Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Opinion of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP

[LETTERHEAD OF SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP]

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

4 World Financial Center

New York, New York 10080

As your counsel, we have examined a copy of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (hereinafter called the “Company”), certified by the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. We are familiar with the corporate proceedings had in connection with the proposed issuance and sale by the Company to the Underwriter named in the Terms Agreement referred to below, pursuant to an Underwriting Agreement dated August 5, 1998 (the “Underwriting Agreement”), between the Company and Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“MLPF&S”), as supplemented by the Terms Agreement dated August 19, 2002 (the “Terms Agreement”) between the Company and MLPF&S (the “Underwriter”), of $21,810,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 7% Callable STock Return Income DEbt Securities^SMdue August 23, 2004, payable at maturity with Starbucks Corporation common stock (the “Securities”). We have also examined a copy of the Indenture between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank as

Trustee, dated as of April 1, 1983, as amended (the “Indenture”), and the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-83374) relating to the Securities (the “Registration Statement”).

Based upon the foregoing and upon such further investigation as we deemed relevant in the premises, we are of the opinion that:

1. The Company has been duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.

2. The Securities have been duly and validly authorized by the Company and when the Securities have been duly executed and authenticated in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and delivered against payment therefor as set forth in the Underwriting Agreement, as supplemented by the Terms Agreement, the Securities will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with their terms, except to the extent that enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, moratorium, insolvency, reorganization or similar laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally and except as enforcement thereof is subject to general principles at equity (regardless of whether enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law).

We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and as an exhibit to the Current Report of the Company on Form 8-K dated August 23, 2002.

/S/ SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP