Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Commitments and Contingencies

v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
NOTE 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into a number of off-balance sheet commitments. These commitments expose the Corporation to varying degrees of credit and market risk and are subject to the same credit and market risk limitation reviews as those instruments recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For more information on commitments and contingencies, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Credit Extension Commitments

The Corporation enters into commitments to extend credit such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and commercial letters of credit to meet the financing needs of its customers. The table below includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments net of amounts distributed (e.g., syndicated) to other financial institutions of $18.0 billion and $21.9 billion at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. At March 31, 2014, the carrying value of these commitments, excluding commitments accounted for under the fair value option, was $528 million, including deferred revenue of $19 million and a reserve for unfunded lending commitments of $509 million. At December 31, 2013, the comparable amounts were $503 million, $19 million and $484 million, respectively. The carrying value of these commitments is classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The table below also includes the notional amount of commitments of $11.9 billion and $13.0 billion at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 that are accounted for under the fair value option. However, the table below excludes cumulative net fair value adjustments of $338 million and $354 million on these commitments, which are classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities. For more information regarding the Corporation's loan commitments accounted for under the fair value option, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option.

Credit Extension Commitments
 
 
 
March 31, 2014
(Dollars in millions)
Expire in
One Year
or Less
 
Expire After
One Year Through
Three Years
 
Expire After Three Years Through
Five Years
 
Expire After Five Years
 
Total
Notional amount of credit extension commitments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan commitments
$
64,675

 
$
101,333

 
$
128,766

 
$
28,310

 
$
323,084

Home equity lines of credit
5,098

 
17,689

 
19,353

 
13,824

 
55,964

Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees (1)
22,326

 
8,249

 
4,369

 
2,034

 
36,978

Letters of credit
2,068

 
143

 
37

 
64

 
2,312

Legally binding commitments
94,167

 
127,414

 
152,525

 
44,232

 
418,338

Credit card lines (2)
375,014

 

 

 

 
375,014

Total credit extension commitments
$
469,181

 
$
127,414

 
$
152,525

 
$
44,232

 
$
793,352

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
Notional amount of credit extension commitments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan commitments
$
80,799

 
$
105,175

 
$
133,290

 
$
21,864

 
$
341,128

Home equity lines of credit
4,580

 
16,855

 
21,074

 
14,301

 
56,810

Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees (1)
21,994

 
8,843

 
2,876

 
3,967

 
37,680

Letters of credit
1,263

 
899

 
4

 
403

 
2,569

Legally binding commitments
108,636

 
131,772

 
157,244

 
40,535

 
438,187

Credit card lines (2)
377,846

 

 

 

 
377,846

Total credit extension commitments
$
486,482

 
$
131,772

 
$
157,244

 
$
40,535

 
$
816,033

(1) 
The notional amounts of SBLCs and financial guarantees classified as investment grade and non-investment grade based on the credit quality of the underlying reference name within the instrument were $27.3 billion and $9.2 billion at March 31, 2014, and $27.6 billion and $9.6 billion at December 31, 2013. Amounts include consumer SBLCs of $444 million and $453 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
(2) 
Includes business card unused lines of credit.

Legally binding commitments to extend credit generally have specified rates and maturities. Certain of these commitments have adverse change clauses that help to protect the Corporation against deterioration in the borrower's ability to pay.
Other Commitments

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had unfunded equity investment commitments of $133 million and $195 million.

At both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had a commitment to purchase $1.4 billion of equity securities. The commitment expires on June 1, 2014.

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had commitments to purchase loans (e.g., residential mortgage and commercial real estate) of $2.8 billion and $1.5 billion, which upon settlement will be included in loans or LHFS.

In connection with the FHFA Settlement, at March 31, 2014, the Corporation had a commitment to purchase RMBS with an estimated fair value of $3.2 billion from FNMA and FHLMC. Such securities were purchased on April 1, 2014.

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had commitments to enter into forward-dated resale and securities borrowing agreements of $93.5 billion and $75.5 billion, and commitments to enter into forward-dated repurchase and securities lending agreements of $56.5 billion and $38.3 billion. These commitments expire within the next 12 months.

The Corporation is a party to operating leases for certain of its premises and equipment. Commitments under these leases are approximately $2.2 billion, $2.5 billion, $2.2 billion, $1.7 billion and $1.3 billion for the remainder of 2014 and the years through 2018, respectively, and $5.7 billion in the aggregate for all years thereafter.

Other Guarantees

Bank-owned Life Insurance Book Value Protection

The Corporation sells products that offer book value protection to insurance carriers who offer group life insurance policies to corporations, primarily banks. The book value protection is provided on portfolios of intermediate investment-grade fixed-income securities and is intended to cover any shortfall in the event that policyholders surrender their policies and market value is below book value. These guarantees are recorded as derivatives and carried at fair value in the trading portfolio. At both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the notional amount of these guarantees totaled $13.4 billion and the Corporation's maximum exposure related to these guarantees totaled $3.1 billion and $3.0 billion with estimated maturity dates between 2030 and 2045. The net fair value including the fee receivable associated with these guarantees was $35 million and $39 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and reflects the probability of surrender as well as the multiple structural protection features in the contracts.

Employee Retirement Protection

The Corporation sells products that offer book value protection primarily to plan sponsors of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governed pension plans, such as 401(k) plans and 457 plans. The book value protection is provided on portfolios of intermediate/short-term investment-grade fixed-income securities and is intended to cover any shortfall in the event that plan participants continue to make qualified withdrawals after all securities have been liquidated and there is remaining book value. The Corporation retains the option to exit the contract at any time. If the Corporation exercises its option, the investment manager will either terminate the contract or convert the portfolio into a high-quality fixed-income portfolio, typically all government or government-backed agency securities, with the proceeds of the liquidated assets to assure the return of principal. To manage its exposure, the Corporation imposes restrictions and constraints on the timing of the withdrawals, the manner in which the portfolio is liquidated and the funds are accessed, and the investment parameters of the underlying portfolio. These constraints, combined with significant structural protections, are designed to provide adequate buffers and guard against payments even under extreme stress scenarios. These guarantees are recorded as derivatives and carried at fair value in the trading portfolio. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the notional amount of these guarantees totaled $3.3 billion and $4.6 billion with estimated maturity dates up to 2017 if the exit option is exercised on all deals. The decline in notional amount during the three months ended March 31, 2014 was primarily the result of plan sponsors terminating contracts pursuant to exit options. As of March 31, 2014, the Corporation had not made a payment under these products.

Merchant Services

In accordance with credit and debit card association rules, the Corporation sponsors merchant processing servicers that process credit and debit card transactions on behalf of various merchants. In connection with these services, a liability may arise in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor. If the merchant defaults on its obligation to reimburse the cardholder, the cardholder, through its issuing bank, generally has until six months after the date of the transaction to present a chargeback to the merchant processor, which is primarily liable for any losses on covered transactions. However, if the merchant processor fails to meet its obligation to reimburse the cardholder for disputed transactions, then the Corporation, as the sponsor, could be held liable for the disputed amount. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the sponsored entities processed and settled $149.4 billion and $148.3 billion of transactions and recorded losses of $4 million for both periods. A significant portion of this activity was processed by a joint venture in which the Corporation holds a 49 percent ownership. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the sponsored merchant processing servicers held as collateral $114 million and $203 million of merchant escrow deposits which may be used to offset amounts due from the individual merchants.

The Corporation believes the maximum potential exposure for chargebacks would not exceed the total amount of merchant transactions processed through Visa and MasterCard for the last six months, which represents the claim period for the cardholder, plus any outstanding delayed-delivery transactions. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the maximum potential exposure for sponsored transactions totaled $251.7 billion and $258.5 billion. However, the Corporation believes that the maximum potential exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure and does not expect to make material payments in connection with these guarantees.

Other Derivative Contracts

The Corporation funds selected assets, including securities issued by CDOs and CLOs, through derivative contracts, typically total return swaps, with third parties and VIEs that are not consolidated by the Corporation. The total notional amount of these derivative contracts was $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion with commercial banks at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and $1.3 billion with VIEs at both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The underlying securities are senior securities and substantially all of the Corporation's exposures are insured. Accordingly, the Corporation's exposure to loss consists principally of counterparty risk to the insurers. In certain circumstances, generally as a result of ratings downgrades, the Corporation may be required to purchase the underlying assets, which would not result in additional gain or loss to the Corporation as such exposure is already reflected in the fair value of the derivative contracts.

Other Guarantees

The Corporation has entered into additional guarantee agreements and commitments, including lease-end obligation agreements, partial credit guarantees on certain leases, real estate joint venture guarantees, sold risk participation swaps, divested business commitments and sold put options that require gross settlement. The maximum potential future payment under these agreements was approximately $6.8 billion and $6.9 billion at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The estimated maturity dates of these obligations extend up to 2033. The Corporation has made no material payments under these guarantees.

In the normal course of business, the Corporation periodically guarantees the obligations of its affiliates in a variety of transactions including ISDA-related transactions and non-ISDA related transactions such as commodities trading, repurchase agreements, prime brokerage agreements and other transactions.

Payment Protection Insurance Claims Matter

In the U.K., the Corporation previously sold payment protection insurance (PPI) through its international card services business to credit card customers and consumer loan customers. PPI covers a consumer's loan or debt repayment if certain events occur such as loss of job or illness. In response to an elevated level of customer complaints across the industry, heightened media coverage and pressure from consumer advocacy groups, the U.K. Financial Services Authority, which has subsequently been replaced by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), investigated and raised concerns about the way some companies have handled complaints related to the sale of these insurance policies. In connection with this matter, the Corporation established a reserve for PPI. The reserve was $413 million and $381 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Corporation recorded $141 million of expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to no expense for the same period in 2013. It is reasonably possible that the Corporation will incur additional expense related to PPI claims; however, the amount of such additional expense cannot be reasonably estimated.

Litigation and Regulatory Matters

The following supplements the disclosure in Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure).

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are routinely defendants in or parties to many pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. These actions and proceedings are generally based on alleged violations of consumer protection, securities, environmental, banking, employment, contract and other laws. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for substantial monetary damages are asserted against the Corporation and its subsidiaries.

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory and governmental examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries, investigations, and threatened legal actions and proceedings. Certain subsidiaries of the Corporation are registered broker/dealers or investment advisors and are subject to regulation by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the European Commission, the PRA, the FCA and other international, federal and state securities regulators. In connection with formal and informal inquiries by those agencies, such subsidiaries receive numerous requests, subpoenas and orders for documents, testimony and information in connection with various aspects of their regulated activities.

In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such litigation, regulatory and governmental matters, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages or where the matters present novel legal theories or involve a large number of parties, the Corporation generally cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss, fines or penalties related to each pending matter may be.

In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Corporation establishes an accrued liability for litigation, regulatory and governmental matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. As a litigation, regulatory or governmental matter develops, the Corporation, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluates on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable. When a loss contingency is not both probable and estimable, the Corporation does not establish an accrued liability. If, at the time of evaluation, the loss contingency related to a litigation, regulatory or governmental matter is not both probable and estimable, the matter will continue to be monitored for further developments that would make such loss contingency both probable and estimable. Once the loss contingency related to a litigation, regulatory or governmental matter is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Corporation will establish an accrued liability with respect to such loss contingency and record a corresponding amount of litigation-related expense. The Corporation continues to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously established. Excluding expenses of internal or external legal service providers, litigation-related expense of $6.0 billion was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $2.2 billion for the same period in 2013.

For a limited number of the matters disclosed in this Note, and in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, for which a loss, whether in excess of a related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, is reasonably possible in future periods, the Corporation is able to estimate a range of possible loss. In determining whether it is possible to estimate a range of possible loss, the Corporation reviews and evaluates its material litigation, regulatory and governmental matters on an ongoing basis, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. These may include information learned through the discovery process, rulings on dispositive motions, settlement discussions, and other rulings by courts, arbitrators or others. In cases in which the Corporation possesses sufficient appropriate information to estimate a range of possible loss, that estimate is aggregated and disclosed below. There may be other disclosed matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible but such an estimate of the range of possible loss may not be possible. For those matters where an estimate of the range of possible loss is possible, management currently estimates the aggregate range of possible loss is $0 to $5.0 billion in excess of the accrued liability (if any) related to those matters. This estimated range of possible loss is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment and a variety of assumptions, and known and unknown uncertainties. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate. Those matters for which an estimate is not possible are not included within this estimated range. Therefore, this estimated range of possible loss represents what the Corporation believes to be an estimate of possible loss only for certain matters meeting these criteria. It does not represent the Corporation's maximum loss exposure.

Information is provided below, or in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, regarding the nature of all of these contingencies and, where specified, the amount of the claim associated with these loss contingencies. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that loss contingencies arising from pending matters, including the matters described herein, and in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Corporation. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in these matters, some of which are beyond the Corporation's control, and the very large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could be material to the Corporation's results of operations or cash flows for any particular reporting period.

Bond Insurance Litigation

FGIC

On April 7, 2014, the Corporation entered into a settlement with FGIC for certain second-lien RMBS trusts for which FGIC provided financial guarantee insurance, as well as, on April 11, 2014, separate settlements with The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) as trustee with respect to seven of those trusts. The agreements resolve all outstanding litigation between FGIC and the Corporation, as well as outstanding and potential claims by FGIC and the trustee related to alleged representations and warranties breaches and other claims involving second-lien RMBS trusts for which FGIC provided financial guarantee insurance.
In addition to the seven trust settlements with BNY Mellon that have already been completed, two remaining trust settlements are subject to additional investor approvals in a process that is scheduled to be completed on or before May 27, 2014. The Corporation has made payments totaling $900 million under the FGIC and the completed trust settlements and will pay an additional $50 million if and when the remaining two trust settlements are completed. The total costs of the FGIC and trust settlements were covered by previously established reserves.

Credit Card Debt Cancellation and Identity Theft Protection Products

On April 7, 2014, the Corporation entered into separate Consent Orders with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The Consent Order with the OCC resolves its investigation into billing and fulfillment practices concerning identity theft protection products, including those marketed and billed by vendors. The Consent Order with the CFPB resolves its investigation into billing and fulfillment practices concerning identity theft protection products, including those marketed and billed by vendors, and also resolves its investigation into marketing, sales and fulfillment practices concerning certain credit card debt cancellation products. Pursuant to the Consent Orders, the Corporation paid, in April 2014, $45 million in civil monetary penalties and will provide approximately $738 million in refunds to affected consumers, a substantial amount of which has previously been refunded to consumers. The penalties and customer refund payments are covered by previously established reserves. In addition, the Corporation has agreed to certain enhancements in its vendor, third-party provider and risk management programs for certain products.

In re Bank of America Securities, Derivative and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation

New York Attorney General (NYAG) Action

On March 25, 2014, the Corporation agreed to settle the NYAG’s claims for $15 million, reflecting the NYAG's cost of investigation and litigation, and to adopt certain corporate governance changes.

Mortgage-backed Securities Litigation and Other Government Mortgage Origination Investigations

Civil RMBS Matters Filed by the DOJ and the SEC

In connection with defendants’ motions to dismiss the DOJ and SEC complaints, the magistrate judge issued recommendations on March 27, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively. The magistrate judge recommended dismissal of all claims in the DOJ complaint with prejudice; on April 10, 2014, the DOJ filed objections to the recommendation, and on April 28, 2014, defendants responded. The magistrate judge recommended denial of defendants’ motion to dismiss the SEC complaint; on April 17, 2014, defendants filed objections to the recommendation, and on April 30, 2014, the SEC responded.

FHFA Settlement

On March 25, 2014, the Corporation entered into a settlement with FHFA as conservator of FNMA and FHLMC to resolve (1) all outstanding RMBS litigation between FHFA, FNMA and FHLMC, and the Corporation and its affiliates, and (2) other legacy contract claims related to representations and warranties (collectively, the FHFA Settlement). In connection with the FHFA Settlement, on April 1, 2014, the Corporation paid FNMA and FHLMC, collectively, $9.5 billion and received from them RMBS with a fair market value of approximately $3.2 billion, for a net cost of $6.3 billion. The total costs associated with the FHFA Settlement were covered by previously established reserves and an additional charge of $3.7 billion, of which $3.6 billion was litigation expense, recorded as of March 31, 2014.

Specifically, the FHFA Settlement resolved all claims asserted in: Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al. (the Countrywide Action), Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Bank of America Corporation, et al. (the Bank of America Action) and Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al. (the Merrill Lynch Action). The securities covered by the releases in the FHFA Settlement have an original purchase cost of approximately $57.5 billion.

The Countrywide Action, the Bank of America Action and the Merrill Lynch Action have been dismissed and FHFA, FNMA and FHLMC have released the Corporation and its affiliates from the claims asserted therein.

Regulatory and Governmental Investigations

The Corporation is subject to inquiries and investigations, and may be subject to penalties and fines by the DOJ, state Attorneys General and other members of the RMBS Working Group of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (collectively, the Governmental Authorities), regarding the Corporation’s RMBS and other mortgage-related matters. The Corporation is also a party to civil litigation proceedings brought by the DOJ and certain other Governmental Authorities regarding the Corporation’s RMBS. The Corporation continues to cooperate with and has had discussions about a potential resolution of these matters with certain Governmental Authorities. There can be no assurances that these discussions will lead to a resolution of any or all of the matters. For more information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.