Rule No. 424(b)(5)
Registration Statement No. 33-49947
PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO COMPLETION AND AMENDMENT
ISSUE DATE: JANUARY 3, 1994
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(TO PROSPECTUS DATED AUGUST 27, 1993)
LOGO
$100,000,000
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
JAPAN INDEX SM
EQUITY PARTICIPATION SECURITIES WITH MINIMUM RETURN PROTECTION DUE JANUARY ,
2000
---------------
The Japan Index SM Equity Participation Securities with Minimum Return
Protection due January , 2000 (the "Securities", or the "Notes") of Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. (the "Company"), which are being issued in denominations of
$1,000 and integral multiples thereof, will mature on January , 2000. At
maturity, a beneficial owner of a Security will be entitled to receive, with
respect to each Security, the principal amount thereof plus an interest
payment (the "Supplemental Redemption Amount") based on the percentage
increase, if any, in the Index (as hereinafter defined). The Securities are to
be issued as a series of Senior Debt Securities under the Senior Indenture
described herein. The Securities are not redeemable or callable by the Company
prior to maturity. While at maturity a beneficial owner of a Security will
receive the principal amount of such Security plus the Supplemental Redemption
Amount, there will be no payment of interest, periodic or otherwise.
The Supplemental Redemption Amount payable with respect to a Security at
maturity will equal the product of (A) the principal amount of the applicable
Security, (B) the percentage change from the closing value of the Index on the
date the Securities are priced for initial sale to the public as compared to
the Final Average Value (as hereinafter defined), and (C) % (the
"Participation Rate"). In no event, however, will the Supplemental Redemption
Amount be less than $150 per $1,000 principal amount of the Securities (the
"Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount"), representing a minimum annualized
rate of return of 2.34%. The calculation of the Final Average Value, as more
fully described herein, will equal the arithmetic average of the closing
values of the Index on certain days during January of 1998, 1999 and 2000.
Although the Index will initially be the Japan Index (as defined herein),
under certain circumstances described herein, a New Japan Index (as defined
herein) may be substituted for the Japan Index. The Japan Index (or, if such
substitution shall occur, the New Japan Index) is referred to herein as the
"Index".
For information as to the calculation of the Supplemental Redemption Amount
which will be paid at maturity, the calculation and the composition of the
Index, and certain tax consequences to beneficial owners of the Securities,
see "Description of Securities", "The Index", and "Certain United States
Federal Income Tax Considerations", respectively in this Prospectus
Supplement. For other information that should be considered by prospective
investors, see "Special Considerations" in this Prospectus Supplement.
Ownership of the Securities will be maintained in book-entry form by or
through the Depository (as hereinafter defined). Beneficial owners of the
Securities will not have the right to receive physical certificates evidencing
their ownership except under the limited circumstances described herein.
Application will be made to list the Securities on the American Stock
Exchange.
---------------
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION
PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR
THE PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL
OFFENSE.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRICE TO UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO THE
PUBLIC DISCOUNT COMPANY(1)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
Per Note............................. 100% % %
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
Total................................ $100,000,000 $ $
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Before deduction of expenses payable by the Company.
The Securities are offered by the Underwriter, subject to prior sale, when,
as and if issued by the Company and accepted by the Underwriter and subject to
certain other conditions. The Underwriter reserves the right to reject orders
in whole or in part. It is expected that delivery of the Securities will be
made in New York, New York on or about January , 1994.
This Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Prospectus may be used by
the Underwriter in connection with offers and sales related to market-making
transactions in the Securities. The Underwriter may act as principal or agent
in such transactions. Such sales will be made at prices related to prevailing
market prices at the time of sale.
---------------
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
---------------
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT IS , 1994.
SM"Japan Index" is a service mark of The American Stock Exchange
IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITER MAY OVER-ALLOT OR EFFECT
TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE SECURITIES
OFFERED HEREBY AT LEVELS ABOVE THOSE WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN
MARKET. SUCH TRANSACTIONS MAY BE EFFECTED ON THE AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, IN
THE OVER-THE-COUNTER MARKET OR OTHERWISE. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY
BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME.
----------------
The Commissioner of Insurance of The State of North Carolina has not approved
or disapproved the offering of the Securities made hereby nor has the
Commissioner passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this Prospectus Supplement
or Prospectus.
S-2
SUMMARY
The following summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its
entirety by the more detailed information appearing elsewhere in this
Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Prospectus.
Issuer.......................... Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Securities Offered.............. $100,000,000 of Equity Participation
Securities with Minimum Return Protection due
January , 2000. The Securities are to be
issued as a series of Senior Debt Securities
under the Senior Indenture described herein.
Listing......................... Application will be made to list the
Securities on the American Stock Exchange.
Denominations................... $1,000 and integral multiples thereof.
Original Issue Price............ 100%.
Maturity........................ January , 2000.
Payment at Maturity............. At maturity, a beneficial owner of a Security
will be entitled to receive (i) the principal
amount thereof and (ii) the Supplemental
Redemption Amount equal to:
Principal Amount X Final Average Value - Initial Value X %
-----------------------------------
Initial Value
provided, however, that the Supplemental
Redemption Amount will not be less than $150
for each $1,000 principal amount of the
Securities (i.e. the Minimum Supplemental
Redemption Amount). Unless a New Japan Index
is substituted for the Japan Index as
described herein, the Initial Value will
equal the closing value of the Japan Index on
the date the Securities are priced by the
Company for initial sale to the public. The
Final Average Value will be the arithmetic
average (mean) of the closing values of the
Index on certain days during January of 1998,
1999 and 2000.
Index........................... The Index used for purposes of calculating
the Supplemental Redemption Amount will
initially be the Japan Index. The Japan Index
is a modified, price-weighted stock index
calculated, published and disseminated by the
American Stock Exchange (the "AMEX") which
measures the composite price performance of
210 Japanese stocks trading on the Tokyo
Stock Exchange (the "TSE") representing a
broad cross-section of Japanese industries.
Stocks that constitute the Japan Index may be
deleted or added at the discretion of the
AMEX, which is under no obligation to
continue the calculation and the
dissemination of the Japan Index. See "The
Index" herein.
Substitution of the Index....... Under certain circumstances, a New Japan
Index may replace the Japan Index for
purposes of determining the Supplemental
Redemption Amount payable with respect to the
Securities. As further described herein, any
such
S-3
substitution will be made for the purpose of
utilizing a capitalization-weighted index,
and will be made in a manner intended to
preserve any gains or losses in the Japan
Index which have occurred as of the time the
New Japan Index is substituted for the Japan
Index.
Special Considerations.......... The Securities are subject to certain special
considerations. Investors should be aware
that if the Final Average Value of the Index
does not exceed the Initial Value by more
than approximately %, beneficial owners of
the Securities will receive only the
principal amount thereof and the Minimum
Supplemental Redemption Amount.
Because the Final Average Value will be based
upon average values of the Index during
specified periods in three successive years,
a significant increase in the Index as
measured by the average values during the
specified period in the final year, or in
either earlier year, may be substantially or
entirely offset by the average values of the
Index during the specified periods in the
other two years.
A beneficial owner of the Securities may
receive a Supplemental Redemption Amount
equal only to the Minimum Supplemental
Redemption Amount at maturity, and such
Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount is
below what the Company would pay as interest
as of the date hereof if the Company issued
non-callable senior debt securities with a
similar maturity as that of the Securities.
The return of principal of the Securities at
maturity and the payment of the Minimum
Supplemental Redemption Amount are not
expected to reflect the full opportunity
costs implied by inflation or other factors
relating to the time value of money.
The Index used to calculate the Supplemental
Redemption Amount will initially be the Japan
Index, which is currently calculated and
published by the American Stock Exchange.
Upon the occurrence of certain events
described under "Description of Securities--
Substitution of the Index", a New Japan Index
(which will also relate to the trading of
equity securities in Japan) will be
substituted for the Japan Index as the basis
of the calculation of the Supplemental
Redemption Amount. The required
characteristics of such New Japan Index are
described herein; however, the New Japan
Index does not currently exist, and such New
Japan Index may be calculated and published
by a United States stock exchange other than
the American Stock Exchange. In the event
that a New Japan Index is substituted for the
Japan Index, no assurance can be given as to
whether the Supplemental Redemption Amount
calculated on the basis of such New Japan
Index will be more than, less than or equal
to the Supplemental Redemption Amount which
S-4
would have been payable had such substitution
not occurred.
The underlying stocks that constitute the
Japan Index have been issued by Japanese
companies. If a New Japan Index is
substituted for the Japan Index, such New
Japan Index would also be based upon stocks
issued by Japanese companies. Investments in
securities indexed to the value of Japanese
equity securities involve certain risks. The
Japanese securities markets may be more
volatile than U.S. or other securities
markets and may be affected by market
developments in different ways than U.S. or
other securities markets. Direct or indirect
government intervention to stabilize the
Japanese securities markets and cross-
shareholdings in Japanese companies on such
markets may affect prices and volume of
trading on those markets. Also, there is
generally less publicly available information
about Japanese companies than about those
U.S. companies that are subject to the
reporting requirements of the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, and Japanese
companies are subject to accounting, auditing
and financial reporting standards and
requirements that differ from those to which
U.S. reporting companies are subject.
Securities prices in Japan are subject to
political, economic, financial and social
factors that apply in Japan. These factors
(including the possibility that recent or
future changes in the Japanese government's
economic and fiscal policies, the possible
imposition of, or changes in, currency
exchange laws or other Japanese laws or
restrictions applicable to Japanese companies
or investments in Japanese equity securities
and the possibility of fluctuations in the
rate of exchange between currencies) could
negatively affect the Japanese securities
markets. Moreover, the Japanese economy may
differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S.
economy in such respects as growth of gross
national product, rate of inflation, capital
reinvestment, resources and self-sufficiency.
There is no precedent to indicate how the
Securities will trade in the secondary market
or whether such market will be liquid. It is
expected that the secondary market for the
Securities will be affected by the
creditworthiness of the Company and by a
number of other interrelated factors
including interest rates in the U.S. and
Japan, the volatility of the Index, the time
remaining to maturity and dividend rates in
Japan. The trading value of the Securities is
expected to depend primarily on the extent of
the appreciation, if any, of the Index over
the Initial Value. If, however, Securities
are sold prior to the maturity date at a time
when the Index exceeds the Initial Value, the
sale price may be at a discount
S-5
from the amount expected to be payable to the
beneficial owner if such excess of the Index
over the Initial Value were to prevail until
maturity of the Securities because of the
possible fluctuation of the Index between the
time of such sale and the maturity date and
the effect of the value of the Index on prior
days used to calculate the Final Average
Value, if any. Furthermore, the price at
which a beneficial owner will be able to sell
Securities prior to maturity may be at a
discount, which could be substantial, from
the principal amount thereof if, at such
time, the Index is below, equal to or not
sufficiently above the Initial Value and/or
the value of the Index on prior days used to
calculate the Final Average Value, if any,
was below, equal to or not sufficiently above
the Initial Value. A discount could also
result from rising interest rates in the U.S.
Although the Stocks comprising the Japan
Index are traded in Japanese Yen and the
Securities are denominated in U.S. dollars,
the Supplemental Redemption Amount will be
based upon the absolute changes in the Index,
and will not be affected by the currency
exchange rate in effect at the maturity of
the Securities.
The Index does not reflect the payment of
dividends on the stocks underlying it and
therefore, in addition to the considerations
regarding averaging discussed above, the
yield based on the Index to the maturity of
the Securities will not produce the same
yield as if such underlying stocks were
purchased and held for a similar period. See
"Special Considerations" in this Prospectus
Supplement.
It is suggested that prospective investors
who consider purchasing the Securities should
reach an investment decision only after
carefully considering the suitability of the
Securities in light of their particular
circumstances.
Investors should also consider the tax
consequences of investing in the Securities.
See "Certain United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations" in this Prospectus
Supplement.
S-6
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
PAYMENT AT MATURITY
Investors should be aware that if the Final Average Value of the Index does
not exceed the Initial Value by more than approximately %, beneficial owners
of the Securities will receive only the principal amount thereof and the
Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount. A beneficial owner of the Securities
may receive a Supplemental Redemption Amount equal only to the Minimum
Supplemental Redemption Amount at maturity, and such Minimum Supplemental
Redemption Amount is below what the Company would pay as interest as of the
date hereof if the Company issued non-callable senior debt securities with a
similar maturity as that of the Securities. The return of principal of the
Securities at maturity and the payment of the Minimum Supplemental Redemption
Amount are not expected to reflect the full opportunity costs implied by
inflation or other factors relating to the time value of money.
The Index does not reflect the payment of dividends on the stocks underlying
it and therefore, in addition to the considerations regarding averaging
discussed below, the yield based on the Index to the maturity of the Securities
will not produce the same yield as if such underlying stocks were purchased and
held for a similar period.
Because the Final Average Value will be based upon average values of the
Index during specified periods in three successive years, a significant
increase in the Index as measured by the average values during the specified
period in the final year, or in either earlier year, may be substantially or
entirely offset by the average values of the Index during the specified periods
in the other two years.
The Index used to calculate the Supplemental Redemption Amount will initially
be the Japan Index, which is currently calculated and published by the American
Stock Exchange. Upon the occurrence of certain events described under
"Description of Securities--Substitution of the Index", a New Japan Index
(which will also relate to the trading of equity securities in Japan) will be
substituted for the Japan Index as the basis of the calculation of the
Supplemental Redemption Amount. The required characteristics of such New Japan
Index are described herein; however, the New Japan Index does not currently
exist, and such New Japan Index may be calculated and published by a United
States stock exchange other than the American Stock Exchange. In the event that
a New Japan Index is substituted for the Japan Index, no assurance can be given
as to whether the Supplemental Redemption Amount calculated on the basis of
such New Japan Index will be more than or less than or equal to the
Supplemental Redemption Amount which would have been payable had such
substitution not occurred.
The Indenture provides that the Indenture and the Securities will be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of New York. Under present New
York law the maximum rate of interest is 25% per annum on a simple interest
basis. This limit may not apply to Securities in which $2,500,00 or more has
been invested. While the Company believes that New York law would be given
effect by a state or Federal court sitting outside of New York, state laws
frequently regulate the amount of interest that may be charged to and paid by a
borrower (including, in some cases, corporate borrowers). All payments under
the Securities (other than the return of principal) could be considered
interest for the purpose of state usury laws. The Company will covenant for the
benefit of the Holders of the Securities, to the extent permitted by law, not
to claim voluntarily the benefits of any laws concerning usurious rates of
interest against a Holder of the Securities.
TRADING
Application will be made to list the Securities on the American Stock
Exchange. There is no precedent to indicate how the Securities will trade in
the secondary market or whether such market will be liquid. It is expected that
the secondary market for the Securities will be affected by the
creditworthiness of the Company and by a number of other factors. Because the
Final Average Value is an average of the three Calculation
S-7
Values as described below, the price at which a beneficial owner of a Security
will be able to sell such Security in the secondary market may be at a discount
if the first or second such Calculation Value is below the Initial Value.
The trading value of the Securities is expected to depend primarily on the
extent of the appreciation, if any, of the Index over the Initial Value. If,
however, Securities are sold prior to the maturity date at a time when the
Index exceeds the Initial Value, the sale price may be at a discount from the
amount expected to be payable to the beneficial owner if such excess of the
Index over the Initial Value were to prevail until maturity of the Securities
because of the possible fluctuation of the Index between the time of such sale
and the maturity date and the effect of the value of the Index on prior days
used to calculate the Final Average Value, if any. (See "The Index--Historical
Data on the Japan Index"). Furthermore, the price at which a beneficial owner
will be able to sell Securities prior to maturity may be at a discount, which
could be substantial, from the principal amount thereof if, at such time, the
Index is below, equal to or not sufficiently above the Initial Value and/or if
the value of the Index on prior days used to calculate the Final Average Value,
if any, was below, equal to or not sufficiently above the Initial Value. A
discount could also result from rising interest rates in the U.S.
The trading values of the Securities may be affected by a number of
interrelated factors, including the creditworthiness of the Company and those
factors listed below. The relationship among these factors is complex,
including how these factors affect the relative value of the principal amount
of the Securities to be repaid at maturity and the value of the Supplemental
Redemption Amount. Accordingly, investors should be aware that factors other
than the level of the Index are likely to affect the Securities' trading value.
The expected theoretical effect on the trading value of the Securities of each
of the factors listed below, assuming in each case that all other factors are
held constant, is as follows:
Interest Rates. In general, if U.S. interest rates increase, the value of
the Securities is expected to decrease. If U.S. interest rates decrease,
the value of the Securities is expected to increase. In general, if
Japanese interest rates increase, the value of the Securities is expected
to increase. If Japanese interest rates decrease, the value of the
Securities is expected to decrease. Interest rates may also affect the
Japanese economy, and, in turn, the value of the Index. Rising interest
rates may lower the value of the Index and, thus, the Securities. Falling
interest rates may increase the value of the Index and, thus, may increase
the value of the Securities.
Volatility of the Index. If the volatility of the Index increases, the
trading value of the Securities is expected to increase. If the volatility
of the Index decreases, the trading value of the Securities is expected to
decrease.
Time Remaining to Maturity. The Securities may trade at a value above
that which may be inferred from the level of interest rates and the Index.
This difference will reflect a "time premium" due to expectations
concerning the value of the Index during the period prior to maturity of
the Securities. As the time remaining to maturity of the Securities
decreases, however, this time premium is expected to decrease, thus
decreasing the trading value of the Securities. In addition, the price at
which a beneficial owner may be able to sell Securities prior to maturity
may be at a discount, which may be substantial, from the minimum expected
value at maturity if one or more Calculation Values, as defined below, were
below, equal to or not sufficiently above the Initial Value.
Dividend Rates in Japan. If dividend rates on the stocks comprising the
Index increase, the value of the Securities is expected to decrease.
Conversely, if dividend rates on the stocks comprising the Index decrease,
the value of the Securities is expected to increase. However, in general,
rising Japanese corporate dividend rates may increase the value of the
Index and, in turn, increase the value of the Securities. Conversely,
falling Japanese dividend rates may decrease the value of the Index and, in
turn, decrease the value of the Securities.
Although the stocks comprising the Japan Index are traded in Japanese yen and
the Securities are denominated in U.S. dollars, the Supplemental Redemption
Amount will not be adjusted for the currency
S-8
exchange rate in effect at the maturity of the Securities. The Supplemental
Redemption Amount is based upon the percentage increase in the Japan Index. The
Japan Index is calculated using a constant U.S.$/Japanese Yen exchange rate.
The value of the Securities should not, therefore, be directly affected by the
currency exchange rate. For example, if the Japan Index were to increase by 25%
from the Initial Value to the Final Average Value, a holder of the Securities
would receive $ at maturity regardless of the U.S.$/Japanese Yen exchange
rate prevailing at maturity. Changes in the exchange rate, however, may reflect
changes in the Japanese economy which, of course, would affect the value of the
Index and the Securities.
THE JAPANESE MARKET
The underlying stocks that constitute the Japan Index have been issued by
Japanese companies. If a New Japan Index is substituted for the Japan Index,
such New Japan Index would also be based upon stocks issued by Japanese
Companies. Investments in securities indexed to the value of Japanese equity
securities involve certain risks. The Japanese securities markets may be more
volatile than U.S. or other securities markets and may be affected by market
developments in different ways than U.S. or other securities markets. Direct or
indirect government intervention to stabilize the Japanese securities markets
and cross-shareholdings in Japanese companies on such markets may affect prices
and volume of trading on those markets. Also, there is generally less publicly
available information about Japanese companies than about those U.S. companies
that are subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, and Japanese companies are subject to accounting, auditing
and financial reporting standards and requirements that differ from those to
which U.S. reporting companies are subject.
Securities prices in Japan are subject to political, economic, financial and
social factors that apply in Japan. These factors (including the possibility
that recent or future changes in the Japanese government's economic and fiscal
policies, the possible imposition of, or changes in, currency exchange laws or
other Japanese laws or restrictions applicable to Japanese companies or
investments in Japanese equity securities and the possibility of fluctuations
in the rate of exchange between currencies) could negatively affect the
Japanese securities markets. Moreover, the Japanese economy may differ
favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of
gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resources and
self-sufficiency.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
It is suggested that prospective investors who consider purchasing the
Securities should reach an investment decision only after carefully considering
the suitability of the Securities in light of their particular circumstances.
Investors should also consider the tax consequences of investing in the
Securities. See "Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations" in
this Prospectus Supplement.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The following summary of certain consolidated financial information
concerning the Company for the nine months ended September 25, 1992 and
September 24, 1993 was derived from, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to, the condensed consolidated financial statements and data
contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 24, 1993 and other documents incorporated by reference herein. See
"Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference" in the accompanying
Prospectus. Such condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited;
however, in the opinion of management of the Company, all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring accruals and a non-recurring pretax charge
of $103.0 million ($59.7 million after income taxes) related to the Company's
decision not to occupy certain floors at its World Financial Center
Headquarters facility) necessary for a fair statement of the results of
operations have been included.
The Company conducts its business in highly volatile markets. Consequently,
the Company's results can be affected by many factors, including general market
conditions, the liquidity of secondary markets, the level
S-9
and volatility of interest rates and currency values, the valuation of
securities positions, competitive conditions, and the size, number and timing
of transactions. In periods of unfavorable market activity, profitability can
be adversely affected because certain expenses remain relatively fixed. As a
result, net earnings and revenues can vary significantly from period to period.
Thus, interim results may not necessarily be representative of the full year
results of operations.
NINE MONTHS ENDED
-------------------------
SEPT. 25, SEPT. 24,
1992 1993
------------ ------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
RATIOS)
Revenues.............................................. $ 10,160,808 $ 12,078,667
Net Revenues(1)....................................... $ 6,512,337 $ 7,816,859
Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect
of changes in accounting principles.................. $ 1,260,284 $ 1,827,528
Net earnings.......................................... $ 672,384 $ 1,047,120
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)................. 1.3 1.4
Total assets.......................................... $111,896,715 $147,611,339
Long-term borrowings(3)............................... $ 10,818,478 $ 13,027,015
Stockholders' equity.................................. $ 4,439,352 $ 5,608,656
- --------
(1) Net revenues are revenues net of interest expense.
(2) For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
"earnings" consists of earnings from continuing operations before income
taxes and fixed charges. "Fixed charges" consists of interest costs and
that portion of rentals estimated to be representative of the interest
factor.
(3) To finance its diverse activities, the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries borrow substantial amounts of short-term funds on a regular
basis. Although the amount of short-term borrowings significantly varies
with the level of general business activity, on September 24, 1993,
$336,151,000 of bank loans and $12,916,972,000 of commercial paper were
outstanding. In addition, certain of the Company's subsidiaries lend
securities and enter into repurchase agreements to obtain financing. At
September 24, 1993, cash deposits for securities loaned and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase amounted to $3,267,169,000 and
$52,771,145,000, respectively. From September 25, 1993 to December 27,
1993, long-term borrowings, net of repayments and repurchases, increased in
the amount of approximately $730,820,000.
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1993
Net earnings for the first nine months of 1993 were a record $1,047.1 million
and surpassed full year 1992 results. Nine month 1993 net earnings increased
$374.7 million (56%) above the $672.4 million reported in the corresponding
1992 period. Results for the first nine months of 1993 include a previously
announced (1993 first quarter) non-recurring pretax lease charge totaling
$103.0 million ($59.7 million after income taxes) related to the Company's
decision not to occupy certain space at its World Financial Center Headquarters
facility. Net earnings in 1992 were restated to reflect the previously reported
$58.6 million cumulative effect charge related to the early adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 106, "Employers'
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions" and SFAS No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes." Earnings before cumulative effect of changes in
accounting principles increased 43% above the $731.0 million reported in the
corresponding 1992 period.
Revenues after interest expense ("net revenues") advanced 20% in the first
nine months of 1993 to $7,817 million. The increase was broad based with total
revenues up 19% from the comparable 1992 period to $12,079 million.
Commission revenues increased 14% during the first nine months of 1993 to
$2,071 million on the continued strength of listed securities transactions and
higher mutual fund commission volume. Commissions on listed securities
benefited from higher trading volume and increases in average market prices.
Demand for
S-10
mutual funds remained strong as investors continued to diversify their assets
to achieve potentially higher returns. Contributing to the increase in mutual
fund commissions was the growth in sales of front-end funds and a higher level
of distribution fees earned on deferred charge funds.
Interest and dividend revenues for the first nine months of 1993 advanced 17%
to $5,056 million, while interest expense, which includes dividend expense,
increased 17% to $4,262 million. As a result, net interest and dividend profit
rose 16% to $794 million. The increase in interest and dividend profit is
attributable to increased collateralized lending activities, higher interest
earning assets, reduced financing costs due to lower interest rates, and a
growing equity base.
Principal transactions revenues for the 1993 nine-month period rose 28% to
$2,222 million. Fixed-income and foreign exchange trading, in the aggregate,
benefited from higher revenues in swaps and derivatives, corporate bonds,
municipal securities and money market instruments. Equity trading revenues
increased due primarily to higher volume in over-the-counter and foreign
equities.
Investment banking revenues rose 17% during the first nine months of 1993 to
$1,311 million. Contributing to this strong performance were higher
underwriting revenues from equity securities, corporate bonds, private
placements and high-yield debt. Strategic services revenues, which includes
merger and acquisition and advisory services, advanced during the 1993 third
quarter, but on a year-to-date basis, revenues from strategic services were
slightly below last year's levels. Asset management and custodial fees rose 12%
during the 1993 nine-month period to $727 million, due primarily to increases
in stock and bond fund assets under management. Other revenues increased 38%
from a year ago to $692 million. Contributing to the advance were higher fee
revenues from the Merrill Lynch Consults(Registered Trademark) investor
portfolio management service, decreases in net investment losses attributable to
merchant banking and insurance activities, and increased revenues from mortgage
related transactions.
Non-interest expenses increased 14% over the corresponding 1992 period to
$5,989 million. Compensation and benefits expense, which represented
approximately 64.1% of total non-interest expenses, increased 16% due primarily
to increases in incentive and production related compensation tied directly to
the Company's performance. Nevertheless, compensation and benefits expense as a
percentage of net revenues declined to 49.1% from 50.6% in the year-ago period.
Facilities-related costs, including occupancy, communications and equipment
rental expenses, and depreciation and amortization, increased 15% as a result
of the non-recurring pretax lease charge of $103.0 million. Excluding the lease
charge, facilities-related costs rose 2%. Brokerage, clearing and exchange fees
were up 6% due to increased business volume. Advertising and market development
expenses increased 18% as a result of higher sales promotion costs and
recognition programs for Financial Consultants tied to the higher level of
business activity and discretionary increases in local advertising.
Professional fees were up 3%, partially as a result of higher system consulting
and employment service fees, while other expenses increased 2% due in part to
the write-off of certain fixed assets.
Income tax expense totaled $780 million representing a 42.7% effective tax
rate. This compared with a 42.0% effective tax rate in the corresponding 1992
period. The increase in the effective tax rate is due primarily to legislation
raising corporate income tax rates retroactive to the beginning of the year.
Subsequent to quarter-end, the Company's Board of Directors declared a two-
for-one common stock split, in the form of a 100% stock dividend, paid November
24, 1993 to stockholders of record on October 22, 1993. All amounts included in
the prospectus are presented on a pre-split basis.
The Company believes that its equity base is adequate relative to the level
and composition of its assets and the mix of its businesses.
In the normal course of its investment banking, trading and insurance
activities, the Company underwrites, purchases, sells and makes markets in
high-yield securities and other non-investment grade
S-11
securities. Additionally, the Company provides financing and advisory services
to corporations entering into leveraged transactions. These activities are
subject to risks related to the creditworthiness of the issuers and the
liquidity of the market for such securities, in addition to the usual risks
associated with investing, extending credit, underwriting and trading in
investment grade instruments.
At September 24, 1993, the carrying value of extensions of credit provided to
corporations entering into leveraged transactions aggregated $496 million
(excluding unutilized revolving lines of credit and other lending commitments
of $72 million), consisting primarily of senior term and subordinated financing
to 44 medium-sized corporations. At September 24, 1993, the Company had one
bridge loan outstanding, totaling $70 million, which has since been repaid.
Loans to highly leveraged corporations are carried at unpaid principal balance
less a reserve for estimated losses. The allowance for loan losses is estimated
based on a review of each loan, and considerations of economic, market and
credit conditions. Direct equity investments made in conjunction with the
Company's investment and merchant banking activities, which are generally
recorded at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value, aggregated
$306 million at September 24, 1993, representing investments in 85 enterprises.
At September 24, 1993, the Company held interests in partnerships, totaling $85
million (recorded on the cost basis), that invest in highly leveraged
transactions and non-investment grade securities. The Company has a co-
investment arrangement to enter into direct equity investments. At September
24, 1993, the additional co-investment commitments were $81 million. The
Company also has committed to invest an additional $14 million in partnerships
that invest in leveraged transactions.
As a market-maker, the Company holds trading positions in non-investment
grade securities. At September 24, 1993, the fair value of long and short non-
investment grade trading positions amounted to $2,065 million and $236 million,
respectively, and in aggregate (i.e., the sum of long and short trading
positions), represented 3.6% of aggregate consolidated trading positions.
Investments of the Company's insurance subsidiaries, which are carried at
amortized cost, include non-investment grade securities. At September 24, 1993,
$492 million or 6.0% of the aggregate carrying value of such investments were
non-investment grade.
As of September 24, 1993, the largest non-investment grade holdings related
to a single issuer totaled $158 million. No one industry sector represented
more than 16% of total non-investment grade positions. At September 24, 1993,
the Company held an aggregate carrying value of $294 million in securities of
issuers who were in various stages of bankruptcy proceedings or in default.
Approximately 46% of this amount resulted from the Company's market-making
activities in such securities.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
GENERAL
The Securities are to be issued as a series of Senior Debt Securities under
the Senior Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1983, as amended and restated, which
is more fully described in the accompanying Prospectus. The Securities will
mature on January , 2000.
While at maturity a beneficial owner of a Security will receive the principal
amount of such Security plus the Supplemental Redemption Amount, there will be
no payment of interest, periodic or otherwise. (See "Payment at Maturity",
below.)
The Securities are not subject to redemption by the Company or at the option
of any beneficial owner prior to maturity. Upon the occurrence of an Event of
Default with respect to the Securities, beneficial owners of the Securities may
accelerate the maturity of the Securities, as described under "Description of
Securities--Events of Default and Acceleration" in this Prospectus Supplement
and "Description of Debt Securities--General--Events of Default" in the
accompanying Prospectus.
The Securities are to be issued in denominations of $1,000 and integral
multiples thereof.
S-12
PAYMENT AT MATURITY
At maturity, a beneficial owner of a Security will be entitled to receive the
principal amount thereof plus a Supplemental Redemption Amount, all as provided
below. If the Final Average Value of the Index does not exceed the Initial
Value by more than approximately % a beneficial owner of a Security will be
entitled to receive only the principal amount thereof and the Minimum
Supplemental Redemption Amount. Although the Index will initially be the Japan
Index, under certain circumstances described herein a New Japan Index (as
defined herein) may be substituted for the Japan Index. The Japan Index (or, if
such substitution shall occur, the New Japan Index) is referred to herein as
the "Index".
At maturity, a beneficial owner of a Security will be entitled to receive,
with respect to each such Security, (i) the principal amount thereof, and (ii)
the Supplemental Redemption Amount equal in amount to:
Principal Amount X Final Average Value-Initial Value X %
---------------------------------
Initial Value
provided, that the Supplemental Redemption Amount will not be less than the
Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount of $150 per $1,000 principal amount of
Securities. The Initial Value will equal the closing value of the Japan Index
on the date the Securities are priced by the Company for initial sale to the
public; provided, however, that a new Initial Value will be calculated as
described herein if a New Japan Index is substituted for the Japan Index.
The Final Average Value of the Index will be determined by State Street Bank
and Trust Company (the "Calculation Agent") and will equal the arithmetic
average (mean) of the Yearly Values, as defined below, for 1998, 1999 and 2000.
The Yearly Value for any year will be calculated during the Calculation Period
for such year which will be from and including January in 1998, January in
1999 and January in 2000 to and including the fifth scheduled Business Day
after each such date. The Yearly Value for each year will equal the arithmetic
average (mean) of the closing values of the Index on the first Business Day in
the applicable Calculation Period (provided that a Market Disruption Event, as
defined below, shall not have occurred on such day) and on each succeeding
Business Day (provided that a Market Disruption Event shall not have occurred
on the applicable day) up to and including the last Business Day in the
applicable Calculation Period (each, a "Calculation Date") until the
Calculation Agent has so determined such closing values for five Business Days.
If a Market Disruption Event occurs on two or more of the Business Days during
a Calculation Period, the Yearly Value for the relevant year will equal the
average of the values on Business Days on which a Market Disruption Event did
not occur during such Calculation Period or, if there is only one such Business
Day, the value on such day. If a Market Disruption Event occurs on all of such
Business Days during a Calculation Period, the Yearly Value for the relevant
year shall equal the closing value of the Index on the last Business Day of the
Calculation Period regardless of whether a Market Disruption Event shall have
occurred on such day. A Yearly Value may be restated if the Substitution Event
occurs after the determination of such Yearly Value, see "Substitution of the
Index".
For purposes of determining the Final Average Value, a "Business Day" is a
day on which the Relevant Stock Exchange is open for trading. "Relevant Stock
Exchange" means the AMEX or, if a New Japan Index has been substituted for the
Japan Index, the U.S. stock exchange that publishes such New Japan Index. All
determinations made by the Calculation Agent shall be at the sole discretion of
the Calculation Agent and, absent a determination by the Calculation Agent of a
manifest error, shall be conclusive for all purposes and binding on the Company
and beneficial owners of the Securities.
The following table illustrates, for a range of hypothetical Final Average
Values and assuming a Participation Rate of 115%, an Initial Value equal to
175.0, a Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount equal to $150 per $1,000
principal amount of the Securities and no change in foreign exchange rates
between Japan and the United States, (i) the total amount payable at maturity
for each $1,000 principal amount of Securities, (ii) the pretax annualized rate
of return to beneficial owners of Securities, and (iii) the pretax annualized
rate of return of an investment in the stocks underlying the Japan Index (which
includes an assumed aggregate dividend yield of .88% per annum, as more fully
described below).
S-13
TOTAL PRETAX PRETAX ANNUALIZED
HYPOTHETICAL FINAL PERCENTAGE AMOUNT ANNUALIZED RATE OF RATE OF RETURN OF
AVERAGE VALUE OF CHANGE OVER PAYABLE AT RETURN ON THE STOCKS UNDERLYING THE
THE JAPAN INDEX INITIAL VALUE MATURITY SECURITIES(1) JAPAN INDEX(1)(2)
------------------ ------------- ---------- ------------------ ---------------------
87.5 -50% $1,150 2.34% -10.36%
105.0 -40% $1,150 2.34% -7.47%
122.5 -30% $1,150 2.34% -4.99%
140.0 -20% $1,150 2.34% -2.82%
157.5 -10% $1,150 2.34% - .87%
175.0(3) 0% $1,150 2.34% .88%
192.5 10% $1,150 2.34% 2.48%
210.0 20% $1,230 3.48% 3.96%
227.5 30% $1,345 5.00% 5.33%
245.0 40% $1,460 6.41% 6.60%
262.5 50% $1,575 7.72% 7.80%
280.0 60% $1,690 8.94% 8.92%
297.5 70% $1,805 10.09% 9.98%
315.0 80% $1,920 11.18% 10.99%
332.5 90% $2,035 12.20% 11.95%
350.0 100% $2,150 13.18% 12.86%
367.5 110% $2,265 14.11% 13.74%
385.0 120% $2,380 14.99% 14.57%
- --------
(1) The annualized rates of return specified in the preceding table are
calculated on a semiannual bond equivalent basis and assume the Securities
are held until maturity.
(2) This rate of return assumes (i) an investment of a fixed amount in the
stocks underlying the Japan Index with the allocation of such amount
reflecting the relative weights of such stocks in the Japan Index; (ii) a
percentage change in the aggregate price of such stocks that equals the
percentage change in the Japan Index from the Initial Value to the relevant
Final Average Value; (iii) a constant dividend yield of .88% per annum,
paid quarterly from the date of initial delivery of Securities, applied to
the value of the Japan Index at the end of each such quarter assuming such
value increases or decreases linearly from 175 to the applicable
hypothetical Final Average Value; (iv) no transaction fees or expenses; (v)
a six year maturity for the Securities from the date of issuance; and (vi)
a final Japan Index value equal to the Final Average Value. The aggregate
dividend yield of the stocks underlying the Japan Index as of December 29,
1993 was approximately .88%.
(3) Approximate value of Japan Index on December 29, 1993.
The above figures are for purposes of illustration only. The actual Total
Redemption Amount received by investors and the pretax annualized rate of
return resulting therefrom will depend entirely on the actual Final Average
Value determined by the Calculation Agent as provided herein. Because the Final
Average Value will be based upon average values of the Index (which may be a
New Japan Index substituted for the Japan Index) during specified periods in
three successive years, a significant increase or decrease in the Index as
measured by the average values during the specified period in any year may be
substantially or entirely offset by the average values of the Index during the
specified periods in the other two years. Historical data regarding the Japan
Index is included in this Prospectus Supplement under "The Index--Historical
Data on the Japan Index".
The Indenture provides that the Indenture and the Securities will be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of New York. Under
present New York law, the maximum rate of interest is 25% per annum on a simple
interest basis. This limit may not apply to Securities in which $2,500,000 or
more has been invested. While the Company believes that New York law would be
given effect by a state or federal court sitting outside of New York, state
laws frequently regulate the amount of interest that may be charged to and paid
by a borrower (including, in some cases, corporate borrowers). It is suggested
S-14
that prospective investors consult their personal advisors with respect to the
applicability of such laws. The Company has covenanted for the benefit of the
beneficial owners of the Securities, to the extent permitted by law, not to
claim voluntarily the benefits of any laws concerning usurious rates of
interest against a beneficial owner of the Securities.
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE INDEX; MARKET DISRUPTION EVENT
If at any time the method of calculating the Index, or the value thereof, is
changed in a material respect, or if the Index is in any other way modified so
that such Index does not, in the opinion of the Calculation Agent, fairly
represent the value of the Index had such changes or modifications not been
made, then, from and after such time, the Calculation Agent shall, at the close
of business in New York, New York, on each date that the closing value with
respect to the Final Average Value is to be calculated, make such adjustments
as, in the good faith judgment of the Calculation Agent, may be necessary in
order to arrive at a calculation of a value of a stock index comparable to the
Index as if such changes or modifications had not been made, and calculate such
closing value with reference to the Index, as adjusted. Accordingly, if the
method of calculating the Index is modified so that the value of such Index is
a fraction or a multiple of what it would have been if it had not been modified
(e.g., due to a split in the Index), then the Calculation Agent shall adjust
such Index in order to arrive at a value of the Index as if it had not been
modified (e.g., as if such split had not occurred).
"Market Disruption Event" means the occurrence or existence of either of the
following events on a Business Day during a Calculation Period during the one-
half hour period preceding the close of trading on the Relevant Stock Exchange,
as determined by the Calculation Agent:
(i) a suspension or absence of trading on the TSE of 20% or more of the
Underlying Stocks which then comprise the Index or a Successor Index; or
(ii) the suspension or material limitation on the Singapore International
Monetary Exchange Ltd. (the "SIMEX"), Osaka Securities Exchange (the "OSE")
or the Relevant Stock Exchange or any other major securities market of
trading in futures or options contracts related to the Index.
For purposes of determining whether a Market Disruption Event has occurred:
(1) a limitation on the hours or number of days of trading will not constitute
a Market Disruption Event if it results from an announced change in the regular
business hours of the relevant exchange, (2) a decision to permanently
discontinue trading in the relevant contract will not constitute a Market
Disruption Event, (3) a suspension of trading in a futures or options contract
on the Index by the Relevant Stock Exchange or other major securities market by
reason of (x) a price change exceeding limits set by the Relevant Stock
Exchange or such securities market, (y) an imbalance of orders relating to such
contracts or (z) a disparity in bid and ask quotes relating to such contracts
will constitute a suspension or material limitation of trading in futures or
options contracts related to the Index and (4) an "absence of trading" on the
SIMEX, OSE, the Relevant Stock Exchange or a major securities market on which
futures or options contracts related to the Index are traded will not include
any time when the SIMEX, OSE, the Relevant Stock Exchange or such securities
market, as the case may be, itself is closed for trading under ordinary
circumstances.
SUBSTITUTION OF THE INDEX
Movements in the Japan Index correspond generally to movements in the Nikkei
225 Index published by Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc., which is currently the most
widely utilized index relating to Japanese equity securities, as measured by
trading volume and open interest relating to the futures contract on such index
(the "Nikkei 225 Futures Contract"). In October of 1993, Nihon Keizai Shimbun,
Inc. commenced the calculation and publication of a new broad-based,
capitalization-weighted index referred to as the Nikkei 300 Index (the "Nikkei
300 Index"). Unlike the Nikkei 225 Index, which is a price-weighted index of
225 Japanese companies listed in the First Section of the TSE, the Nikkei 300
Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 300 Japanese companies listed in
the First Section of the TSE. See "The Index--The New Index" for a description
of the Nikkei 300 Index. The OSE announced that, if a broad-based,
capitalization-weighted
S-15
index were introduced on the TSE, the OSE expected to establish a new futures
contract on such index. Although the OSE has not as of the date of this
Prospectus Supplement introduced a new futures contract on the Nikkei 300
Index, any such contract which it may introduce at some future date is referred
to herein as the "Nikkei 300 Futures Contract".
If the Nikkei 300 Futures Contract is introduced and publicly traded on an
exchange in Japan, and such contract develops trading volume and open interest
exceeding that of the Nikkei 225 Futures Contract, the Company believes this
would indicate that the Nikkei 300 Futures Contract will have become more
widely utilized than the Nikkei 225 Futures Contract. Therefore, in the event
that a Nikkei 300 Futures Contract is publicly traded at some future date on an
exchange in Japan and each of the additional conditions described below are
fulfilled (the occurrence of all such conditions being referred to herein as a
"Substitution Event"), a New Japan Index (as defined below) will be substituted
for the Japan Index. From and after such time, the Index used to determine the
Supplemental Redemption Amount with respect to the Notes will be such New Japan
Index. Upon the substitution of the New Japan Index for the Japan Index, the
Company will cause notice thereof to be given to Holders of the Notes. Such
notice will also state that, for purposes of calculating the Supplemental
Redemption Amount, an adjusted Initial Value will be substituted for the
original Initial Value. Such adjusted Initial Value will be calculated as
follows:
Initial Value of Japan Index
---------------------------- x current value of New Japan Index
current value of Japan Index
where the current values of the Japan Index and of the New Japan Index will
equal their respective levels reported by the relevant exchange at the close of
business on the day that the Calculation Agent substitutes the New Japan Index
for the Japan Index. If the Substitution Event occurs after the determination
of a Yearly Value, any such Yearly Value will be restated in terms of the New
Japan Index pursuant to the following formula:
Yearly Value prior to restatement
--------------------------------- x adjusted Initial Value
original Initial Value
The Supplemental Redemption Amount will then be calculated using such restated
Yearly Value.
A "Substitution Event" will have occurred if, as determined by the
Calculation Agent (whose opinion shall be conclusive and binding on the Company
and on the holders of the Notes), the following conditions are fulfilled:
(a) Nikkei 300 Futures Contracts shall be introduced and publicly traded
on an exchange in Japan; and
(b) The AMEX or another United States securities exchange publishes (on a
basis not less regularly than each day on which such exchange and the TSE
are open for trading) an index (the "New Japan Index") which:
(i) for a period of 90 days immediately preceding the date of the
Substitution Event has a correlation based on daily, closing value to
closing value, percentage changes of not less than 90% with the Nikkei
300 Index (during the 90 days immediately preceding the date of this
Prospectus Supplement, the Japan Index had a correlation of
approximately 99% with the Nikkei 225 Index); and
(ii) an option, warrant or other security which has payments
determined by reference to the New Japan Index has been approved to be
listed on a national securities exchange by the Securities and Exchange
Commission; and
(c) Either of the following has occurred:
(i) the Nikkei 225 Index is no longer published and/or the Nikkei 225
Futures have been delisted from trading on the OSE; or
S-16
(ii) the Nikkei 300 Futures Contracts publicly traded on exchanges in
Japan have (A) greater average daily volume and (B) greater average
daily open interest than the Nikkei 225 Futures Contracts which trade
on the OSE, each for any three-month period prior to the date of the
Substitution Event, commencing on a futures expiration date on the OSE
and ending on the following futures expiration date; and
(d) To the extent required, the Company shall have obtained any license
necessary to use the New Japan Index as described herein. The Company will
agree in the Notes to use its reasonable efforts to obtain any such
license.
Notwithstanding the above, unless the Nikkei 225 Index is no longer published
and/or the Nikkei 225 Futures Contracts shall have been delisted from trading
on the OSE, a Substitution Event will not be deemed to have occurred on any of
the 180 days next preceding the maturity date of the Notes.
All disclosure contained in this Prospectus regarding the Nikkei 225 Index,
Nikkei 225 Futures Contract, Nikkei 300 Index, Nikkei 300 Futures Contract, or
their publisher, Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc., is derived from publicly available
information. Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. has no relationship with the Company or
the Notes; it does not sponsor, endorse, authorize, sell or promote the Notes,
and has no obligation or liability in connection with the administration,
marketing or trading of the Notes.
DISCONTINUANCE OF THE INDEX
If the AMEX discontinues publication of the Japan Index (or, if a New Japan
Index has been substituted for the Japan Index, publication of the New Japan
Index has been discontinued) and the AMEX or another entity publishes a
successor or substitute index that the Calculation Agent determines, in its
sole discretion, to be comparable to such Index (any such index being referred
to hereinafter as a "Successor Index"), then, upon the Calculation Agent's
notification of such determination to the Trustee and the Company, the
Calculation Agent will substitute the Successor Index as calculated by the AMEX
or such other entity for the Japan Index or the New Japan Index, as the case
may be, and calculate the Final Average Value as described above under "Payment
at Maturity". Upon any selection by the Calculation Agent of a Successor Index,
the Company shall cause notice thereof to be given to Holders of the Notes.
If the AMEX discontinues publication of the Japan Index (or, if a New Japan
Index has been substituted for the Japan Index, publication of the New Japan
Index has been discontinued) and a Successor Index is not selected by the
Calculation Agent or is no longer published on any of the Calculation Dates,
the value to be substituted for the Index for any such Calculation Date used to
calculate the Supplemental Redemption Amount at maturity will be a value
computed by the Calculation Agent for each Calculation Date in accordance with
the procedures last used to calculate the Index prior to any such
discontinuance. If a Successor Index is selected or the Calculation Agent
calculates a value as a substitute for the Index as described below, such
Successor Index or value shall be substituted for the Index for all purposes,
including for purposes of determining whether a Market Disruption Event exists.
If the AMEX discontinues publication of the Japan Index (or, if a New Japan
Index has been substituted for the Japan Index, publication of the New Japan
Index has been discontinued) prior to the period during which the Supplemental
Redemption Amount is to be determined and the Calculation Agent determines that
no Successor Index is available at such time, then on each Business Day until
the earlier to occur of (i) the determination of the Final Average Value and
(ii) a determination by the Calculation Agent that a Successor Index is
available, the Calculation Agent shall determine the value that would be used
in computing the Supplemental Redemption Amount as described in the preceding
paragraph as if such day were a Calculation Date. The Calculation Agent will
cause notice of each such value to be published not less often than once each
month in The Wall Street Journal (or another newspaper of general circulation),
and arrange for information with respect to such values to be made available by
telephone. Notwithstanding these alternative arrangements, discontinuance of
the publication of the Index may adversely affect trading in the Securities.
S-17
EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND ACCELERATION
In case an Event of Default with respect to any Securities shall have
occurred and be continuing, the amount payable to a beneficial owner of a
Security upon any acceleration permitted by the Securities, with respect to
each $1,000 principal amount thereof, will be equal to: (i) the initial issue
price ($1,000), plus (ii) an additional amount of contingent interest
calculated as though the date of early repayment were the maturity date of the
Securities. The Calculation Period used to calculate the final Yearly Value of
the Notes so accelerated will begin on the eighth scheduled Business Day next
preceding the scheduled date for such early redemption. If such final Yearly
Value is the only Yearly Value which shall have been calculated with respect to
the Notes, such final Yearly Value will be the Final Average Value. If one or
two other Yearly Values shall have been calculated with respect to the Notes
for prior years when the Notes shall have been outstanding, the average (mean)
of the final Yearly Value and such one other Yearly Value or such two other
Yearly Values, as the case may be, will be the Final Average Value. The Minimum
Supplemental Redemption Amount with respect to any such early redemption date
will be an amount equal to the interest which would have accrued on the
Securities from and including the date of original issuance to but excluding
the date of early redemption at an annualized rate of %, calculated on a
semiannual bond equivalent basis. See "Description of Securities-Payment at
Maturity" in this Prospectus Supplement. If a bankruptcy proceeding is
commenced in respect of the Company, the claim of the beneficial owner of a
Security may be limited, under Section 502(b)(2) of Title 11 of the United
States Code, to the principal amount of the Security plus an additional amount
of contingent interest calculated as though the date of the commencement of the
proceeding were the maturity date of the Securities.
In case of default in payment at the maturity date of the Securities (whether
at their stated maturity or upon acceleration), from and after the maturity
date the Securities shall bear interest, payable upon demand of the beneficial
owners thereof, at the rate of 5.5% per annum (to the extent that payment of
such interest shall be legally enforceable) on the unpaid amount due and
payable on such date in accordance with the terms of the Securities to the date
payment of such amount has been made or duly provided for.
DEPOSITORY
Upon issuance, all Securities will be represented by one or more fully
registered global securities (the "Global Securities"). Each such Global
Security will be deposited with, or on behalf of, The Depository Trust Company
("DTC"), as Depository, registered in the name of DTC or a nominee thereof.
Unless and until it is exchanged in whole or in part for Securities in
definitive form, no Global Security may be transferred except as a whole by the
Depository to a nominee of such Depository or by a nominee of such Depository
to such Depository or another nominee of such Depository or by such Depository
or any such nominee to a successor of such Depository or a nominee of such
successor.
DTC has advised the Company as follows: DTC is a limited-purpose trust
company organized under the Banking Law of the State of New York, a member of
the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the
New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant
to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. DTC was created to hold securities of its participants
("Participants") and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions among its Participants in such securities through electronic book-
entry changes in accounts of the Participants, thereby eliminating the need for
physical movement of securities certificates. DTC's Participants include
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations,
and certain other organizations.
DTC is owned by a number of Participants and by the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc., the American Stock Exchange, Inc. and the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. Access to the DTC book-entry system is also available
to others, such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear
through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Participant, either
directly or indirectly ("Indirect Participants").
Purchases of Securities must be made by or through Participants, which will
receive a credit on the records of DTC. The ownership interest of each actual
purchaser of each Security ("Beneficial Owner") is in
S-18
turn to be recorded on the Participants' or Indirect Participants' records.
Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their
purchase, but Beneficial Owners are expected to receive written confirmations
providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their
holdings, from the Participant or Indirect Participant through which the
Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Ownership of beneficial
interests in such Global Security will be shown on, and the transfer of such
ownership interests will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC
(with respect to interests of Participants) and on the records of Participants
(with respect to interests of persons held through Participants). The laws of
some states may require that certain purchasers of securities take physical
delivery of such securities in definitive form. Such limits and such laws may
impair the ability to own, transfer or pledge beneficial interests in Global
Securities.
So long as DTC, or its nominee, is the registered owner of a Global Security,
DTC or its nominee, as the case may be, will be considered the sole owner or
Holder of the Securities represented by such Global Security for all purposes
under the Senior Indenture. Except as provided below, Beneficial Owners in a
Global Security will not be entitled to have the Securities represented by such
Global Securities registered in their names, will not receive or be entitled to
receive physical delivery of the Securities in definitive form and will not be
considered the owners or Holders thereof under the Senior Indenture.
Accordingly, each Person owning a beneficial interest in a Global Security must
rely on the procedures of DTC and, if such Person is not a Participant, on the
procedures of the Participant through which such Person owns its interest, to
exercise any rights of a Holder under the Senior Indenture. The Company
understands that under existing industry practices, in the event that the
Company requests any action of Holders or that an owner of a beneficial
interest in such a Global Security desires to give or take any action which a
Holder is entitled to give or take under the Senior Indenture, DTC would
authorize the Participants holding the relevant beneficial interests to give or
take such action, and such Participants would authorize Beneficial Owners
owning through such Participants to give or take such action or would otherwise
act upon the instructions of Beneficial Owners. Conveyance of notices and other
communications by DTC to Participants, by Participants to Indirect
Participants, and by Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial
Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or
regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
Payment of the principal of, and any Supplemental Redemption Amount with
respect to, Securities registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be
made to DTC or its nominee, as the case may be, as the Holder of the Global
Securities representing such Securities. None of the Company, the Trustee or
any other agent of the Company or agent of the Trustee will have any
responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to or
payments made on account of beneficial ownership interests or for supervising
or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial ownership interests. The
Company expects that DTC, upon receipt of any payment of principal or any
Supplemental Redemption Amount in respect of a Global Security, will credit the
accounts of the Participants with payment in amounts proportionate to their
respective holdings in principal amount of beneficial interest in such Global
Security as shown on the records of DTC. The Company also expects that payments
by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing customer
instructions and customary practices, as is now the case with securities held
for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name",
and will be the responsibility of such Participants.
If (x) any Depository is at any time unwilling or unable to continue as
Depository and a successor depository is not appointed by the Company within 60
days, (y) the Company executes and delivers to the Trustee a Company Order to
the effect that the Global Securities shall be exchangeable or (z) an Event of
Default has occurred and is continuing with respect to the Securities, the
Global Securities will be exchangeable for Securities in definitive form of
like tenor and of an equal aggregate principal amount, in denominations of
$1,000 and integral multiples thereof. Such definitive Securities shall be
registered in such name or names as the Depository shall instruct the Trustee.
It is expected that such instructions may be based upon directions received by
the Depository from Participants with respect to ownership of beneficial
interests in such Global Securities.
S-19
THE INDEX
THE JAPAN INDEX
The Index for purposes of calculating the Supplemental Redemption Amount will
initially be the Japan Index. Unless otherwise stated, all information herein
relating to the Japan Index has been provided by the AMEX. Such information
reflects the policies of the AMEX; such policies are subject to change in the
discretion of the AMEX.
The Japan Index is a stock index calculated, published and disseminated by
the AMEX that measures the composite price performance of selected Japanese
stocks. The Japan Index currently is based on 210 highly capitalized Underlying
Stocks trading on the TSE representing a broad cross-section of Japanese
industries. All 210 Underlying Stocks are stocks listed in the First Section of
the TSE. Stocks listed in the First Section are among the most actively traded
stocks on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Options contracts on the Japan Index are
traded on the AMEX.
The Japan Index is a modified, price-weighted index (i.e., an Underlying
Stock's weight in the index is based on its price per share rather than the
total market capitalization of the issuer) which is calculated by (i)
multiplying the per share price of each Underlying Stock by the corresponding
weighing factor for such Underlying Stock (a "Weight Factor"), (ii) calculating
the sum of all these products and (iii) dividing such sums by a divisor (the
"Divisor"). The Divisor, initially set in September 1990 at 9,799,460, was
9,608,949 as of December 28, 1993, and is subject to periodic adjustments as
set forth below. Each Weight Factor is computed by dividing (Yen)50 by the par
value of the relevant Underlying Stock and multiplying the result by 100, so
that the share price of each Underlying Stock when multiplied by its Weight
Factor corresponds to a share price based on a uniform par value of (Yen)50.
Each Weight Factor represents the number of shares of the related Underlying
Stock which are included in one trading unit of the Japan Index. The stock
prices used in the calculation of the Japan Index are those reported by a
primary market for the Underlying Stock (currently the TSE). The level of the
Japan Index is calculated once per day using last sale prices only (i.e., not
"special bid quotes" or "special ask quotes" which are used in connection with
other stock indices) for transactions in Underlying Stock on the TSE. The level
of the Japan Index is disseminated via the Consolidated Tape Authority Network-
B (commonly referred to as the "AMEX Tape"). The AMEX Tape symbol for the Japan
Index is "JPN".
In order to maintain continuity in the level of the Japan Index in the event
of certain changes due to non-market factors affecting the Underlying Stocks,
such as the addition or deletion of stocks, substitution of stocks, stock
dividends, stock splits or distributions of assets to stockholders, the Divisor
used in calculating the Japan Index is adjusted in a manner designed to prevent
any instantaneous change or discontinuity in the level of the Japan Index.
Thereafter, the Divisor remains at the new value until a further adjustment is
necessary as the result of another change. As a result of each such change
affecting any Underlying Stock, the Divisor is adjusted in such a way that the
sum of all share prices immediately after such change multiplied by the
applicable Weight Factor and divided by the new Divisor (i.e., the level of the
Japan Index immediately after such change) will equal the level of the Japan
Index immediately prior to the change.
Underlying Stocks may be deleted or added by the AMEX. However, to maintain
continuity in the Japan Index, the policy of the AMEX is generally not to alter
the composition of the Underlying Stocks except when an Underlying Stock is
deleted due to (i) bankruptcy of the issuer, (ii) merger of the issuer with, or
acquisition of the issuer by, another company, (ii) delisting of such stock, or
(iv) failure of such stock to meet, upon periodic review by the AMEX, market
value and trading volume criteria established by the AMEX (as such may change
from time to time). Upon deletion of a stock from the Underlying Stocks, the
AMEX may select a suitable replacement for such deleted Underlying Stock. The
policy of the AMEX is to announce any such change in advance via distribution
of an information circular.
The AMEX is under no obligation to continue the calculation and dissemination
of the Japan Index. The Securities are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or
promoted by the AMEX. No inference should be drawn
S-20
from the information contained in this Prospectus Supplement that the AMEX
makes any representation or warranty, implied or express, to the Company,
beneficial owners of the Securities or any member of the public regarding the
advisability of investing in securities generally or in the Securities in
particular or the ability of the Japan Index to track general stock market
performance. The AMEX has no obligation to take the needs of the Company or
beneficial owners of the Securities into consideration in determining,
composing or calculating the Japan Index. The AMEX is not responsible for, and
has not participated in the determination or calculation of the equation by
which the Supplemental Redemption Amount with respect to the Securities will be
determined. The AMEX has no obligation or liability in connection with the
administration, marketing or trading of the Securities.
The use of and reference to the Japan Index in connection with the Securities
has been consented to by the AMEX, the publisher of the Japan Index. "Japan
Index" is a service mark of the AMEX.
None of the Company, the Calculation Agent and the Underwriter accepts any
responsibility for the calculation, maintenance or publication of the Japan
Index or any Successor Index. The AMEX disclaims all responsibility for any
errors or omissions in the calculation and dissemination of the Japan Index or
the manner in which such index is applied in determining the Supplemental
Redemption Amount with respect to the Securities.
HISTORICAL DATA ON THE JAPAN INDEX
The AMEX first calculated and published the Japan Index on April 2, 1990.
Historical data relating to the Japan Index in the table below for the period
from October 26, 1989 through March 30, 1990, have been retroactively
determined by the AMEX as if the Japan Index had been calculated by the AMEX
during such period.
The following table sets forth the highest and lowest daily closing level of
the Japan Index for each quarter or partial quarter, as the case may be, in the
period from October 26, 1989, through December 29, 1993, as well as the closing
level of the Japan Index as of the end of each such quarter or partial quarter,
as the case may be. These historical data on the Japan Index are not any
indication of the future performance of the Japan Index.
DAILY CLOSING LEVELS
----------------------
HIGHEST LOWEST CLOSING
LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL
------- ------ -------
1989:
4th Quarter (beginning October 26)...................... 388.96 354.23 388.96
1990:
1st Quarter............................................. 388.96 296.06 299.14
2nd Quarter............................................. 331.00 280.00 318.83
3rd Quarter............................................. 331.51 210.48 210.48
4th Quarter............................................. 252.55 202.99 237.57
1991:
1st Quarter............................................. 270.11 228.43 260.59
2nd Quarter............................................. 268.29 232.12 232.12
3rd Quarter............................................. 240.46 214.58 239.67
4th Quarter............................................. 253.51 216.22 230.72
1992:
1st Quarter............................................. 238.57 194.39 194.39
2nd Quarter............................................. 189.53 158.69 160.82
3rd Quarter............................................. 190.56 144.34 175.28
4th Quarter............................................. 178.81 161.53 171.22
1993:
1st Quarter............................................. 192.66 164.84 188.22
2nd Quarter............................................. 213.25 193.38 198.47
3rd Quarter............................................. 214.41 198.84 203.97
4th Quarter (through December 29)....................... 207.84 163.63 175.89
S-21
Since its inception, the Japan Index has experienced significant daily price
fluctuations. Any historical upward or downward trend in the closing level of
the Japan Index during any period set forth above is not any indication that
the Japan Index is more or less likely to increase or decline at any time
during the term of the Securities. The following graph sets forth the
historical performance of the Japan Index at the end of each quarter from the
fourth quarter of 1989 through December 29, 1993. PAST MOVEMENTS OF THE JAPAN
INDEX ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE FUTURE JAPAN INDEX VALUES. The
closing value of the Japan Index on December 29, 1993 was 175.89.
[Graphic No. 1 appears here]
THE TOKYO STOCK EXCHANGE
The Tokyo Stock Exchange is one of the world's largest securities exchanges
in terms of market capitalization. TSE is a two-way, continuous pure auction
market. Trading hours are currently from 9:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. and from 1:00
P.M. to 3:00 P.M., Tokyo time, Monday through Friday.
Due to the time zone difference, on any normal trading day the TSE will close
prior to the opening of business in New York City on the same calendar day.
Therefore, the closing level of the Japan Index on such trading day will
generally be available in the United States by the opening of business on the
same calendar day.
The TSE has adopted certain measures intended to prevent any extreme short-
term price fluctuation resulting from order imbalances. These include daily
price floors and ceilings intended to prevent extreme fluctuations in
individual stock prices. Any stock listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange cannot be
traded at a price outside of these limits which are stated in absolute Japanese
yen, and not percentage, limits from the closing price of the stock on the
previous day. In addition, when there is a major order imbalance in a listed
stock, the TSE posts a "special bid quote" or a "special asked quote" for that
stock at a specified higher or lower price level than the stock's last sale
price in order to solicit counter orders and balance supply and
S-22
demand for the stock. Investors should also be aware that the TSE may suspend
the trading of individual stocks in certain limited and extraordinary
circumstances including, for example, unusual trading activity in that stock.
As a result, variations in the Japan Index may be limited by price limitations
on, or by suspension of trading in, individual stocks which comprise the Japan
Index which may, in turn, adversely affect the value of the Securities or
result in a Market Disruption Event. See "Description of Securities--
Adjustments to the Index; Market Disruption Event".
THE NEW JAPAN INDEX
Under certain circumstances, a New Japan Index may be substituted for the
Japan Index for purposes of calculating the Supplemental Redemption Amount. The
New Japan Index would be an index published by the AMEX or another United
States securities exchange with a high correlation to the Nikkei 300 Index. See
"Substitution of the Index".
The Nikkei 300 Index is an index calculated, published and disseminated by
Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc., that measures the composite price performance of
stocks of 300 Japanese companies. All 300 stocks are listed in the First
Section of the TSE. Stocks listed in the First Section are among the most
actively traded stocks on the TSE. Publication of the Nikkei 300 Index began on
October 8, 1993.
The Nikkei 300 Index is a market capitalization-weighted index which is
calculated by (i) multiplying the per share price of each stock included in the
Nikkei 300 Index by the number of outstanding shares (excluding shares held by
the Japanese Government), (ii) calculating the sum of all these products (such
sum being hereinafter referred to as the "Aggregate Market Price"), (iii)
dividing the Aggregate Market Price by the Base Aggregate Market Price (i.e.
the Aggregate Market Price as of October 1, 1982) and (iv) multiplying the
result by 100. Larger companies' shares have a larger effect on moving the
entire index than smaller companies' shares.
Although the Nikkei 300 Index was first published in October 1993, Nihon
Keizai Shimbun, Inc. has calculated values for the Nikkei 300 Index for the
period from October 1, 1982 through October 8, 1993. The stocks included in the
Nikkei 300 Index (such stocks being hereinafter referred to as the "Underlying
Stocks") were selected from a reference group of stocks which were selected by
excluding stocks listed in the First Section of the TSE that have relatively
low market liquidity or extremely poor financial results. The Underlying Stocks
were selected from this reference group by (i) selecting from the remaining
stocks in this reference group the stocks with the largest aggregate market
value in each of 36 industrial sectors and (ii) selecting additional stocks
(with priority within each industrial sector given to the stock with the
largest aggregate market value) so that the selection ratios (i.e. the ratio of
the aggregate market value of the included stocks to that of the stocks in the
reference group) with respect to all 36 industry sectors will be as nearly
equal as possible and the total number of companies with stocks included in the
Nikkei 300 Index will be 300.
In order to maintain continuity in the level of the Nikkei 300 Index, the
Nikkei 300 Index will be reviewed annually by Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. and
the Underlying Stocks may be replaced, if necessary, in accordance with the
"deletion/addition rule". The "deletion/addition" rule provides generally for
the deletion of a stock from the Nikkei 300 Index if such stock is no longer
included in the reference group or if the aggregate market value of such stock
is low relative to other stocks in the relevant industry sector. Stocks deleted
pursuant to the "deletion/addition" rule will be replaced by stocks included in
the reference group which have relatively high aggregate market values. In
addition, stocks may be added or deleted from time to time for extraordinary
reasons.
All disclosure contained in this Prospectus regarding the Nikkei 225 Index,
Nikkei 225 Futures Contract, Nikkei 300 Index, Nikkei 300 Futures Contract, or
their publisher, Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc., is derived from publicly available
information. Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. has no relationship with the Company or
the Notes; it does not sponsor, endorse, authorize, sell or promote the Notes,
and has no obligation or liability in connection with the administration,
marketing or trading of the Notes.
S-23
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following summary of certain United States Federal income tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Notes is based
upon the opinion, set forth in full below, of Brown & Wood, counsel to the
Company, which opinion is based upon laws, regulations, rulings and decisions
now in effect (or, in the case of certain regulations, in proposed form), all
of which are subject to change (including changes in effective dates) or
possible differing interpretations. The discussion below deals only with Notes
held as capital assets and does not purport to deal with persons in special tax
situations, such as financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated
investment companies, dealers in securities or currencies, persons holding
Notes as a hedge against currency risks or as a position in a "straddle" for
tax purposes. It also does not deal with holders other than original purchasers
(except where otherwise specifically noted). Persons considering the purchase
of the Notes should consult their own tax advisors concerning the application
of United States Federal income tax laws to their particular situations as well
as any consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Notes
arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
As used herein, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of a Note
that is for United States Federal income tax purposes (i) a citizen or resident
of the United States, (ii) a corporation, partnership or other entity created
or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political
subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate or trust the income of which is subject to
United States Federal income taxation regardless of its source or (iv) any
other person whose income or gain in respect of a Note is effectively connected
with the conduct of a United States trade or business. As used herein, the term
"non-U.S. Holder" means a holder of a Note that is not a U.S. Holder.
GENERAL
There are no regulations (except the Proposed Regulations as described
below), published rulings or judicial decisions involving the characterization,
for United States Federal income tax purposes, of securities with terms
substantially the same as the Notes. However, although the matter is not free
from doubt, under current law, each Note should be treated as a debt instrument
of the Company for United States Federal income tax purposes. The discussion
below is based upon the assumption that each Note will be treated as a debt
instrument of the Company for United States Federal income tax purposes.
U.S. HOLDERS
Under general principles of current United States Federal income tax law,
payments of interest on a debt instrument generally will be taxable to a U.S.
Holder as ordinary interest income at the time such payments are accrued or are
received (in accordance with the U.S. Holder's regular method of tax
accounting). Despite the foregoing, nonperiodic payments of interest on a debt
instrument generally will be treated as original issue discount, for United
States Federal income tax purposes, and will be includible in income by a U.S.
Holder as ordinary interest as it accrues over the term of the debt instrument
under a constant yield method in advance of receipt of the cash payments
attributable to such income, regardless of the U.S. Holder's regular method of
tax accounting. Under these principles, the Minimum Supplemental Redemption
Amount (i.e., a nonperiodic payment of interest) generally would be treated as
original issue discount, for United States Federal income tax purposes, and
would be includible in income by a U.S. Holder as ordinary interest as it
accrues over the term of the Note under a constant yield method in advance of
receipt of the Supplemental Redemption Amount, regardless of the U.S. Holder's
regular method of tax accounting. The excess of the Supplemental Redemption
Amount over the Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount (the "Additional
Interest Amount"), if any, would be treated as contingent interest and
generally would be includible in income by a U.S. Holder as ordinary interest
on the date the Supplemental Redemption Amount is accrued (i.e., determined) or
when such amount is received (in accordance with the U.S. Holder's regular
method of tax accounting). It is possible, however, that as of the last
Calculation Date in one or more certain Calculation Periods (other than the
final Calculation Period), the sum of the Yearly Value calculated during the
Calculation Period to which such last Calculation Date
S-24
relates and the Yearly Values for all prior Calculation Periods, if any, would
equal an amount such that the Supplemental Redemption Amount is certain to
exceed the Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount even if the Yearly Values for
all subsequent Calculation Periods were to be zero (such Supplemental
Redemption Amount is hereinafter referred to as the "Fixed Supplemental
Redemption Amount" and each last Calculation Date relating to a certain Fixed
Supplemental Redemption Amount is hereinafter referred to as a "Fixing
Calculation Date"). Under such circumstances, an accrual method U.S. Holder
would be required to include in income on the Fixing Calculation Date as
ordinary interest an amount equal to the portion of the excess of the Fixed
Supplemental Redemption Amount over the Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount
or, in the event there has been a prior Fixing Calculation Date, the portion of
the excess of the Fixed Supplemental Redemption Amount over the Fixed
Supplemental Redemption Amount relating to such prior Fixing Calculation Date
(in each case, such excess is hereinafter referred to as the "Fixed Additional
Interest Amount") that has accrued as of the Fixing Calculation Date. The
remaining portion of the Fixed Additional Interest Amount would be includible
in income by an accrual method U.S. Holder as ordinary interest as it accrues
over a period commencing on the Fixing Calculation Date and concluding at the
Note's maturity. A cash method U.S. Holder, however, would not be required to
include any portion of the Fixed Additional Interest Amount in income prior to
receipt of the Supplemental Redemption Amount.
Upon the sale or exchange of a Note prior to its maturity, a U.S. Holder
generally would recognize taxable gain or loss equal to the difference between
the amount realized on the sale or exchange and such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax
basis in the Note. A U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in a Note generally will
equal such U.S. Holder's initial investment in the Note increased by the amount
of any original issue discount included in income by the U.S. Holder. Such gain
or loss generally should be capital gain or loss and should be long-term
capital gain or loss if the Note were held by the U.S. Holder for more than one
year (subject to the market discount rules, as discussed below). It is
possible, however, that the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") may assert that
any amounts realized upon the sale or exchange of a Note prior to its maturity
in excess of the sum of the principal amount thereof and the amount of original
issue discount that has accrued on the Note as of the date of such sale or
exchange constitutes ordinary interest income (subject to the bond premium
rules, as discussed below). Nonetheless, although the matter is not free from
doubt, under current law, any gain realized upon the sale or exchange of a Note
prior to its maturity should be treated entirely as capital gain (subject to
the market discount rules, as discussed below).
On December 21, 1992, the IRS released proposed Treasury regulations (the
"1992 Proposed Regulations") under the original issue discount provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), which replaced
proposed regulations that were issued in 1986 dealing with debt instruments
issued with original issue discount. The 1992 Proposed Regulations, which are
not proposed to be made retroactive, would apply to debt instruments issued 60
days or more after the date the 1992 Proposed Regulations become final;
therefore by their terms they would not apply to the Notes. Nevertheless,
because the 1992 Proposed Regulations represent the Treasury Department's most
recent view with respect to the qualification as and treatment of "variable
rate debt instruments" they are discussed below. Moreover, it is also possible
that the Treasury Department could change the effective date of the 1992
Proposed Regulations so that such regulations would retroactively apply to the
Notes. There is no assurance, however, that the 1992 Proposed Regulations will
be adopted or, if adopted, adopted in their current form.
Under the 1992 Proposed Regulations, if a debt instrument qualifies as a
"variable rate debt instrument," then a special set of rules would apply to the
debt instrument whereby all "qualified stated interest" payments on the debt
instrument generally would be taxable to a U.S. Holder as ordinary interest
income in accordance with the U.S. Holder's regular method of tax accounting. A
debt instrument would qualify as a "variable rate debt instrument" under the
1992 Proposed Regulations (and would therefore not be treated as a contingent
payment debt obligation) if it (a) provides for total noncontingent principal
payments at least equal to its issue price and (b) provides for stated
interest, paid or compounded at least annually, at current values of a single
objective rate. In general, an "objective rate" is a rate which is determined
using a single formula
S-25
that is fixed throughout the term of the debt instrument and which is based
upon the price of actively traded property (other than foreign currency) or an
index of the prices of such property. The Notes would not qualify as "variable
rate debt instruments" under the 1992 Proposed Regulations, even if such
regulations are ultimately adopted in their current form and retroactively
applied to the Notes, because the Notes provide for stated interest (i.e., the
Supplemental Redemption Amount) that is neither paid nor compounded at least
annually. Since the Notes would not qualify as "variable rate debt instruments"
under the 1992 Proposed Regulations, the Notes would be treated as contingent
payment debt obligations.
It is not entirely clear under current law how the Notes would be taxed since
they are classified as contingent payment debt obligations. As noted above,
under general principles of current United States Federal income tax law, the
Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount would be treated as original issue
discount and would be includible in income by a U.S. Holder as ordinary
interest as it accrues over the term of the Note under a constant yield method,
regardless of the U.S. Holder's regular method of tax accounting. Under these
same principles, the Additional Interest Amount would be treated as contingent
interest and generally would be includible in income by a U.S. Holder as
ordinary interest on the date the amount payable at maturity is accrued (i.e.,
determined) or when such amount is received (in accordance with the U.S.
Holder's regular method of tax accounting). In addition, in the event of a
Fixing Calculation Date, an accrual method U.S. Holder would be required to
include in income on such Fixing Calculation Date as ordinary interest an
amount equal to the portion of the Fixed Additional Interest Amount that has
accrued as of the Fixing Calculation Date. The remaining portion of the Fixed
Additional Interest Amount would be includible in income by an accrual method
U.S. Holder as ordinary interest as it accrues over a period commencing on the
Fixing Calculation Date and concluding at the Note's maturity.
However, in 1991, the Treasury Department issued proposed regulations (the
"1991 Proposed Regulations" and, together with the 1992 Proposed Regulations,
the "Proposed Regulations") under the original issue discount provisions of the
Code concerning contingent payment debt obligations which, if applicable to the
Notes, would bifurcate a Note into a debt instrument and a right based upon the
value of the Index. The 1991 Proposed Regulations were not replaced by the 1992
Proposed Regulations and contain a retroactive effective date of February 20,
1991. Thus, if the 1991 Proposed Regulations are ultimately adopted in their
current form, such regulations would apply to the Notes and would cause the
timing and character of income, gain or loss reported on a Note to differ from
the timing and character of income, gain or loss on a Note had the 1991
Proposed Regulations not applied.
The 1991 Proposed Regulations would treat a Note as consisting of two
separate instruments: (i) the fixed payments (i.e., the debt instrument),
consisting of the right to receive both the Note principal amount and the
Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount (the "Fixed Payments"), and (ii) the
contingent payment, consisting of the right to receive the Additional Interest
Amount (the "Contingent Payment"). A Note's original issue price would be
allocated between the Fixed Payments and the Contingent Payment in accordance
with their relative fair market values.
Under the 1991 Proposed Regulations, the Fixed Payments would be treated, for
United States Federal income tax purposes, as a separate debt obligation issued
at an original issue discount. A U.S. Holder (whether a cash or accrual method
taxpayer) would be required to include the original issue discount on a Note in
gross income (using a constant yield method) over the Note's term in advance of
receipt of the cash payments attributable to such income. The original issue
discount required to be included in income with respect to a Note would be
equal to the difference between the sum of the Note's principal amount and the
Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount (i.e., $1,150 per $1,000 principal
amount) and the amount of the Note's original issue price allocated to the
Fixed Payments. If the 1991 Proposed Regulations are ultimately adopted in
their current form and, thus, are applied to the Notes, then the amount of
original issue discount on a Note would be $ per $1,000 principal amount.
Under the 1991 Proposed Regulations, a U.S. Holder that disposes of a Note
prior to its maturity would generally recognize taxable gain or loss, with
respect to the Fixed Payments, in an amount equal to the difference (if any)
between the portion of the sales proceeds allocated to such Fixed Payments (in
accordance with the relative fair market values of the
S-26
Fixed Payments and the Contingent Payment as determined on the date of
disposition) and such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the Fixed Payments. A
U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the Fixed Payments generally would equal
the portion of such U.S. Holder's initial investment in the Note that is
allocated to the Fixed Payments (in accordance with the relative fair market
values of the Fixed Payments and the Contingent Payment), increased by the
amount of original issue discount previously included in income by such U.S.
Holder with respect to the Fixed Payments.
Under the 1991 Proposed Regulations, the Contingent Payment would be treated
separately from the Fixed Payments and taxed "in accordance with [its] economic
substance". Although the matter is not free from doubt, if the 1991 Proposed
Regulations were applied to the Notes, under an "economic substance" analysis,
the Contingent Payment would most likely be treated as an "unlisted" cash
settlement option (an "Index Right") on the Index that is an "equity" option
for purposes of Code section 1256 (which includes the Code's mark-to-market
rules). Accordingly, a U.S. Holder would recognize taxable gain or loss with
respect to the Index Right only upon its sale, exchange, expiration or payment
at maturity. The amount of gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder with
respect to the Index Right would generally be measured by the difference
between the amount realized with respect to the Index Right and the U.S.
Holder's tax basis in the Index Right. A U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Index
Right generally would be the portion of the U.S. Holder's initial investment in
the Note that is allocated to the Contingent Payment (in accordance with the
relative fair market values of the Fixed Payments and the Contingent Payment).
Such gain or loss on the Index Right would generally be long-term capital gain
or loss if the Note were held by the U.S. Holder for more than one year.
Despite the foregoing, it would appear that under the 1991 Proposed
Regulations, in the event of a Fixing Calculation Date, a U.S. Holder would be
required to treat an amount equal to the excess of (i) the Fixed Additional
Interest Amount over (ii) the present value (determined by using a discount
rate equal to the mid-term applicable federal rate in effect on the Note's
issue date) of the Fixed Additional Interest Amount (the "Discounted Fixed
Additional Interest Amount") as original issue discount. Such original issue
discount would be includible in income by a U.S. Holder as ordinary interest as
it accrues over the remaining term of the Note under a constant yield method,
regardless of the U.S. Holder's regular method of tax accounting. In addition,
under such circumstances, a U.S. Holder would be required to reduce its tax
basis in the Index Right by an amount equal to the Discounted Fixed Additional
Interest Amount. Accordingly, if the Discounted Fixed Additional Interest
Amount or, in the event there has been a prior Fixing Calculation Date, if the
sum of the Discounted Fixed Additional Interest Amounts relating to each such
Fixing Calculation Date exceeds the U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Index Right,
then such U.S. Holder would be required to recognize taxable gain or loss with
respect to the Index Right in an amount equal to such excess prior to the sale,
exchange, expiration or payment at maturity of the Index Right.
Although the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") has not designated
a contract market for a contract based on the Japan Index and thus, if the 1991
Proposed Regulations were applied to the Notes, the Index Right would most
likely be treated as an unlisted "equity" option for purposes of Code section
1256, it is possible that the IRS could conclude that the Japan Index meets the
requirements of law for such a designation by the CFTC and may assert that the
Index Right should be treated as a listed option that is a nonequity option
subject to Code section 1256 (i.e., a "listed nonequity option"). Specifically,
if the IRS were to conclude that the Index Right should be treated as a
"nonequity" option, for purposes of Code section 1256, on the basis that the
Japan Index meets the requirements of law for a designation by the CFTC of a
contract market for a contract based on the Japan Index, the IRS could also
take the position that the Index Right should be treated as a "listed" option
based on the fact that the Index Right is part of a Note which is "listed" or,
alternatively, because there are listed options based on the Japan Index.
Although it is possible that if the 1991 Proposed Regulations were applied to
the Notes the Index Right could be treated as a "listed nonequity option", it
is not clear that Code section 1256 and the 1991 Proposed Regulations
contemplate such a result. Moreover, while the Notes are listed on the AMEX,
the Index Right cannot be separately traded and is not separately listed.
Additionally, there are differences between the Index Right and options
S-27
on the Japan Index that are actually traded which means that there is no public
trading market from which to draw a market price.
If the 1991 Proposed Regulations were applied to the Notes and if the Index
Right were treated as a "listed nonequity option", such Index Right would
generally be marked to market under Code section 1256, i.e., treated as if it
were sold for its fair market value on the last business day of the U.S.
Holder's taxable year. Any resulting gain or loss would be treated as 60
percent long-term and 40 percent short-term capital gain or loss. Additionally,
gain or loss on the sale, exchange, expiration or payment at maturity of the
Index Right would be 60 percent long-term and 40 percent short-term capital
gain or loss. Furthermore, if the 1991 Proposed Regulations were applied to the
Notes and if the Index Right were treated as a "listed nonequity option," in
the event that a New Japan Index is substituted for the Japan Index and there
are no listed options or futures on the New Japan Index in existence during all
or a portion of the remaining term of the Note, it is possible that the Index
Right would cease to be treated as a "listed nonequity option" and would not be
marked to market under Code section 1256 for the remaining term of the Note.
Prospective investors in the Notes should consult their own tax advisors as to
the proper treatment of the Index Right under the 1991 Proposed Regulations in
the event that the 1991 Proposed Regulations are applied to the Notes.
There is no assurance that the 1991 Proposed Regulations will be adopted or,
if adopted, adopted in their current form. In addition, on January 19, 1993,
the Treasury Department issued proposed regulations (the "1993 Proposed
Regulations"), concerning contingent payment debt obligations, which would have
replaced the 1991 Proposed Regulations and which would have provided for a set
of rules with respect to the timing and character of income recognition on
contingent payment debt obligations that differ from the rules contained in the
1991 Proposed Regulations with respect to the timing and character of income
recognition on contingent payment debt obligations. The 1993 Proposed
Regulations, which would have applied to debt instruments issued 60 days or
more after the date the 1993 Proposed Regulations became final, generally
provided for several alternative timing methods which would have required
annual interest accruals to reflect either a market yield for the debt
instrument, determined as of the issue date, or a reasonable estimate of the
performance of contingencies. The amount of interest deemed to accrue in a
taxable year pursuant to such methods would have been currently includible in
income by a U.S. Holder, with subsequent adjustments to the extent that the
estimate of income was incorrect. In addition, under the 1993 Proposed
Regulations, any gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or
retirement of a contingent payment debt obligation would have been treated
entirely as ordinary interest income and any loss recognized on the sale,
exchange or retirement of a contingent payment debt obligation would have been
treated entirely as a capital loss. However, on January 22, 1993, the United
States Government's Office of Management and Budget announced that certain
proposed regulations which had not yet been published in the Federal Register,
including the 1993 Proposed Regulations, had been withdrawn. It is unclear
whether the 1993 Proposed Regulations will be re-proposed or, if re-proposed,
what effect, if any, such regulations would have on the Notes. Based upon the
foregoing, the continued viability of the 1991 Proposed Regulations is
uncertain. It should also be noted that proposed Treasury regulations are not
binding upon either the IRS or taxpayers prior to becoming effective as
temporary or final regulations. Prospective investors in the Notes are urged to
consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the Proposed
Regulations to their investment in the Notes, if any, and the effect of
possible changes to the Proposed Regulations.
MARKET DISCOUNT AND PREMIUM
If a U.S. Holder purchases a Note for an amount that is less than the Note's
issue price (i.e., the Note's stated principal amount), or, in the case of a
subsequent purchaser, its adjusted issue price as of the purchase date (i.e.,
the Note's stated principal amount increased by any previously accrued original
issue discount), the amount of the difference will be treated as "market
discount," unless such difference is less than a specified de minimis amount
(generally 1/4 of 1% of the Note's adjusted issue price as of the purchase date
multiplied by the number of complete years to maturity from the date the U.S.
Holder purchased such Note).
S-28
Under the market discount rules, a U.S. Holder will be required to treat any
gain realized on the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of a Note
as ordinary income to the extent of the lesser of (i) the amount of such
realized gain or (ii) the market discount which has not previously been
included in income and is treated as having accrued on such Note at the time of
such disposition. Market discount will be considered to accrue ratably during
the period from the date of acquisition to the Note's maturity, unless the U.S.
Holder elects to accrue market discount on the basis of semiannual compounding.
A U.S. Holder may be required to defer the deduction of all or a portion of
the interest paid or accrued on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to
purchase or carry a Note with market discount until the Note's maturity or its
earlier disposition in a taxable transaction, because a current deduction is
only allowed to the extent the interest expense exceeds an allocable portion of
market discount. A U.S. Holder may elect to include market discount in income
currently as it accrues (on either a ratable or semiannual compounding basis),
in which case the rules described above regarding the treatment as ordinary
income of gain upon the disposition of the Note and regarding the deferral of
interest deductions will not apply. Generally, such currently included market
discount is treated as ordinary interest for United States Federal income tax
purposes and a U.S. Holder would increase its tax basis in the Note by the
amount of any such currently included market discount.
A U.S. Holder that purchases a Note for an amount that is greater than its
adjusted issue price as of the purchase date will be considered to have
purchased the Note at an "acquisition premium". The "adjusted issue price" of a
Note equals the sum of the issue price of the Note plus the amount of original
issue discount that has previously accrued with respect to the Note. Under the
acquisition premium rules, the amount of original issue discount which such
U.S. Holder must include in its gross income with respect to such Note for any
taxable year (or portion thereof in which the U.S. Holder holds the Note) will
be reduced (but not below zero) by the portion of the acquisition premium
properly allocable to the period.
If a U.S. Holder purchases a Note for an amount that is greater than its
stated redemption price at maturity (i.e., the sum of the Note's stated
principal amount and the Minimum Supplemental Redemption Amount), such U.S.
Holder will be considered to have purchased the Note with "amortizable bond
premium" equal in amount to such excess. A U.S. Holder may elect to amortize
such premium using a constant yield method over the remaining term of the Note
and may offset interest otherwise required to be included in respect of the
Note during any taxable year by the amortized amount of such excess for the
taxable year. Such election, if made, would apply to all debt instruments held
by the U.S. Holder at the beginning of the taxable year to which such election
applies and to all debt instruments acquired by such U.S. Holder thereafter.
Such election would also be irrevocable once made, unless the U.S. Holder
making such an election obtains the express consent of the IRS to revoke such
election.
Prospective investors in the Notes should be aware, however, that the
application of the market discount and premium rules to the Notes may differ
from the application discussed above in the event that the 1991 Proposed
Regulations are applied to the Notes.
NON-U.S. HOLDERS
A non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to United States Federal income taxes
on payments of principal or interest (including original issue discount, if
any) on a Note, unless such non-U.S. Holder is a direct or indirect 10% or
greater shareholder of the Company, a controlled foreign corporation related to
the Company or a bank receiving interest described in section 881(c)(3)(A) of
the Code. However, income allocable to non-U.S. Holders will generally be
subject to annual tax reporting on IRS Form 1042S. For a non-U.S. Holder to
qualify for the exemption from taxation, the last United States payor in the
chain of payment prior to payment to a non-U.S. Holder (the "Withholding
Agent") must have received in the year in which a payment of interest or
principal occurs, or in either of the two preceding calendar years, a statement
that (i) is signed by the beneficial owner of the Note under penalties of
perjury, (ii) certifies that such owner is not a U.S. Holder and (iii) provides
the name and address of the beneficial owner. The statement may be made on an
IRS Form
S-29
W-8 or a substantially similar form, and the beneficial owner must inform the
Withholding Agent of any change in the information on the statement within 30
days of such change. If a Note is held through a securities clearing
organization or certain other financial institutions, the organization or
institution may provide a signed statement to the Withholding Agent. However,
in such case, the signed statement must be accompanied by a copy of the IRS
Form W-8 or the substitute form provided by the beneficial owner to the
organization or institution. The Treasury Department is considering
implementation of further certification requirements aimed at determining
whether the issuer of a debt obligation is related to holders thereof.
Generally, a non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to Federal income taxes on
any amount which constitutes capital gain upon retirement or disposition of a
Note, provided the gain is not effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business in the United States by the non-U.S. Holder. Certain other
exceptions may be applicable, and a non-U.S. Holder should consult its tax
advisor.
Under current law, a Note will not be includible in the estate of a non-U.S.
Holder unless the individual is a direct or indirect 10% or greater shareholder
of the Company or, at the time of such individual's death, payments in respect
of such Note would have been effectively connected with the conduct by such
individual of a trade or business in the United States. Under the 1991 Proposed
Regulations, however, a portion of the Note equal to the fair market value of
the Contingent Payment may be includible in the gross estate of a nonresident
alien individual for United States Federal estate tax purposes if the 1991
Proposed Regulations were applied to the Notes.
BACKUP WITHHOLDING
Backup withholding of United States Federal income tax at a rate of 31% may
apply to payments made in respect of the Notes to registered owners who are not
"exempt recipients" and who fail to provide certain identifying information
(such as the registered owner's taxpayer identification number) in the required
manner. Generally, individuals are not exempt recipients, whereas corporations
and certain other entities generally are exempt recipients. Payments made in
respect of the Notes to a U.S. Holder must be reported to the IRS, unless the
U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient or establishes an exemption. Compliance with
the identification procedures described in the preceding section would
establish an exemption from backup withholding for those non-U.S. Holders who
are not exempt recipients.
In addition, upon the sale of a Note to (or through) a broker, the broker
must withhold 31% of the entire purchase price, unless either (i) the broker
determines that the seller is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii)
the seller provides, in the required manner, certain identifying information
and, in the case of a non-U.S. Holder, certifies that such seller is a non-U.S.
Holder (and certain other conditions are met). Such a sale must also be
reported by the broker to the IRS, unless either (i) the broker determines that
the seller is an exempt recipient or (ii) the seller certifies its non-U.S.
status (and certain other conditions are met). Certification of the registered
owner's non-U.S. status would be made normally on an IRS Form W-8 under
penalties of perjury, although in certain cases it may be possible to submit
other documentary evidence.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
beneficial owner would be allowed as a refund or a credit against such
beneficial owner's United States Federal income tax provided the required
information is furnished to the IRS.
USE OF PROCEEDS
The net proceeds from the sale of the Securities will be used as described
under "Use of Proceeds" in the attached Prospectus and to hedge market risks
affecting the value of the Supplemental Redemption Amount or Minimum Redemption
Amount. The Company does not intend to confine its hedging activities to any
particular domestic or foreign exchanges.
S-30
UNDERWRITING
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (the "Underwriter") has
agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of the Underwriting Agreement and a
Terms Agreement, to purchase from the Company $100,000,000 aggregate principal
amount of Notes. The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of
the Underwriter are subject to certain conditions precedent and that the
Underwriter will be obligated to purchase all of the Notes if any are
purchased.
The Underwriter has advised the Company that it proposes initially to offer
all or part of the Notes directly to the public at the offering price set forth
on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement and to certain dealers at such
price less a concession not in excess of % of the principal amount of the
Notes. The Underwriter may allow, and such dealers may reallow, a discount not
in excess of % of the principal amount of the Notes to certain other dealers.
After the initial public offering, the public offering price may be changed.
The underwriting of the Securities will conform to the requirements set forth
in the applicable sections of Schedule E to the By-Laws of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
VALIDITY OF SECURITIES
The validity of the Securities will be passed upon for the Company and for
the Underwriter by Brown & Wood, New York, New York.
S-31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR THE PROSPECTUS IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER MADE BY
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE PROSPECTUS, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH IN-
FORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED
BY THE COMPANY OR BY THE UNDERWRITER. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT AND THE PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER AND THEREUNDER SHALL
UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE CREATE AN IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN
THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY SINCE THE DATE HEREOF. THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
AND THE PROSPECTUS DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION BY ANYONE IN ANY
JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED OR IN WHICH
THE PERSON MAKING SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DO SO OR TO
ANYONE TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION.
---------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
PAGE
----
Summary ................................................................... S-3
Special Considerations .................................................... S-7
Recent Developments ....................................................... S-9
Description of Securities ................................................. S-12
The Index ................................................................. S-20
Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations ................... S-24
Use of Proceeds ........................................................... S-30
Underwriting .............................................................. S-31
Validity of Securities .................................................... S-31
PROSPECTUS
Available Information ..................................................... 2
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference ........................... 2
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. ................................................. 3
Use of Proceeds ........................................................... 3
Summary Financial Information ............................................. 4
Description of Debt Securities ............................................ 7
Description of Debt Warrants .............................................. 11
Description of Currency Warrants .......................................... 12
Description of Index Warrants.............................................. 13
Plan of Distribution ...................................................... 18
Experts ................................................................... 18
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOGO
$100,000,000
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
JAPAN INDEX SM
EQUITY PARTICIPATION SECURITIES WITH MINIMUM RETURN PROTECTION DUE JANUARY ,
2000
---------------
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
---------------
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
, 1994
SM "Japan Index" is a service mark of the American Stock Exchange.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRAPHICS APPENDIX LIST
PAGE WHERE
GRAPHIC
APPEARS DESCRIPTION OF GRAPHIC OR CROSS REFERENCE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Graphic No. 1 The graph appearing at S-22 reflects quarter-end
closing values of the Japan Index through
December 29, 1993.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------