Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

Bank of America Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (Check the appropriate box):

Table of Contents

March 18, 2009

Dear Stockholder:

I am pleased to invite you to the Bank of America Corporation 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m., local time, on April 29, 2009, in the Belk Theater of the North Carolina Blumenthal Performing Arts Center, 130 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina. If you are unable to attend, you will be able to listen to the meeting and view our slide presentation over the Internet at http://investor.bankofamerica.com.

Enclosed are a notice of matters to be voted on at the meeting, our proxy statement, a proxy card and our 2008 Annual Report.

Whether or not you plan to attend, please submit a proxy to vote your shares in one of three ways: via Internet, telephone or mail. Instructions regarding Internet and telephone voting are included on the proxy card (or, if applicable, in your electronic delivery notice). If you choose to submit a proxy by mail, please mark, sign and date the proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised as explained in the proxy statement.

If you plan to attend, please bring the admission ticket attached to your proxy card and photo identification. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or other nominee, please bring with you a letter (and a legal proxy if you wish to vote your shares) from the broker or nominee confirming your ownership as of the record date.

Sincerely yours,

Kenneth D. Lewis

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

Table of Contents

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

Bank of America Corporate Center

Charlotte, North Carolina 28255

NOTICE OF 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Stockholder Meeting to be Held on April 29, 2009

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders

are available at http://investor.bankofamerica.com

Webcast of the Annual Meeting: You may listen to a live audiocast of the meeting on our website at http://investor.bankofamerica.com at 10:00 a.m., local time, on April 29, 2009.

Items of Business:

Record Date: You are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting (or any adjournment or postponement thereof) if you were a stockholder of record on March 4, 2009. In accordance with Delaware law, for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, a list of those registered stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection in the office of the Corporate Secretary, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America Plaza, 101 South Tryon Street, NC1-002-29-01, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255. The list also will be available at the Annual Meeting.

Proxy Voting: Your vote is important. Please submit your proxy as soon as possible via either the Internet, telephone or mail.

By order of the Board of Directors:

Alice A. Herald

Deputy General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary

March 18, 2009

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

Bank of America Corporate Center

Charlotte, North Carolina 28255

PROXY STATEMENT

We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Bank of America Corporation for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). In this proxy statement, we refer to the Board of Directors as the “Board” and to Bank of America Corporation as “we,” “us,” “our company,” “Bank of America” or the “Corporation.” This proxy statement is being mailed starting on or about March 18, 2009.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Record Date. Only holders of record at the close of business on March 4, 2009 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Holders of the Corporation’s Common Stock (the “Common Stock”), the 7% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), the Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 1 (the “Series 1 Preferred Stock”), the Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Preferred Stock”), the 6.375% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 3 (the “Series 3 Preferred Stock”), the Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 4 (the “Series 4 Preferred Stock”), the Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 5 (the “Series 5 Preferred Stock”), the 6.70% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series 6 (the “Series 6 Preferred Stock”), the 6.25% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series 7 (the “Series 7 Preferred Stock”), and the 8.625% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series 8 (the “Series 8 Preferred Stock”), vote together without regard to class except as otherwise required by law.

As of the record date of March 4, 2009, there were 6,404,894,551 shares of Common Stock, 7,642 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock, 21,000 shares of the Series 1 Preferred Stock, 37,000 shares of the Series 2 Preferred Stock, 27,000 shares of the Series 3 Preferred Stock, 20,000 shares of the Series 4 Preferred Stock, 50,000 shares of the Series 5 Preferred Stock, 65,000 shares of the Series 6 Preferred Stock, 50,000 shares of the Series 7 Preferred Stock and 89,100 shares of the Series 8 Preferred Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of the Common Stock and Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote. Each share of the Series 1-5 Preferred Stock and Series 8 Preferred Stock is entitled to 150 votes. Each share of the Series 6 and 7 Preferred Stock is entitled to five votes.

Voting By Proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you may submit a proxy to vote your shares via Internet, telephone or mail as more fully described below:

If you properly submit a proxy without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows:

“FOR”:

and “AGAINST” the stockholder proposals regarding:

Table of Contents

If other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons appointed to vote the proxies will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. Such persons also have discretionary authority to vote to adjourn the Annual Meeting, including for the purpose of soliciting proxies to vote in accordance with the Board’s recommendations on any of the above items.

Revoking Your Proxy. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by:

Cost of Proxy Solicitation. We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail or electronic delivery, we also may use some of our associates, who will not be specially compensated, to solicit proxies, either personally or by telephone, facsimile or written or electronic mail. In addition, we have agreed to pay Georgeson Inc. $17,000 and Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC $17,500 plus expenses to assist us in soliciting proxies from banks, brokers and nominees. We also will reimburse banks, brokers and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners.

Quorum Required to Hold the Annual Meeting. In order to hold the Annual Meeting, a quorum consisting of the holders of a majority of the aggregate voting power of the Common Stock and the Series B Preferred Stock, Series 1 Preferred Stock, Series 2 Preferred Stock, Series 3 Preferred Stock, Series 4 Preferred Stock, Series 5 Preferred Stock, Series 6 Preferred Stock, Series 7 Preferred Stock and Series 8 Preferred Stock must be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. For purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum, we intend to count as present shares present in person but not voting and shares for which we have received proxies but for which holders thereof have abstained. Furthermore, shares represented by proxies returned by a broker holding the shares in nominee or “street” name will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, even if the shares are not entitled to be voted on matters where discretionary voting by the broker is not allowed (“broker non-votes”).

Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors. In October 2006, the Board amended our Bylaws to provide that a nominee for director in an uncontested election shall be elected to the Board if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against his or her election. Abstentions from voting, as well as broker non-votes, if any, are not treated as votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on the proposal to elect directors. In a contested election (a situation in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the standard for election of directors will be a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting.

If a nominee who is currently serving as a director is not elected at the Annual Meeting, under Delaware law the director will continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any director who fails to be elected must offer to resign from the Board. The director whose resignation is under consideration will abstain from participating in any decision regarding that resignation. The Corporate Governance Committee and the Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation. The Board will publicly disclose its decision regarding the resignation within 90 days after results of the election are certified. If the resignation is not accepted, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until the director’s successor is elected and qualified. If a nominee who is not

2

Table of Contents

already serving as a director is not elected at the Annual Meeting, under Delaware law that nominee will not become a director and will not serve on the Board as a “holdover director.”

The Board will nominate for re-election only candidates who have tendered irrevocable resignations that will be effective upon: (i) the failure to receive the required vote at the next annual meeting at which they are nominated for re-election; and (ii) Board acceptance of such resignation. In addition, the Board will fill director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender, promptly following their appointment to the Board, the same form of irrevocable resignation.

Votes Required to Adopt Other Proposals. Approval of each of the other proposals requires the votes cast in favor of each such proposal to exceed the votes cast against such proposal. Abstentions from voting, as well as broker non-votes, if any, are not treated as votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on any such proposal.

Voting by Associates. If you participate in The Bank of America 401(k) Plan, The Bank of America 401(k) Plan for Legacy Companies, the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan, the Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. Retirement Accumulation Plan, the Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, the Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. 401(k) Savings & Retirement Plan or the First Republic Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and your plan account is invested in Bank of America Common Stock, you must provide voting instructions to the trustee of the plan (either via the proxy card or by Internet or telephone) in order for the shares represented by your investment to be voted as you instruct. If no voting instructions are received, the trustee of the plan will vote these shares in the same ratio as the shares for which voting instructions have been provided to the trustee. Your voting instructions will be held in strict confidence. If you participate in the Merrill Lynch Employee Stock Purchase Plan, your shares must be voted in order to count. The deadline to cast votes for shares held in the foregoing plans is April 28, 2009 at 8:00 a.m. EST. You will not be able to change your vote after this deadline.

Householding. Unless we have received contrary instructions, we send a single copy of the annual report, proxy statement and notice of annual or special meeting to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if we believe the stockholders are members of the same family. Each stockholder in the household will continue to receive a separate proxy card. This process, known as “householding,” reduces the volume of duplicate information received at your household and helps reduce our expenses.

If you would like to receive your own set of the annual report, proxy statement and notice of annual meeting this year or in future years, follow the instructions described below:

If your shares are registered in your own name, please contact our transfer agent and inform them of your request to revoke householding by calling them at 1.800.642.9855 or writing to them at Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3078. Within 30 days of your revocation, we will send to you individual documents.

If a bank, broker or other nominee holds your shares, please contact your bank, broker or other nominee directly.

If two or more stockholders residing in the same household individually receive copies of the annual report, proxy statement and notice of annual or special meeting and as a household wish to receive only one copy, you may contact our transfer agent at the address and telephone number listed in the preceding paragraph in the case of registered holders, or your bank, broker or other nominee directly if such bank, broker or other nominee holds your shares, and request that householding commence as soon as practicable.

Electronic Delivery. In addition to householding, we can also reduce our expenses if you elect to receive annual reports and proxy materials via the Internet. If you request, you can receive email notifications when these documents are available electronically on the Internet. If you have an account maintained in your name at Computershare Investor Services, you may sign up for this service at www.computershare.com/bac.

Questions. If you hold your shares directly, please call Computershare Trust Company at 1.800.642.9855. If your shares are held in street name, please contact the telephone number provided on your voting instruction form or contact your broker directly.

Rules of Conduct for the Annual Meeting

We anticipate significant stockholder attendance at the Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend, please bring the admission ticket attached to your proxy card and photo identification. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or other nominee, please bring with you a letter (and a legal proxy if you wish to vote your shares) from

3

Table of Contents

the broker or nominee confirming your ownership as of the record date, which is March 4, 2009. Failure to bring such a letter may delay your ability to attend or prevent you from attending the meeting.

A number of stockholders have expressed an interest in speaking at the meeting. The Board appreciates the opportunity to hear the views of stockholders. In fairness to all stockholders and participants at the meeting, and in the interest of an orderly and constructive meeting, rules of conduct will be enforced. Copies of these rules will be available at the meeting. Only stockholders or their valid proxy holders may address the meeting. Depending on the number of stockholders who wish to speak, we cannot assure that every stockholder who wishes to speak will be able to do so for as long as they might want to hold the floor.

Only proposals that meet the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or our Bylaws will be eligible for consideration at the meeting. This year the only proposals that meet the criteria are those set forth in this proxy statement. Therefore, proposals raised at the meeting that are not identified in this proxy statement will not be considered during the Annual Meeting.

Stockholders may submit proposals and other matters for consideration at the 2010 Annual Meeting as described in “Proposals for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” on page 58.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Commitment to Corporate Governance Best Practices

Bank of America’s business and affairs are managed by or under the direction of the Board. In its oversight of Bank of America, the Board sets the tone for the highest ethical standards and performance of our management, associates and the Corporation as a whole. The Board strongly believes that good corporate governance practices are important for successful business performance. Our corporate governance practices are designed to align the interests of the Board and management with those of our stockholders and to promote honesty and integrity throughout Bank of America. Over the past several years, we have enhanced our corporate governance practices in many important ways, and we continually seek out best practices to promote a high level of performance from the Board and management. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that embody long-standing practices of Bank of America as well as current corporate governance best practices. Highlights of our corporate governance practices are described below.

Additional Corporate Governance Information, Committee Charters and Code of Ethics

More corporate governance information about us can be found on our website at http://investor.bankofamerica.com under the heading Corporate Governance. Information available at this website includes our: (i) Certificate of Incorporation; (ii) Bylaws; (iii) Corporate Governance Guidelines (including the Related Person Transactions Policy); (iv) Code of Ethics; (v) charters of each of the committees of the Board; and (vi) Director Independence Categorical Standards. This information is also available in print free of charge upon written request addressed to: Bank of America Corporation, Attention: Shareholder Relations, 101 South Tryon Street, NC1-002-29-01, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255.

The Board of Directors

The basic responsibility of the Board is to oversee the businesses and affairs of Bank of America. Key responsibilities of the Board and its committees include:

4

Table of Contents

Board Evaluation and Education

Each year, the Board and the Audit, Compensation and Benefits and Corporate Governance Committees evaluate their effectiveness. The Board views self-evaluation as an ongoing process designed to achieve high levels of Board and committee performance.

All new directors participate in our orientation program in their first year as a director. This orientation includes presentations by senior management to familiarize new directors with our management, lines of business, strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management matters, compliance programs, conflict policies, Code of Ethics and other policies. Directors receive ongoing continuing education through educational sessions at meetings and periodic mailings between meetings. In addition, all but two of the non-management directors participated in a half-day session on risk management matters in 2008. The session was led by our Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Our Executive Officers, Chief Accounting Officer, General Auditor, certain line of business managers and senior risk and finance officers covered key risks by line of business, market risks, accounting matters and new product and new business governance. Our General Counsel was also in attendance at the session. The Board also encourages directors to participate in continuing education programs and reimburses directors for the expenses of such participation.

Director Independence

The Board is composed at all times of at least a majority of directors who are independent. As described below, the Board has determined that 16 of the Board’s 18 director nominees, or approximately 89%, are independent directors. The Board has adopted categorical standards to assist it in making the annual affirmative determination of each director’s independence status. These Director Independence Categorical Standards (“Categorical Standards”) are attached as Appendix A and posted on our website. A director will be considered “independent” if he or she meets the requirements of the Categorical Standards and the criteria for independence set forth from time to time in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

The Board has evaluated the relationships between each current director (and his or her immediate family members and related interests) and Bank of America and its subsidiaries. The Board has affirmatively determined, upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, that each of the following directors is independent under the Categorical Standards and the NYSE listing standards: William Barnet, III; Frank P. Bramble, Sr.; Virgis W. Colbert; John T. Collins; Gary L. Countryman; Tommy R. Franks; Monica C. Lozano; Walter E. Massey; Thomas J. May; Patricia E. Mitchell; Joseph W. Prueher; Charles O. Rossotti; Thomas M. Ryan; O. Temple Sloan, Jr.; Meredith R. Spangler; Robert L. Tillman; and Jackie M. Ward.

The Board has determined that Charles K. Gifford and Kenneth D. Lewis do not meet the independence standards. Mr. Lewis is our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gifford was employed by Bank of America or a predecessor and receives compensation from the Corporation which exceeds the threshold set forth in the Categorical Standards.

In making its independence determinations, the Board considered that in the ordinary course of business the Corporation and its subsidiaries may provide commercial and investment banking, financial advisory and other services to some of the independent directors, or members of the directors’ families, and to business organizations and individuals associated with them. The Board also considered that in the ordinary course of business some business organizations with which an independent director is, or members of the director’s family are, associated may provide products and services to the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The Board has determined that, based on the information available to the Board, none of these relationships was material.

Board Attendance and Annual Meeting Policy

Directors are expected to attend our annual meeting of stockholders, regular and special meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on which they serve. They are also expected to prepare for meetings in advance and to dedicate the time at each meeting as necessary to properly discharge their responsibilities. Informational materials, useful in preparing for meetings, are distributed in advance of each meeting. In 2008, there were thirteen meetings of the Board, and each of the directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served. In addition, all of the members of the Board, consistent with our policy, attended our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

5

Table of Contents

The Board also encourages directors to participate in board information sessions via telephone conference which were commenced by our management in 2008. During these sessions, which are conducted by our Chief Executive Officer, directors have access to and receive updates from, senior management on the Corporation’s financial condition and lines of business. A total of eight sessions were held in 2008 and included reviews of developing market conditions.

Independent Lead Director

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that an independent Lead Director be elected annually for a one-year term. In 2006, Mr. Sloan was elected by the independent directors to serve as independent Lead Director, and has since been re-elected to serve for additional one-year terms through April 2009.

The independent Lead Director’s duties, which the Board updated in 2008, include:

As independent Lead Director, Mr. Sloan regularly communicates with our Chief Executive Officer on a variety of issues including business strategy and succession planning.

The Board periodically considers its structure and the role and responsibilities of the independent Lead Director to reflect its commitment to corporate governance best practices.

Executive Sessions of the Board

Our non-management directors meet in executive session at each regular Board meeting. Our independent Lead Director chairs these executive sessions. In addition, if at any time the group of non-management directors includes directors who are not independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards, the independent directors will meet separately in executive session at least once a year.

Board Committee Membership and Meetings

During 2008, the Board had five standing committees: Asset Quality; Audit; Compensation and Benefits; Corporate Governance; and Executive. All of the members of the committees are nominated by the Corporate Governance Committee and appointed by the Board.

6

Table of Contents

The table below provides membership information for each of the Board’s committees.

2008/2009 Bank of America Committee Composition

In addition, the Board has made, subject to election of the director nominees by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the following committee assignments to be effective as of the Annual Meeting:

2009/2010 Bank of America Committee Composition

7

Table of Contents

While each committee has its own charter and designated responsibilities, the committees act on behalf of the entire Board and regularly report on their activities to the entire Board. The committee charters are posted on our website and key information about each committee is described below.

Asset Quality Committee. The Asset Quality Committee currently consists of six directors. During 2008, the Committee held six meetings. Duties of the Asset Quality Committee include:

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee currently consists of six directors, all of whom are independent under the NYSE listing standards, the Categorical Standards and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations applicable to audit committees. The Board has determined that all six directors are financially literate in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and Mr. Barnet and Mr. May also qualify as audit committee financial experts under SEC rules. During 2008, the Audit Committee held ten meetings. Duties of the Audit Committee include the following:

Compensation and Benefits Committee. The Compensation and Benefits Committee currently consists of six directors, including our independent Lead Director, all of whom are independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards. During 2008, the Compensation and Benefits Committee held five meetings. Duties of the Committee include:

The Committee may create subcommittees with authority to act on the Committee’s behalf. The Committee has delegated to the Stock Plan Award Subcommittee (which consists of the chairman of the Committee) the Committee’s authority to make awards and determine the terms and conditions of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock awards (both shares and units) under the Bank of America Corporation 2003 Key Associate Stock Plan (the “Key Associate Stock Plan”) that was most recently approved by stockholders in December 2008. However, this delegation of authority does not extend to awards to our executive officers.

8

Table of Contents

The Committee may delegate to management certain of its duties and responsibilities, including with respect to the adoption, amendment, modification or termination of benefit plans and with respect to the awards of stock options under certain stock plans. Significant delegations made by the Committee include the following:

The Committee actively engages in its duties and follows procedures intended to ensure excellence in the governance of our pay-for-performance philosophy:

The form and amount of compensation paid to our non-employee directors is reviewed from time to time by the Committee. Any changes to director compensation are recommended by the Committee to the Board for approval.

Our executive officers are generally not engaged directly with the Committee in setting the amount or form of executive officer or director compensation. However, as part of the annual performance review for our executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee considers the Chief Executive Officer’s perspective on each executive officer’s individual performance and compensation as well as the performance of our various business segments and lines of business. As discussed in the Compensation and Discussion Analysis beginning on page 21, in light of the extraordinary economic environment that evolved in 2008, year-end compensation decisions for all of our executive officers were made by the full Board, excluding Mr. Lewis, and were based, in part, on the recommendation of Mr. Lewis.

The Committee uses the services of a compensation consultant to assist it in performing its duties. The Committee has the sole authority and responsibility under its charter to approve the engagement of any compensation consultant. The consultant must have no relationship with us that would interfere with its ability to provide independent advice. The Committee reviews any relationships between management and the consultant, as well as the amount of work performed for us by the consultant in areas other than executive officer and director compensation. If the compensation consultant provides services to us other than in connection with the evaluation of director, chief executive officer or executive officer compensation and benefits, the Committee will approve the annual amount of aggregate fees permitted for such other services.

9

Table of Contents

The Committee retained Frederic W. Cook & Company (“Cook”) for matters relating to 2008 executive and director compensation. Cook’s business is limited to providing independent executive and director compensation consulting services to its clients. It does not provide any other management or human resources-related services. The Committee asked Cook to provide it with external market and performance comparisons and to advise it with respect to executive officer and Chief Executive Officer compensation. Towers Perrin, the Committee’s compensation consultant for 2007 executive compensation decisioning, provided the Committee with some preliminary analysis of 2008 executive compensation levels early in the year. Due to the extraordinary economic environment that evolved in 2008, that early analysis ultimately was not a factor in our 2008 compensation decisions.

Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of six directors, including our independent Lead Director, all of whom are independent under the NYSE listing standards and the Categorical Standards. During 2008, the Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings. Duties of the Corporate Governance Committee include:

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee currently consists of five directors, including our independent Lead Director. During 2008, the Executive Committee held six meetings although it has only one regularly scheduled meeting per year. The Executive Committee has the power to act on behalf of the Board between regular Board meetings. The Executive Committee reports its actions to the full Board at the next regular meeting.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating candidates and recommending proposed director nominees to the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates proposed or suggested by Board members, management, third party search firms retained by the Corporate Governance Committee and stockholders. The Corporate Governance Committee follows the same process and uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates whether proposed by Board members, management, third party search firms or stockholders.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the standards for evaluating candidates as director nominees. The Corporate Governance Committee and the Board consider the overall experience and expertise represented by the Board as well as the qualification of each candidate. Specifically, the standards for evaluating candidates are as follows:

10

Table of Contents

In addition, a director who has reached the age of 72 will not be nominated for election to the Board. A director who changes his or her principal occupation shall offer to resign, and the Corporate Governance Committee, along with the Chairman of the Board, will determine whether to accept such resignation. Management directors will resign from the Board when they leave their executive officer positions.

Any stockholder recommending a candidate to be considered by the Corporate Governance Committee for nomination at an annual meeting of stockholders must submit the proposal in writing by no later than October 15^th of the preceding year. The proposal must include the following:

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board shall nominate for election or re-election as directors only candidates who agree to tender, following the annual meeting at which they are elected or re-elected as directors, irrevocable resignations that will be effective upon: (i) the failure to receive the required vote at the next annual meeting at which they are nominated for re-election; and (ii) Board acceptance of such resignation. In addition, the Board shall fill director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender, promptly following their appointment to the Board, the same form of irrevocable resignation tendered by other directors in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Communications with the Board of Directors

The Board has established a process for stockholders and other interested parties to communicate with the Board, any director (including the independent Lead Director), non-management members of the Board as a group or any Board committee. Parties may send a letter to Bank of America Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 101 South Tryon Street, NC1-002-29-01, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255. For further information, refer to “Contact the Board” on our website.

Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and associates, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. The Code of Ethics embodies our commitment to the highest standards of ethical and professional conduct. All directors, officers and associates are required to annually certify that they have read and complied with the Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics consists of basic standards of business practice as well as professional and personal conduct. We intend to post any amendments to the Code of Ethics, or waivers thereof (to the extent applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Chief Accounting Officer), on our website.

Charitable Giving and Political Contributions

The Board annually reviews a report on our charitable giving and political contribution programs. Information regarding our policy on political contributions and activities can be found in our “Corporate Political Contributions Policy Statement” on our website.

11

Table of Contents

Director Compensation

Mr. Lewis is our sole employee director and he does not receive any compensation for his services as a director. We provide the following elements of annual compensation for our non-employee directors:

Non-employee directors who begin their Board service mid-year receive a pro-rata portion of the annual compensation.

The annual restricted stock award is provided under the Bank of America Corporation Directors’ Stock Plan (the “Directors’ Stock Plan”) and is subject to a one-year vesting requirement. The number of shares awarded equals the dollar value of the award divided by the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date, rounded down to the next whole share, with cash payable for any fractional share.

Non-employee directors can elect to defer any or all of their compensation through the Bank of America Corporation Director Deferral Plan (the “Director Deferral Plan”). If a director elects to defer their annual restricted stock award, we credit a “stock account” with a number of whole and fractional “stock units” of equal value, with each stock unit having the same value as our Common Stock. These stock units are subject to the same one-year vesting requirement that applies under the Directors’ Stock Plan. Directors can choose to defer their annual cash award, as well as any independent Lead Director or committee chairman retainers, into the stock account or a “cash account.” We credit the stock account with dividend equivalents in the form of additional stock units and credit the cash account with interest at a long-term bond rate. Following retirement from the Board, a non-employee director receives the balances of his or her stock account (to the extent vested) and cash account in a single lump sum cash payment or in 5 or 10 annual cash installments per the director’s prior election. Because stock units are not actual shares of our Common Stock, they do not have any voting rights.

The following table presents the compensation we paid, accrued or expensed with respect to our non-employee directors for their services in 2008:

12

Table of Contents

This column does not include any such cash awards that were deferred under the Director Deferral Plan into a director’s stock account. Those amounts are instead reflected in the “2008 Stock Awards” column.

13

Table of Contents

In consideration for his consulting services and other agreements, Mr. Gifford receives: (i) a $50,000 retainer for each of the first five years of the Retirement Agreement; (ii) use of company-provided aircraft for up to 120 hours per year for each of the first five years of the Retirement Agreement and up to 100 hours per year for any additional year the Retirement Agreement remains in effect thereafter; and (iii) office space (for as long as he requests) and secretarial support (for the first five years of the Retirement Agreement, renewable annually thereafter) that is both reasonable and appropriate in size and scope.

For 2008, the value of these benefits equaled the following: (i) $50,000 in consulting fees; (ii) $947,682 in aircraft usage (which is the amount paid to a third party vendor); and (iii) $225,031 in office and administrative support. In addition, we paid Mr. Gifford a tax gross-up in the amount of $281,307 related to his use of company-provided aircraft. We did this because in 2006 we began imputing income for personal use of company-provided aircraft using a third-party “charter” value, rather than the more common IRS-approved Standard Industry Fare Level (SIFL). By changing to the charter value, we made it more expensive for our executive officers to use company-provided aircraft for personal travel. However, this change also made the aircraft usage for Mr. Gifford more expensive, which was not the intent when the Retirement Agreement was originally entered into. The tax gross-up represents the difference in the taxes Mr. Gifford is required to pay using charter values versus what he would have had to pay had we continued using SIFL values.

Upon his retirement as an associate, Mr. Gifford became entitled to receive compensation as a non-employee director as more fully described above.

Stock Ownership Requirements for Directors. We have formal stock ownership requirements that apply to our non-employee directors. Under these requirements, each non-employee director is required to own and hold a minimum of 10,000 shares of our Common Stock. All full value shares beneficially owned are included in the calculation. New non-employee directors have up to five years to achieve compliance. All non-employee directors who have served on the Board for at least five years comply with our requirements. Non-employee directors cannot sell the restricted stock they receive as compensation (except as necessary to pay taxes upon vesting) until termination of their service.

ITEM 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board has nominated each of the following individuals for election at the Annual Meeting. Each director elected will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders when his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal. If any nominee is unable to stand for election for any reason, the persons appointed to vote the proxies may vote at the Annual Meeting for another person proposed by the Board, or the number of directors constituting the Board may be reduced. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 15, 2008, as amended, between Bank of America and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”), we agreed to expand the Board and appoint three additional directors from among the directors serving on the Merrill Lynch board of directors immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition. As a result, in January 2009, the Corporate Governance Committee recommended the appointment of, and the Board appointed, the following former Merrill Lynch directors to the Board: Virgis W. Colbert; Retired Admiral Joseph W. Prueher; and Charles O. Rossotti.

14

Table of Contents

The Nominees

Set forth below are each nominee’s name, principal occupation and five year business history.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” all of the nominees listed below for election as directors (Item 1 on the proxy card).

		WILLIAM BARNET, III (66), Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Barnet Company, Spartanburg, South Carolina, a real estate and other investments firm. He has been in his present position since 2001 and has been President of Barnet Development Corporation, a real estate investment firm, since 1990. He has also served as Chairman of William Barnet & Son, LLC, a synthetic fiber processing company, from 2001 to 2006, and served as Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2001. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of William Barnet & Son, Inc. from 1976 to 2000. He has been the Mayor of Spartanburg, South Carolina since 2002. He has been a director of the Corporation since April 2004 and is a member of the Audit Committee. He also serves as a director of Duke Energy Corporation.
		FRANK P. BRAMBLE, SR. (60), Former Executive Officer, MBNA Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware. He served as an advisor to the Executive Committee of MBNA Corporation, a financial services company, from April 2005 to December 2005 when it was acquired by the Corporation. Prior to that time, he had served as Vice Chairman of MBNA from July 2002 to April 2005. He also served as a director of Allfirst Financial, Inc. and Allfirst Bank from April 1994 to May 2002, and from December 1999 to May 2002 as Chairman of the Board. He has been a director of the Corporation since January 2006 and is a member of the Asset Quality Committee.
		VIRGIS W. COLBERT (69), Senior Advisor, MillerCoors Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a brewing company. He served as Miller Brewing Company’s Executive Vice President of Worldwide Operations from 1997 to 2005; Senior Vice President and Vice President of Operations from 1993 to 1997; and also held other key leadership positions at Miller Brewing Company since 1979. He is Chairman Emeritus of the Thurgood Marshall College Fund and former Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Fisk University. He has been a director of the Corporation since January 2009 and is a member of the Asset Quality Committee. He also serves as a director of Lorillard, Inc., The Manitowoc Company, Inc., Sara Lee Corporation and The Stanley Works.
		JOHN T. COLLINS (62), Chief Executive Officer, The Collins Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, a venture capital, private equity investments and management firm. He has been in his present position since 1995. He has been a director of the Corporation since April 2004 and is a member of the Audit Committee.
		GARY L. COUNTRYMAN (69), Chairman Emeritus and Director, Liberty Mutual Group, Boston, Massachusetts, an international and property and casualty insurance company. He served as Chairman of Liberty Mutual Group from 1986 to 2000. He also served as Chief Executive Officer from 1986 to 1998. He has been a director of the Corporation since April 2004 and is a member of the Compensation and Benefits, Corporate Governance and Executive Committees. He also serves as trustee of NSTAR and a director of CBS Corporation.
		TOMMY R. FRANKS (63), Retired General, United States Army, Roosevelt, Oklahoma. General Franks has operated Franks & Associates, LLC, a private consulting firm, since 2003. He served in the United States Army from 1965 to 2003. In August 2003, he retired as a four star general. He has been a director of the Corporation since January 2006 and is a member of the Audit Committee.

15

Table of Contents

		CHARLES K. GIFFORD (66), Former Chairman, Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina. He served as Chairman of the Corporation from April 2004 until January 2005. Prior to that time, he had served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FleetBoston since 2002. He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of FleetBoston from 2001 to 2002 and President and Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2001. He has been a director of the Corporation since April 2004 and is a member of the Asset Quality and Executive Committees. He also serves as a trustee of NSTAR and a director of CBS Corporation.
		KENNETH D. LEWIS (61), Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina. He has served as Chief Executive Officer since April 2001, President since July 2004 and Chairman since February 2005. He previously served as Chairman from April 2001 to April 2004 and President from January 1999 to April 2004. He also served as Chief Operating Officer from October 1999 to April 2001. He also serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of Bank of America, N.A. and as Chairman and a director of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. He has been a director of the Corporation since 1999 and is a member of the Executive Committee.
		MONICA C. LOZANO (52), Publisher and Chief Executive Officer, La Opinion, Los Angeles, California, the largest Spanish-language newspaper in the United States. She has been in her present position since January 2004. In addition, she has served as Senior Vice President of ImpreMedia, LLC, the parent of La Opinion, since January 2004. From 2000 to 2004, Ms. Lozano served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Lozano Enterprises. She also served as a member of the Board of Regents of the University of California since December 2001 and as trustee of the University of Southern California since 1991. She has been a director of the Corporation since April 2006 and is a member of the Asset Quality Committee. She also serves as a director of The Walt Disney Company.
		WALTER E. MASSEY (70), President Emeritus, Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia. He served as President of Morehouse College from August 1995 to June 2007. He has been a director of the Corporation since 1998 and is a member of the Audit Committee. He also serves as a director of McDonald’s Corporation.
		THOMAS J. MAY (61), Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, NSTAR, Boston, Massachusetts, an energy utility company. He has served as President of NSTAR and its subsidiaries since 2002 and as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee since 1999. He has been a director of the Corporation since April 2004 and is chairman of the Audit Committee.
		PATRICIA E. MITCHELL (66), President and Chief Executive Officer, The Paley Center for Media, New York, New York, a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing the understanding of the media. She has served in her present position since March 2006. Prior to that time, she had served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Public Broadcasting Service, a private non-profit media enterprise, from March 2000 to March 2006. She also has served as President of CNN Productions and Time Inc. Television, a division of Time Warner, Inc. She has been a director of the Corporation since 2001 and is a member of the Compensation and Benefits and Corporate Governance Committees. She also serves as a director of SunMicro Systems Incorporated.

16

Table of Contents

		JOSEPH W. PRUEHER (66), Retired Admiral, United States Navy, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Admiral Prueher has served as a Consulting Professor at the Stanford University Center for International Security and Cooperation since 2001 and as a Senior Advisor at the Preventive Defense Project since 2001. He served as United States Ambassador to the People’s Republic of China from 1999 to 2001. He also served in the United States Navy from 1964 to 1999 and last served as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Pacific Command. He has been a director of the Corporation since January 2009 and is a member of the Audit Committee. He also serves as a director of DynCorp International, Emerson Electric Co., Fluor Corporation and New York Life Insurance Company.
		CHARLES O. ROSSOTTI (68), Senior Advisor, The Carlyle Group, Washington D.C., a private global investment firm. He has served in his present position since 2003. From 1997 to 2002, he served as Commissioner of Internal Revenue of the Internal Revenue Service. In 1970, he co-founded American Management Systems, Inc., an international business and information technology consulting firm, and served at various times as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board until 1997. He has been a director of the Corporation since January 2009 and is a member of the Compensation and Benefits and Corporate Governance Committees. He also serves as a director of The AES Corporation.
		THOMAS M. RYAN (56), Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, CVS/Caremark Corporation, Woonsocket, Rhode Island, an integrated provider of pharmacy and related healthcare services. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since May 1998 and as Chairman since April 1999. He has been a director of the Corporation since April 2004 and is chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation and Benefits Committee. He also serves as a director of Yum! Brands, Inc.
		O. TEMPLE SLOAN, JR. (70), Chairman, General Parts International, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, a distributor of automotive replacement parts. He has served in his present position since 1961. From 1961 to December 2008, he also served as Chief Executive Officer. He has been a director of the Corporation since 1996. He is the Corporation’s independent Lead Director and is chairman of the Compensation and Benefits and Executive Committees and a member of the Corporate Governance Committee. He also serves as Chairman of the Board of Highwoods Properties, Inc. and as a director of Lowe’s Companies, Inc.
		ROBERT L. TILLMAN (65), Former Chairman and CEO Emeritus, Lowe’s Companies, Inc., Mooresville, North Carolina, a home improvement retailer. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. from January 1998 until January 2005. He has been a director of the Corporation since April 2005 and is a member of the Asset Quality and Executive Committees.
		JACKIE M. WARD (70), Retired Chairman/CEO, Computer Generation, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, a telecommunications software company. She served as Chairman of Computer Generation Inc., from May 2000 to December 2000 and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from October 1968 to May 2000. She has been a director of the Corporation since 1994 and is chairman of the Asset Quality Committee. She also serves as a director of Flowers Foods, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation, SYSCO Corporation and Wellpoint, Inc.

17

Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP

As of December 31, 2008, we had two classes of voting securities, Common Stock and Series B Preferred Stock. Effective January 1, 2009 with the Merrill Lynch acquisition, eight additional classes of voting preferred stock were added. Our classes of voting securities are the Common stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series 1 Preferred Stock, Series 2 Preferred Stock, Series 3 Preferred Stock, Series 4 Preferred Stock, Series 5 Preferred Stock, Series 6 Preferred Stock, Series 7 Preferred Stock and Series 8 Preferred Stock. As of February 9, 2009, we did not know of any person who beneficially owned 5% or more of the Common Stock or the Series 1-8 Preferred Stock (collectively, along with the Series B Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”). The following table sets forth as of February 9, 2009, information regarding the sole holder known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the Series B Preferred Stock.

The following table sets forth information as of February 9, 2009, with respect to the beneficial ownership of Common Stock by: (i) each director and nominee for director; (ii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table; and (iii) all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group. As of February 9, 2009, no director, nominee or executive officer of the Corporation owned any shares of the Preferred Stock other than as disclosed below.

18

Table of Contents

19

Table of Contents

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and some of our officers to file reports with the SEC indicating their holdings of, and transactions in, our equity securities. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports we received, and written representations from the reporting persons, we believe that, during 2008, our reporting persons complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements, except that, due to an administrative error on the part of the Corporation, a late Form 4 was filed on behalf of Mr. Lewis to report the purchase of 86,000 shares of 8.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series H, and 3,714 restricted stock units were inadvertently omitted from a Form 3 filed on behalf of Mr. Rosato.

COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation and Benefits Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis that immediately follows this report. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and Benefits Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Corporation is participating in the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) established by the United States Department of the Treasury under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.

As required by the TARP, the Compensation and Benefits Committee certifies that it has reviewed with our senior risk officers the TARP Senior Executive Officer incentive compensation arrangements for 2008 and has made rea-

20

Table of Contents

sonable efforts to ensure that such arrangements do not encourage our TARP Senior Executive Officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of our company. See “Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP)” on page 25 for additional information concerning our TARP Senior Executive Officers.

Submitted by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board:

O. Temple Sloan, Jr., Chairman*

Patricia E. Mitchell*

Thomas M. Ryan*

Meredith R. Spangler*

Gary L. Countryman**

Charles O. Rossotti**

 *Member of the Committee throughout all of 2008 and through the February 26, 2009 Committee meeting at which this Report was approved, and involved in all deliberations and actions of the Committee during and with respect to 2008.

**Member of the Committee effective January 28, 2009. Accordingly, Messrs. Countryman and Rossotti did not participate in any deliberations or actions of the Committee before that date, including Committee actions with respect to compensation decisions for 2008 and the Committee’s review of the TARP Senior Executive Officer incentive compensation arrangements for 2008.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

Although we were one of the few major financial institutions to be profitable for 2008, our results did not meet our expectations. Therefore, consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, Mr. Lewis recommended that no year-end compensation be paid to him or any other executive officer.

The Board of Directors reviewed our 2008 performance and after careful consideration of Mr. Lewis’ recommendation, ultimately concluded that no year-end cash or equity incentive compensation should be awarded to Mr. Lewis or any other executive officer for 2008, including the named executive officers whose compensation is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 27.

Overview of 2008 Executive Compensation Program

We operate a large, global financial services business in a very competitive environment. There are many challenges inherent in running a business of our size and scope. To best meet these challenges, we have designed our executive compensation program to attract and retain the highest quality executive officers and directly link pay to our performance. This pay-for-performance philosophy results in a compensation program that aligns our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders, provides pay that varies depending on performance and can be easily understood by our stockholders.

The key compensation element for our executive officers is an opportunity to earn a year-end incentive award based on our performance. The Compensation and Benefits Committee may, in its discretion, provide this award in a mix of cash incentive, restricted stock and stock option awards. Historically, the Committee has delivered most of the year-end incentive award in a balanced mix of restricted stock and stock options because stock ownership is the simplest, most direct way to align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders.

The Compensation and Benefits Committee determines these year-end incentive awards in the exercise of its informed discretion without formulas or weightings. The Committee places the greatest emphasis on company-wide financial performance, with a particular focus on operating earnings, operating earnings per share, total stockholder return and revenue as collectively the best indicators of our financial performance. The Committee gen- erally reviews growth in these measures over one-year and multi-year periods. The Committee may also consider the financial performance of individual lines of business and other factors such as quality and sustainability of earnings and successful implementation of strategic initiatives.

21

Table of Contents

Our executive officers also receive base salary in order to have a level of predictable income. Base salary forms only a minor part of the total compensation opportunity. The Compensation and Benefits Committee establishes the base salary levels for our executive officers to reflect each executive officer’s scope of responsibility and accountability within the company and to be part of a competitive total compensation package.

Historically, the Compensation and Benefits Committee took into account compensation practices and financial performance at a group of leading U.S. financial services companies when deciding base salary levels and year-end compensation awards for our executive officers. Review of competitor compensation practices and financial performance is by necessity a backwards looking exercise, based on data from prior years. The extraordinary economic environment experienced in the financial services industry during 2008 caused such historic competitor data to become less relevant and was therefore not considered in making 2008 executive compensation decisions.

Prior to 2008, our practice was to establish a target total compensation package for each executive officer at the beginning of each year comprised of base salary and year-end cash incentive, restricted stock and stock option target awards. However, due to the extraordinary economic environment during 2008, the target total compensation packages established at the beginning of 2008 ultimately were not a factor in our 2008 compensation decisions.

Pay-for-Performance Features of Our Program

Our year-end compensation decisions over the last several years most clearly illustrate the direct linkage between our executive officers’ pay and our company’s performance. For 2006, our company achieved good performance results, and accordingly the total compensation awards for our executive officers approximated target levels. For 2007, we awarded compensation for our executive officers significantly below target levels based on our performance. And as discussed more fully below, our executive officers received no year-end cash or equity compensation awards for 2008 as a result of our company’s performance.

Many of our program’s unique features further demonstrate the commitment to our pay-for-performance philosophy.

Conditions of Stock Ownership

Severance and SERPs

22

Table of Contents

Option Grant Practices

Recoupment Policies

Our 2008 Compensation Decisions

One of the Compensation and Benefits Committee’s primary responsibilities is to review our performance and approve the compensation of our executive officers, and subject to further approval by the Board, our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation. However, in light of the extraordinary economic environment that evolved during 2008, the 2008 year-end compensation decisions for all of the executive officers were made by the full Board, excluding Mr. Lewis. Salary and all other elements of compensation actually paid for 2008 and reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 27 were approved by the Compensation and Benefits Committee.

Our executive officers are not engaged directly with the Committee in setting the amount or form of executive officer compensation. However, as part of the annual performance review for our executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee considers the Chief Executive Officer’s perspective on each executive officer’s individual performance and compensation as well as the performance of our various business segments and lines of business.

The full Board, excluding Mr. Lewis, reviewed our financial performance for 2008. The Board also considered the recommendation of Mr. Lewis that no year-end compensation be awarded to him or any other executive officer.

Even with the exceptional challenges presented by the economic environment, we were one of the few major financial institutions to be profitable for 2008. We also made progress on a number of projects during 2008 that we expect will create value for our company in future years. We acquired both Countrywide and Merrill Lynch, in addition to completing a highly successful transition at LaSalle.

Regardless of our profitability and continued progress and growth, our performance for 2008 did not meet our expectations, including a loss for the fourth quarter.

Based on these results and Mr. Lewis’ recommendation, and given the pay-for-performance directive of our executive compensation program, the Board, after careful consideration and deliberation, ultimately determined that no year-end cash incentive, restricted stock or stock option awards should be awarded to Mr. Lewis or any other executive officer for 2008 performance.

23

Table of Contents

The following chart shows the results of these compensation decisions:

Compensation Decisions For Performance Year 2008

The 2008 row in the Summary Compensation Table on page 27 shows amounts expensed in the financial statements during 2008 for restricted stock and stock option awards made for performance in 2005, 2006 and 2007. Therefore, none of the equity amounts in the Summary Compensation Table reflect compensation decisions for performance in 2008.

Our Other Compensation Practices

Other Elements of Compensation

The other elements of our executive compensation program are as follows:

Retirement Benefits

Executive officers participate in our various employee benefit plans designed to provide retirement income. Our qualified and nonqualified pension plans provide a retirement income base, and our qualified and nonqualified 401(k) plans permit additional retirement savings. To encourage retirement savings under the qualified and nonqualified 401(k) plans, we provide an employer matching contribution.

We limit eligible compensation for earning benefits under the qualified and nonqualified pension plans and for employer matching contributions under the qualified and nonqualified 401(k) plans to the first $250,000 in annual cash compensation. As a result, the Compensation and Benefits Committee’s decisions to grant annual performance-based cash incentive, restricted stock and stock option awards do not create any additional retirement benefits earned under these plans.

Our executive officers do not earn additional retirement income under any SERPs. We believe that our executive officers should be able to provide for their retirement needs from the compensation they earn based on our performance.

24

Table of Contents

For more information about these plans, see “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” on pages 36 and 38 respectively.

Perquisites and Other Fringe Benefits

Our executive officers receive health and welfare benefits, such as group medical, group life and long-term disability coverage, under plans generally available to all other United States-based salaried associates. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, we provide very few executive fringe benefits. Because we have internal expertise on tax and financial planning matters, we make those services available at no cost to our executive officers for their personal tax and financial planning needs. We also provide our executive officers with secured parking and home security systems. Our executive officers have access to our corporate aircraft on a limited basis for personal travel pursuant to company guidelines.

Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP)

We are participating in the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) established by the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury Department”) under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.

TARP requires the Compensation and Benefits Committee to identify our senior executive officers and review their incentive compensation arrangements with our senior risk officers to ensure that the arrangements do not encourage the senior executive officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of our company. Our named executive officers who were senior executive officers under TARP for 2008 were Mr. Lewis, Mr. Price, Ms. Desoer and Mr. McGee (collectively, the “TARP Senior Executive Officers”).

As required by TARP, the Compensation and Benefits Committee has certified that it has reviewed with our senior risk officers the TARP Senior Executive Officer incentive compensation arrangements for 2008 and has made reasonable efforts to ensure that such arrangements do not encourage our TARP Senior Executive Officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of our company. See “Compensation and Benefits Committee Report” on page 20 for the Compensation and Benefits Committee’s certification.

Participation in TARP also requires certain limitations on executive compensation during the period that the Treasury Department holds a debt or equity interest in our company. The material features of these executive compensation limits applicable to the TARP Senior Executive Officers as of the printing of this proxy, are as follows:

25

Table of Contents

On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which includes additional restrictions on executive compensation applicable to companies participating in the TARP, was signed into law by President Obama. This law will provide further restrictions on the amount and type of compensation we pay to our executive officers and certain other highly compensated employees; however, the details of those restrictions will not be known until the Treasury Department proposes and finalizes regulations to effectuate the law.

Recoupment Policy

In addition to the recoupment requirements described above as a result of our participation in TARP, if our Board or an appropriate Board committee has determined that any fraud or intentional misconduct by one or more executive officers caused us, directly or indirectly, to restate our financial statements, the Board or committee will take, in its sole discretion, such action as it deems necessary to remedy the misconduct and prevent its recurrence. The Board or committee may require reimbursement of any bonus or incentive compensation awarded to such officers or cancel unvested restricted stock or outstanding stock option awards previously granted to such officers in the amount by which such compensation exceeded any lower payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results.

Timing of Equity Grants

Awards of restricted stock and stock options to executive officers and other eligible key associates are made on a regular award date each year shortly after the end of the applicable performance year. This is the same date that we pay cash incentive awards for the performance year, and is scheduled to give us sufficient time to complete all performance reviews and obtain all necessary approvals. For the past few years, the award date has been February 15, or the immediately preceding business day if February 15 is not a business day.

We occasionally make awards of restricted stock or stock options other than on the regular annual award date, usually in connection with hiring a new key associate or awards under annual performance plans that follow a different timing cycle. We make these awards on the first day of the calendar month following approval, which for newly hired associates is on or after their actual hire date.

Formal approval for awards is obtained prior to the grant dates. We do not coordinate the timing of our awards with the release of material non-public information. The exercise price for the stock options equals the closing price of our Common Stock for the grant date.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1,000,000, but excludes “performance-based compensation” from this limit.

Cash incentive compensation and restricted stock awards are provided under the stockholder-approved Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EIC Plan). Under the EIC Plan’s compensation formula, participating executive officers may receive maximum deductible incentive compensation for a year up to 0.20% of our net income for that year. Under the EIC Plan, the Compensation and Benefits Committee can determine to make all or any portion of the annual incentive award in the form of a restricted stock award under our Key Associate Stock Plan.

In addition, compensation realized by our executive officers through the exercise of stock options should be fully deductible to us as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m).

TARP imposes additional requirements under Code Section 162(m). For certain “covered executives” for purposes of Code Section 162(m)(5), during the period that the Treasury Department holds a debt or equity interest in our company, we cannot deduct annual compensation for the covered executives in excess of $500,000. The “performance-based exception” does not apply to this TARP-related deduction limit.

Some compensation payable to our executive officers for 2008 exceeds the applicable Section 162(m) deduction limit. All compensation decisions for our executive officers are made with full consideration of the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) implications.

26

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table. The following table shows compensation paid, accrued or expensed with respect to our named executive officers during the year indicated:

Summary Compensation Table ⁽¹⁾

The grant date fair value of restricted stock awards expensed in 2008 was based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the applicable grant date. The grant date fair value of stock option awards expensed in 2008 was determined based on the assumptions in the following chart:

27

Table of Contents

The “Change in Pension Value” equals the change in the actuarial present value of all pension benefits from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008. For this purpose, in accordance with SEC rules, the present value was determined using the same assumptions applicable for valuing pension benefits for purposes of our financial statements. See “Pension Benefits” on page 36.

Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, the named executive officers are not accruing significant additional pension benefits. This is because pension benefits accrue on no more than the first $250,000 of compensation.

The amounts listed above under “Change in Pension Value” for Mr. Lewis and Ms. Desoer result primarily because they have frozen annuity benefits under a prior supplemental executive retirement plan. These frozen

28

Table of Contents

benefits are an annual annuity payment beginning at age 60 (or later for retirement after age 60). The amount of this annuity payment has been unchanged for each executive officer since the applicable freeze date. However, the lump sum value of the frozen annuity amount will increase each year based on the passage of time (i.e., the time-value of money) because the executive officer is one year closer to his retirement age when payment of the annuity is scheduled to commence. Under the MBNA SERP, Mr. Hammonds’ benefits are also expressed as an annuity beginning at age 60. However, the MBNA SERP does not provide for any actuarial increase in the amount of the annual annuity payments for retirement after age 60.