Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Commitments and Contingencies

v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
NOTE 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into a number of off-balance sheet commitments. These commitments expose the Corporation to varying degrees of credit and market risk and are subject to the same credit and market risk limitation reviews as those instruments recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For more information on commitments and contingencies, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Credit Extension Commitments

The Corporation enters into commitments to extend credit such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and commercial letters of credit to meet the financing needs of its customers. The table below includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments net of amounts distributed (e.g., syndicated) to other financial institutions of $17.8 billion and $21.9 billion at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014, the carrying value of these commitments, excluding commitments accounted for under the fair value option, was $521 million, including deferred revenue of $18 million and a reserve for unfunded lending commitments of $503 million. At December 31, 2013, the comparable amounts were $503 million, $19 million and $484 million, respectively. The carrying value of these commitments is classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The table below also includes the notional amount of commitments of $10.1 billion and $13.0 billion at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 that are accounted for under the fair value option. However, the table below excludes cumulative net fair value adjustments of $330 million and $354 million on these commitments, which are classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities. For more information regarding the Corporation's loan commitments accounted for under the fair value option, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option.

Credit Extension Commitments
 
 
 
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in millions)
Expire in
One Year
or Less
 
Expire After
One Year Through
Three Years
 
Expire After Three Years Through
Five Years
 
Expire After Five Years
 
Total
Notional amount of credit extension commitments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan commitments
$
75,710

 
$
111,200

 
$
132,908

 
$
19,534

 
$
339,352

Home equity lines of credit
5,674

 
18,437

 
17,012

 
13,856

 
54,979

Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees (1)
21,030

 
8,439

 
4,165

 
1,939

 
35,573

Letters of credit
2,537

 
249

 
63

 
31

 
2,880

Legally binding commitments
104,951

 
138,325

 
154,148

 
35,360

 
432,784

Credit card lines (2)
370,401

 

 

 

 
370,401

Total credit extension commitments
$
475,352

 
$
138,325

 
$
154,148

 
$
35,360

 
$
803,185

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
Notional amount of credit extension commitments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan commitments
$
80,799

 
$
105,175

 
$
133,290

 
$
21,864

 
$
341,128

Home equity lines of credit
4,580

 
16,855

 
21,074

 
14,301

 
56,810

Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees (1)
21,994

 
8,843

 
2,876

 
3,967

 
37,680

Letters of credit
1,263

 
899

 
4

 
403

 
2,569

Legally binding commitments
108,636

 
131,772

 
157,244

 
40,535

 
438,187

Credit card lines (2)
377,846

 

 

 

 
377,846

Total credit extension commitments
$
486,482

 
$
131,772

 
$
157,244

 
$
40,535

 
$
816,033

(1) 
The notional amounts of SBLCs and financial guarantees classified as investment grade and non-investment grade based on the credit quality of the underlying reference name within the instrument were $26.2 billion and $9.0 billion at June 30, 2014, and $27.6 billion and $9.6 billion at December 31, 2013. Amounts include consumer SBLCs of $411 million and $453 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
(2) 
Includes business card unused lines of credit.

Legally binding commitments to extend credit generally have specified rates and maturities. Certain of these commitments have adverse change clauses that help to protect the Corporation against deterioration in the borrower's ability to pay.
Other Commitments

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had unfunded equity investment commitments of $92 million and $195 million.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had commitments to purchase loans (e.g., residential mortgage and commercial real estate) of $3.2 billion and $1.5 billion, which upon settlement will be included in loans or LHFS.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had commitments to enter into forward-dated resale and securities borrowing agreements of $105.3 billion and $75.5 billion, and commitments to enter into forward-dated repurchase and securities lending agreements of $72.8 billion and $38.3 billion. These commitments expire within the next 12 months.

The Corporation is a party to operating leases for certain of its premises and equipment. Commitments under these leases are approximately $1.4 billion, $2.5 billion, $2.2 billion, $1.8 billion and $1.4 billion for the remainder of 2014 and the years through 2018, respectively, and $5.9 billion in the aggregate for all years thereafter.

Other Guarantees

Bank-owned Life Insurance Book Value Protection

The Corporation sells products that offer book value protection to insurance carriers who offer group life insurance policies to corporations, primarily banks. The book value protection is provided on portfolios of intermediate investment-grade fixed-income securities and is intended to cover any shortfall in the event that policyholders surrender their policies and market value is below book value. These guarantees are recorded as derivatives and carried at fair value in the trading portfolio. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the notional amount of these guarantees totaled $13.5 billion and $13.4 billion and the Corporation's maximum exposure related to these guarantees totaled $3.1 billion and $3.0 billion with estimated maturity dates between 2030 and 2045. The net fair value including the fee receivable associated with these guarantees was $32 million and $39 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and reflects the probability of surrender as well as the multiple structural protection features in the contracts.

Employee Retirement Protection

The Corporation sells products that offer book value protection primarily to plan sponsors of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governed pension plans, such as 401(k) plans and 457 plans. The book value protection is provided on portfolios of intermediate/short-term investment-grade fixed-income securities and is intended to cover any shortfall in the event that plan participants continue to make qualified withdrawals after all securities have been liquidated and there is remaining book value. The Corporation retains the option to exit the contract at any time. If the Corporation exercises its option, the investment manager will either terminate the contract or convert the portfolio into a high-quality fixed-income portfolio, typically all government or government-backed agency securities, with the proceeds of the liquidated assets to assure the return of principal. To manage its exposure, the Corporation imposes restrictions and constraints on the timing of the withdrawals, the manner in which the portfolio is liquidated and the funds are accessed, and the investment parameters of the underlying portfolio. These constraints, combined with significant structural protections, are designed to provide adequate buffers and guard against payments even under extreme stress scenarios. These guarantees are recorded as derivatives and carried at fair value in the trading portfolio. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the notional amount of these guarantees totaled $2.0 billion and $4.6 billion with estimated maturity dates up to 2018 if the exit option is exercised on all deals. The decline in notional amount during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily the result of plan sponsors terminating contracts pursuant to exit options. As of June 30, 2014, the Corporation had not made a payment under these products.

Merchant Services

In accordance with credit and debit card association rules, the Corporation sponsors merchant processing servicers that process credit and debit card transactions on behalf of various merchants. In connection with these services, a liability may arise in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor. If the merchant defaults on its obligation to reimburse the cardholder, the cardholder, through its issuing bank, generally has until six months after the date of the transaction to present a chargeback to the merchant processor, which is primarily liable for any losses on covered transactions. However, if the merchant processor fails to meet its obligation to reimburse the cardholder for disputed transactions, then the Corporation, as the sponsor, could be held liable for the disputed amount. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the sponsored entities processed and settled $164.3 billion and $313.7 billion of transactions and recorded losses of $4 million and $8 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the sponsored entities processed and settled $157.9 billion and $306.2 billion of transactions and recorded losses of $4 million and $8 million. A significant portion of this activity was processed by a joint venture in which the Corporation holds a 49 percent ownership. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the sponsored merchant processing servicers held as collateral $116 million and $203 million of merchant escrow deposits which may be used to offset amounts due from the individual merchants.

The Corporation believes the maximum potential exposure for chargebacks would not exceed the total amount of merchant transactions processed through Visa and MasterCard for the last six months, which represents the claim period for the cardholder, plus any outstanding delayed-delivery transactions. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the maximum potential exposure for sponsored transactions totaled $253.0 billion and $258.5 billion. However, the Corporation believes that the maximum potential exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure and does not expect to make material payments in connection with these guarantees.

Other Derivative Contracts

The Corporation funds selected assets, including securities issued by CDOs and CLOs, through derivative contracts, typically total return swaps, with third parties and VIEs that are not consolidated by the Corporation. The total notional amount of these derivative contracts was $656 million and $1.8 billion with commercial banks at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion with VIEs at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The underlying securities are senior securities and substantially all of the Corporation's exposures are insured. Accordingly, the Corporation's exposure to loss consists principally of counterparty risk to the insurers. In certain circumstances, generally as a result of ratings downgrades, the Corporation may be required to purchase the underlying assets, which would not result in additional gain or loss to the Corporation as such exposure is already reflected in the fair value of the derivative contracts.

Other Guarantees

The Corporation has entered into additional guarantee agreements and commitments, including sold risk participation swaps, liquidity facilities, lease-end obligation agreements, partial credit guarantees on certain leases, real estate joint venture guarantees, divested business commitments and sold put options that require gross settlement. The maximum potential future payment under these agreements was approximately $6.5 billion and $6.9 billion at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The estimated maturity dates of these obligations extend up to 2033. The Corporation has made no material payments under these guarantees.

In the normal course of business, the Corporation periodically guarantees the obligations of its affiliates in a variety of transactions including ISDA-related transactions and non-ISDA related transactions such as commodities trading, repurchase agreements, prime brokerage agreements and other transactions.

Payment Protection Insurance Claims Matter

In the U.K., the Corporation previously sold payment protection insurance (PPI) through its international card services business to credit card customers and consumer loan customers. PPI covers a consumer's loan or debt repayment if certain events occur such as loss of job or illness. In response to an elevated level of customer complaints across the industry, heightened media coverage and pressure from consumer advocacy groups, the U.K. Financial Services Authority, which has subsequently been replaced by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), investigated and raised concerns about the way some companies have handled complaints related to the sale of these insurance policies. In connection with this matter, the Corporation established a reserve for PPI. The reserve was $242 million and $381 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Corporation recorded $43 million and $184 million of expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $29 million for both the same periods in 2013. It is reasonably possible that the Corporation will incur additional expense related to PPI claims; however, the amount of such additional expense cannot be reasonably estimated.

Litigation and Regulatory Matters

The following supplements the disclosure in Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014 (the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure).

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are routinely defendants in or parties to many pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. These actions and proceedings are generally based on alleged violations of consumer protection, securities, environmental, banking, employment, contract and other laws. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for substantial monetary damages are asserted against the Corporation and its subsidiaries.

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory and governmental examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries, investigations, and threatened legal actions and proceedings. Certain subsidiaries of the Corporation are registered broker/dealers or investment advisors and are subject to regulation by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the European Commission, the PRA, the FCA and other international, federal and state securities regulators. In connection with formal and informal inquiries by those agencies, such subsidiaries receive numerous requests, subpoenas and orders for documents, testimony and information in connection with various aspects of their regulated activities.

In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such litigation, regulatory and governmental matters, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages or where the matters present novel legal theories or involve a large number of parties, the Corporation generally cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss, fines or penalties related to each pending matter may be.

In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Corporation establishes an accrued liability for litigation, regulatory and governmental matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. As a litigation, regulatory or governmental matter develops, the Corporation, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluates on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable. When a loss contingency is not both probable and estimable, the Corporation does not establish an accrued liability. If, at the time of evaluation, the loss contingency related to a litigation, regulatory or governmental matter is not both probable and estimable, the matter will continue to be monitored for further developments that would make such loss contingency both probable and estimable. Once the loss contingency related to a litigation, regulatory or governmental matter is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Corporation will establish an accrued liability with respect to such loss contingency and record a corresponding amount of litigation-related expense. The Corporation continues to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously established. Excluding expenses of internal or external legal service providers, litigation-related expense of $4.0 billion and $10.0 billion was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $471 million and $2.7 billion for the same periods in 2013.

For a limited number of the matters disclosed in this Note, and in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, for which a loss, whether in excess of a related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, is reasonably possible in future periods, the Corporation is able to estimate a range of possible loss. In determining whether it is possible to estimate a range of possible loss, the Corporation reviews and evaluates its material litigation, regulatory and governmental matters on an ongoing basis, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. These may include information learned through the discovery process, rulings on dispositive motions, settlement discussions, and other rulings by courts, arbitrators or others. In cases in which the Corporation possesses sufficient appropriate information to estimate a range of possible loss, that estimate is aggregated and disclosed below. There may be other disclosed matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible but such an estimate of the range of possible loss may not be possible. For those matters where an estimate of the range of possible loss is possible, management currently estimates the aggregate range of possible loss is $0 to $5.0 billion in excess of the accrued liability (if any) related to those matters. This estimated range of possible loss is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment and a variety of assumptions, and known and unknown uncertainties. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate. Those matters for which an estimate is not possible are not included within this estimated range. Therefore, this estimated range of possible loss represents what the Corporation believes to be an estimate of possible loss only for certain matters meeting these criteria. It does not represent the Corporation's maximum loss exposure.

Information is provided below, or in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, regarding the nature of all of these contingencies and, where specified, the amount of the claim associated with these loss contingencies. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that loss contingencies arising from pending matters, including the matters described herein, and in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Corporation. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in these matters, some of which are beyond the Corporation's control, and the very large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could be material to the Corporation's results of operations or cash flows for any particular reporting period.

Bond Insurance Litigation

FGIC

On May 15, 2014 and May 28, 2014, following the receipt of the requisite investor approvals, the Corporation entered into two remaining trust settlements with BNY Mellon.

Interchange and Related Litigation

On July 18, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the court in which all but one of the opt-out suits have been consolidated, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the opt-out complaints, including the complaint in the consolidated proceedings naming the Corporation as a defendant.

LIBOR, Other Reference Rate and Foreign Exchange (FX) Inquiries and Litigation

On June 23, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York resolved various outstanding motions to dismiss and motions for reconsideration related to the LIBOR matters. As to the Corporation and BANA, the court further limited manipulation claims under the Commodities Exchange Act based on the statute of limitations, dismissed manipulation claims based on alleged trader conduct, and dismissed certain common law claims brought by plaintiffs who alleged no direct dealings with the Corporation or BANA. The court’s rulings will be applicable to later filed actions to the extent they assert similar claims.

BANA (Singapore Branch) has completed the actions required by the previously disclosed Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) review, including completing the enhancements to its submission practices with the MAS. For more information, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Mortgage-backed Securities Litigation and Other Government Mortgage Origination Investigations

AIG Litigation

On July 15, 2014, the Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a settlement agreement with AIG to resolve all RMBS claims asserted in American International Group, Inc., et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., the action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, as well as the Countrywide MBS claims pending in a related proceeding in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The settlement provides for dismissal with prejudice of both actions and the release by AIG of the Corporation and its affiliates from the claims asserted therein. The settlement also provides for the withdrawal by AIG of its objection in the BNY Mellon Settlement court approval proceeding, including its participation in all pending appeals. The Corporation paid AIG $650 million in this settlement. The settlement amount was fully accrued as of June 30, 2014. For more information regarding the BNY Mellon Settlement, see Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees.

Civil RMBS Matters Filed by the DOJ and the SEC

On August 6, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC filed separate civil actions in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina against Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, BANA and Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc. (and, in the DOJ case, the Corporation). Both cases allege generally that the offering materials for a single 2008 RMBS offering contained material misstatements and omissions regarding, inter alia, the concentration of loans originated in the wholesale loan channel. The DOJ case asserts violations of FIRREA and the SEC case asserts claims under Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) and Section 5(b)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933. The complaints demand unspecified damages and other relief. Defendants moved to dismiss both complaints on November 8, 2013.

On June 19, 2014, the court granted the DOJ leave to amend, which it held rendered the motion to dismiss moot as a matter of law. On the same date, the court denied defendants' motion to dismiss the SEC complaint.

Prudential Insurance Litigation

On April 17, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.

Regulatory and Governmental Investigations

The Corporation is subject to inquiries and investigations, and may be subject to litigation, penalties and fines by the DOJ, state Attorneys General and other members of the RMBS Working Group of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (collectively, the Governmental Authorities) regarding the Corporation's RMBS and other mortgage-related matters. The Corporation is also a party to civil litigation proceedings brought by the DOJ and certain other Governmental Authorities regarding the Corporation's RMBS. The Corporation continues to cooperate with and has had discussions about a potential resolution of these matters with certain Governmental Authorities. There can be no assurances that these discussions will lead to a resolution of any or all of these matters and additional litigation may be filed by the DOJ or certain other Governmental Authorities regarding the Corporation’s RMBS. For more information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Mortgage Repurchase Litigation

U.S. Bank Litigation

On March 31, 2014 and May 27, 2014, plaintiff filed notices of appeal from the court's February 13, 2014 order.

Ocala Litigation

FDIC Action

On June 10, 2014, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) published a Notice of Withdrawal of the No Value Determination in the Federal Register. On June 20, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacated its August 26, 2013 order granting the FDIC's motion to dismiss BANA's claims against the FDIC in its capacity as receiver for Colonial Bank.

Policemen's Annuity Litigation

On June 5, 2014, the parties informed the court that they have reached an agreement in principle to settle the case for an amount not material to the Corporation's results of operations, subject to approval of plaintiffs' boards and the court.