10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on November 13, 2000
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2000
------------------
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-7182
------
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 13-2740599
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4 WORLD FINANCIAL CENTER
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10080
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 449-1000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
805,326,290 shares of Common Stock and 4,770,616 Exchangeable Shares as of the
close of business on November 3, 2000. The Exchangeable Shares, which were
issued by Merrill Lynch & Co., Canada Ltd. in connection with the merger with
Midland Walwyn Inc., are exchangeable at any time into Common Stock on a
one-for-one basis and entitle holders to dividend, voting, and other rights
equivalent to Common Stock.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
-----------------------------
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
- -----------------------------
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
4
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
SEPTEMBER 29, 2000
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Merrill Lynch &
Co., Inc. ("ML & Co.") and subsidiaries (collectively, "Merrill Lynch"). All
material intercompany balances have been eliminated. The December 31, 1999
unaudited consolidated balance sheet was derived from the audited financial
statements, as restated for the pooling-of-interests (See Note 2). The interim
consolidated financial statements for the three- and nine-month periods are
unaudited; however, in the opinion of Merrill Lynch management, all adjustments
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations have been included.
These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited financial statements included in Merrill Lynch's Annual Report included
as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. The nature of
Merrill Lynch's business is such that the results of any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications
have also been made to prior period financial statements, where appropriate, to
conform to the current period presentation.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 2. MERGER WITH HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 14, 2000, Merrill Lynch acquired Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc. ("Herzog"),
a leading Nasdaq market maker, through an exchange offer followed by a merger of
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc, with and into Herzog.
Pursuant to the offer and the merger, each Herzog shareholder, after giving
effect to the two-for-one common stock split, was entitled to receive 283.75502
shares of ML & Co. common stock for each share held. A total of 17,100,602
shares of ML & Co. common stock were issued in connection with this transaction.
In addition, as specified in the merger agreement, Herzog treasury shares
(2,449,090 shares of ML & Co. common stock) were cancelled and retired upon
consummation of the merger.
The merger has been accounted for as a pooling-of-interests, and accordingly,
prior period financial statements and footnotes have been restated to reflect
the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows as if Merrill
Lynch and Herzog had always been combined. The effect of combining Herzog into
the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of Merrill Lynch
was not material.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 3. COMMON STOCK SPLIT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 18, 2000, Merrill Lynch's Board of Directors declared a two-for-one
common stock split, effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. The new
shares were distributed on August 31, 2000 to stockholders of record on August
4, 2000. The par value of ML & Co. common stock remained at $1.33 1/3 per share.
Accordingly, an adjustment totaling $680 from Paid-in-capital to Common stock
and Exchangeable shares was required to preserve the par value of the post-split
shares. All share and per share data in these financial statements have been
restated for the effect of the split.
7
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 4. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short-term borrowings at September 29, 2000 and December 31, 1999 are presented
below:
8
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 5. SEGMENT INFORMATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In reporting to management, Merrill Lynch's operating results are categorized
into three business segments: the Corporate and Institutional Client Group
("CICG"), the Private Client Group ("PCG") and Merrill Lynch Investment Managers
("MLIM"). Prior period amounts have been restated to conform to the current
period presentation. For information on each segment's activities, see
Management's Discussion and Analysis - Business Segments and the 1999 Annual
Report included as an exhibit to Form 10-K.
Operating results by business segment follow:
(a) Represents the elimination of intersegment revenues.
(b) Management views interest income net of interest expense in evaluating
results.
(c) Represents costs associated with the acquisition of Mercury Asset Management
Group.
(d) Represents goodwill amortization of $52 million, net of elimination of
intersegment expenses of $37 million.
9
(a) Represents the elimination of intersegment revenues.
(b) Management views interest income net of interest expense in evaluating
results.
(c) Represents costs associated with the acquisition of Mercury Asset Management
Group.
(d) Represents goodwill amortization of $57 million, net of elimination of
intersegment expenses of $45 million.
10
(a) Represents the elimination of intersegment revenues.
(b) Management views interest income net of interest expense in evaluating
results.
(c) Represents costs associated with the acquisition of Mercury Asset
Management Group.
(d) Represents goodwill amortization of $162 million and $170 million, net of
elimination of intersegment expenses of $146 million and $165 million, for
the nine months ended September 29, 2000 and September 24, 1999,
respectively.
11
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 7. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information relating to earnings per common share computations follows:
(1) See Note 11 to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 1999 Annual Report
included as an exhibit to Form 10-K for a description of these instruments.
12
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 8. DERIVATIVES, COMMITMENTS, AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merrill Lynch enters into various derivative contracts to meet clients' needs
and to manage its own market risks. Derivative contracts often involve future
commitments to exchange interest payment streams or currencies (such as interest
rate and currency swaps or foreign exchange forwards) or to purchase or sell
other financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date. Options, for
example, can be purchased or written on a wide range of financial instruments
such as securities, currencies, futures, and various market indices.
The notional or contractual amounts of derivatives provide only a measure of
involvement in these types of transactions and represent neither the amounts
subject to the various types of market risk nor the future cash requirements
under these instruments. The notional or contractual amounts of derivatives used
for trading purposes and included in trading inventory by type of risk follow:
(1) Certain derivatives subject to interest rate risk are also exposed to the
credit spread risk of the underlying financial instrument.
(2) Forward contracts subject to interest rate risk principally represent "To Be
Announced" mortgage pools that bear interest rate as well as principal
prepayment risk.
(3) Included in the currency risk category are certain contracts that are also
subject to interest rate risk.
13
The notional or contractual amounts of non-trading derivatives used to hedge
market risk exposures on non-trading assets and liabilities at September 29,
2000 and December 31, 1999 follow:
(1) Includes $9 billion and $10 billion of instruments that also contain
currency risk at September 29, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively,
and $3 billion and $4 billion of instruments that also contain equity risk
at September 29, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively.
(2) Primarily hedging interest rate risk.
(3) Hedging currency risk.
Most of these derivatives are entered into with Merrill Lynch's derivative
dealer subsidiaries, which hedge interest rate, currency, and equity risks in
the normal course of their trading activities. Realized gains and losses on
early terminations of derivatives are deferred over the remaining lives of the
hedged assets or liabilities. At September 29, 2000, there were $7 in deferred
gains relating to a derivative contract terminated during 1999.
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch enters into underwriting
commitments and commitments to extend credit. Settlement of these commitments as
of September 29, 2000 would not have a material effect on the consolidated
financial condition of Merrill Lynch.
As of September 29, 2000, Merrill Lynch has been named as parties in various
actions, some of which involve claims for substantial amounts. Although the
results of legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion
of management that the resolution of these actions will not have a material
adverse effect on Merrill Lynch's financial condition; however, such resolution
could have a material adverse impact on quarterly operating results in future
periods, depending in part on the results for such periods.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 9. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("MLPF&S"), a registered
broker-dealer, is subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the alternative method permitted by
this rule, the minimum required net capital, as defined, shall not be less than
2% of aggregate debit items arising from customer transactions. At September 29,
2000, MLPF&S's regulatory net capital of $3.4 billion was 12% of aggregate debit
items, and its regulatory net capital in excess of the minimum required was $2.8
billion.
Merrill Lynch International ("MLI"), a U.K. registered broker-dealer, is subject
to the capital requirements of the Financial Services Authority ("FSA").
Financial resources, as defined, must exceed the total financial resources
requirement of the FSA. At September 29, 2000, MLI's financial resources were
$4.5 billion and exceeded the minimum requirement by $1.0 billion.
14
Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc. ("MLGSI"), a primary dealer in U.S.
Government securities, is subject to the capital adequacy requirements of the
Government Securities Act of 1986. This rule requires dealers to maintain liquid
capital in excess of market and credit risk, as defined, by 20% (a 1.2-to-1
capital-to-risk standard). At September 29, 2000, MLGSI's liquid capital of $1.6
billion was 367% of its total market and credit risk, and liquid capital in
excess of the minimum required was $1.1 billion.
15
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT
- -------------------------------
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and subsidiaries ("Merrill Lynch") as of September 29,
2000, and the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the
three- and nine-month periods ended September 29, 2000 and September 24, 1999,
and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended
September 29, 2000 and September 24, 1999. These financial statements are the
responsibility of Merrill Lynch's management. The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the merger of
Merrill Lynch and Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc. ("Herzog"), which has been
accounted for as a pooling-of-interests, as described in Note 2 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America
(hereinafter referred to as "generally accepted auditing standards"), the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Merrill Lynch as of December 31,
1999, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in
stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 28, 2000, we
expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph for the
change in accounting method in 1998 for certain internal-use software
development costs to conform with Statement of Position 98-1. We also audited
the adjustments, related to the pooling-of-interets, as mentioned in the first
paragraph above, that were applied to restate the consolidated balance sheet of
Merrill Lynch as of December 31, 1999(not presented herein). In our opinion,
such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied and the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation
to the restated consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
November 13, 2000
16
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. ("ML & Co." and, together with its subsidiaries and
affiliates, "Merrill Lynch") is a holding company that, through its subsidiaries
and affiliates, provides investment, financing, advisory, insurance, and related
services worldwide. Merrill Lynch conducts its businesses in global financial
markets that are influenced by numerous unpredictable factors including economic
conditions, monetary policies, liquidity, international and regional political
events, regulatory developments, the competitive environment, and investor
sentiment. These conditions or events can significantly affect the volatility of
financial markets. While greater volatility increases risk, it may also increase
order flow in businesses such as trading and brokerage. Revenues and net
earnings may vary significantly from period to period due to these unpredictable
factors and the resulting market volatility.
The financial services industry continues to be affected by the intensifying
competitive environment, as demonstrated by consolidation through mergers and
acquisitions, as well as diminishing margins in many mature products and
services, and competition from new entrants as well as established competitors.
In addition, the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in November of 1999
represented a significant accomplishment in the effort to modernize the
financial services industry in the U.S. by repealing anachronistic laws that
separated commercial banking, investment banking and insurance activities.
In addition to providing historical information, Merrill Lynch may make or
publish forward-looking statements about management expectations, strategic
objectives, business prospects, anticipated financial performance, and other
similar matters. A variety of factors, many of which are beyond its control,
affect the operations, performance, business strategy, and results of Merrill
Lynch and could cause actual results and experience to differ materially from
the expectations expressed in these statements. These factors include, but are
not limited to, the factors listed in the previous paragraphs, as well as
actions and initiatives taken by both current and potential competitors, the
impact of pending and future legislation and regulation throughout the world,
and the other risks detailed in the following sections.
MERRILL LYNCH UNDERTAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY TO UPDATE OR REVISE ANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A difficult operating environment existed in the third quarter, as market
indices declined globally. After a series of modest summertime rallies, stock
markets began to struggle due to a number of factors, including a plunging euro,
rising oil prices, and U.S. election uncertainties. Equity underwriting
activity, however, was not impacted by the underperforming indices, as domestic
IPO's raised nearly 50% more in equity capital than in the third quarter of
1999.
Long-term U.S. interest rates, as measured by the yield on the 10-year U.S.
Treasury note, declined from the end of the second quarter, ending the third
quarter at approximately 5.8%. Short-term U.S. rates, after climbing steadily
since June of 1999, remained unchanged during the 2000 third quarter. Short-term
interest rates in Europe generally increased during the third quarter due to
growing inflation caused by higher oil prices and a weak euro. Credit spreads,
which represent the risk premium over the risk-free rate paid by an issuer
(based on the issuer's perceived creditworthiness), continued to widen in the
third quarter of 2000.
17
U.S. equity indices, which achieved extraordinary gains in 1999, continued to
experience the volatility that began in the second quarter of 2000. Investor
concern over slower corporate earnings growth, together with the previously
mentioned factors, led to weak market performance. The Nasdaq Composite Index
ended the third quarter down 7.4% for the three month period, but up 33.7% from
the 1999 third quarter, as technology, media, and telecommunications stocks were
among the poorest performers due to an increased level of negative pre-earnings
announcements from established companies. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
gained only 1.9% during the quarter, and 3.0% from the end of the third quarter
of 1999. During the 2000 third quarter, the S&P 500 fell slightly from the end
of the second quarter, but advanced 12.0% from the end of the corresponding 1999
period.
Global equity markets, as measured by the Dow Jones World Index, dropped 7.7%
during the quarter, but were up 3.4% since the end of the third quarter of 1999.
However, rising oil prices benefited Latin America, where Mexico and Venezuela
are major oil exporters. Tokyo stocks fell 8% in U.S. dollar terms and 7% in yen
terms resulting from slower progress in corporate restructuring efforts in the
region. European markets also suffered due to a more depressed
telecommunications industry and inflationary pressures which led the European
Central Bank to raise short-term interest rates by a quarter percentage point.
The Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Japan intervened
in the foreign exchange market after the euro hit a historic low point during
the quarter.
Global debt underwriting volume declined from $723 billion in the third quarter
of 1999, to $648 billion in the third quarter of 2000, but was up from $642
billion in the second quarter of 2000, according to Thomson Financial Securities
Data, as interest rate worries dissipated during the quarter. Equity
underwriting was stronger in the 2000 third quarter, particularly in the IPO
market. IPOs in the U.S. raised $18 billion in the quarter, almost 50% higher
than the third quarter of 1999. In the first nine months of 2000, initial public
offerings have already raised more than the full-year record set in 1999.
Merger and acquisition activity was more balanced among industry sectors in the
third quarter, as the focus shifted away from the technology sector. Global
announced merger and acquisition volume was $792 billion, slightly higher than
both the third quarter of 1999 and the second quarter of 2000, according to
Thomson Financial Securities Data. In the U.S., announced merger volume was $521
billion, up from $338 billion in the third quarter of 1999, and $315 billion in
the second quarter of 2000. Consolidation in the financial services sector and
an increased level of purchases of U.S. companies by European acquirers
contributed to the strong quarter.
Merrill Lynch continually evaluates its businesses for profitability and
performance under varying market conditions and, in light of the evolving
conditions in its competitive environment, for alignment with its long-term
strategic objectives. Maintaining long-term client relationships, closely
monitoring costs and risks, diversifying revenue sources, growing fee-based
revenues, and expanding strategically, all contribute to mitigating the effects
of market volatility on Merrill Lynch's business as a whole.
18
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merrill Lynch's net earnings were $885 million for the 2000 third quarter, up
53% from the $579 million earned in the same quarter a year ago. Earnings per
common share were $1.09 basic and $0.94 diluted, compared with $0.75 basic and
$0.67 diluted in the 1999 third quarter.
Net revenues were $6.1 billion, up 15% from the 1999 third quarter with record
asset management and portfolio service fees and strong revenues from commissions
and net interest.
The pre-tax profit margin for the quarter was 21.3%, up significantly from the
16.9% achieved in the 1999 third quarter. Annualized return on average common
equity was 21.6%, compared with 20.2% in the third quarter of 1999.
Net earnings for the first nine months of 2000 reached a record $2.9 billion,
53% higher than the corresponding 1999 period. The associated pre-tax margin of
21.5% is the highest for the first nine months of any year since 1993.
Year-to-date earnings per common share were $3.63 basic and $3.18 diluted,
compared with $2.49 basic and $2.19 diluted in the comparable period a year ago.
Annualized return on average common equity was approximately 25.9% for the
nine-month period, up from 23.5% in the same period last year.
19
Commissions revenues are summarized as follows:
Commissions revenues were $1.6 billion, up 12% from the 1999 third quarter,
driven by increased trading of listed securities on exchanges outside the U.S.
and higher mutual fund sales.
Net trading revenues, representing principal transactions revenues and related
net interest, are presented in the table below. Interest revenue and expense
amounts are based on management's assessment of the cost to finance trading
positions, after consideration of the underlying liquidity of these positions.
Trading and related hedging and financing activities affect the recognition of
both principal transactions revenues and net interest and dividend revenues. In
assessing the profitability of its trading activities, Merrill Lynch aggregates
net interest and principal transactions revenues. For financial reporting
purposes, however, realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading
positions, including hedges, are recorded in principal transactions revenues.
The net interest carry (i.e., the spread representing interest earned less
financing costs) for trading positions, including hedges, is recorded either as
principal transactions revenues or net interest revenues, depending on the
nature of the specific instruments. Changes in the composition of trading
inventories and hedge positions can cause the recognition of revenues within
these categories to fluctuate.
Net trading revenues were $1.3 billion, up 5% from $1.2 billion in the 1999
third quarter, primarily as a result of higher revenues from equities.
Equities and equity derivatives net trading revenues were $647 million, up 14%
from the third quarter of 1999, primarily driven by an increase in U.S. and
international equities trading.
Debt and debt derivatives net trading revenues decreased 2% from the 1999 third
quarter to $661 million due to lower trading revenues from sovereign debt and
mortgages.
20
Investment banking revenues were $858 million in the third quarter of 2000, a
10% decline from the strong third quarter a year ago, primarily as a result of
lower strategic advisory service revenues associated with merger and acquisition
activity.
A summary of Merrill Lynch's investment banking revenues follows:
Merrill Lynch retained its position as leading underwriter of total debt and
equity offerings in the U.S. and global markets during the third quarter of
2000. In addition, Merrill Lynch remained number one in U.S. and global debt
underwriting. Merrill Lynch's underwriting market share information based on
transaction value follows:
Source: Thomson Financial Securities Data statistics based on full credit to
book manager.
Strategic advisory services fees declined 27% from the 1999 third quarter to
$278 million, primarily as a result of lower fees from mergers and acquisitions,
both in the U.S. and Europe. Merrill Lynch's merger and acquisition market share
information based on transaction value follows:
21
Source: Thomson Financial Securities Data statistics based on full credit to
both target and acquiring companies' advisors.
A summary of asset management and portfolio service fees is as follows:
Asset management and portfolio service fees rose 20% from the 1999 third quarter
to a new quarterly high of $1.4 billion. Asset management fees increased 6% from
a year ago, as a result of the growth in assets under management, which reached
$571 billion at quarter end, and a shift in assets from older, lower fee mutual
funds to new higher fee mutual funds. Excluding the impact of money transferred
to Merrill Lynch bank deposits, assets under management grew 8% from the end of
the 1999 third quarter. This growth was attributable to a net inflow of customer
assets as well as asset appreciation, partially offset by a reduction in assets
under management due to foreign currency translation. Portfolio service fees
increased 47% from the comparable period last year, as assets in asset-priced
accounts continued to accumulate, driven by growth in Unlimited Advantage
(Service Mark) and Merrill Lynch Consults (Registered Trademark). The majority
of the revenues associated with these accounts are included in portfolio service
fees.
Total assets in Private Client accounts or under management increased $254
billion, or 17% from the end of the 1999 third quarter to $1.8 trillion at
September 29, 2000, including $1.6 trillion in Private Client accounts. Assets
under management, the majority of which are included in Private Client accounts,
totaled $571 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2000, an increase of $18
billion from the end of the 1999 third quarter. The changes in these balances
are noted as follows:
22
1. Includes reinvested dividends.
2. Includes net outflows of $26 billion of retail money market funds to bank
deposits at Merrill Lynch's U.S. banks.
3. Includes foreign exchange translation adjustments of $(24) billion.
Other revenues reached a record $318 million, an increase of $196 million from
the third quarter of 1999, driven by gains from sales of private equity
investments.
Significant components of interest and dividend revenues and interest expense
follow:
Interest and dividend revenues and expenses are a function of the level and mix
of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the prevailing
level, term structure, and volatility of interest rates. Net interest and
dividend profit was $775 million in the third quarter of 2000, up $251 million
from the third quarter a year ago. This increase was due to higher
customer-lending balances and changes in asset/liability composition. (For
further information on balance sheet composition, see Average Assets and
Liabilities.)
Merrill Lynch hedges certain of its long- and short-term borrowings, primarily
with interest rate and currency swaps, to better match the interest rate and
currency characteristics of the borrowings to the assets funded by borrowing
proceeds. The effect of this hedging activity, which is included in "Borrowings"
in the previous table, increased/(decreased) interest expense by $48 million and
$(69)million for the 2000 and 1999 third quarters, respectively, and by $84
million and $(234) million for the 2000 and 1999 nine months, respectively.
23
- -
Merrill Lynch's non-interest expenses are summarized below:
Compensation and benefits, the largest expense category, rose 13% from the 1999
third quarter to $3.1 billion as increased profitability led to higher incentive
compensation, but these expenses were down 10% from the second quarter of 2000.
Compensation and benefits as a percentage of net revenues was 51.2% for the
third quarter of 2000, compared with 52.0% in the third quarter of last year and
unchanged from the previous quarter. These expenses include $70 million
associated with staff reductions in the U.S. private client business during
the 2000 third quarter.
Non-interest expenses, excluding compensation and benefits, were virtually
unchanged from the 1999 third quarter and were reduced by 12% from the 2000
second quarter. These expenses declined to 27.5% of net revenues for the third
quarter of 2000, down from 31.1% for the comparable quarter in 1999. These
decreases in the quarter compared with the second quarter of 2000 were across
all segments and every business line.
Communications and technology expenses were $542 million, down 7% from the
second quarter of 2000, primarily due to lower systems consulting costs, but up
11% from the third quarter of 1999. The increase from the 1999 third quarter is
mainly due to higher technology-related depreciation and increased communication
costs.
Occupancy and related depreciation expense was $250 million in the third quarter
of 2000, slightly lower than the 2000 second quarter and up 8% from the 1999
third quarter.
Advertising and market development expenses declined 22% from the previous
quarter to $205 million, due to lower spending on advertising and promotional
programs. The 7% increase from the 1999 third quarter is a result of higher
sales promotion and travel costs associated with increased business activity.
Brokerage, clearing, and exchange fees were $206 million, a decrease of 12% from
the second quarter of 2000 due to lower transaction volume, but an increase of
7% year-over-year, partially as a result of increased transaction volume.
Professional fees were $147 million, down 13% from the 2000 second quarter due
to reduced legal and consulting fees, and virtually unchanged from a year ago.
24
Goodwill amortization was $52 million in the third quarter of 2000, virtually
unchanged from the second quarter of 2000 and down 9% from the third quarter of
1999. Other expenses were $290 million, 20% lower than the 2000 second quarter
and 19% lower than the 1999 third quarter, due to a decline in provisions for
various business matters.
The year-to-date effective tax rate was 30.8% for the first nine months of 2000,
compared with 31.8% in the corresponding 1999 period.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merrill Lynch reports the results of its business within three business
segments: Corporate and Institutional Client Group ("CICG"), Private Client
Group ("PCG"), and Merrill Lynch Investment Managers ("MLIM"). CICG's activities
primarily involve providing services to corporate, institutional, and
governmental clients throughout the world. PCG provides investment, financing,
insurance, tax, and other financial services and products to retail clients
globally. MLIM provides investment management services to a wide variety of
retail and institutional clients globally. For further information on services
provided to clients within these segments, see the 1999 Form 10-K and the 1999
Annual Report included as an exhibit thereto.
Certain MLIM and CICG products are distributed by PCG distribution networks, and
to a more limited extent, certain MLIM products are distributed through the
distribution capabilities of CICG. Expenses and revenues associated with these
intersegment activities are recognized in each segment and eliminated at the
corporate level.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATE AND INSTITUTIONAL CLIENT GROUP
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CICG achieved solid results for the quarter in a seasonally slower business
environment. Net revenues were $2.8 billion for the quarter, representing a 13%
increase from the third quarter of 1999, and pre-tax earnings were $839 million,
a 35% increase from the 1999 third quarter. Pre-tax profit margin in the quarter
expanded to 30.4%, up 5 percentage points from 25.4% in the third quarter a year
ago, while the year-to-date pre-tax margin was 32.1%, up from 27.2% in the first
nine months of 1999. CICG posted a strong performance in both equity trading and
equity origination, as Merrill Lynch's global market share increased to 18.8%
from 13.8% in the third quarter of 1999, according to Thomson Financial
Securities Data. Revenues from the strategic advisory business were down
compared with the strong 1999 third quarter due to a decline in revenues in the
U.S. and Europe. Revenues from the Debt Markets business decreased compared with
the third quarter of 1999, due to lower industry-wide debt underwriting
activity. Merrill Lynch retained its position as the leading underwriter of
total debt and equity securities, both in the U.S. and globally, as well as the
#1 position in U.S. and global debt underwriting, according to Thomson Financial
Securities Data.
CICG continued to make progress on several strategic initiatives during the
quarter. The merger with Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc. was completed during the
quarter and, as a result of integration, the internalization of Nasdaq orders is
increasing. As part of its efforts to build its private equity business, Merrill
Lynch launched, with partners, a $300 million venture capital fund to invest
primarily in mobile Internet ventures and technologies in Europe and North
America. In addition, Merrill Lynch collaborated with other financial firms to
create TheMarkets.com, a portal for institutional investors offering equity
research, equity new issue information, and news and market data.
25
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIVATE CLIENT GROUP
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net revenues for PCG were $2.8 billion in the third quarter of 2000, up 16% from
$2.5 billion in the 1999 third quarter. In the U.S., net revenues for the third
quarter were up 15% from the year ago period, and internationally, net revenues
were up 21%. Pre-tax earnings for the quarter were $402 million, an increase of
44% from the 1999 third quarter. The pre-tax margin in the quarter rose to
14.1%, an increase from 11.4% in third quarter of 1999. During the third
quarter, actions were taken to realign and strengthen the U.S. private client
business, which included both the reallocation and reduction of staff. Third
quarter 2000 expenses declined from the preceding quarter, primarily as a result
of lower volume-related transaction costs, reduced advertising spending, staff
reductions, and other actions taken to generate efficiencies. The overall
decrease in expenses is after recording $70 million of compensation and benefits
expenses associated with staff reductions.
Approximately 445 new Financial Consultants were added during the quarter,
including 400 domestically, and 45 outside the U.S. Producing office managers in
the U.S. and Canada are now included in the Financial Consultant headcount.
Total assets in U.S. client accounts remained essentially unchanged from the
second quarter at $1.4 trillion, with net new money inflows of $27 billion
during the quarter. Outside the U.S., client assets reached $148 billion, with
$7 billion of net new money inflows during the 2000 third quarter. Total assets
in asset-priced accounts grew 5% from the 2000 second quarter to $218 billion,
an increase of 66% from a year ago.
Unlimited Advantage, Merrill Lynch's fee-based, non-discretionary brokerage
service continued to grow, with client assets in those accounts reaching $93
billion at the end of the quarter, with $2 billion of net new money during the
quarter. Additionally, client assets in ML Direct, the online investing service
for self-directed investors, grew 15% during the quarter to $3.1 billion. Over
735,000 clients now have on-line access to their accounts through ML Online and
ML Direct, as more than 70,000 accounts were activated for online servicing
during the third quarter.
In June of 2000, Merrill Lynch began to redirect cash inflows from certain Cash
Management Accounts ("CMA") and other types of accounts from taxable money
market funds which are included in assets under management, to bank deposits at
Merrill Lynch banks. As a result, U.S. bank deposits included in Demand and time
deposits on the consolidated balance sheet grew to $38 billion from $5 billion
at the end of the 1999 third quarter and $19 billion at the end of the second
quarter of 2000.
In April 2000, Merrill Lynch announced a 50/50 joint venture with HSBC to create
the first global online banking and investment services company, serving
individual customers outside the U.S. The venture currently employs 300 people
and is expected to launch in the U.K. this year, and in Canada and Australia
over the next few months.
26
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT MANAGERS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarterly earnings for MLIM continued their upward trend as MLIM continued to
achieve solid investment performance across all product lines. Net revenues and
pre-tax earnings were $604 million and $143 million, respectively, in the third
quarter of 2000, up 18% and 70% from $513 million and $84 million in the 1999
third quarter. The pre-tax profit margin for the quarter expanded to 23.7%, up
from 16.4% in the 1999 third quarter. Assets under management reached $571
billion at the end of the quarter, up 3% from the end of the 1999 third quarter.
Excluding the impact of net outflows to Merrill Lynch's U.S. banks, assets under
management grew 8% from the same period last year. During the quarter, MLIM had
net new money of $1.3 billion.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND LIQUIDITY
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary objectives of Merrill Lynch's capital structure and funding policies
are to:
1. Ensure sufficient equity capital to absorb losses,
2. Support the business strategies, and
3. Assure liquidity at all times, across market cycles, and through periods of
financial stress.
These objectives and Merrill Lynch's capital structure and funding policies are
discussed more fully in the 1999 Annual Report included as an exhibit to Form
10-K.
Among U.S. institutions engaged primarily in the global securities business,
Merrill Lynch is one of the most highly capitalized, with $16.7 billion in
common equity, $425 million in preferred stock, and $2.7 billion of preferred
securities issued by subsidiaries at September 29, 2000. Preferred securities
issued by subsidiaries consist primarily of Trust Originated Preferred
Securities(Service Mark) ("TOPrS"(Service Mark)). Based on various analyses and
criteria, management believes that Merrill Lynch's equity capital base of $19.9
billion is adequate.
Merrill Lynch's leverage ratios were as follows:
(1) Total assets to total stockholders' equity and preferred securities issued
by subsidiaries.
(2) Total assets less (a) securities received as collateral, net of
securities pledged as collateral, (b) securities pledged as collateral,
and (c) receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowed
transactions, to total stockholders' equity and preferred securities
issued by subsidiaries.
(3) Computed using month-end balances.
An asset-to-equity leverage ratio does not reflect the risk profile of assets,
hedging strategies, or off-balance sheet exposures. Thus, Merrill Lynch does not
rely on overall leverage ratios to assess risk-based capital adequacy.
27
Commercial paper outstanding totaled $12.1 billion at September 29, 2000 and
$24.2 billion at December 31, 1999, which was equal to 3.2% and 7.3% of total
assets at September 29, 2000 and year-end 1999, respectively. Outstanding
long-term borrowings increased to $66.6 billion at September 29, 2000 from $53.5
billion at December 31, 1999. Major components of the change in long-term
borrowings during the first nine months of 2000 follow:
(1) At September 29, 2000, $48.4 billion of long-term borrowings had maturity
dates beyond one year.
In addition to equity capital sources, Merrill Lynch views long-term debt as a
stable funding source for its core balance sheet assets. Another source of
liquidity is an $8.0 billion committed, senior, unsecured bank credit facility
that, at September 29, 2000, was not drawn upon. Additionally, Merrill Lynch
maintains access to significant uncommitted credit lines, both secured and
unsecured, from a large group of banks.
The cost and availability of unsecured financing generally are dependent on
credit ratings. Merrill Lynch's senior long-term debt, preferred stock, and
TOPrS were rated by several recognized credit rating agencies at September 29,
2000 as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merrill Lynch monitors changes in its balance sheet using average daily balances
that are determined on a settlement date basis and reported for management
information purposes. For financial statements and risk management purposes,
balances are recorded on a trade date basis. The following discussion compares
changes in settlement date average daily balances.
For the first nine months of 2000, average total assets were $366 billion, up
10% from $334 billion for the 1999 fourth quarter. Average total liabilities
increased 9% to $348 billion from $319 billion for the 1999 fourth quarter. The
major components in the changes in average total assets and liabilities for the
first nine months of 2000 as compared with the fourth quarter of 1999 are
summarized as follows:
28
The significant growth in demand and time deposits in the first nine months of
2000 reflects the redirection of cash inflows from certain CMA and other types
of accounts from taxable money market funds which are included in assets under
management to bank deposits at Merrill Lynch's U.S. banks. This increase in
deposits was used to fund the growth in marketable investment securities. Higher
trading volume during the first nine months of 2000, as compared with the fourth
quarter of 1999, caused an increase in trading assets and liabilities, as well
as the average customer receivable and payable balances. Additionally,
securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions rose due to increased
matched-book activity. In addition to the increase in demand and time deposits
and securities loaned transactions, the growth in average assets was funded by
increases in commercial paper and long-term borrowings, particularly medium-term
notes.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NON-INVESTMENT GRADE HOLDINGS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-investment grade holdings, which include transactions with highly leveraged
counterparties, involve risks related to the creditworthiness of the issuers or
counterparties and the liquidity of the market for such investments. Merrill
Lynch recognizes these risks and, whenever possible, employs strategies to
mitigate exposures. The specific components and overall level of non-investment
grade positions may vary significantly from period to period as a result of
inventory turnover, investment sales, and asset redeployment.
In the normal course of business, Merrill Lynch underwrites, trades, and holds
non-investment grade cash instruments in connection with its investment banking,
market-making, and derivative structuring activities. Non-investment grade
holdings have been defined as debt and preferred equity securities rated as BB+
or lower, or equivalent ratings by recognized credit rating agencies, sovereign
debt in emerging markets, amounts due under derivative contracts from
non-investment grade counterparties, and other instruments that, in the opinion
of management, are non-investment grade.
29
In addition to the amounts included in the following table, derivatives may also
expose Merrill Lynch to credit risk related to the underlying security where a
derivative contract can either synthesize ownership of the underlying security
(e.g., long total return swaps) or potentially force ownership of the underlying
security (e.g., short put options). At September 29, 2000, Merrill Lynch had
derivatives with notionals of approximately $700 million with non-investment
grade credit exposure. Derivatives may also subject Merrill Lynch to credit
spread or issuer default risk, in that changes in credit spreads or in the
credit quality of the underlying securities may adversely affect the
derivatives' fair values. Merrill Lynch seeks to manage these risks by engaging
in various hedging strategies to reduce its exposure associated with
non-investment grade positions, such as purchasing an option to sell the related
security or entering into other offsetting derivative contracts. At September
29, 2000, Merrill Lynch had derivatives with notionals of approximatley $900
million that hedged non-investment grade credit exposure.
Merrill Lynch provides financing and advisory services to, and invests in,
companies entering into leveraged transactions, which may include leveraged
buyouts, recapitalizations, and mergers and acquisitions. Merrill Lynch provides
extensions of credit to leveraged companies in the form of senior and
subordinated debt, as well as bridge financing on a select basis. In addition,
Merrill Lynch syndicates loans for non-investment grade companies or in
connection with highly leveraged transactions and may retain a residual portion
of these loans.
Merrill Lynch holds direct equity investments in leveraged companies and
interests in partnerships that invest in leveraged transactions. Merrill Lynch
has also committed to participate in limited partnerships that invest in
leveraged transactions. Future commitments to participate in limited
partnerships and other direct equity investments will be made on a select basis.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRADING EXPOSURES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table summarizes Merrill Lynch's non-investment grade trading
exposures:
Among the trading exposures included in the preceding table are debt and equity
securities and bank loans of companies in various stages of bankruptcy
proceedings or in default. At September 29, 2000, the carrying value of such
debt and equity securities totaled $261 million, of which 98% resulted from
Merrill Lynch's market-making activities in such securities. This compared with
$133 million at December 31, 1999, of which 89% related to market-making
activities. Also included are distressed bank loans with a carrying value
totaling $133 million and $86 million at September 29, 2000 and December 31,
1999, respectively.
30
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NON-TRADING EXPOSURES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table summarizes Merrill Lynch's non-investment grade non-trading
exposures:
(1) Increases since December 31, 1999 are primarily due to new loans to several
telecommunications companies. Subsequent to the end of the third quarter,
these loans were reduced by approximately $140 million.
(2) Represents outstanding loans to 131 and 115 companies at September 29, 2000
and December 31, 1999, respectively.
(3) Includes $581 million and $599 million in investments at September 29, 2000
and December 31, 1999, respectively, related to deferred compensation plans,
for which the default risk of the investments generally rests with the
participating employees.
(4) Includes investments in 71 and 62 enterprises at September 29, 2000 and
December 31, 1999, respectively.
The following table summarizes Merrill Lynch's commitments with exposure to
non-investment grade counterparties:
(1) Subsequent to the end of the third quarter, these commitments were reduced
by $66 million.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In June 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Board deferred for one year the
effective date of the accounting and reporting requirements of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("SFAS No. 133").
SFAS No.133 requires Merrill Lynch to recognize all derivatives as either assets
or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments
at fair value. If the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting, depending on
the nature of the hedge accounting relationship, changes in the fair value of
the derivative will either be offset by the change in fair value of the hedged
asset, liability, or firm commitment item through earnings, or recorded in other
comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The
ineffective portion of the derivative hedging instrument will be immediately
recognized in earnings. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
must be recorded at fair value, with changes in value reported in earnings. Upon
adoption of SFAS No. 133, all existing hedge relationships must be designated
anew, with transition adjustments recorded either in earnings or other
comprehensive income, as appropriate.
Currently, the majority of Merrill Lynch's derivatives are recognized at fair
value in trading assets and liabilities, as they are entered into in a dealing
capacity. However, Merrill Lynch also enters into derivatives to hedge its
exposures relating to non-trading assets and liabilities, some of which,
depending on the nature of the derivative and the related hedged item, are not
carried at fair value.
31
Merrill Lynch will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001, and
has undertaken initiatives to implement this standard. Merrill Lynch has
determined that the new standard will primarily impact the accounting for
derivatives used to hedge borrowings. Merrill Lynch currently expects that the
majority of its derivatives used to hedge borrowings will qualify for the
assumption of "no hedge ineffectiveness" under the criteria detailed in SFAS No.
133, and therefore expects that for these derivatives there will be no net
impact on earnings from the adoption of the statement. A smaller population of
derivatives that effectively shorten the maturity of floating rate borrowings,
or effectively convert the currency of the borrowings, will not qualify for
hedge accounting and the fair value of this portfolio will be recorded as a
transition adjustment. Derivatives that are embedded in non-trading liabilities
will be recorded at fair value with transition adjustments recorded in earnings;
these amounts are expected to be offset by the adjustments to record the
offsetting derivative instruments related to these liabilities at fair value.
Merrill Lynch is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on earnings;
however, the ultimate effect of the new standard on earnings is dependent upon a
number of factors including changing market conditions, the Company's funding
needs, hedge designation strategies, and actions taken in response to these
conditions. Due to the interdependent nature of these variables, and the
inability to predict market conditions at year-end, the Company believes that
providing a meaningful estimated range of the impact of adopting this standard
at year-end 2000 is not possible at this time.
32
Note: Certain prior period amounts have been restated to conform to the current
period presentation and to reflect the merger with Herzog, Heine, Geduld,
Inc., as required under pooling-of-interests accounting.
33
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
---------------------------
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
-----------------------------------------
ML & Co. issued unregistered common stock in connection with the Herzog, Heine,
Geduld, Inc. ("Herzog") merger, as described in ML & Co.'s Form 10-Q for the
2000 second quarter and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this
report. Since the filing of the second quarter Form 10-Q, ML & Co. has filed a
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 to register the resale
of the ML & Co. shares by the Herzog shareholders. The registration statement
became effective on October 16, 2000.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
-----------------
The 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Friday,
April 27, 2001 at the Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Conference and Training Center,
800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey. Any stockholder of record
entitled to vote generally for the election of directors may nominate one or
more persons for election as a director at such meeting only if proper written
notice of such stockholder's intent to make such nomination or nominations, in
accordance with the provisions of ML & Co.'s Certificate of Incorporation, has
been given to the Secretary of ML & Co., 222 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New
York 10038, no earlier than February 9, 2001 and no later than March 8, 2001. In
addition, in accordance with provisions of ML & Co.'s By-Laws, any stockholder
intending to bring any other business before the meeting must provide proper
written notice to ML & Co. of the stockholder's intent to do so on or before
March 8, 2001. In order to be included in ML & Co.'s proxy statement,
stockholder proposals had to be received by ML & Co. at its principal executive
offices not later than November 9, 2000.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
--------------------------------
(a) Exhibits
(4) Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including
indentures:
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, ML
& Co. hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, upon request, copies of the
instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term
debt securities of ML & Co. that authorize an amount of
securities constituting 10% or less of the total assets
of ML & Co. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis.
(10)Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan,
as amended on July 24, 2000.
(11)Statement re: computation of per common share earnings
(12)Statement re: computation of ratios
(15)Letter re: unaudited interim financial information
(27)Financial Data Schedule
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The following Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed by ML & Co. with
the Securities and Exchange Commission during the quarterly period
covered by this report:
(i) Current Report dated July 18, 2000 for the purpose of filing
ML & Co.'s Preliminary Unaudited Earnings Summary for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2000.
(ii) Current Report dated August 2, 2000 for the purpose of
filing ML & Co.'s Preliminary Unaudited Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of June 30, 2000.
34
(iii)Current Report dated August 4, 2000 for the purpose of filing the
forms of ML & Co.'s Callable Nasdaq-100(Registered Trademark)
Market Index Target-Term Securities(Registered Trademark) due
August 3, 2007 and Callable Market Index Target-Term Securities
due August 3, 2007 based upon Biotech HOLDRS(Service Mark).
(iv) Current Report dated September 13, 2000 for the purpose of
filing the form of ML & Co.'s Callable Market Index
Target-Term Securities due September 13, 2007 based upon
Broadband HOLDRS.
35
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
--------------------------------
(Registrant)
Date: November 13, 2000 By: /s/ Thomas H. Patrick
--------------------------------
Thomas H. Patrick
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
36
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibits
10 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan,
as amended on July 24, 2000.
11 Statement re: computation of per common share earnings.
12 Statement re: computation of ratios.
15 Letter re: unaudited interim financial information.
27 Financial Data Schedule.