SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to (Section) 240.14a-11(c) or (Section) 240.14a-12
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.,
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how
it was determined):
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(5) Total fee paid:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(3) Filing Party:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(4) Date Filed:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
March 16, 2001
Dear Stockholder:
We cordially invite you to attend Merrill Lynchs Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will be held on Friday, April 27, 2001, at 10 a.m., at the Merrill Lynch
Conference and Training Center, 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey.
At the meeting, you will vote on a number of important matters described in the attached proxy statement. There also will be an opportunity for you to ask questions about our
business and to comment on any aspect of company affairs.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Even if you plan to attend the meeting in person, please vote your proxy by telephone or by internet
(see instructions on your proxy card), or by completing and returning your proxy card, so that your shares are represented.
We look forward to receiving your vote and seeing you at the meeting. If you need directions to the meeting, or have a disability that may require special assistance, please
contact our Corporate Secretary, Andrea L. Dulberg, at 222 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10038-2510; telephone: (212) 670-0432 or 0433; email address: corporatesecretary@exchange.ml.com.
DAVID H. KOMANSKY
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
April 27, 2001
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.s Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Friday, April 27, 2001, at 10 a.m. The meeting will take place at the Merrill Lynch
Conference and Training Center, 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey.
At the meeting, you will be asked to:
|
|
elect three directors to the Board of Directors, each for a three-year term,
|
|
|
increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock,
|
|
|
increase the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under our employee stock purchase plan,
|
|
|
act on a stockholder proposal, and
|
|
|
consider any other business properly brought before the meeting.
|
The accompanying proxy statement describes the matters being voted on and contains other information that may be helpful to you.
The close of business on February 27, 2001 was the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. A list of those stockholders will be
available at the offices of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P., located at 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey, from April 17, 2001 until the meeting. This list also will be available at the meeting.
|
By order of the Board of Directors
|
New York, New York
March 16, 2001
We included public notice of the date of the Annual Meeting in our Mid-Year Report to Shareholders, which was mailed on August 22, 2000. We also included notice of the meeting
in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2000, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2000.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING
Who is soliciting my vote?
The Board of Directors of Merrill Lynch is soliciting your vote for our 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
What will I vote on?
You are being asked to vote on:
|
|
the election of three directors to our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
an increase in our authorized common stock.
|
|
|
an increase in the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under our employee stock purchase plan.
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal.
|
How many votes do I have?
You have one vote for every share of common stock that you owned on the record date.
When was the record date for the Annual Meeting?
The close of business on February 27, 2001 was the record date for determining those stockholders who are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or
postponement.
How many votes can be cast by all stockholders?
A total of 834,649,292 votes may be cast, consisting of:
|
|
one vote for each of the 830,446,397 shares of our common stock, par value $1.33 1/3 per share, which were outstanding on the record
date, and
|
|
|
one vote for each share of the 4,202,895 exchangeable securities issued by one of our Canadian subsidiaries. Each share is
exchangeable into, and has voting rights equivalent to, one share of our common stock.
|
There is no cumulative voting.
How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?
A majority of the votes that can be cast, or 417,324,647 votes, is needed to hold the Annual Meeting. We urge you to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the meeting. That
will help us to know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present to hold the meeting.
How do I vote?
You may vote at the Annual Meeting by proxy or in person.
To vote by proxy, you may use:
|
|
the enclosed proxy card,
|
If you use the enclosed proxy card, you must sign and date it, and return it to us in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. You will find instructions for voting by telephone or
the internet on the proxy card.
If you want to vote in person at the meeting, and you hold your stock through a securities broker (that is, in street name), you must obtain an additional proxy from your
broker and bring that proxy to the meeting.
How many votes will be required to elect a director or to adopt a proposal?
|
|
A plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be required to elect each director to the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
A majority of the votes that can be cast, or 417,324,647 votes, as well as a majority of the common stock, or 415,223,199 votes, will
be required to adopt the proposal to increase the number of shares of common stock that we are authorized to issue.
|
|
|
A majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote will be required to adopt the other proposals and other
matters properly raised at the meeting.
|
Can I change my vote?
Yes. Just cast a new vote by telephone or internet or send a new proxy card with a later date. You may also send a written notice of revocation to Andrea L. Dulberg, Corporate
Secretary, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 222 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10038-2510. If you attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, your vote will revoke any previously submitted proxy.
What if I do not indicate my vote for some of the matters on my proxy card?
If you return a signed proxy card without indicating your vote, your shares will be voted:
|
|
for the election of the three persons named under the caption Nominees for Election to the Board of
Directors,
|
|
|
for our proposal to authorize additional shares of common stock,
|
|
|
for our proposal to increase the common stock that may be issued under our employee stock purchase plan, and
|
|
|
against the stockholder proposal.
|
What if I withhold my vote, or vote to abstain?
In the election of directors, you can vote for the three directors named on the proxy card, or you can indicate that you are withholding your vote.
Withheld votes will not affect the election of directors.
In connection with any proposal, you may vote for or against the proposal, or you may abstain from voting on the proposal. An
abstention from voting on a proposal will have the effect of a vote against that proposal.
What happens if I do not vote and do not attend the Annual Meeting?
If you do not vote shares held in your name, those shares will not be voted.
If you do not vote and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated is your broker, it will vote your shares on matters other than the stockholder proposal in
proportion to the votes cast by all other stockholders. If you do not vote and your shares are held through any other broker, your broker can vote your shares on matters other than the stockholder proposal. No broker may vote on the stockholder
proposal without your specific instructions.
If you do not vote your shares held through a broker and your broker votes them on some, but not all, of the proposals, the votes will be broker non-votes for any
proposal on which they are not voted. Broker non-votes will:
|
|
have the same effect as a vote against our proposal to increase the number of shares of common stock that we may issue,
and
|
|
|
have no effect on any other matter that may be voted on at the meeting.
|
Will my votes be confidential?
Yes. Your votes will be tabulated by an independent agent and will not be disclosed to our directors or employees, except for a very limited number of employees involved in
coordinating the voting tabulation process. Our confidentiality policy does not apply to certain matters, such as contested elections or disputed votes.
How can I attend the Annual Meeting?
Only stockholders of the company as of the record date, February 27, 2001, may attend the Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the meeting, we ask that you notify Andrea L.
Dulberg, Corporate Secretary, at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 222 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10038-2510, or by email: corporatesecretary@exchange.ml.com. Please be sure to bring photo identification with you to the meeting.
Additionally, if you hold your stock in street name, please be sure to bring proof of your ownership as of the record date, such as a letter or account statement from your broker or bank.
Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
Our by-laws require prior notification of a stockholders intent to request a vote on other matters at the meeting. The deadline for notification has passed and we have
not received any notifications. If any other matters properly arise at the meeting, your proxy, together with the other proxies received, will be voted at the discretion of the proxy holders.
Will Merrill Lynchs auditors participate in the Annual Meeting?
Yes. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of its Audit Committee, has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the 2001 fiscal year. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the meeting, and will have an opportunity to make a statement and to answer your questions.
What happens if the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned?
Your proxy will still be good and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.
Who will pay the expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of my vote?
Merrill Lynch pays the cost of preparing proxy materials and soliciting your vote. Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. has been retained (for a fee of $22,000, plus
expenses) to act as a proxy solicitor. Certain directors, officers or employees of Merrill Lynch or its subsidiaries, without additional compensation, may also solicit your vote in person, by telephone or by other means. We reimburse brokers,
including our subsidiary Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and other nominees for the cost of mailing materials to beneficial owners of our common stock under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. We also pay all
Annual Meeting expenses. You may incur telephone or internet access charges if you vote by telephone or internet.
Do any stockholders beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock?
Yes. State Street Bank and Trust Company, as trustee of various Merrill Lynch employee benefit plans and as trustee or discretionary advisor to non-Merrill Lynch related
accounts, beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock. For details of this ownership, please see Owners of More than 5% of Our Common Stock.
MATTERS REQUIRING STOCKHOLDER ACTION
Our Board of Directors has three classes. One class is elected each year and each class serves for a term of three years.
The Board of Directors has nominated each of the people named below for a three-year term ending in 2004. Seven of our current directors will continue to serve in accordance
with previous elections. One director will retire at the start of the Annual Meeting and our Board of Directors will be reduced to ten members. The biographical information presented below for the director nominees and for the directors continuing
in office is based upon information we received from the nominees and directors. Unless otherwise indicated, the offices listed are offices of Merrill Lynch. While we do not anticipate that any of the nominees will be unable to take office, if that
is the case your shares will be voted in favor of another person or other persons nominated by the Board of Directors.
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors
for a Three-Year Term Expiring in 2004*
Name and age |
|
Position, principal occupation, business
experience and directorships |
David H. Komansky (61) |
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Director since 1995 |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board since April 1997 |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer since December 1996 |
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer from January 1995 to April 1997 |
|
|
|
Other Directorship: Schering-Plough Corporation |
|
|
Robert P. Luciano (67) |
|
Corporate Director and Chairman Emeritus of Schering-
Plough Corporation |
|
|
|
Director since 1989 |
|
|
|
Chairman Emeritus of Schering-Plough Corporation, a health and personal care
products company |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer of Schering-Plough Corporation from February 1982
to January 1996 |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Schering-Plough Corporation from January 1984
to November 1998 |
|
|
|
Other Directorships: Schering-Plough Corporation, Honeywell International Inc.
and C. R. Bard, Inc. |
|
|
Name and age |
|
Position, principal occupation, business
experience and directorships |
David K. Newbigging (67) |
|
Chairman of the Board of Friends Provident Life Office |
|
|
|
Director
since 1996 |
|
|
|
Chairman of
the Board of Friends Provident Life Office, a
United Kingdom-based life assurance company |
|
|
|
Chairman of
the Board of Equitas Holdings Limited, the
parent company of a group of reinsurance companies
based in the United Kingdom, from 1995 to 1998 |
|
|
|
Chairman of
the Board of Rentokil Group PLC, an
international support services group based in the United
Kingdom, from 1987 to 1994 |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Senior Managing Director of
Jardine, Matheson & Co. Limited, a Hong Kong-based
international trading, industrial and financial services
group, from 1975 to 1983 |
|
|
|
Other Directorships: Chairman of the Board of Faupel
Trading Group PLC and Thistle Hotels PLC, Deputy
Chairman of Benchmark Group PLC, and director of
Ocean Energy, Inc. and Paccar Inc. |
*
|
Mr. Komansky currently serves on the Board of Directors in the class with terms expiring in 2002. To better balance the classes, Mr.
Komansky is nominated for election this year. Upon his election, the class of 2002 will then be reduced to three members.
|
Members of the Board of Directors Continuing in Office
With Terms Expiring in 2002
Name and age |
|
Position, principal occupation, business
experience and directorships |
Jill K. Conway (66) |
|
Visiting Scholar, Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
|
|
|
Director since 1978 |
|
|
|
Visiting
Scholar, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
since 1985 |
|
|
|
President of
Smith College from July 1975 to June 1985 |
|
|
|
Other
Directorships: Colgate-Palmolive Company and
NIKE, Inc. |
|
|
George B. Harvey (69) |
|
Corporate Director and Chairman of the Board, Retired, of
Pitney Bowes Inc. |
|
|
|
Director since 1993 |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Pitney Bowes Inc., a provider of
mailing, office and logistics systems and management
and financial services, from 1983 to December 1996 |
|
|
|
President
and Chief Operating Officer of Pitney Bowes
Inc. from 1981 to May 1996 |
|
|
|
Other
Directorships: Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
Company, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Pfizer
Inc. |
|
|
John L. Steffens (59) |
|
Vice Chairman of the Board and Chairman of U.S. Private
Client Group |
|
|
|
Director
since 1997 |
|
|
|
Vice Chairman
of the Board since April 1997 |
|
|
|
Chairman
of U.S. Private Client Group since February
2000 |
|
|
|
President
of U.S. Private Client Group from April 1997 to
February 2000 |
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President, Private Client Group from
October 1990 to April 1997 |
Members of the Board of Directors Continuing in Office
With Terms Expiring in 2003
Name and age |
|
Position, principal occupation, business
experience and directorships |
W.H. Clark (68) |
|
Corporate Director and Chairman of the Board, Retired, of
Nalco Chemical Company |
|
|
|
Director since 1995 |
|
|
|
Chairman of
the Board of Nalco Chemical Company, a
producer of specialty chemicals, from 1984 to 1994 |
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer of Nalco Chemical Company from
1982 to 1994 |
|
|
|
President of
Nalco Chemical Company from 1984 to 1990 |
|
|
|
Other
Directorships: Bethlehem Steel Corporation,
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Millennium Chemicals Inc.
and Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation |
|
|
Stephen L. Hammerman (63) |
|
Vice Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
Director
since 1985 |
|
|
|
Vice Chairman
of the Board since April 1992 |
|
|
|
General
Counsel since October 1984 |
|
|
Aulana L. Peters (59) |
|
Corporate Director and Member, Public Oversight Board
of AICPA |
|
|
|
Director
since 1994 |
|
|
|
Partner in
the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
from 1980 to 1984 and from 1988 to 2000 |
|
|
|
Commissioner
of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission from 1984 to 1988 |
|
|
|
Other
Directorships: Callaway Golf Company, Minnesota
Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) and Northrop
Grumman Corporation |
|
|
John J. Phelan, Jr. (69) |
|
Corporate Director and Senior Advisor to the Boston
Consulting Group |
|
|
|
Director
since 1991 |
|
|
|
Senior
Advisor to the Boston Consulting Group since
October 1992 |
|
|
|
Member of the
Council on Foreign Relations since 1988 |
|
|
|
President of
the International Federation of Stock
Exchanges from January 1991 to January 1993 |
|
|
|
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the New York
Stock Exchange, Inc. from May 1984 to December 1990 |
|
|
|
Other
Directorships: Eastman Kodak Company and
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
William R. Hoover, age 71, has served as a director since 1995 and will continue to serve until the start of the 2001
Annual Meeting. Mr. Hoover is the Chairman of the Executive Committee of Computer Sciences Corporation, a provider of information technology consulting, systems integration, and outsourcing to industry and government. Mr. Hoover serves as a director
of Computer Sciences Corporation, Rofin-Sinar Technologies, Inc. and Storage Technology Corporation.
A Description of Our Committees
In addition to the Executive Committee, the Board of Directors has appointed other standing committees. These other committees, and certain of their principal functions, are
described below.
Our Audit Committee:
|
|
reviews our annual consolidated financial statements with management and our independent auditors.
|
|
|
recommends the appointment and monitors the performance, independence, and fees of our independent auditors, and monitors the
professional services they provide.
|
|
|
monitors our system of internal accounting controls and oversees and evaluates the internal audit function.
|
|
|
monitors compliance with risk management and compliance policies and procedures and oversees and evaluates management and compliance
functions.
|
|
|
discharges other responsibilities including those described under the caption Audit Committee Report.
|
Our Finance Committee:
|
|
reviews, makes recommendations about and approves our policies regarding financial commitments and other expenditures.
|
|
|
reviews and approves financial commitments, acquisitions, divestitures and proprietary investments in excess of specified dollar
amounts.
|
|
|
oversees our corporate funding policy, securities offerings, financial commitments and related matters.
|
|
|
reviews procedures for implementing and monitoring adherence to corporate funding policies.
|
Our Management Development and Compensation Committee:
|
|
reviews, recommends and oversees employee compensation programs, policies and practices, including salary, incentive compensation,
stock related plans including stock option and stock bonus plans, retirement, health and welfare programs.
|
|
|
makes grants under the Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans and other stock-based compensation
plans.
|
|
|
reviews management development programs and executive succession plans and certain senior management appointments.
|
|
|
discharges other responsibilities described under the caption Management Development and Compensation Committee Report on
Executive Compensation.
|
Our Public Policy and Responsibility Committee:
|
|
assists the Board of Directors and senior management in overseeing Merrill Lynchs fulfillment of its principles of Respect
for the Individual, Teamwork, Responsible Citizenship and Integrity.
|
|
|
reviews and, where appropriate, makes recommendations regarding our political and charitable contribution policies, and our policies,
practices and actions as they relate to social and public policy issues that affect our business around the world.
|
Our Nominating Committee:
|
|
identifies and recommends potential candidates to serve on the Board of Directors, with a view toward maintaining a desirable balance
of expertise among the directors.
|
|
|
makes recommendations to the Board of Directors relating to the membership of committees of the Board of Directors.
|
The Nominating Committee considers director nominees recommended by our stockholders. To submit recommendations for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you may write to
Andrea L. Dulberg, Corporate Secretary, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 222 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10038-2510; email address: corporatesecretary@exchange.ml.com.
The following table shows the membership and the number of meetings of each of our committees during the 2000 fiscal year, including, in the case of the Nominating Committee,
action taken by consent. The Board of Directors held 11 meetings in 2000. Each director attended at least 75 percent of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and board committees of which he or she was a member in 2000.
Director
|
|
Audit*
|
|
Finance*
|
|
Management
Development
and Compensation
|
|
Public Policy and
Responsibility
|
|
Nominating
|
Mr. Clark** |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs. Conway |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Chair |
|
Mr. Harvey |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
Mr. Hoover |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Luciano |
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
|
X |
|
Mr. Newbigging |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
|
Mrs. Peters |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Mr. Phelan |
|
Chair |
|
Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 meetings |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
*
|
On June 5, 2000 the Board of Directors approved the separation of the Audit and Finance Committee into two committees, the Audit
Committee and the Finance Committee.
|
**
|
Mr. Clark was a member of the Audit and Finance Committee through June 5, 2000, at which time he became a member of the Management
Development and Compensation Committee.
|
The Audit Committee (the Committee) is comprised of four independent directors and operates under a written charter, which is attached as Exhibit A. The Committee
recommends to the Board of Directors the selection of Merrill Lynchs independent auditors.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for Merrill Lynch for the fiscal year ended December
29, 2000 with Merrill Lynchs management and Deloitte & Touche LLP
(Deloitte & Touche), our independent auditors.
The Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit
Committees. In addition, the Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees and has
discussed with Deloitte & Touche its independence from Merrill Lynch and its management.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements for Merrill
Lynch for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2000 be included in our 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders which will be incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2000 for filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee
John J. Phelan, Jr., Chairman
William R. Hoover
David K. Newbigging
Aulana L. Peters
Our Proposal to Authorize Additional Shares of Common Stock
The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders adopt an amendment to Article IV of our restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized
shares of common stock to 3,000,000,000 shares.
The table below shows, as of February 27, 2001, Merrill Lynchs current and proposed authorized and outstanding capital stock (after giving effect to our most recent stock
split). It shows stock of a subsidiary that is exchangeable into common stock and stock currently available or subject to awards under stockholder-approved plans (other than the 25,000,000 share increase to the authorized shares for the Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan that we are asking stockholders to approve at this meeting).
Security
|
|
Authorized
|
|
Outstanding on
February 27, 2001
|
|
Available or
subject to
awards under
stockholder-
approved plans
|
|
Proposal
|
Common Stock |
|
1,000,000,000 |
|
830,446,397 |
|
112,494,579 |
|
3,000,000,000 |
Preferred Stock |
|
25,000,000 |
|
42,500 |
|
0 |
|
Unchanged |
Exchangeable Stock |
|
|
|
4,202,895 |
|
0 |
|
Unchanged |
Total Capital Stock |
|
1,025,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,025,000,000 |
The Board of Directors believes that the increase in our authorized shares of common stock will maintain Merrill Lynchs financing and capital raising flexibility and
facilitate future stock splits, acquisitions and other corporate purposes and, therefore, is in the best interests of Merrill Lynch and our stockholders. If our certificate of incorporation is amended, the additional shares will be available
for:
|
|
issuance in connection with stock splits
|
|
|
issuance to obtain funds for our present and future operations
|
|
|
use in connection with acquisitions of businesses or properties
|
|
|
any other proper corporate purpose
|
Merrill Lynch has no present agreements to issue the additional shares to be authorized by this proposal. Merrill Lynch will issue additional shares of common stock if the
Board of Directors determines the issuance would be in the best interests of Merrill Lynch and you, our stockholders.
Any newly authorized shares of common stock will have voting and other rights identical to those of the currently authorized shares of common stock. Under our certificate of
incorporation, holders of common stock do not have preemptive rights. As is true for shares presently authorized, any issuance of additional shares of our common stock could dilute the equity of the outstanding shares of common stock.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the adoption of our proposal to authorize additional shares of common stock.
Our Proposal to Authorize Additional Shares for Our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders adopt an amendment to our 1986 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of
shares of common stock available for our employees under the plan by 25,000,000 shares.
This plan has assisted Merrill Lynchs efforts to attract and retain highly talented employees, and has significantly increased the interest of participating employees in
the continuing success of Merrill Lynch. The plan was approved by our stockholders in April 1987. Our stockholders voted to increase the number of shares available for sale under the plan in 1989, and again in 1991.
As of February 27, 2001, a total of 93,992,212 shares of our common stock had been purchased by employees under the plan since inception, and 6,607,788 shares of our common
stock were available for issuance under the plan. In order to provide an adequate number of shares for future issuance and sale to employees, the Board of Directors now seeks your approval to amend the Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
|
|
to increase the number of shares authorized under the Plan by 25,000,000 shares for a total of 125,600,000 authorized
shares.
|
The plan is a broad-based plan and provides Merrill Lynch employees with an opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock through regular payroll deductions of up to 10%
of their annual eligible compensation. These amounts are applied to the purchase of our common stock under the plan on designated investment dates. The shares used under the plan may be either shares that stockholders authorized but that have not
yet been issued or shares that have been repurchased and held in treasury.
Purchase price: 85% of the average of the high and low price of Merrill Lynch common stock on each investment date.
Maximum annual payroll deduction per participant: $21,250 per employee.
Eligible employees: Virtually all regular employees and certain part-time employees of Merrill Lynch and our domestic subsidiaries employed at least one year and
employees of our foreign subsidiaries who are designated by the Management Development and Compensation Committee.
Number of participating employees: 9,096 employees.
Number of eligible employees: 60,190.
Tax treatment for U.S. employees: If shares are sold two years or more after the purchase date, the 15% discount is ordinary income, any further profit is a long-term
capital gain and any loss is treated as a long-term capital loss. If shares are sold less than two years after the purchase date, the discount is taxed as ordinary income (even where there is a loss). Any profit above the 15% discount is taxed as a
short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on how long the shares were held. Any loss, after including the 15% discount as ordinary income, is treated as a capital loss.
Tax treatment for Merrill Lynch: Merrill Lynch is entitled to a deduction equal to the full 15% discount.
This is only a summary of the terms of the plan. A copy of the entire plan, as we propose to amend it, may be obtained by writing to Andrea L. Dulberg, Corporate Secretary,
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 222 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10038-2510 or by sending an email to corporatesecretary@exchange.ml.com.
Three of our executive officers, including E. Stanley ONeal, currently participate in the plan. The maximum value received by these executive officers in 2001 will not
exceed the maximum value to any other plan participant as described above.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the adoption of our proposal to authorize additional shares for our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis, Watergate Office Building, 2600 Virginia Ave., N.W., Suite 215, Washington, D.C. 20037, who holds 800 shares of common stock, has given notice of her
intention to propose the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
|
RESOLVED: That the stockholders of Merrill Lynch, assembled in Annual Meeting in person and by proxy, hereby request the Board
of Directors to take the necessary steps to provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means each stockholder shall be entitled to as many votes as shall equal the number of shares he or she owns multiplied by the number of
directors to be elected, and he or she may cast all of such votes for a single candidate, or any two or more of them as he or she may see fit.
|
The following statement has been submitted by Mrs. Davis in support of the resolution:
|
REASONS: Many states have mandatory cumulative voting, so do National Banks.
|
|
In addition, many corporations have adopted cumulative voting.
|
|
Last year the owners of 81,346,817 shares, representing approximately 32.6% of shares voting, voted FOR this
proposal.
|
|
If you AGREE, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution.
|
For the reasons stated below, the Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the adoption of this stockholder proposal.
A similar proposal has been rejected at our past annual meetings fifteen times by you, our stockholders, each time by a substantial majority. The important
reasons for rejecting this proposal in the past remain important reasons for rejecting the proposal now.
Cumulative voting may:
|
|
allow for the election of directors by small groups with special interests.
|
|
|
result in directors being elected who feel an obligation to represent the special interest groups that elected them, regardless of
whether the furtherance of those groups interests would benefit all of our stockholders generally.
|
|
|
create factionalism among board members and undermine their ability to work together effectively.
|
In order to minimize the risks of such divisiveness, and the consequent risk of distracting our Board of Directors from management of Merrill Lynchs affairs, Merrill
Lynch, like most other major corporations, elects directors by allowing each share of common stock to have one vote for each nominee. By using this method, we:
|
|
ensure that each director is elected by stockholders representing a plurality of all of the shares of common stock voted at the
meeting.
|
|
|
encourage accountability of each director to all of our stockholders.
|
|
|
reduce the risk of divisive factionalism.
|
In short, we believe that our current system of electing directors best serves the interests of you, our stockholders.
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Ownership by Our Directors and Executive Officers
We encourage our directors, officers and employees to become stockholders of Merrill Lynch. We believe that this helps to align their interests with your interests, as
stockholders. We also believe that this policy has been a significant factor in the returns that we have achieved for our stockholders.
The following table contains information about the beneficial ownership of common stock, common stock options and common stock-linked units by each of our directors and certain
executive officers. Information is also provided as to ownership by all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. This information is as of February 27, 2001.
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Common
Stock(1)
|
|
Stock
Options(2)
|
|
Stock
Units(3)
|
|
Total(4)
|
W. H. Clark |
|
Director |
|
10,308 |
|
0 |
|
4,770 |
|
15,078 |
|
Jill K. Conway |
|
Director |
|
12,616 |
|
0 |
|
6,515 |
|
19,131 |
|
Thomas W. Davis |
|
Executive Vice President |
|
485,933 |
|
1,465,567 |
|
115,777 |
|
2,067,277 |
|
Stephen L. Hammerman |
|
Director and Vice Chairman |
|
656,163 |
|
1,969,699 |
|
97,119 |
|
2,722,981 |
|
George B. Harvey |
|
Director |
|
14,674 |
|
0 |
|
8,491 |
|
23,165 |
|
William R. Hoover |
|
Retiring Director |
|
10,580 |
|
0 |
|
6,353 |
|
16,933 |
|
David H. Komansky |
|
Director, Chairman and CEO |
|
710,919 |
|
4,848,669 |
|
1,101,187 |
|
6,660,775 |
|
Robert P. Luciano |
|
Director |
|
15,680 |
|
0 |
|
8,419 |
|
24,099 |
|
David K. Newbigging |
|
Director |
|
9,000 |
|
0 |
|
10,146 |
|
19,146 |
|
E. Stanley ONeal |
|
Executive Vice President |
|
73,161 |
|
1,354,387 |
|
67,367 |
|
1,494,915 |
|
Jeffrey M. Peek |
|
Executive Vice President |
|
369,681 |
|
1,272,673 |
|
109,684 |
|
1,752,038 |
|
Aulana L. Peters |
|
Director |
|
2,956 |
|
0 |
|
18,751 |
|
21,707 |
|
John J. Phelan, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
15,680 |
|
0 |
|
6,515 |
|
22,195 |
|
John L. Steffens |
|
Director and Vice Chairman |
|
1,399,176 |
|
1,264,707 |
|
568,088 |
|
3,231,972 |
|
Directors and executive
officers as a group |
|
|
|
6,494,753 |
|
18,309,988 |
|
2,601,286 |
|
27,406,028 |
(1)
|
Includes 72,000 shares held in trusts for which Mr. Hammerman has shared voting and investment power, 29,580 shares held by a
charitable foundation for which Mr. Peek has shared voting and investment power, 2,156 shares held in a trust for which Mrs. Peters has shared voting and investment power, 9,084 shares held by charitable foundations, and 10,464 shares held in
custodial accounts and trusts as to which, in each case, an executive officer has shared voting and investment power. The directors and executive officers have sole voting and investment power over all other shares of common stock
listed.
|
(2)
|
This column includes all stock options for the directors and executive officers as a group, including 11,260,070 stock options that
have or will become exercisable within 60 days of the record date and 7,049,918 stock options that will become exercisable after that date. The number of stock options exercisable within 60 days for the named individuals are as follows: Mr. Davis
704,862, Mr. Hammerman 1,369,868, Mr. Komansky 3,639,182, Mr. ONeal 274,796, Mr. Peek 605,100, and Mr. Steffens 589,706.
|
(3)
|
Units in the table are linked to the value of our common stock and are generally paid in shares of common stock at the end of the
restricted or deferral period.
|
(4)
|
No individual director or executive officer owned more than 1% of our outstanding common stock. The group of directors and executive
officers owned approximately 2.1% of the outstanding common stock (excluding stock units and stock options that will not become exercisable within 60 days after the record date).
|
Owners of More than 5% of Our Common Stock
Except as described below, we know of no person that beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Beneficial
Ownership |
|
Percent of
Class |
|
State Street Bank and Trust Company
(225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As trustee of the Merrill Lynch Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (ESOP) |
|
44,334,477 |
(1) |
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As trustee of other Merrill Lynch employee benefit plans |
|
39,470,302 |
(2) |
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As trustee or discretionary advisor for certain unaffiliated accounts and
collective investment funds. |
|
20,141,518 |
(3) |
|
2.4 |
% |
(1)
|
As of February 27, 2001, 44,212,554 shares were allocated to ESOP participants and 121,923 shares were beneficially owned by the ESOP
but were unallocated to participants. Participants have the right to direct the voting of allocated shares by State Street. State Street is generally obligated to vote unallocated shares and allocated shares for which it has not received
instructions in the same proportion as allocated shares that have directed a vote.
|
(2)
|
Participants have the right to direct the voting of shares of common stock by State Street. State Street is generally obligated to
vote shares for which it has not received instructions in the same proportion as shares that have directed a vote.
|
(3)
|
This information is as of December 31, 2000 and was derived from a State Street SEC filing. State Street has sole voting power over
13,362,530 shares, sole dispositive power over 15,245,205 shares, shared voting power over 5,034,742 shares, and shared dispositive power over 4,896,313 shares.
|
MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive Compensation Overview
Merrill Lynchs continuing status as a pre-eminent financial services company owes much to its tradition of quality leadership. Our executive compensation program is
therefore designed to attract and retain highly talented individuals and to recognize performance that maintains the firms reputation for superior results and continued success. The program supports creation of stockholder value by providing
compensation based on annual financial results and long-term stock price appreciation.
Policies and Process
General
The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the MDCC) is responsible for administering all executive officer compensation programs and plans, including
the determination and approval of base salaries, cash bonuses and stock bonuses. The MDCC consists of four directors who have never been employees of Merrill Lynch and who are not eligible to participate in any of the MDCC-administered compensation
programs or plans.
The MDCC reviews Merrill Lynchs executive compensation programs to align them with Merrill Lynchs annual and long-term goals. The MDCC has access to advice and
counsel from independent third parties.
Compensation Components
The three elements of total compensation for Merrill Lynch executives are base salary, cash bonus and stock bonus. The MDCC has balanced these components of pay to provide
Merrill Lynchs top executives with a powerful incentive to achieve annual and long-term goals that promote stockholder value.
Base Salary
Executive officer base salaries are reviewed periodically based on factors determined by the MDCC at the time of review. The relationship of salaries to total compensation
enhances the motivational value of the incentive compensation elements of the program.
Cash Bonus
The cash bonus program provides a strong incentive for executive officers to deliver superior financial performance. The cash bonus is a major component of total compensation
and places significant emphasis on at risk compensation that is dependent on organizational performance.
Stock Bonus
The stock bonus program is a critical component of the total compensation awarded to executive management. The ultimate value of restricted unit and stock option awards is
dependent on future stock price performance. As such, the stock bonus aligns executive and stockholder financial interests and encourages a balance between short-term goals and long-term strategic objectives.
Executive officers are also eligible to participate in broad-based plans offered generally to Merrill Lynch employees, including retirement, investment, health, and other
employee benefit plans.
Incentive Compensation Rationale
Merrill Lynchs incentive awards for executive officers are determined in accordance with a stockholder-approved performance formula that complies with Internal Revenue
Service regulations regarding the tax deductibility of executive officer compensation in excess of $1 million. The MDCC assesses the performance of the CEO and all other executive officers and recommends annual cash bonus and stock bonus amounts for
each individual to the Board of Directors for approval. The MDCC retains the discretion to establish executive officer incentive awards that are less than the formula amounts.
Performance factors taken into consideration for executive officer compensation may include: strategic planning, quality of client service, market share, corporate reputation,
financial results, fixed expense control, capital allocation, profit margins, compliance and risk control, management development, workforce diversity, technology and innovation. The MDCC also considers the extent to which individuals exemplify and
foster Merrill Lynchs principles of Client Focus, Respect for the Individual, Teamwork, Responsible Citizenship, and Integrity. All factors are considered collectively by the MDCC and are not weighted in any particular order of
importance.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer for 2000 Performance
Based on a year-end assessment of Merrill Lynchs performance, the MDCC recommended and the Board of Directors approved CEO total compensation of $32,500,000 for
performance year 2000.
The MDCC weighed a number of performance variables in determining the compensation for the CEO:
|
|
Merrill Lynchs year-over-year improvements in net earnings, return on equity and diluted earnings per share.
|
|
|
Various measures of financial performance relative to financial industry peer companies.
|
|
|
Measurable strategic initiatives that the MDCC identified as critical to the long-term growth of the organization.
|
Further, the MDCC determined an appropriate mix of CEO compensation to be 50% cash (base salary and cash bonus), 25% restricted units and 25% stock options. The number of
restricted units was calculated by dividing the dollar value to be paid in restricted units by the fair market value (average of the high and low prices) of a share of Merrill Lynch common stock on January 23, 2001, the effective
date of grant. The number of stock options was derived by dividing the dollar value to be paid in stock options by the same price of common stock used to determine the restricted unit grant, and multiplying the result by three.
The methodology for determining stock awards for other executive officers is the same as for the CEO except that the number of stock options was derived by dividing the dollar
value to be paid in stock options by the price of common stock used to determine the restricted unit grant, and multiplying the result by four, instead of three used for the CEO.
Summary
The CEOs compensation for performance year 2000, based on the methodology described above, consists of:
Base Salary
|
|
Cash Bonus
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Total
|
$700,000 |
|
$15,550,000 |
|
$8,125,000 |
|
$8,125,000 |
|
$32,500,000 |
Management Development and Compensation Committee
Robert P. Luciano, Chairman
W.H. Clark
Jill K. Conway
George B. Harvey
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the MDCC are named above. None of these individuals has ever been an officer or employee of Merrill Lynch or any of its subsidiaries and no compensation
committee interlocks existed during the 2000 fiscal year.
The following tables contain information with respect to the CEO and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of Merrill Lynch.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
Long-Term
Compensation Awards(1)
|
|
All Other
Compensation(5)
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
Restricted
Securities
(2)(3)(4)
|
|
Securities
Underlying
Options
|
David H. Komansky |
|
2000 |
|
$700,000 |
|
$15,550,000 |
|
$8,380,400 |
|
314,263 |
|
$ 29,939 |
Chairman of the Board and |
|
1999 |
|
700,000 |
|
8,234,000 |
|
2,100,704 |
|
656,320 |
|
8,518,478 |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
1998 |
|
700,000 |
|
4,535,321 |
|
1,104,554 |
|
409,160 |
|
19,100 |
|
Thomas W. Davis |
|
2000 |
|
$350,000 |
|
$ 9,650,000 |
|
$5,157,200 |
|
257,857 |
|
$ 19,659 |
Executive Vice President |
|
1999 |
|
300,000 |
|
5,765,000 |
|
1,470,270 |
|
381,580 |
|
3,855,533 |
|
|
1998 |
|
300,000 |
|
2,645,000 |
|
627,613 |
|
204,240 |
|
14,300 |
|
E. Stanley ONeal |
|
2000 |
|
$350,000 |
|
$ 9,650,000 |
|
$1,199,600 |
|
257,857 |
|
$3,847,066 |
Executive Vice President |
|
1999 |
|
300,000 |
|
5,765,000 |
|
1,470,270 |
|
772,020 |
|
6,400 |
|
|
1998 |
|
300,000 |
|
2,830,000 |
|
666,700 |
|
216,950 |
|
6,400 |
|
Jeffrey M. Peek |
|
2000 |
|
$350,000 |
|
$ 8,650,000 |
|
$4,641,440 |
|
232,071 |
|
$ 15,405 |
Executive Vice President |
|
1999 |
|
300,000 |
|
5,765,000 |
|
1,470,270 |
|
317,990 |
|
1,976,310 |
|
|
1998 |
|
210,000 |
|
2,800,000 |
|
640,666 |
|
208,470 |
|
11,100 |
|
Stephen L. Hammerman |
|
2000 |
|
$400,000 |
|
$ 7,100,000 |
|
$3,867,920 |
|
193,393 |
|
$ 22,885 |
Vice Chairman |
|
1999 |
|
400,000 |
|
5,600,000 |
|
1,470,270 |
|
305,270 |
|
1,673,334 |
|
|
1998 |
|
400,000 |
|
2,105,000 |
|
533,876 |
|
173,730 |
|
11,450 |
(1)
|
Awards were made in January 2001 for performance in 2000.
|
(2)
|
Awards consisted of restricted units payable at the end of five years. All awards have been valued for this table using the closing
prices of common stock on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System on the grant dates of the awards. The closing price on January 23, 2001, the effective date of the grants for performance in 2000, was $80.00. All restricted units vest three
years following grant and may not be transferred for an additional two years after vesting. Restricted units convey to the holder all the rights of a stockholder except voting.
|
(3)
|
During the applicable vesting and restricted periods, dividend equivalents are paid on restricted units. The dividend equivalents are
equal in amount to the dividends paid on shares of common stock.
|
(4)
|
The number and value of restricted shares and units held by the named executive officers as of December 29, 2000 are as follows: Mr.
Komansky (87,692 shares and 103,050 units $13,006,697); Mr. Davis (66,644 shares and 66,944 units $9,109,366); Mr. ONeal (64,376 shares and 68,004 units $9,026,992); Mr. Peek (46,502 shares and
66,936 units $7,735,337); and Mr. Hammerman (45,556 shares and 58,950 units $7,126,264). These amounts do not include restricted units awarded in 2001 for performance in 2000.
|
(5)
|
Amounts shown for 2000 consist of the following: (i) contributions made in 2000 by Merrill Lynch under our 401(k) Savings &
Investment Plan (including, where applicable, cash payments made
because of limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code): Mr. Komansky ($2,000); Mr. Davis ($2,000); Mr. Peek ($2,000); and Mr. Hammerman ($2,000); (ii) allocations made in 2000 by Merrill Lynch under our defined contribution retirement program:
Mr. Komansky ($20,400); Mr. Davis ($13,600); Mr. ONeal ($6,400); Mr. Peek ($11,900); and Mr. Hammerman ($18,700); (iii) the dollar value of the premiums paid by Merrill Lynch with respect to the term portion of split dollar life insurance
policies purchased on the lives of the named executives and their spouses: Mr. Komansky ($7,539); Mr. Davis ($4,059); Mr. ONeal ($3,666); Mr. Peek ($1,505); and Mr. Hammerman ($2,185); and (iv) the actuarial equivalent of the benefit to Mr.
ONeal of the aggregate premiums paid on the split dollar life insurance policy by Merrill Lynch over the life of the policy based on our assumptions regarding interest rates and life expectancy ($3,837,000). Merrill Lynch will recover the
amount of the aggregate premiums paid by it.
|
Stock Option Grants Made in Last Fiscal Year(1)
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
Granted
|
|
% of Total
Options
Granted to
Employees in
Fiscal Year
|
|
Exercise
Price
Per Share
|
|
Expiration
Date(2)
|
|
Grant Date
Present
Value(3)
|
David H. Komansky |
|
314,263 |
|
0.9 |
% |
|
$77.5625 |
|
1/23/2011 |
|
$7,951,133 |
Thomas W. Davis |
|
257,857 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
77.5625 |
|
1/23/2011 |
|
6,524,011 |
E. Stanley ONeal |
|
257,857 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
77.5625 |
|
1/23/2011 |
|
6,524,011 |
Jeffrey M. Peek |
|
232,071 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
77.5625 |
|
1/23/2011 |
|
5,871,602 |
Stephen L. Hammerman |
|
193,393 |
|
0.6 |
|
|
77.5625 |
|
1/23/2011 |
|
4,893,015 |
(1)
|
Includes awards made in January 2001 for performance in 2000. Awards made in January 2000 for performance in 1999 are
excluded.
|
(2)
|
All stock options vest on August 1, 2001.
|
(3)
|
Valued using a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model. The exercise price of each stock option ($77.5625) is equal to the
average of the high and low prices on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System of a share of common stock on January 23, 2001, the date of grant. The assumptions used for the variables in the model were: 35.87% volatility (which is the
volatility of the common stock for the 120 months preceding grant); a 5.25% risk-free rate of return (which is the yield as of the date of grant on a U.S. Treasury Strip (zero-coupon bond) maturing in February 2008, as quoted in The Wall Street
Journal); a 0.83% dividend yield (which was the dividend yield on the date of grant); and a 7-year option term (which is the expected term until exercise). A discount of 25% was applied to the option value yielded by the model to reflect the
non-marketability of employee stock options. The actual gain that executives will realize on their stock options will depend on the future price of the common stock and cannot be accurately forecast by application of an option pricing
model.
|
Aggregated Stock Option Exercises Made in Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
|
|
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
|
|
Value
Realized(2)
|
|
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
Value of Unexercised
In-the-Money Options
at Fiscal Year-End(1)
|
Name
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
David H. Komansky |
|
320,000 |
(3) |
|
$14,469,992 |
|
2,965,784 |
|
1,568,622 |
|
$163,432,180 |
|
$55,769,232 |
Thomas W. Davis |
|
226,800 |
|
|
14,103,181 |
|
508,280 |
|
699,430 |
|
26,388,830 |
|
21,335,432 |
E. Stanley ONeal |
|
539,634 |
|
|
26,852,903 |
|
0 |
|
1,096,530 |
|
0 |
|
31,014,323 |
Jeffrey M. Peek |
|
82,000 |
|
|
3,776,844 |
|
533,802 |
|
607,040 |
|
29,024,734 |
|
18,611,162 |
Stephen L. Hammerman |
|
440,000 |
|
|
20,020,476 |
|
1,201,186 |
|
575,120 |
|
68,422,332 |
|
17,853,484 |
(1)
|
These valuations represent the difference between $68.19, the closing price of a share of common stock on December 29, 2000 on the
Consolidated Transaction Reporting System, and the exercise prices of these stock options.
|
(2)
|
These valuations represent the difference between the average of the high and low prices of a share of common stock on the
Consolidated Transaction Reporting System on the date of exercise and the exercise prices of the stock options exercised.
|
(3)
|
Mr. Komansky elected to defer the gain received upon the exercise of these stock options. He continues to hold 295,368 stock units as
a result of this deferral.
|
Pension Plan Annuity and Supplemental Annuity
In 1988, we terminated our defined benefits pension plan. To pay pension plan benefits to the vested participants, we purchased a group annuity contract from Metropolitan Life
Insurance Company with a portion of the terminated pension plan assets. The executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table are eligible to receive an annuity amount on retirement, adjusted to reflect cost of living increases in
accordance with IRS limits. Merrill Lynch participates in the actuarial experience and investment performance of the annuity assets.
Those retiring at age 65 with at least 10 years of pension plan participation will receive up to the maximum amount permitted by law for the year in which the annuity payments
are made. In 2000, the maximum amount was $126,000 for those born between 1938 and 1954. Those retiring at an earlier retirement age will receive reduced annuity payments.
If annuity payments are payable as straight life annuities, they will not exceed the following annual amounts: $103,655 for Mr. Komansky; $85,015 for Mr. Davis; $5,679 for Mr.
ONeal; $54,825 for Mr. Peek; and $100,466 for Mr. Hammerman. These amounts reflect an offset for estimated social security benefits, as required by the terms of the terminated pension plan.
In January of 1997, we entered into an annuity agreement with Mr. Komansky that provides for supplemental annuity payments to Mr. Komansky and his surviving spouse. Mr.
Komansky is entitled to the annuity if he retires or dies while employed by Merrill Lynch. The payment will be made monthly in the form of a life annuity, or a 10-year certain and life annuity, or a 50% or 100% joint and survivor
life annuity. The annual amount of his annuity will be equal to either: (1) $1,620,000 if payable as a straight life annuity or a 10-year certain and life annuity, or (2) $1,370,000 if payable as a 50% or 100% joint and survivor life annuity. These
amounts will be subject to the following adjustments:
|
|
Deduction of: (1) the dollar amount of the pension plan annuity described above; (2) the combined annuity value at retirement of
account balances attributable to our contributions to the 401(k) Savings & Investment Plan and the Retirement Accumulation Plan and to the allocations under the Employee Stock Ownership Plan; and (3) 50% of the annual social security retirement
benefit amount receivable at retirement at age 65 (computed as of his actual retirement date if earlier than age 65).
|
|
|
Semi-annual adjustment for inflation until the commencement of payments.
|
Severance Agreements
We have severance agreements with certain members of our executive and senior management. These agreements provide for payments and other benefits if: (1) there is a
Change in Control of Merrill Lynch, and (2) employment terminates for a qualifying reason, such as being terminated without Cause or leaving employment for Good Reason (as these terms are
described in the severance agreements).
Under each agreement, if a member of executive or senior management is entitled to severance compensation, that employee will receive:
|
|
a lump sum payment equal to the lesser of: (A) 2.99 times the employees average annual W-2 compensation for the five
years before termination, and (B) 2.99 times the employees average annual salary, bonus, and the grant value of stock-based compensation for the five years before termination,
|
|
|
the value of various insurance benefits for 24 months after termination, plus an amount covering income taxes on that payment,
and
|
|
|
a payment of the retirement contribution, plus an amount covering income taxes on that payment, that the employee would have been
eligible to receive from us under the terms of our retirement program if the employee had been employed by us for an additional 24 months at his or her highest annual rate of compensation during the 12 months before termination.
|
Any payments under the severance agreements will be in addition to amounts payable under certain stock-based plans, including our Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the
LTICP), except as otherwise provided in the severance agreements. The LTICP provides for early vesting and payment if an employee is terminated under circumstances described in the LTICP.
Compensation of Directors
Fees and Expenses
In addition to reimbursement of the expense of attending meetings, we paid non-employee directors in 2000:
|
|
base compensation of $55,000.
|
|
|
$15,000 for chairing the Management Development and Compensation Committee.
|
|
|
$15,000 for chairing the Audit and the Finance Committees.
|
|
|
$10,000 for chairing each of the Public Policy and Responsibility and Nominating Committees.
|
We did not pay other committee members compensation for their service as members.
Non-employee directors are entitled to defer all or a portion of their base compensation and committee fees. Deferred payments are held in accounts with values indexed either
to (a) the performance of selected mutual funds or certain sponsored employee partnerships, or (b) the performance of our common stock, including reinvested dividends.
Stock Compensation
We also grant non-employee directors (a) deferred units (representing our obligation to pay the value of one share of our common stock) and deferred stock units (representing
our obligation to deliver one share of our common stock) valued at $50,000 each when they join our Board of Directors, and (b) in the month following the fifth Annual Meeting after their most recent grant, additional deferred units and
deferred stock units valued at $50,000. The grant value of deferred units or deferred stock units is reduced proportionately for directors retiring in less than five years. In addition, each non-employee director is eligible for an annual $10,000
grant of deferred units.
|
|
Deferred units and deferred stock units are payable at the end of a five-year deferral period, or earlier if the non-employee
directors service on the Board of Directors ends. The grants are pro-rated if a directors service ends prior to scheduled retirement for any reason other than death.
|
|
|
While outstanding, the units receive dividend equivalents, but may not vote.
|
|
|
Payment of the units may be deferred.
|
As of April 2001, non-employee directors will receive revised stock-based compensation as follows:
(a) annual grants of deferred stock units with a value of $72,500 and (b) annual grants of stock options with a value of $72,500.
Retirement
Current non-employee directors are entitled to lifetime annual retirement payments, a lump-sum payment, or a death benefit when they end their service for any reason (other
than cause). The
retirement and death benefits, which have been frozen at current levels, are based on a directors annual base compensation ($55,000). New directors will not be entitled to any pension benefit.
Benefits
We offer medical insurance benefits to current non-employee directors and eligible family members. These benefits are generally comparable to those offered to our employees,
except that we provide these benefits on a non-contributory basis and with differences in deductible, coinsurance and lifetime benefits. We also offer life and business travel insurance benefits to non-employee directors. In the 2000 fiscal year,
the value of medical insurance coverage that we provided was $666 for Mrs. Conway, $1,776 for Mr. Hoover, and $1,776 for Mr. Phelan. The value of life insurance coverage that we provided for Mrs. Peters was $618. New non-employee directors will not
be eligible for these benefits.
The following performance graph compares the performance of our common stock for the last five years to that of the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Financial Index, and two
indices based on the common stock of two groups of peer companies. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and each of the four named indices was $100 at December 29, 1995 and that all dividends were reinvested. Points
on the graph represent the performance as of the last Friday in December of the specified year, the day of Merrill Lynchs fiscal year-end. Stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price
performance.
Peer Group Company
|
|
Peer Group #1
|
|
Peer Group #2
|
A.G. Edwards, Inc. |
|
X
|
|
X
|
The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. |
|
X
|
|
X
|
The Charles Schwab Corporation |
|
X
|
|
X
|
The Chase Manhattan Corporation |
|
|
|
X
|
Citigroup Inc. |
|
X
|
|
X
|
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
X
|
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated |
|
X
|
|
X
|
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. |
|
X
|
|
X
|
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. |
|
X
|
|
X
|
Paine Webber Group Inc. |
|
X
|
|
|
Peer Group #1 consists of the companies included in the peer group in Merrill Lynchs 2000 Proxy Statement. Peer Group #2 is a new group that reflects the following
changes to last years peer group: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (which first issued publicly traded stock on May 4, 1999) and The Chase Manhattan Corporation (which merged with J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated on December 31, 2000) have been
added, and Paine Webber Group Inc. (which merged into UBS AG on November 3, 2000 and is no longer a U.S. publicly traded company) has been removed.
Some directors, executive officers and their associates may from time to time borrow money from Merrill Lynch in the form of margin account loans, mortgage loans, revolving
lines of credit, and other extensions of credit. These transactions are entered into in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral provisions, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with our other customers.
For some credit products, interest rates charged were the lowest rates charged to other customers or were at the rates charged to our employees. These transactions did not
involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or other unfavorable features. Our directors, officers, and employees are entitled to receive certain discounts, or waivers of fees or commissions, for products and services offered by our
subsidiaries.
State Street Bank and Trust Company is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. We and certain of our subsidiaries have engaged in
transactions in the ordinary course of business with State Street and with certain of its affiliates. These transactions were on substantially the same terms as comparable transactions with other customer organizations.
We performed investment banking, financial advisory, and other services in the ordinary course of our business for certain corporations with which some of our directors are
affiliated.
The law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP performed legal services for Merrill Lynch and for mutual funds advised by Merrill Lynch. Aulana L. Peters, one of our directors, retired as a partner of this law firm during 2000.
The current directors who were also directors between 1984 and 1988 are named defendants in a 1991 consolidated stockholder derivative action in the Supreme Court of New York,
New York County. Unspecified damages are sought in connection with transactions between Merrill Lynch and Guarantee Security Life Insurance Company.
Fees Paid to Our Independent Auditors
Audit Fees: The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent auditors, in connection with the audit and review of our 2000 financial statements was $20,115,000.
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees: The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with
financial information systems design and implementation by Deloitte & Touche LLP was $6,746,028.
All Other Fees: The aggregate of all other fees billed for professional services, including fees for audit-related activities, rendered during
2000 by Deloitte & Touche LLP was $32,837,413.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the services rendered by our independent auditors with respect to the foregoing fees are compatible with maintaining their
independence.
Stockholder Proposals for the 2002 Annual Meeting
If you intend to present a proposal at our 2002 Annual Meeting and wish your proposal to be included in the proxy statement for that meeting, you should submit your proposal in
writing to us at the following address: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 222 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10038-2510, Attention: Corporate Secretary. We must receive your proposal no later than November 16, 2001.
If you wish to submit a proposal for consideration at our 2002 Annual Meeting and do not meet the deadline for inclusion in the proxy statement, our by-laws require that notice
of the proposal must be received by the Corporate Secretary at least 50 days before the meeting.
Under our certificate of incorporation, if you intend to nominate a director at our 2002 Annual Meeting, you must deliver notice of the nomination to the Corporate Secretary at
least 50 days but no more than 75 days before the meeting.
Exhibit A
Adopted: June 5, 2000
Purpose
The Audit Committee (the Committee) shall be appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board) of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (together with its
affiliates, the Company) to assist the Board in overseeing the preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements, the Companys system of internal controls, including the Companys risk management and
compliance functions, and the independence and performance of the Companys internal and independent auditors.
Membership
The Committees membership is determined by the Board and consists of at least three (3) Board members in accordance with the Companys By-Laws. The Committee shall
meet all applicable requirements of the Audit Committee Policy of the New York Stock Exchange with respect to independence, financial literacy, and accounting or related financial management expertise, and any other matters required by the New York
Stock Exchange or the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Authority
The Committee shall have full, free and unrestricted authority to, and the ability to, communicate with the Companys senior management and employees, and internal and
independent auditors and shall have the authority to retain outside third parties, as it determines appropriate, to fulfill its responsibilities.
The Committees responsibility is one of oversight. It is the responsibility of the Companys management to prepare consolidated financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and of the Companys independent auditor to audit those financial statements. The Committee does not provide any expert or other special assurance as to such financial statements concerning
compliance with laws, regulations, or generally accepted accounting principles.
The Committee shall have authority to take any and all acts that it deems necessary to carry out its oversight function, including but not limited to:
1. Financial Statements
|
A.
|
Reviewing with Company management and the independent auditor, the Companys audited consolidated financial statements,
including the matters set forth in Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61, as well as related significant financial reporting issues, judgments, estimates made in preparing such financial statements and other matters required by professional
auditing literature. After review, recommending to the Board whether the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
2. Independent Auditor
|
A.
|
Selecting, evaluating, and recommending to the Board the nomination of and, where appropriate, the replacement of, the independent
auditor. The independent auditor shall be ultimately accountable to the Committee and the Board.
|
|
B.
|
Evaluating and satisfying itself as to the independence of the independent auditor by, among other things, (i) ensuring that the
independent auditor periodically submits to the Committee a formal written statement delineating all relationships between such auditor and the Company; (ii) actively engaging in a dialogue with the independent auditor with respect to any disclosed
relationships or services that may impact its objectivity and independence; and (iii) if appropriate, recommending that the Board take action to satisfy itself of the independence of the auditor.
|
|
C.
|
Reviewing the annual plan and scope of work of the independent auditor and monitoring any and all related fees for these and all
other services.
|
|
D.
|
Discussing the adequacy of the Companys internal controls with the independent auditor.
|
3. Internal Audit
|
A.
|
Reviewing the annual plan and scope of work of Internal Audit.
|
|
B.
|
Reviewing, as appropriate, the results of internal audits and discussing related significant internal control matters with Internal
Audit and with Company management.
|
|
C.
|
Discussing the adequacy of the Companys internal controls with Internal Audit.
|
|
D.
|
Reviewing the appointment and performance of the Companys Director of Internal Audit and the adequacy of resources to support
Internal Audit.
|
4. Risk Management and Compliance
|
A.
|
Overseeing the Companys risk management function.
|
|
B.
|
Overseeing the Companys compliance function.
|
5. Meetings, Reports and Charter Review
|
A.
|
Holding regular meetings of the Committee, reporting significant matters arising from such meetings to the Board and, at least once
per year, meeting separately with the independent and internal auditors without Company management present.
|
|
B.
|
Providing the report of the Committee in the Companys annual proxy statement, as required by the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
|
C.
|
Annually reviewing and assessing the adequacy of this charter and, if appropriate, recommending changes to the Board.
|
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
4 World Financial Center
New York, NY 10080
www.ml.com
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. PROXY
Annual Meeting - April 27, 2001
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
I appoint Stephen L. Hammerman and Thomas H. Patrick individually as proxies to vote all of my Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Common Stock at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 27, 2001, or at any adjourment or
postponement of that meeting as directed on the |
|
other side of this card and, in their discretion, upon other matters that arise at the meeting. I also give each of them the ability to substitute someone else as proxy. I revoke any proxy previously given for the same shares of
stock. |
|
The shares represented by this proxy will be voted in
accordance with instructions given on the other side of this
card. If this proxy is signed and returned without specific
instuctions as to any item or all items, it will be voted for
the election of 3 directors as named herein, for proposals (2) and (3), and against stockholder proposal (4).
|
____________________________
(Signature of Stockholder) |
_____________________________
(Date)
|
____________________________
(Signature of Stockholder) |
_____________________________
(Date)
|
|
Please vote on the other side of this card. Sign, date and return this card promptly using the enclosed envelope. Sign exactly as your name appears above. Each joint tenant should sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, etc.,
give full title. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals (1), (2) and (3) |
|
The Board
Recommends |
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote
AGAINST
stockholder proposal (4) |
|
The Board
Recommends
|
|
|
|
ê
|
|
|
|
|
|
ê
|
|
(1) |
The election to the Board of Directors of the 3 nominess named below for a term of 3 years:
David H. Komansky
Robert P. Luciano
David K Newbigging |
|
FOR
all nominees
listed (except as indicated to the contrary below)
p
|
|
|
WITHOLD
authority to vote for all
nominees listed
p
|
|
(4) Institute cumulative voting |
FOR
p
|
AGAINST
p
|
ABSTAIN
p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Amend the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock |
FOR
p
|
AGAINST
p
|
ABSTAIN
p
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Amend the Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the authorized shares |
FOR
p
|
AGAINST
p
|
ABSTAIN
p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for one or more
individual nominees, write the name(s) of such person(s) here: |
___________________________________________________________
(To be signed on the other side) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|