge of
$39 million primarily related to severance costs and the
accelerated amortization of previously granted stock awards
arising from headcount reduction initiatives conducted during
that quarter.
The income tax benefit from continuing operations was
$181 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 compared with $3.1 billion for the comparable period
in 2008. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2009
was (35.6)%, which reflects the benefit of a shift in the
geographic mix of our earnings as well as net permanent tax
benefits discussed in the
Year-to-Date
Consolidated Results of Operations section below
offsetting a higher percentage of our pre-tax income. For the
prior year period, the effective tax rate was 37.9%, which was
primarily driven by a tax benefit attributable to a loss on
foreign subsidiary stock offset by a charge related to a
nondeductible expense and the geographic mix of our earnings.
The majority of the income of certain foreign subsidiaries is
not currently subject to U.S. income tax as a result of
deferral provisions applicable to active financing income. These
provisions are scheduled to expire for taxable years beginning
on or after January 1, 2010. Absent an extension of these
provisions, active financing income earned by foreign
subsidiaries after expiration will be subject to a tax provision
that considers the incremental U.S. tax. Merrill Lynch does
not expect the impact, which will depend upon the amount and
geographic mix of future earnings, to drive Merrill Lynchs
effective tax rate higher than the U.S. statutory tax rates
for 2010.
Year-to-Date
Consolidated Results of Operations
For the first nine months of 2009, our net income from
continuing operations was $2.2 billion, compared with a net
loss from continuing operations of $11.7 billion in the
prior-year period. Net revenues for the first nine months of
2009 were $16.8 billion compared with $834 million in
the prior-year period. The increase in net revenues primarily
reflected improved fixed income trading results,
90
including mortgage and credit products. These increases were
partially offset by lower equity trading revenues and a net loss
of $3.5 billion due to the impact of the narrowing of
Merrill Lynchs credit spreads on the carrying value of
certain of our long-term debt liabilities. The results for the
first nine months of 2008 included net losses related to
U.S. ABS CDOs of $9.8 billion, credit valuation
adjustments related to hedges with financial guarantors of
$7.2 billion, net losses related to certain residential and
commercial mortgage exposures of $5.1 billion, net losses
related to the investment securities portfolio of Merrill
Lynchs U.S. banks of $2.9 billion, net losses of
$2.1 billion related to major U.S. broker-dealers and
certain government sponsored entities, and leveraged finance
commitment write-downs of $1.8 billion. These losses were
partially offset by a net gain of $5.0 billion related to
the impact of the widening of credit spreads on the carrying
value of certain of our long-term debt liabilities and a net
pre-tax gain from the sale of our 20% ownership stake in
Bloomberg, L.P. of $4.3 billion.
Compensation and benefits expenses were $9.2 billion for
the first nine months of 2009, down 18% from $11.2 billion
in the first nine months of 2008 due primarily to the same
reasons as the quarterly decline, including a change in
compensation that delivers a greater portion of incentive
compensation over time.
Non-compensation expenses were $5.2 billion for the first
nine months of 2009 and $9.3 billion in prior year period,
which included the $2.5 billion Temasek payment and the
$425 million ARS-related expense incurred in the third
quarter of 2008. Brokerage, clearing, and exchange fees were
$732 million, down 34% primarily due to decreased
transaction volumes. Professional fees were $396 million,
down 47% primarily due to lower legal and consulting fees.
Advertising and market development costs were $248 million,
down 50% primarily due to lower travel and entertainment
expenses as well as lower promotion and marketing expenses.
Other expenses were $1,398 million as compared with
$1,212 million in 2008, which included the
$425 million ARS-related expense. The increase from the
prior year included additional amortization of intangible assets
that were recorded in connection with the acquisition of Merrill
Lynch by Bank of America, and additional expense associated with
non-controlling interests of certain principal investments,
including private equity investments. Non-compensation expenses
for the first nine months of 2008 also included a restructuring
charge of $484 million related to headcount reduction
initiatives conducted during that period.
The income tax expense/(benefit) was $241 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared with
$(7.9) billion for the prior year period. The effective tax
rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of 9.9%
was driven by net permanent tax benefits, primarily a valuation
allowance release and foreign earnings taxed at rates below the
U.S. rate, offsetting a higher percentage of our pre-tax
income. For the prior year period, the effective tax rate was
40.4%, which reflects the impact of a tax benefit attributable
to a loss on foreign subsidiary stock offset by the geographic
mix of our earnings and a non-deductible expense related to the
Temasek dividend payment. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, Bank of America recognized capital
gains against which a portion of the U.S. capital loss
carryforwards may be utilized. Merrill Lynchs effective
tax rate reflects the release of $750 million of a
valuation allowance attributable to its U.S. capital loss
carryforward during 2009. The effective tax rate for the fourth
quarter may be positively impacted by one-time items, including
tax benefits from the recognition of additional tax capital
losses and possible settlements with various taxing authorities.
U.S. ABS
CDO and Other Mortgage-Related Activities
Capital markets showed some signs of improvement in the first
nine months of 2009. Market dislocations that occurred
throughout 2008 continued to impact our results in the first
nine months of
91
2009, but to a much lesser extent in comparison with the losses
we incurred on CDOs and other mortgage related products in the
first nine months of 2008.
Residential
Mortgage, U.S. Super Senior ABS CDO and Commercial
Mortgage-Related Activities (excluding the Investment Securities
Portfolio)
The following table provides a summary of our U.S. super
senior ABS CDO, residential and commercial mortgage-related net
exposures, excluding net exposures to residential and commercial
mortgage-backed securities held in our investment securities
portfolio, which are described in the Investment Securities
Portfolio section below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Excluding the investment securities portfolio.)
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Net
|
|
Net
|
|
|
exposures as
|
|
exposures as
|
|
exposures as
|
|
|
of Dec. 26,
|
|
of June 30,
|
|
of Sept. 30,
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Prime(1)
|
|
$
|
34,799
|
|
|
$
|
33,226
|
|
|
$
|
33,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Residential:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Sub-prime
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
(233
|
)
|
|
$
|
(478
|
)
|
U.S. Alt-A
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
Residential(2)
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
$
|
2,979
|
|
|
$
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Super Senior ABS CDO
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whole Loans/Conduits
|
|
$
|
3,845
|
|
|
$
|
3,765
|
|
|
$
|
3,505
|
|
Securities and Derivatives
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
Real Estate
Investments(3)
|
|
|
5,685
|
|
|
|
4,054
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Real Estate, excluding First Republic
Bank
|
|
$
|
9,704
|
|
|
$
|
7,167
|
|
|
$
|
5,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Republic Bank, Commercial Real Estate
|
|
$
|
3,119
|
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
5,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of September 30, 2009,
net exposures include approximately $30.8 billion of prime
loans originated with clients of our global wealth management
business (of which $13.9 billion were originated by First
Republic Bank). |
(2) |
|
Includes warehouse lending,
whole loans and residential mortgage-backed
securities. |
(3) |
|
Merrill Lynch makes debt and
equity investments in entities whose underlying assets are real
estate. The amounts presented are net investments and therefore
exclude the amounts that have been consolidated but for which
Merrill Lynch does not consider itself to have economic
exposure. |
U.S. ABS
CDO Activities
In September 2008, we sold $30.6 billion gross notional
amount of U.S. super senior ABS CDOs (the
Portfolio) to an entity owned and controlled by Lone
Star Funds (Lone Star) for a sales price of
$6.7 billion. We provided a financing loan to the purchaser
for approximately 75% of the purchase price. The recourse on
this loan, which is not included in the table above, is limited
to the assets of the purchaser, which consist solely of the
Portfolio. All cash flows and distributions from the Portfolio
(including sale proceeds) will be applied in accordance with a
specified priority of payments. The loan had a carrying value of
$4.5 billion at September 30, 2009. Events of default
under the loan are
92
customary events of default, including failure to pay interest
when due and failure to pay principal at maturity. As of
September 30, 2009, all scheduled payments on the loan have
been received.
Monoline
Financial Guarantors
We hedge a portion of our long exposures of U.S. super
senior ABS CDOs with various market participants, including
financial guarantors. We define financial guarantors as monoline
insurance companies that provide credit support for a security
either through a financial guaranty insurance policy on a
particular security or through an instrument such as a credit
default swap (CDS). Under a CDS, the financial
guarantor generally agrees to compensate the counterparty to the
swap for the deterioration in the value of the underlying
security upon an occurrence of a credit event, such as a failure
by the underlying obligor on the security to pay principal
and/or
interest.
We hedged a portion of our long exposures to U.S. super
senior ABS CDOs with certain financial guarantors through the
execution of CDS that are structured to replicate standard
financial guaranty insurance policies, which provide for timely
payment of interest
and/or
ultimate payment of principal at their scheduled maturity date.
CDS gains and losses are based on the fair value of the
referenced ABS CDOs. Based on the creditworthiness of the
financial guarantor hedge counterparties, we record credit
valuation adjustments in estimating the fair value of the CDS.
At September 30, 2009, the carrying value of our hedges
with financial guarantors related to U.S. super senior ABS
CDOs was $1.0 billion.
In addition to hedges with financial guarantors on
U.S. super senior ABS CDOs, we also have hedges on certain
long exposures related to corporate CDOs, Collateralized Loan
Obligations (CLOs), Residential Mortgage-Backed
Securities (RMBS) and Commercial Mortgage-Backed
Securities (CMBS). At September 30, 2009, the
carrying value of our hedges with financial guarantors related
to these types of exposures was $4.2 billion, of which
approximately 36% pertains to CLOs and various high grade basket
trades. The other 64% relates primarily to CMBS and RMBS in the
U.S. and Europe.
The following table provides a summary of our total financial
guarantor exposures to other referenced assets, as described
above, other than U.S. super senior ABS CDOs, as of
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-Market
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Default Swaps with
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
Life-to-Date
|
|
|
Guarantors (Excluding U.S. Super
|
|
Notional of
|
|
Net
|
|
Credit Valuation
|
|
Credit Valuation
|
|
Carrying
|
Senior ABS CDO)
|
|
CDS(1)
|
|
Exposure(2)
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Value(4)
|
|
|
By counterparty credit
quality(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
(11,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,839
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,647
|
|
Non-investment grade or unrated
|
|
|
(23,374
|
)
|
|
|
(16,920
|
)
|
|
|
6,454
|
|
|
|
(3,882
|
)
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial guarantor exposures
|
|
$
|
(35,111
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,293
|
|
|
$
|
(4,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the gross notional
amount of CDS purchased as protection to hedge predominantly
Corporate CDO, CLO, RMBS & CMBS exposure. Amounts do
not include exposure with financial guarantors on U.S. super
senior ABS CDOs which are reported separately above. |
(2) |
|
Represents the notional of the
total CDS, net of gains prior to credit valuation
adjustments. |
(3) |
|
Represents S&P rating band
as of September 30, 2009. |
(4) |
|
The total carrying value as of
June 30, 2009 and December 26, 2008 was
$5,321 million and $7,770 million, respectively. The
decrease in carrying value from June 30, 2009 primarily
reflected a $900 million decrease in CLO, corporate CDO,
CMBS and RMBS carrying value. |
93
Investment
Securities Portfolio
The investment securities portfolio had historically consisted
of investment securities comprising various asset classes held
by MLBUSA and MLBT-FSB (the Investment Securities
Portfolio). During the fourth quarter of 2008, in order to
manage capital at MLBUSA, certain investment securities were
transferred from MLBUSA to a consolidated non-bank entity. This
transfer had no impact on how the investment securities were
valued or the subsequent accounting treatment. The net exposure
of this portfolio was $2.2 billion at September 30,
2009 and $8.1 billion at June 30, 2009. The decline
primarily reflected asset sales and the sale of MLBUSA to Bank
of America (see Executive Overview
Transactions with Bank of America Sale of
U.S. Banks to Bank of America for further
information). The cumulative balances in other comprehensive
income/(loss) as of December 26, 2008 associated with this
portfolio were eliminated as of January 1, 2009 as a result
of purchase accounting adjustments recorded in connection with
the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America. We
regularly (at least quarterly) evaluate each security whose
value has declined below amortized cost to assess whether the
decline in fair value is
other-than-temporary.
We value RMBS based on observable prices and where prices are
not observable, values are based on modeling the present value
of projected cash flows that we expect to receive, based on the
actual and projected performance of the mortgages underlying a
particular securitization. Key determinants affecting our
estimates of future cash flows include estimates for borrower
prepayments, delinquencies, defaults, and loss severities.
A decline in a debt securitys fair value is considered to
be
other-than-temporary
if it is probable that not all amounts contractually due will be
collected. In assessing whether it is probable that all amounts
contractually due will not be collected, we consider the
following:
|
|
|
The period of time over which it is estimated that the fair
value will increase from the current level to at least the
amortized cost level, or until principal and interest is
estimated to be received;
|
|
|
The period of time a securitys fair value has been below
amortized cost;
|
|
|
The amount by which the securitys fair value is below
amortized cost;
|
|
|
The financial condition of the issuer; and
|
|
|
Managements intention to sell the security or if it is
more likely than not that Merrill Lynch will be required to sell
the security before the recovery of its amortized cost.
|
Refer to Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
94
The following table provides a summary of the Investment
Securities Portfolios net exposures and losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Other
|
|
Net
|
|
|
exposures
|
|
|
|
gains/(losses)
|
|
gains/(losses)
|
|
net changes
|
|
exposures
|
|
|
as of June 30
|
|
Sale of
|
|
reported in
|
|
included in OCI
|
|
in net
|
|
as of Sept. 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
MLBUSA
|
|
income
|
|
(pre-tax)
|
|
exposures(1)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Investment Securities Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-prime
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
1,717
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
|
771
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
(1,491
|
)
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Prime residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
476
|
|
Non-residential asset-backed securities
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-residential CDOs
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
Agency residential asset-backed securities and other
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,106
|
|
|
$
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
(4,725
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily represents sales and
principal paydowns. |
As a part of our normal operations, we enter into various
off-balance sheet arrangements that may require future payments.
The table and discussion below outline our significant
off-balance sheet arrangements, as well as their future
expirations, as of September 30, 2009. Refer to
Note 14 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for further information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Less than
|
|
1+ -
3
|
|
3+ -
5
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
1 year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
|
Standby liquidity facilities
|
|
$
|
4,950
|
|
|
$
|
2,178
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2,770
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Auction rate security guarantees
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residual value guarantees
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Standby letters of credit and other guarantees
|
|
|
29,455
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
27,362
|
|
|
|
Standby
Liquidity Facilities
Merrill Lynch provides standby liquidity facilities to certain
municipal bond securitization special purpose entities
(SPEs). In these arrangements, Merrill Lynch is
required to fund these standby liquidity facilities if the fair
value of the assets held by the SPE declines below par value and
certain other contingent events take place. In those instances
where the residual interest in the securitized trust is owned by
a third party, any payments under the facilities are offset by
economic hedges entered into by Merrill Lynch. In those
instances where the residual interest in the securitized trust
is owned by Merrill Lynch, any requirement to pay under the
facilities is considered remote because Merrill Lynch, in most
instances, will purchase the senior interests issued by the
trust at fair value as part of its dealer market-making
activities. However, Merrill Lynch will have exposure to these
purchased senior interests. Refer to Note 9 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information.
95
Auction
Rate Security (ARS) Guarantees
Under the terms of its announced purchase program as augmented
by the global agreement reached with the New York Attorney
General, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Massachusetts Securities Division and other state securities
regulators, Merrill Lynch agreed to purchase ARS at par from its
retail clients, including individual,
not-for-profit,
and small business clients. Certain retail clients with less
than $4 million in assets with Merrill Lynch as of
February 13, 2008 were eligible to sell eligible ARS to
Merrill Lynch starting on October 1, 2008. Other eligible
retail clients meeting specified asset requirements were
eligible to sell ARS to Merrill Lynch beginning on
January 2, 2009. The final date of the ARS purchase program
is January 15, 2010. Under the ARS purchase program, the
eligible ARS held in accounts of eligible retail clients at
Merrill Lynch as of September 30, 2009 was
$505 million. As of September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch
had purchased $8.1 billion of ARS from eligible clients. In
addition, under the ARS purchase program, Merrill Lynch has
agreed to purchase ARS from retail clients who purchased their
securities from Merrill Lynch and transferred their accounts to
other brokers prior to February 13, 2008. At
September 30, 2009, a liability of $41 million has
been recorded for our estimated exposure related to this
guarantee.
Residual
Value Guarantees
At September 30, 2009, residual value guarantees of
$738 million included amounts associated with the Hopewell,
NJ campus, aircraft leases and certain power plant facilities.
Standby
Letters of Credit and Other Guarantees
Merrill Lynch provides guarantees to certain counterparties in
the form of standby letters of credit in the amount of
$1.0 billion.
In connection with residential mortgage loan and other
securitization transactions, Merrill Lynch typically makes
representations and warranties about the underlying assets. If
there is a material breach of such representations and
warranties, Merrill Lynch may have an obligation to repurchase
the assets or indemnify the purchaser against any loss. For
residential mortgage loan and other securitizations, the maximum
potential amount that could be required to be repurchased is the
current outstanding asset balance. Specifically related to First
Franklin activities, there is currently approximately
$27 billion (including loans serviced by others) of
outstanding loans that First Franklin sold in various asset
sales and securitization transactions where there may be an
obligation to repurchase the asset or indemnify the purchaser
against the loss if claims are made and it is ultimately
determined that there has been a material breach related to such
loans. The repurchase reserve liability arising from these First
Franklin residential mortgage sales and securitization
transactions was approximately $500 million at
September 30, 2009.
Derivatives
We record all derivative transactions at fair value on our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We do not monitor our
exposure to derivatives based on the notional amount because
that amount is not a relevant indicator of our exposure to these
contracts, as it is not indicative of the amount that we would
owe on the contract. Instead, a risk framework is used to define
risk tolerances and establish limits to help to ensure that
certain risk-related losses occur within acceptable, predefined
limits. Since derivatives are recorded on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and the disclosure of
the notional amounts is not a relevant indicator of risk,
notional amounts are not provided for the off-balance sheet
exposure on derivatives. Derivatives that meet the definition of
a guarantee under
96
ASC 460, Guarantees, and credit derivatives are included
in Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Involvement
with SPEs
We transact with SPEs in a variety of capacities, including
those that we help establish as well as those initially
established by third parties. Our involvement with SPEs can vary
and, depending upon the accounting definition of the SPE (i.e.,
voting rights entity (VRE), variable interest entity
(VIE) or qualified special purpose entity
(QSPE)), we may be required to reassess prior
consolidation and disclosure conclusions. An interest in a VRE
requires reconsideration when our equity interest or management
influence changes, an interest in a VIE requires reconsideration
when an event occurs that was not originally contemplated (e.g.,
a purchase of the SPEs assets or liabilities), and an
interest in a QSPE requires reconsideration if the entity no
longer meets the definition of a QSPE. Refer to Note 1 to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion
of our consolidation accounting policies. Types of SPEs with
which we have historically transacted include:
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bond securitization SPEs: SPEs that
issue medium-term paper, purchase municipal bonds as collateral
and purchase a guarantee to enhance the creditworthiness of the
collateral.
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities SPEs: SPEs that issue
different classes of debt, from super senior to subordinated,
and equity and purchase assets as collateral, including
residential mortgages, commercial mortgages, auto leases and
credit card receivables.
|
|
|
|
ABS CDOs: SPEs that issue different classes of
debt, from super senior to subordinated, and equity and purchase
asset-backed securities collateralized by residential mortgages,
commercial mortgages, auto leases and credit card receivables.
|
|
|
|
Synthetic CDOs: SPEs that issue different
classes of debt, from super senior to subordinated, and equity,
purchase high-grade assets as collateral and enter into a
portfolio of credit default swaps to synthetically create the
credit risk of the issued debt.
|
|
|
|
Credit-linked note SPEs: SPEs that issue
notes linked to the credit risk of a company, purchase
high-grade assets as collateral and enter into credit default
swaps to synthetically create the credit risk to pay the return
on the notes.
|
|
|
|
Tax planning SPEs: SPEs are sometimes used to
legally isolate transactions for the purpose of obtaining a
particular tax treatment for our clients as well as ourselves.
The assets and capital structure of these entities vary for each
structure.
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred security SPEs: These SPEs hold
junior subordinated debt issued by ML & Co. or our
subsidiaries, and issue preferred stock on substantially the
same terms as the junior subordinated debt to third party
investors. We also provide a parent guarantee, on a junior
subordinated basis, of the distributions and other payments on
the preferred stock to the extent that the SPEs have funds
legally available. The debt we issue into the SPE is classified
as long-term borrowings on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The ML & Co. parent guarantees of its own
subsidiaries are not required to be recorded in the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
Conduits: Generally, entities that issue
commercial paper and subordinated capital, purchase assets, and
enter into total return swaps or repurchase agreements with
higher-rated counterparties, particularly banks. The Conduits
generally have a liquidity
and/or
credit facility
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
to further enhance the credit quality of the commercial paper
issuance. A single seller conduit will execute total return
swaps, repurchase agreements, and liquidity and credit
facilities with one financial institution. A multi-seller
Conduit will execute total return swaps, repurchase agreements,
and liquidity and credit facilities with numerous financial
institutions.
|
Our involvement with SPEs includes off-balance sheet
arrangements discussed above, as well as the following
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Holder of Issued Debt and Equity: Merrill
Lynch invests in debt of third party securitization vehicles
that are SPEs and also invests in SPEs that we establish. In
Merrill Lynch formed SPEs, we may be the holder of debt and
equity of an SPE. These holdings will be classified as trading
assets, loans, notes and mortgages or investment securities.
Such holdings may change over time at our discretion and rarely
are there contractual obligations that require us to purchase
additional debt or equity interests. Significant obligations are
disclosed in the off-balance sheet arrangements table above.
|
|
|
|
Warehousing of Loans and Securities: Warehouse
loans and securities represent amounts maintained on our balance
sheet that are intended to be sold into a trust for the purposes
of securitization. We may retain these loans and securities on
our balance sheet for the benefit of a CDO managed by a third
party. Warehoused loans are carried as held for sale and
warehoused securities are carried as trading assets.
|
|
|
|
Securitizations: In the normal course of
business, we securitize: commercial and residential mortgage
loans; municipal, government, and corporate bonds; and other
types of financial assets. Securitizations involve the selling
of assets to SPEs, which in turn issue debt and equity
securities (tranches) with those assets as
collateral. We may retain interests in the securitized financial
assets through holding tranches of the securitization. See
Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
Funding
We fund our assets primarily with a mix of secured and unsecured
liabilities through a globally coordinated funding strategy with
Bank of America. We fund a portion of our trading assets with
secured liabilities, including repurchase agreements, securities
loaned and other short-term secured borrowings, which are less
sensitive to our credit ratings due to the underlying
collateral. Refer to Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information regarding our
borrowings.
Credit
Ratings
Our credit ratings affect the cost and availability of our
unsecured funding, and it is our objective to maintain high
quality credit ratings. In addition, credit ratings are
important when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to
engage in certain long-term transactions, including OTC
derivatives. Following the acquisition by Bank of America, the
major credit rating agencies have indicated that the primary
drivers of Merrill Lynchs credit ratings are Bank of
Americas credit ratings. The rating agencies have also
noted that Bank of Americas credit ratings currently
reflect significant support from the U.S. government. In
addition to Bank of Americas credit ratings, other factors
that influence our credit ratings include rating agencies
assessment of the general operating environment, our relative
positions in the markets in which we compete, our reputation,
our liquidity position, the
98
level and volatility of our earnings, our corporate governance
and risk management policies, and our capital management
practices. Management maintains an active dialogue with the
rating agencies.
The following table sets forth ML & Co.s
unsecured credit ratings as of November 2, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
Rating Agency
|
|
Ratings
|
|
Debt Ratings
|
|
Ratings
|
|
Paper Ratings
|
|
Ratings Outlook
|
|
|
Dominion Bond Rating Service Ltd.
|
|
A
|
|
A (low)
|
|
A (low)
|
|
R-1 (middle)
|
|
Stable
|
Fitch Ratings
|
|
A+
|
|
A
|
|
BB-
|
|
F1+
|
|
Stable
|
Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
|
|
A2
|
|
A3
|
|
Baa3
|
|
P-1
|
|
Stable
|
Rating & Investment Information, Inc. (Japan)
|
|
A+
|
|
A
|
|
Not rated
|
|
a-1
|
|
Negative
|
Standard & Poors Ratings Services
|
|
A
|
|
A-
|
|
B
|
|
A-1
|
|
Stable
|
|
|
In connection with certain OTC derivatives transactions and
other trading agreements, we could be required to provide
additional collateral to or terminate transactions with certain
counterparties in the event of a downgrade of the senior debt
ratings of ML & Co. The amount of additional
collateral required depends on the contract and is usually a
fixed incremental amount
and/or the
market value of the exposure. At September 30, 2009, the
amount of additional collateral and termination payments that
would be required for such derivatives transactions and trading
agreements was approximately $1.6 billion in the event of a
downgrade to low single-A by all credit agencies. A further
downgrade of ML & Co.s long-term senior debt
credit rating to the BBB+ or equivalent level would require
approximately $0.6 billion of additional collateral. Our
liquidity risk analysis considers the impact of additional
collateral outflows due to changes in ML & Co. credit
ratings, as well as for collateral that is owed by us and is
available for payment, but has not been called for by our
counterparties.
Liquidity
Risk
Following the completion of Bank of Americas acquisition
of Merrill Lynch, ML & Co. became a subsidiary of Bank
of America and established intercompany lending and borrowing
arrangements to facilitate centralized liquidity management.
Included in these intercompany agreements is an initial
$75 billion one year, revolving unsecured line of credit
that allows ML & Co. to borrow funds from Bank of
America for operating requirements at a spread to LIBOR that is
reset periodically and is consistent with other intercompany
agreements. The maturity date for this credit line is
January 1, 2010. The credit line will automatically be
extended by one year to the succeeding
January 1st unless Bank of America provides written
notice not to extend at least 45 days prior to the maturity
date. The agreement does not contain any financial or other
covenants. During 2009, ML & Co. periodically borrowed
against the line of credit. There were no outstanding borrowings
against the line of credit at September 30, 2009.
We may also maintain excess liquidity, primarily in the form of
cash and cash equivalents and unencumbered government
securities, at our largest U.S. and international
broker-dealer subsidiaries.
Unencumbered
Loans and Securities
At September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, unencumbered
liquid assets at our regulated bank subsidiaries were
$21 billion and $60 billion, respectively. The
$39 billion reduction from June 30, 2009 primarily
reflected the sale of MLBUSA to Bank of America, N.A. on
July 1, 2009. These assets are investment grade
asset-backed securities and prime residential mortgages and were
available to meet potential deposit obligations, business
activity demands and stressed liquidity needs of the bank
99
subsidiaries. These unencumbered assets are generally restricted
from transfer and unavailable as a liquidity source to
ML & Co. and other non-bank subsidiaries.
At September 30, 2009, our non-bank subsidiaries, including
broker-dealer subsidiaries, maintained $69 billion of
unencumbered securities, including $8 billion of customer
margin securities. These unencumbered securities are an
important source of liquidity for broker-dealer activities and
other individual subsidiary financial commitments, and are
generally restricted from transfer and therefore unavailable to
support liquidity needs of ML & Co. or other
subsidiaries. Proceeds from encumbering customer margin
securities are further limited to supporting qualifying customer
activities.
Committed
Credit Facilities
Prior to Merrill Lynchs acquisition by Bank of America, we
maintained committed unsecured and secured credit facilities to
cover regular and contingent funding needs. Following the
completion of Bank of Americas acquisition of Merrill
Lynch on January 1, 2009, certain sources of liquidity were
centralized. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
ML & Co. repaid all outstanding amounts and terminated
all of its external committed unsecured and secured credit
facilities.
U.S.
Government Liquidity Facilities
The U.S. Government created several temporary programs to
enhance liquidity and provide stability to the financial markets
following the deterioration of the credit markets in 2008.
Merrill Lynch participated in a number of these programs.
Following the completion of Bank of Americas acquisition
of Merrill Lynch and resulting integration activities, Merrill
Lynch is no longer eligible to directly access certain liquidity
facilities or issue new securities under the programs. In
response, we established intercompany arrangements with Bank of
America to ensure access to liquidity in the event of contingent
funding requirements.
As of September 30, 2009, we had no outstanding borrowings
under these programs.
100
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Not required pursuant to Instruction H(2).
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Material
Weaknesses Previously Disclosed
As discussed in Item 9A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 26, 2008 and in Part II,
Item 4 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, in January 2009, we identified two material
weaknesses in the design and operation of our internal controls.
The first involved the contemporaneous documentation and fair
value hedge effectiveness requirements of ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging (Derivatives
Accounting) for a single material hedge relationship
entered into in the fourth quarter of 2008, which was fully
remediated in the first quarter of 2009.
The second relates to the accounting for certain intercompany
swaps with affiliates entered into by ML & Co. During
the first quarter of 2009, change management and escalation
controls and procedures were put in place to enhance the control
environment. Further, we undertook a balance sheet account
substantiation review during the third quarter for the financial
accounts related to these activities. We will continue to
monitor the execution of these additional control procedures,
including the account reconciliation routines evaluated in the
substantiation review, for on-going effectiveness before we
conclude on the remediation of this material weakness. We
currently anticipate that this remaining material weakness will
be fully remediated prior to the end of the period ending
December 31, 2009.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report and pursuant
to
Rule 13a-15(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act), the Corporations management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted
an evaluation of the effectiveness and design of the
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as that
term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, and due solely
to the one remaining material weakness, the Corporations
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures
were not effective, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting
information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. As a result of this
conclusion, the financial statements for the period covered by
this report were prepared with particular attention to the
unremediated material weakness previously disclosed.
Accordingly, management believes that the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this report fairly present, in
all material respects, our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows as of and for the periods presented.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in ML & Co.s internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during
the third quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, ML &
Co.s internal control over financial reporting. As
previously disclosed, during the first and second quarters of
2009, as part of our plan to address the aforementioned material
weaknesses, we put in place additional change management and
escalation controls and procedures pertaining to the pricing and
recording of certain intercompany swap transactions. In
addition, the contemporaneous documentation and fair value hedge
effectiveness requirements of Derivatives Accounting are now
compliant with the Bank of America Corporation policies and
procedures. We believe that these actions have strengthened our
internal controls over financial reporting.
101
PART II
Other Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Legal and
Regulatory Matters
The following information supplements the discussion in
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008 and in
Part II, Item 1 Legal Proceedings in our
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009.
Auction
Rate Securities Claims
Additional arbitrations and individual lawsuits have been filed
against Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated (MLPF&S) and, in some cases, also
against ML & Co. and Merrill Lynch International, by
parties who purchased auction rate securities. Plaintiffs in
these and the previously disclosed cases, all of which assert
substantially the same types of claims, seek compensatory
damages totaling in excess of $1.3 billion rescission and,
in some cases, punitive damages, among other relief.
Bank
Sweep Programs Litigation
DeBlasio v. Merrill Lynch, et al.: On July 27,
2009, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
New York entered an order dismissing the complaint with
prejudice. The plaintiffs have filed a notice of intent to
appeal the Courts decision.
In re
Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
On October 5, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York granted final approval of the
settlement. Certain objectors to the settlement have filed an
appeal of the District Courts certification of the
settlement class to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit.
Illinois
Funeral Directors Association Matters
Fred C. Dames Funeral Homes, Inc., et al., v. Daniel W.
Hynes, the Illinois Office of the Comptroller et al.: On
September 4, 2009, the plaintiffs, the Illinois Office of
the Comptroller and the Illinois Department of Insurance filed
motions for summary judgment.
Calvert Funeral Homes Ltd., et al. v. Robert W. Ninker,
et al.: On August 14, 2009, MLPF&S and Merrill
Lynch Life Agency, Inc. (MLLA), among others, moved
to dismiss the complaint and to compel arbitration.
David Tipsword as Trustee of Mildred E. Tipsword Trust, et
al. v. I.F.D.A. Services Inc., et al.: On
August 28, 2009, MLPF&S filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint. On October 7, 2009, the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of Illinois stayed the entire action.
Clancy-Gernon Funeral Home, Inc., et al. v. MLPF&S,
et al.: On July 29, 2009, MLPF&S and MLLA removed
the complaint to the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to remand
the case back to the Circuit Court for Cook County or to
transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Illinois.
102
IndyMac
On July 29, 2009, Police & Fire Retirement
System of the City of Detroit v. IndyMac MBS, Inc., et al.
and Wyoming State Treasurer, et al. v. John Olinski,
et al., were consolidated by the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New York and a consolidated amended
complaint was filed on October 9, 2009, naming MLPF&S
as a defendant, among others. Prior to the consolidation of
these matters, the IBEW Local 103 v. Indymac MBS et
al. case was voluntarily dismissed by plaintiffs and its
allegations and claims are incorporated into the consolidated
amended complaint.
Lyondell
Litigation
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York has bifurcated the adversary proceeding to allow for the
adjudication of certain of the fraudulent transfer and avoidance
claims (the Phase I Claims) of the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Lyondell Chemical Company
and affiliates on an expedited basis. On August 26, 2009,
MLPF&S and Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation moved to
dismiss the Phase I Claims. Trial of these claims is set to
begin on December 1, 2009. The Court has stayed all other
claims pending a ruling on the Phase I Claims.
On October 1, 2009, a second adversary proceeding, The
Wilmington Trust Co. v. LyondellBasell Industries AF
S.C.A., et al., was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York. This adversary
proceeding, in which MLPF&S, Merrill Lynch Capital
Corporation and Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited
along with more than seventy other entities are named
defendants, was filed by The Wilmington Trust Company as
Successor Trustee for holders of certain Lyondell Senior Notes
due 2015, and asserts causes of action for declaratory judgment,
breach of contract, and equitable subordination. The declaratory
judgment action alleges that the 2007 leveraged buyout of
Lyondell violated a 2005 Intercreditor Agreement executed in
connection with the August 2005 issuance of the Senior Notes and
asks the Court to declare the 2007 Intercreditor Agreement, and
specifically the debt priority provisions contained therein,
null and void. The breach of contract action seeks unspecified
damages. The equitable subordination action seeks to subordinate
the defendants bankruptcy claims to the claims of the
holders of the Senior Notes.
Subprime
Related Matters
In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Securities,
Derivative and ERISA Litigation: On August 25, 2009,
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York granted final approval of the settlement of the ERISA
Action.
On September 21, 2009, all defendants filed motions to
dismiss the derivative claims in the July 27, 2009 amended
complaint.
On September 28, 2009, an action, entitled N.A.
Lambrecht v. ONeal, et al., was filed in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
by a former Merrill Lynch shareholder. The plaintiff asserts
double-derivative claims on behalf of Bank of America and
Merrill Lynch and alleges causes of action for breach of
fiduciary duty and corporate waste arising out of Merrill
Lynchs business practices in the underwriting of
collateralized debt obligations and for breach of fiduciary duty
against certain former Merrill Lynch officers for allegedly
selling shares on the basis of inside information. The complaint
also alleges a breach of fiduciary duty and corporate waste by
certain former Merrill Lynch officers in connection with the
payment of incentive compensation to Merrill Lynch
employees in December 2008 and alleges that certain Bank of
America officers aided and abetted such breach. The complaint
seeks an unspecified amount of monetary damages, equitable
relief, including reimbursement of certain compensation and
benefits paid to individual defendants, and an award of
attorneys fees and expenses.
103
Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief
Fund v. Conway, et al.: On August 25, 2009, the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
granted preliminary approval of the settlement.
Short
Term Interest Rate Trading (STIRT) Matter
On October 22, 2009, Merrill Lynch International Bank
Limited reached a settlement of this matter with the Irish
Financial Regulator, which resulted in payment of a fine that
was not material to Merrill Lynch.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report,
you should carefully consider the factors discussed in
Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 26, 2008, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are not the only risks facing Merrill Lynch. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently
deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition
and/or
operating results.
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth
under Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors
in Merrill Lynchs 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
other than the addition of the following risk factor.
Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives may
significantly impact Merrill Lynchs financial condition,
operations and ability to pursue business opportunities.
The recent economic and political environment has led to a
number of legislative and regulatory initiatives, both enacted
and proposed, that may significantly impact Merrill Lynch. For
example, President Obamas administration has released a
proposal that contains far reaching changes to the financial
regulatory system that would significantly affect the financial
services industry, including greater powers to regulate risk
across the financial system; a new Financial Services Oversight
Council chaired by the U.S. Treasury Secretary; a Consumer
Financial Protection Agency (which may allow imposition of
additional state consumer protection laws that historically have
been pre-empted); and a new National Bank Supervisor. The
proposal also calls for increased scrutiny and regulation for
financial firms whose combination of size, leverage, and
interconnectedness could pose a threat to financial stability if
they were to fail; requiring that broker-dealers who provide
investment advice about securities to investors have the same
fiduciary obligations as registered investment advisers; new
requirements for the securitization market; and comprehensive
regulation of large participants in the over-the-counter
derivatives markets.
The various legislative and regulatory initiatives noted above
create significant uncertainty for Merrill Lynch, its parent
company Bank of America, and the financial services industry in
general, including the ability to recruit, retain and motivate
key associates. There can be no assurance as to whether or when
any of the parts of the Administrations plan or other
proposals will be enacted, and if adopted, what the final
initiatives will be. The legislative and regulatory initiatives
could require Merrill Lynch to change certain of its business
practices, impose additional costs on Merrill Lynch, limit the
products that Merrill Lynch offers, result in a significant loss
of revenue, limit Merrill Lynchs ability to pursue
business opportunities, cause business disruptions, impact the
value of assets that it holds or otherwise adversely affect
Merrill Lynchs business, results of operations or
financial condition. The long-term impact of these initiatives
on Merrill Lynchs business practices and revenues will
depend upon the successful implementation of its strategies, and
competitors responses to such initiatives, all of which
are difficult to predict.
An exhibit index has been filed as part of this report and is
incorporated herein by reference.
104
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Merrill Lynch &
Co., Inc.
(Registrant)
Robert Qutub
Chief Financial Officer
Thomas W. Perry
Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
Date: November 6, 2009
105
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
|
|
12
|
|
*
|
|
Statement re: computation of ratios.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101
|
|
*
|
|
The following materials from Merrill Lynch & Co.,
Inc.s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2009, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language):(i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings/(Loss), (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income/(Loss), (iii) the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of
text.
|
106